W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

M5 Review by Top Gear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-10-2005, 05:01 PM
  #1  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
hliu21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rowland Heights, CA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E55
M5 Review by Top Gear

http://www.autospies.com/article/ind...articleId=5120
Old 08-10-2005, 07:56 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
M5KILLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mason Neck, VA
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
500hp, v10, 81.2k with nav is a great deal, just the looks are not all there. also, on m5board 25 launch control launches and you warranty is voided!!!
Old 08-10-2005, 08:16 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBE55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'03 Yukon XL Denali, '06 Eclipse GS
Indeed, Top Gear did do a great review on this one. I love how the guy's skeptical, yet still fair on the rating.
Old 08-10-2005, 08:21 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
onesixeight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yup...it was a good review except it seemed like he just wasn't used to the car. He got the seek button and volume button the the wheel mixed u and I know you can self-cancel the E60's triple signal. Although I like the Benz triple single activation better, with the benz, you can push it again, and it will continue to flash another 3 times. With the BMW, it cancel when you push down again.

I liked Tiff's review on Fifth Gear better...

Can't wait to get mine in May! I got a good deal where BMWNA agreed to buy back my 745Li and get me into an M5 for very little money.
Old 08-10-2005, 11:11 PM
  #5  
Member
 
jparch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto , Canada
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2018 E63S wagon, 2016 GLE350d, GLE450 on order
still i prefer the E55.......
Old 08-10-2005, 11:42 PM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Vetluver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Monroe, Louisiana
Posts: 791
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL 65 AMG and E63s AMG
Makes me want to trade my M3 for the new M5. And keep the beast too. Of course. :p
Old 08-11-2005, 12:35 AM
  #7  
Newbie
 
RyE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea i think that was a preety fair review,the m5 is one of those cars where you hate it or love it, personally I dont like the looks but, theres no question when it comes to its power and performance...i can't wait when tuners start to modify these beast, dont forget about the m6
Old 08-11-2005, 01:45 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Hammer Down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,275
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
With all that being said....It only beat the CLS55 1:26.9 to the M5's 1:26.2. I have listen to all of the hype and I would take the CLS55 or my own E55 over the M5. It's a great performing car with all the bells and whistles but who really cares?
Old 08-11-2005, 07:38 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
stevebez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,066
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, LRD4 HSE, R107 280SL
One major issue on the M5's IDrive - it assumes you drive a left hand drive car and are right handed.

Here in UK we have to navigate left handed through it - which when using a mouse all day right handed the transition is a little awkward - you always wanna grab it with your right hand - but cannot unless you wanna park the car in a barrier.

Guess their ergonomics guys missed this one .... or did not care.

Rgds Steve
Old 08-11-2005, 11:21 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,554
Received 1,069 Likes on 857 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
With all that being said....It only beat the CLS55 1:26.9 to the M5's 1:26.2. I have listen to all of the hype and I would take the CLS55 or my own E55 over the M5. It's a great performing car with all the bells and whistles but who really cares?
That makes me believe that with the M5's much stiffer suspension that the CLS55 would out accelerate it on the street and if the track had longer straights that the M5 may fall behind. Sounds like a fun car to drive hard but not one you would EVER want to live with on a daily basis.

All in all, a bad car with poor reliability but a high revving fun engine. The breakdowns do not bode well for the M5. I'll stick with the E55.
Old 08-11-2005, 12:52 PM
  #11  
Member
 
SoulBladeZA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 E46 M3, 2008 E92 M3
That makes me believe that with the M5's much stiffer suspension that the CLS55 would out accelerate it on the street and if the track had longer straights that the M5 may fall behind. Sounds like a fun car to drive hard but not one you would EVER want to live with on a daily basis.
The big difference between the M5 and the CLS 55/E55 is exactly the opposite of what you are claiming. The really noticable difference between them only comes at higher speeds. While the ride isn't AS good as the E55's, it's still a very comfy ride. Also, the Stig isn't a very consistent driver. He seems to drive cars whose traction control systems can't be completely switched off much better than the ones without it.

also, on m5board 25 launch control launches and you warranty is voided!!!
Wow, ONE guy says that he heard it from an UNNAMED source and you believe him? Nowhere is it stated in the owner's manual. I've talked with my dealer and he says you can launch it as much as you want, the car will stop you from doing a LC if you do it too many times and cause excessive heat. Also, I have heard and read that you have to drive a certain distance after every launch.

