Okay, got the new E63 0-60 numbers...er ehh sort of.
08-24-2005 | 02:43 PM
#1
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 12
From: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Okay, got the new E63 0-60 numbers...er ehh sort of.
Okay the new ML63 is rated at 4.9 0-60 That tank is 4730lbs.
So I plugged in a simple math cross equation.
If current E is 4237, then no blower takes off 200lbs instantly, thus 4037.
SO, you do the math and new 0-60 for E63.......4.1.
Okay okay...I know, the factors couldn't be more inaccurate.....but WHAT IF!!!!
So I plugged in a simple math cross equation.
If current E is 4237, then no blower takes off 200lbs instantly, thus 4037.
SO, you do the math and new 0-60 for E63.......4.1.
Okay okay...I know, the factors couldn't be more inaccurate.....but WHAT IF!!!!
Last edited by Jakpro1; 08-24-2005 at 02:47 PM.
Thought it'd be heavier than that. Should be interesting to see what the new E's weight is.
08-24-2005 | 03:38 PM
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas, NV
The other thing which is difficult to factor is that the E63 will have some tweaks to engine and/or exhaust systmen compared to the ML63 which would probably give it better performing results.
08-24-2005 | 04:59 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 3
Mercedes Benz
Originally Posted by Jakpro1
Okay the new ML63 is rated at 4.9 0-60 That tank is 4730lbs.
So I plugged in a simple math cross equation.
If current E is 4237, then no blower takes off 200lbs instantly, thus 4037.
SO, you do the math and new 0-60 for E63.......4.1.
Okay okay...I know, the factors couldn't be more inaccurate.....but WHAT IF!!!!
So I plugged in a simple math cross equation.
If current E is 4237, then no blower takes off 200lbs instantly, thus 4037.
SO, you do the math and new 0-60 for E63.......4.1.
Okay okay...I know, the factors couldn't be more inaccurate.....but WHAT IF!!!!
So say the new 6.3L tips the scales at 4000 even.... then it will be one quick beast.
Amg does not make slower cars so it will likely be faster than a stock E55k
08-25-2005 | 12:24 AM
#7
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ON
It of course isn't that simple... thousands of factors involving exhaust, traction, frontal area, etc. will mess with it. Given how Mercedes have assigned 0-60 ratings, I would guess they'd give the new E63 4.5 or 4.6 s to 60 mph, perhaps 4.7. You have to remember Mercedes tends to be very conservative.
Trending Topics
08-25-2005 | 12:31 AM
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by Turtle25
It of course isn't that simple... thousands of factors involving exhaust, traction, frontal area, etc. will mess with it. Given how Mercedes have assigned 0-60 ratings, I would guess they'd give the new E63 4.5 or 4.6 s to 60 mph, perhaps 4.7. You have to remember Mercedes tends to be very conservative.
08-26-2005 | 12:19 PM
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
xx
As you guys all probably know, the 0-60 time really doesn't tell a whole bunch. Traction & traction mgt issues factor in too much to give a really good idea of the car's straight line performance. 1/4 mile stats (esp. the trap speed) really tell the story of how things will go in roll on races between cars. There are some incredibly powerful, modded Vipers that can't beat (or even match) the stock Viper's 0-60 time because they can't put all the power to the ground off the line. They trap much higher in the 1/4 mile though and in any street situation, they'd easily get away from the stock version.
