Enable You Tube Video Embedding
03-09-2007, 09:18 PM
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C320 Sport Sedan 4MATIC, Cayenne S, Bayliner Capri V8, Subaru STi
Enable You Tube Video Embedding
This would be a nice feature so people can watch the video without leaving the boards
it won't work here:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOWtHuQ4a-U[/youtube]
[youtube]ZOWtHuQ4a-U[/youtube]
yes?
it won't work here:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOWtHuQ4a-U[/youtube]
[youtube]ZOWtHuQ4a-U[/youtube]
yes?
03-14-2007, 11:54 AM
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C320 Sport Sedan 4MATIC, Cayenne S, Bayliner Capri V8, Subaru STi
Here's the procedure:
To Install:
1. Go To Admin CP
2. Scroll down the left nav and select Custom BB Codes
3. Add New BB Code
4. Fill in the following:
Title: YouTube BB Code
Tag: yt (You can change this to whatever you prefer, yt is just nice and small )
Replacement:
Codedisplayerror: (Update license status)
You cannot view code until you prove your license status
Example: [yt]ejOJkcs-a7s[/yt]
Description: Embeds You Tube Videos
Use {Option}: No
from Here:
http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=111386
To Install:
1. Go To Admin CP
2. Scroll down the left nav and select Custom BB Codes
3. Add New BB Code
4. Fill in the following:
Title: YouTube BB Code
Tag: yt (You can change this to whatever you prefer, yt is just nice and small )
Replacement:
Codedisplayerror: (Update license status)
You cannot view code until you prove your license status
Example: [yt]ejOJkcs-a7s[/yt]
Description: Embeds You Tube Videos
Use {Option}: No
from Here:
http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=111386
03-15-2007, 01:14 PM
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C320 Sport Sedan 4MATIC, Cayenne S, Bayliner Capri V8, Subaru STi
Performance of the individuals PC?
You have a low end computer?
Buy more ram and upgrade your videocard, keep your motherboard, videocard, soundcard drivers updated.
I tested and populated a page from another vBulletin board:
Code:
[youtube]ZOWtHuQ4a-U[/youtube] [youtube]zAprzX2O6Zs[/youtube][youtube]qArzSL0ZdCU[/youtube] [youtube]8wKdSq9zj2E[/youtube][youtube]gmJc-tweqYM[/youtube][youtube]SMwfM83XGF0[/youtube] [youtube]njdS9clpOZM[/youtube][youtube]mGbhKQlUhLo[/youtube][youtube]V27CgobKJHw[/youtube]
I played all of it (who would do this?) all mixed sounds.
All played the videos and came out smooth.
Hi Mr. Vanos
03-15-2007, 02:11 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..
Not an individual PC issue (p4 3.6ghz with 3gb of DDR on a DS3 line). More like Youtube trying to load all videos at the same time and bogs it down when you scroll through the page. I could actually care less about lagging PCs but not everyone has an up to date PC.
03-15-2007, 05:13 PM
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C320 Sport Sedan 4MATIC, Cayenne S, Bayliner Capri V8, Subaru STi
The video will only start to load and play when you hit the play button.
It will not start running once you click on the thread.
Welcome back...
Yes, it wont run until you hit the play button.
I typed that hmmm.. must have accidentally deleted it making post#4
Trending Topics
03-15-2007, 07:16 PM
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..
03-15-2007, 10:08 PM
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..
The one I'm talking about is also on phpBB. I guess it affects some people and not others. There's about 30-40 videos on the page that I'm referring to.
AsianML, confirmed he doesn't have the problem so I'm trying to narrow down what the problem is because some users see it some don't.
AsianML, confirmed he doesn't have the problem so I'm trying to narrow down what the problem is because some users see it some don't.
03-16-2007, 12:35 AM
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..
03-16-2007, 12:46 AM
#13
03-16-2007, 12:58 PM
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C320 Sport Sedan 4MATIC, Cayenne S, Bayliner Capri V8, Subaru STi
Increase the Screen Refresh Rate of monitor to 120 Hertz
It's flat panel monitors with slow response time.