You are one of those people who gets drafted into the suicide cults, believing everything some fool tells you.

All in all, a bad car with poor reliability but a high revving fun engine. The breakdowns do not bode well for the M5. I'll stick with the E55.
Then stick to the E55. Each to his own. The M5 is an awesome car - my opinion. As for the diff issues, a local mag had the same problem. None of the owners have reported this, it SEEMS to be a problem only with the press cars. They aren't final spec, I don't know if this includes revisions to the diff.

One thing is for certain - those press cars have been drilled like no owner will ever drive his M5, or E55, for that matter. The ones over here are in a different test almost every day. Such a huge amount of abuse in such a short time will take it's toll on any car. I just hope it gets sorted out. Every first year car has it's faults.
Old 08-11-2005, 01:26 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
krispykrme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: fremont, ca
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 E55
I don't understand why people even bother to deal with redneck on this board.

A lot of E55 owner here bought the car to show off status instead of being a true enthusiast. In their eye, their E55 is god creation and can't be criticized no matter what.

BMW does not void warranty if LC is used over 25 times. It simply requires you to replace the clutch out of your own pocket. And why should BMW pay for your clutch if you insist on killing it by using LC on cosistent basis.

The warranty is still in place except the clutch. Which in this case is a wear and tear item, because it is like you as driver is abusing it by dumping cluch at 4k+RPM.
Old 08-11-2005, 01:38 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBAMGPWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
W215 CL600
Funny review! I actually laughed out loud a couple of times with his remarks/comments. Seems like a super sedan, too bad it's U-G-L-Y. If I didn't have to puke every time I saw an add/review on it, I'd get one.
Old 08-12-2005, 01:32 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
W210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by MBAMGPWR
Funny review! I actually laughed out loud a couple of times with his remarks/comments. Seems like a super sedan, too bad it's U-G-L-Y. If I didn't have to puke every time I saw an add/review on it, I'd get one.
"Yeah look at me, I'm tough, I'm a shark, I have a fin"..

Count me in as one of those who cannot warm up to the M5 (which is why I'm still here). Decided to keep the E55 (for effortless power) and added to the famly a 750Li for comfort and luxury instead.

For those interested in a BMW, try forcing your dealer into placing an Individual Program order for you. While there is nothing we can do to improve the Bangle exterior, the piano black trim and the very nice light cream interior completely transforms the cheap BMW interior into something much nicer.

Test drove the Cayenne Turbo yesterday, the car is great but I'm convinced MB makes the best automatic gear box out there, bar none. Too much lag in the car below 3000 rpm those whose who're used to the E55k powertrain.

The effortless power in the E55 is highly addictive.
Old 08-12-2005, 03:41 PM
  #15  
Almost a Member!
 
ImaginAsian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99 E55
the performance is awesome! the styling is not what i expect if i forked over that kind of cash. and what happened to the good ole days when i dont have to read a drivers manual to operate my car - call me resistant to change, but i prefer analog controls then some crazy joystick/mouse.

