SLK55 (R171) 2004 - 2010: SLK200K, SLK280, SLK350, SLK55, SLK55 Black Series

Boxster S vs SLK55 Magazine article...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-16-2005, 04:32 PM
  #26  
Almost a Member!
 
AMGFUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 S2000 , 2005 911 & soon 2005 slk55 AMG
Mercedes SLK55 AMG: Edmunds on a Mercedes roll
Posted Sep 30, 2004, 7:45 AM ET by David Thomas of Autoblog Magazine
Related entries: Convertibles, Sports/GTs


Jim McGraw must be on vacation in Germany. Or Edmunds invested wisely so the auto journalist could not only bring us the world premiere of the CLS55 AMG but also the first drive of the SLK55 AMG. The good looking roadster continues the company’s new trend of sticking out from the crowd with its design. The large Mercedes symbol in the middle of two aviation-styled grill intakes is the stand-out feature on the outside, while a 5.5 liter V8 is the major performance element inside. 355 horsepower and 376 pound feet of torque is a superb mix and will turn all Porsche Boxster S owners green with envy. Unfortunately the engine is matched to a seven-speed automatic with manual control on the steering wheel and shifter. Even without a manual transmission this beast is a beauty too.
Old 02-16-2005, 04:43 PM
  #27  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by AMGFUN
Mercedes SLK55 AMG: Edmunds on a Mercedes roll
Posted Sep 30, 2004, 7:45 AM ET by David Thomas of Autoblog Magazine
Related entries: Convertibles, Sports/GTs


Jim McGraw must be on vacation in Germany. Or Edmunds invested wisely so the auto journalist could not only bring us the world premiere of the CLS55 AMG but also the first drive of the SLK55 AMG. The good looking roadster continues the company’s new trend of sticking out from the crowd with its design. The large Mercedes symbol in the middle of two aviation-styled grill intakes is the stand-out feature on the outside, while a 5.5 liter V8 is the major performance element inside. 355 horsepower and 376 pound feet of torque is a superb mix and will turn all Porsche Boxster S owners green with envy. Unfortunately the engine is matched to a seven-speed automatic with manual control on the steering wheel and shifter. Even without a manual transmission this beast is a beauty too.
Credit to you for posting the full quote..... the main reason I'm not buying the SLK55 is the auto box...... I hated it.

When I see an SLK55 on the road I will think "Nice car" to myself and I won't try to race one away from some stop lights in the Boxster S because I'd lose (as I've said in other threads) but if I see one one on a twisty road I'll either run off into the distance laughing quietly or will be right in the SLKs rear view mirror as the driver trys to show how fast his car is

I'll say it again...... the SLK55 is a GREAT all rounder...... but the new Boxster S is a GREAT sportscar...... I'd be very happy for the SLK55 community if a future track test shows that the car is quicker than the new Boxster S but I suspect that will be a while before we see that

However I have just come across a new Best Motoring video which features the SLK55, old Boxster S, S2000, Z4 and 350Z and in the small clip the SLK55 was at the front after starting at the back........ if you can find a copy you may enjoy it! heres the clip http://www.bestmotoring.jp/digest/BM/video/BM200503.asx

Last edited by SLK55AMG; 02-17-2005 at 05:26 AM.
Old 02-18-2005, 12:44 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
kimchiFLAVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 Porsche Boxster 987
hehe
Old 02-18-2005, 05:24 AM
  #29  
Super Member
 
SLK55_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: No specific place
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SLK55 AMG
hey dude did you buy the 987S? thanx god not a z4 hehe , boxster S is really cool
Old 02-18-2005, 05:35 AM
  #30  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by SLK55_AMG
hey dude did you buy the 987S? thanx god not a z4 hehe , boxster S is really cool
If that was aimed a me...... yes I've order the 987 S but I don't need it until June. Since making up my mind to go for the Boxster S rather than the SLK55 my choice would have been made for me anyway...... originally the SLK55 and Boxster S were only $200 a month appart (my company car is on a 3 year lease)...... but the lease company have just put the price of the 55 much higher so it would have cost me nearly $500 a month more to have the 55 over the S...... so in some ways I'm glad AMG don't do a manual gearbox as I'd be gutted if I liked the car and then found it was going to cost too much to lease!

I've specced the Boxster with sporting options only..... PASM adaptive suspension, Sport Chrono (more direct throttle response and a single button to put everything in sport mode..... the suspension firms up, the engine responds quicker, the traction control is backed off and a big smile appears on my face ) and sports gear shift.
Old 02-18-2005, 04:22 PM
  #31  
Super Member
 
SLK55_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: No specific place
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SLK55 AMG
R170 wasn't that great, R171 is different, as for boxster S its better than a z4 , but SLK 55 ,,, it will be a hard choice + 997 S is a bit less powerful than the SLK 55
Old 02-18-2005, 04:52 PM
  #32  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by SLK55_AMG
R170 wasn't that great, R171 is different, as for boxster S its better than a z4 , but SLK 55 ,,, it will be a hard choice + 997 S is a bit less powerful than the SLK 55
On paper the SLK is 5bhp more powerful than the 997S but the Carrera has a better power to weight ratio and it handles better...... however even with the AMG autobox I'd rather have the SLK....... the 911 is too common where I live and isn't worth £15k more than the Merc
Old 02-18-2005, 09:28 PM
  #33  
Super Member
 
lisamcgu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by steve-p
Unfortunately an SLK with Brabus suspension would still be less effective as a pure driving machine than a Boxster S. And since the standard SLK55 is already 25% more expensive than the Boxster S, would it be sensible to increase the cost further in a comparison? Is there any reason to think the standard AMG suspension is inferior to the Brabus version? The answer to both questions is no. The AMG suspension is not just the sports suspension option which is available on cheaper models, which is just revised spring rates and dampers. It's completely reworked. I never understand apologists who rubbish articles which don't fit in with their narrow view of something. I love the SLK, but it isn't perfect. Nor does that matter, to me.
To speak so factually, you've driven an SLK55 with a Brabus full racing suspension kit?

Last edited by lisamcgu; 02-18-2005 at 09:31 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Boxster S vs SLK55 Magazine article...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.