Response Time
Definition: Response time is a term associated with LCD monitors and televisions. According to online encyclopedia Wikipedia, "it translates to the amount of time it takes for a liquid crystal cell to go from active (black) to inactive (white) and back to active (black) again. It is measured in milliseconds (ms)."
Response time is a critical element to consider when buying a LCD TV because it directly impacts the screens ability to clearly portray moving images and well-defined edges. However, it is not the only thing that makes or breaks a LCD TV. Other factors like picture improvement technology, progressive scan and resolution also affect overall picture quality.
Side Effects of Slow Response Times
Ghosting would be a product of a slow response time, which is where images stay on screen longer than intended. Or, when watching a baseball game on a LCD screen with a slow response time the ball would appear to have a comet-like tail when it moves across the screen.
Common Response Times
In the TV market, common response times are 8ms, 16ms, 20ms and beyond. On this scale, 8ms would be the best response time. While many LCD screens under 26" are rarely affected by slow response times, screens 30" and larger are not as fortunate. In my opinion, flat panel LCD screens larger than 30" have a difficult time displaying moving images with clarity.Therefore, I would be wary of anything larger than 30" with a response time above 16ms.
http://tv.about.com/od/glossary/g/responsetime.htm
It's flat panel monitors with slow response time.
Response Time
Definition: Response time is a term associated with LCD monitors and televisions. According to online encyclopedia Wikipedia, "it translates to the amount of time it takes for a liquid crystal cell to go from active (black) to inactive (white) and back to active (black) again. It is measured in milliseconds (ms)."
Response time is a critical element to consider when buying a LCD TV because it directly impacts the screens ability to clearly portray moving images and well-defined edges. However, it is not the only thing that makes or breaks a LCD TV. Other factors like picture improvement technology, progressive scan and resolution also affect overall picture quality.
Side Effects of Slow Response Times
Ghosting would be a product of a slow response time, which is where images stay on screen longer than intended. Or, when watching a baseball game on a LCD screen with a slow response time the ball would appear to have a comet-like tail when it moves across the screen.
Common Response Times
In the TV market, common response times are 8ms, 16ms, 20ms and beyond. On this scale, 8ms would be the best response time. While many LCD screens under 26" are rarely affected by slow response times, screens 30" and larger are not as fortunate. In my opinion, flat panel LCD screens larger than 30" have a difficult time displaying moving images with clarity.Therefore, I would be wary of anything larger than 30" with a response time above 16ms.
http://tv.about.com/od/glossary/g/responsetime.htm
03-16-2007, 01:30 PM
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..
03-16-2007, 02:20 PM
#18
It has nothing to do with the response time.
I have a 22" NEC 1250+ CRT @ 1920x1440 at 85hz and it lags, that's the dual AMD 1800+ MP system I was talking about.
LCD's don't flicker, it's not a problem of the computers we're on. It's just flash is very resource intensive.
Good point for the CRT refresh rate increase though, lots of people leave theirs at 60hz and then it can cause headaches.
03-16-2007, 04:49 PM
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C320 Sport Sedan 4MATIC, Cayenne S, Bayliner Capri V8, Subaru STi
and your video card is? memory of card?
1920x1440 at 85hz? your pushing it, thats lag galore
if Nvidia 1024x768 32 bit is the best performance for those cards
You're using Mac though if Windows:
Lets see your Direct X Diagnostics
In Desktop Start--> Run --> type DXDIAG --> Click OK
save all information to desktop then copy and paste results here.
Window XP = I may help
Nvidia = I may help
Mac= No
ATI=No
__________________________________________________ _____
This is becoming a Tech Support thread.......
Are you having a board meeting if You Tube video embedding be enabled?