there is a reason why dealers are buying up off-lease previous gen 3/5 series, so they can make some nice profit for those not diggin the new styilng BMW is heading down. its been 2 years(?) since the 7 series came out and i still cant get used how it looks

they dont look like a german car anymore - they look like high dollar japanese imports. thats not a bad thing, but if i wanted that look i'd just buy a Lexus or Acura with better reliability....my 2 cents
Old 08-12-2005, 03:59 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,929
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
06 SL65 / 97 993tt /11 Suburban/ 2012 GTR (AMG è la mia Famiglia la Bestia è la mia protezione)
Originally Posted by MBAMGPWR
Funny review! I actually laughed out loud a couple of times with his remarks/comments. Seems like a super sedan, too bad it's U-G-L-Y. If I didn't have to puke every time I saw an add/review on it, I'd get one.
The Top Gear review on their BBC TV show was equally funny...

http://www.mininova.org
Old 08-12-2005, 04:24 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
W210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
Originally Posted by ImaginAsian
its been 2 years(?) since the 7 series came out and i still cant get used how it looks

they dont look like a german car anymore - they look like high dollar japanese imports. thats not a bad thing, but if i wanted that look i'd just buy a Lexus or Acura with better reliability....my 2 cents
I agree, even after the face lift the 7 is ugly! Almost bought a Lexus but don't like the way they drive, new model coming around the corner, lack of leg room, and I prefer the European smelling leather, if you know what I mean.

Like with all ugly cars, I went black with the 750Li to hide the unattractive lines. Long gone the days of attractive cool BMWs.
Old 08-12-2005, 08:01 PM
  #18  
Member
 
ajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Daily driver ..... not!!

I sometimes wonder if we all saw the same review. It was a pretty bad review until he pressed the magic "M" button and opened it up on a highway. He also said he found the smg jerky around town. I personally don't want to rev the sh_t out of an engine to get needed power on the highway. I'm number 1 on the waiting list for this car, but there's no way I'm going to pull the trigger without a test drive. I love the effortless and smooth performance of my E55 and see no reason to change based on this review. I also get the sense that this car is over engineered and after experiencing the nightmare of owning a 745i I would suggest waiting til at least the third model year and 300th software upgrade before purchasing an M5.
Old 08-12-2005, 08:15 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,554
Received 1,069 Likes on 857 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
I sometimes wonder if we all saw the same review. It was a pretty bad review until he pressed the magic "M" button and opened it up on a highway.
That's what I was thinking too. I don't see how you could change your opinion of a car after it performed so poorly in town, rode like a rock, had the annoying sat-nav wench that wouldn't go away, or after the damn thing had to be towed from the track because it broke down. I wouldn't care how the damn thing performed when you pressed the "M" button because if it did everything else so poorly it would not be a car you could live with on a daily basis.

I guess owning this car would be like marrying a really ugly crack addict who was great in bed. You couldn't take her out because she's too ugly and you couldn't go too far from home because you'd be afraid that she would have a breakdown. Not to mention, your crack ***** much like your new BMW will be very expensive to maintain.
Old 08-13-2005, 07:26 AM
  #20  
Member
 
SoulBladeZA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 E46 M3, 2008 E92 M3
That's what I was thinking too. I don't see how you could change your opinion of a car after it performed so poorly in town, rode like a rock, had the annoying sat-nav wench that wouldn't go away, or after the damn thing had to be towed from the track because it broke down. I wouldn't care how the damn thing performed when you pressed the "M" button because if it did everything else so poorly it would not be a car you could live with on a daily basis.
It doesn't ride like a rock. It's no E55, but it IS comfy. Sat-Nav works exactly like any other BMW's I-Drive, and I find it VERY easy to use. The Sat-Nav in the SLK is no harder to operate than that of the 645. And yes, you can turn it off easily. As for the jerkiness in town - just like any other manual car, you learn very quickly how to drive it smoothly. My mom had an E46 M3 SMG and after 30 mins seat time I was driving it without the whole head-nodding thing. And it won't roll backwards. I've asked people who actually own the car, and they say it won't roll on an incline, the hill-assist uses the clutch to steady the car. Press cars aren't the final production cars, so they might still have a few problems that have (hopefully) been sorted out. Which might also explain the whole diff problem.

As for the reliability issues - Merc is no better than BMW. Go read up on the S-Class forums, alot of those guys have their service manager on speed dial! My dad's first 745 was also back the dealership every 2nd week, but they gave him a later model and it didn't go back once, save for servicing.

One thing to remember - the press car M5's have been THRASHED beyond belief over and over by "journalists" and such mechanical errors are bound to step in. I'd only start worrying if actual owners started reporting the same sort of failures. The diff problem occured to a local magazine too in an E55 vs M5 shootout. The E55 was faultless. HOWEVER. When they tested the E55 in 2003 - i.e FIRST EDITION OF A NEW MODEL - they had to get THREE cars before they could actually start to drive it. One had electronic problems, and the other one would lock up at random times and no amount of effort could get the car to open up again.

So before you judge a car based on one stupid old fart's opinion and utterly sensasionalistic reviews, rather drive it yourself when it arrives in the USA.

As for the whole torque issue. You realise it has more than the C55? So it's hardly a Honda S2000 engine. Yes the torque comes at high revs, but 80% of torque is already on tap at very low revs. The number evades me now but I'm sure Improviz can track it down

The point I'm trying to make is : No, it won't be as comfy a daily driver as the E55, but it's not meant to be. If it were it'd lose it's driver's edge. You can't say it's a bad car because it aims at a more enthusiastic market. I personally DON'T mind winding that V10 up to 8000 rpm+ on the highway, I think it's utterly intoxicating. Some people would rather just mash the throttle without even downshifting from high gear. Each to their own.

The E55 and M5 are both masterpieces in their respective rights. Anyone who says otherwise is, frankly, an ignorant MTV child who believes whatever the TV tells them.

Last edited by SoulBladeZA; 08-13-2005 at 07:32 AM.
Old 08-13-2005, 08:22 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
W210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
Originally Posted by ajoe
I sometimes wonder if we all saw the same review. It was a pretty bad review until he pressed the magic "M" button and opened it up on a highway. He also said he found the smg jerky around town. I personally don't want to rev the sh_t out of an engine to get needed power on the highway. I'm number 1 on the waiting list for this car, but there's no way I'm going to pull the trigger without a test drive. I love the effortless and smooth performance of my E55 and see no reason to change based on this review. I also get the sense that this car is over engineered and after experiencing the nightmare of owning a 745i I would suggest waiting til at least the third model year and 300th software upgrade before purchasing an M5.
Yeah, exactly how I feel. Only dare to pick up a 7-series after its mid-life face lift. May consider the M5 2-3 years down the road.

For now, I'll enjoy the proven E55.
Old 08-13-2005, 09:02 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
WayneE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,288
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'72 Suburban
Originally Posted by SoulBladeZA
The E55 and M5 are both masterpieces in their respective rights. Anyone who says otherwise is, frankly, an ignorant MTV child who believes whatever the TV tells them.

Very well said!
Old 08-13-2005, 09:03 AM
  #23  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
But here's the thing, what is the M5's and the E55's respective right?
They are both direct competitors!

You can't really expect us BMW and Benz owners to be friends!!
Old 08-13-2005, 09:42 AM
  #24  
Out Of Control!!
 
jangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 S212
Sure can't!! Especially after this body E has been reviewed to OUT HANDLE the smuglly 5 series.

HAHA.

Oh, and yeah...actually, I do drive it HARD and MB loves it. That is why it is the BEAST. You pay $100K to have a car that drives as soft as, well a Mercedes.... and the a$$ to drag with ANY car (or motorcycle) on the road. If you wanted a flat out sports car, spend $50K on a new Vette. If you want 4 seats, get the Caddy CTS-V. Either way, you save a load and are just a step under the M5.

Hehe
Old 08-13-2005, 09:42 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NOTKTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
g
Cross Posting or whatever you call it.... But check out this CLS55 vs M5 Video if you haven't already.
http://www.autoclips.net/detail.php?...&id_video=2319


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: M5 Review by Top Gear



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.