__________________________________________________ ______
Put another forum:
Community Support (Windows)
Community Support (Mac)
1920x1440 at 85hz? your pushing it, thats lag galore
if Nvidia 1024x768 32 bit is the best performance for those cards
You're using Mac though if Windows:
Lets see your Direct X Diagnostics
In Desktop Start--> Run --> type DXDIAG --> Click OK
save all information to desktop then copy and paste results here.
Window XP = I may help
Nvidia = I may help
Mac= No
ATI=No
__________________________________________________ _____
This is becoming a Tech Support thread.......
Are you having a board meeting if You Tube video embedding be enabled?
__________________________________________________ ______
Put another forum:
Community Support (Windows)
Community Support (Mac)
03-16-2007, 05:20 PM
#20
What?!
It seems as if you might not know what you're talking about.
My dual Athlon system has a Geforce FX5900XT. Trust me, at that resolution it's just getting started.
My dual Opteron system has a SLI configuration of 8800's. It's even more powerful than my Athlon system.
My Mac has the integrated ATi X1600 (or whatever it is), it's also quite powerful.
Absolutley incorrect, perhaps 20 years ago (um, not nvidia then, probably 3DFX, Diamond, or S3... who nows), but today if you go out and buy a new computer, most likely it'll have a 17" LCD and the default resolution on those will be 1280x1024. Easily powered by even an integrated Intel chipset.
Every LCD has a "native" resolution that it runs at, that means things will look most sharp, and most clear at that resolution. That's why laptops usually have only one good resolution unless you're outputting to a TV or a second display.
You can't use MacOSX through Windows, you can do the other way around though.
I personally am opposed to embedding Youtube links because it's offsite stuff. Youtube takes down videos all the time. Also I'm opposed to it because it slows down my computer when I load the pages.
I can bring it up in the moderator forum though if more folks are interested.
It seems as if you might not know what you're talking about.
My dual Athlon system has a Geforce FX5900XT. Trust me, at that resolution it's just getting started.
My dual Opteron system has a SLI configuration of 8800's. It's even more powerful than my Athlon system.
My Mac has the integrated ATi X1600 (or whatever it is), it's also quite powerful.
if Nvidia 1024x768 32 bit is the best performance for those cards
Every LCD has a "native" resolution that it runs at, that means things will look most sharp, and most clear at that resolution. That's why laptops usually have only one good resolution unless you're outputting to a TV or a second display.
You can't use MacOSX through Windows, you can do the other way around though.
I personally am opposed to embedding Youtube links because it's offsite stuff. Youtube takes down videos all the time. Also I'm opposed to it because it slows down my computer when I load the pages.
I can bring it up in the moderator forum though if more folks are interested.
03-16-2007, 05:42 PM
#21
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 18,414
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2007 E63
I've got an LCD monitor and the computer is an HP a1330n. So it's not the best of the best. Certainly not as good as what you guys have. So why do I not have the problem?
03-16-2007, 05:47 PM
#22
Flash isn't even embedded on this thread, just images. It could be that what you're confusing it with...
I have flashblock on
03-17-2007, 07:02 AM
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ridgefield, NJ
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C320 Sport Sedan 4MATIC, Cayenne S, Bayliner Capri V8, Subaru STi
ok thanks
_______________________________________________
My dual Athlon system has a Geforce FX5900XT. Trust me, at that resolution it's just getting started.
My dual Opteron system has a SLI configuration of 8800's. It's even more powerful than my Athlon system.
My Mac has the integrated ATi X1600 (or whatever it is), it's also quite powerful.
did you test 1024x768 vs. 1920x1440 performance?
uhh.....no dxdiag results? i'll keep guessing, you must be knowing what you're doing, i'm not the one lagging
and your power supply is?
mine....
http://www.antec.com/us/productDetails.php?ProdID=28550
of course, you'll say my power supply is 300,000,000,000,000 watt output
clean/vacuum all the fans, heatsink inside you PC
no more hardware talk for me, it's giving me a headache
my computer is running stable to my satisfaction
PC is my hobby, not my life
______________________
