W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

M5 real world 1/4 mile submission....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-07-2005, 10:48 PM
  #26  
Super Member
 
RennTechV12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2008 Bentley GTC, Porsche GT2/EVOMS GT700, 1968 Dodge Charger Hemi
Originally Posted by RezF
I think you missed my point! Your 996 (which sounds like a beautiful setup btw) has an upgraded clutch with all the heavy duty mods! correct??
It takes a tremendous toll on the clutch plates to launch a 4000 lb 500 hp car. A safer way of launching cars with the above specs is to use an auto tranny instead of a manual
Very true. The Benz tranny has no problem, whether on the track or on the street.

I just don't understand why BMW would feel like they need to limit their customers to less than the cars' potential.

I would have to say that the 3 year old '03 E55 definetly has an edge over the '06 M5. (that's what I said a couple of months ago and got completely bashed on this forum for)
Old 11-07-2005, 10:49 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
idrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 5,431
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2017 SL63
Originally Posted by BiTurboV12 AMG
Looks like yet another person get there car pictures from ebay with a M5 that only has 32miles on it... ow well...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2006-...QQcmdZViewItem
the old M5 is so much better looking than the new one.

It's ugly. And ugly is ugly at any performance level
Old 11-07-2005, 10:56 PM
  #28  
Super Member
 
RennTechV12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2008 Bentley GTC, Porsche GT2/EVOMS GT700, 1968 Dodge Charger Hemi
Originally Posted by idrivatitleist
the old M5 is so much better looking than the new one.

It's ugly. And ugly is ugly at any performance level


Old 11-07-2005, 10:59 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
e55 baller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
W221 S65 AMG
Curious why the M5 is out and I have yet to see any C&D, MT, or R&T produce 0-60 and 1/4 times? Is it because they can't launch the car?

When the E55 hit the pavement there were times out 1 month before the car hit the streets. Just curious.

At least I know not to be concerned about the new M5 from a dead dig.
Old 11-07-2005, 11:06 PM
  #30  
Super Member
 
RennTechV12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2008 Bentley GTC, Porsche GT2/EVOMS GT700, 1968 Dodge Charger Hemi
Originally Posted by e55 baller
Curious why the M5 is out and I have yet to see any C&D, MT, or R&T produce 0-60 and 1/4 times? Is it because they can't launch the car?

When the E55 hit the pavement there were times out 1 month before the car hit the streets. Just curious.

At least I know not to be concerned about the new M5 from a dead dig.
I agree, I would never buy a car with a feature like that. (I like going fast too much! )
Old 11-07-2005, 11:31 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Fikse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
thats crazy..... whats does launch control do that is so amazing? Is this new to the SMGIII? I drove my friends M3 SMGII and he didnt' mention it.... of course, now that I think about it, I would get him good off the line with my C32 everytime.... we ran em side by side at least 10 times....


Originally Posted by enzom
I am sure the times will come down. But keep in mind that it will only happen with launch control. Not really ideal in the real world because - 1. You can only use it so many times, 2. You need to go through menus/submenus to activate it (which you may not have time to do at a stoplight), and 3. You need to wait a certain period of time/drive a certain distance (4 km, I think) before you can use L/C again. I suspect that we will not see very many M5's at the strip. Hopefully, there will be many at road courses.
Old 11-07-2005, 11:33 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Fikse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
exactly.... I always thought something was strange.... they reviewed the tester models, but never ran em in the 1/4 or posted stats.... there will be a heads up E55 vs M5 article..... there has to be....


Originally Posted by e55 baller
Curious why the M5 is out and I have yet to see any C&D, MT, or R&T produce 0-60 and 1/4 times? Is it because they can't launch the car?

When the E55 hit the pavement there were times out 1 month before the car hit the streets. Just curious.

At least I know not to be concerned about the new M5 from a dead dig.
Old 11-07-2005, 11:59 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
BiTurboV12 AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
02 ML320, 06 E350
Originally Posted by Fikse
thats crazy..... whats does launch control do that is so amazing? Is this new to the SMGIII? I drove my friends M3 SMGII and he didnt' mention it.... of course, now that I think about it, I would get him good off the line with my C32 everytime.... we ran em side by side at least 10 times....
LC is on the M3 to use it you have to turn off traction control then another bar pops up past S5 and its called S6 in S6 mode for SMGII it can shift 80ms (2 times faster than the ferrari version of semi auto). to use LC S6 mode only in the M3 you must have the car stoped push forward on the gear lever and then put your foot on the gas it it will rev to about 2,XXXrpm (i forget cuse i only used it about 4 times and find its not worth the trouble) then as soon as you let go of the gear lever the car launches. BMW M cars are made for the track and are really useless on the streets.(you can go to AMGs website under FAQ why doesnt AMG offer a manual gearbox) AMG cars are made with autos because that is what people prefer in a mercedes an AMG car is just a fast car for the street and a semi good track car. i have met people with ferraris and lambos that have gotten eaten by AMG's on the street and drags but if you take the same cars to the track the AMG will get eaten. AMG-ultimate street car best everyday driving machine. M-Some of the best track cars for the price ex M3.
Old 11-08-2005, 12:05 AM
  #34  
Super Member
 
RennTechV12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2008 Bentley GTC, Porsche GT2/EVOMS GT700, 1968 Dodge Charger Hemi
Originally Posted by BiTurboV12 AMG
LC is on the M3 to use it you have to turn off traction control then another bar pops up past S5 and its called S6 in S6 mode for SMGII it can shift 80ms (2 times faster than the ferrari version of semi auto). to use LC S6 mode only in the M3 you must have the car stoped push forward on the gear lever and then put your foot on the gas it it will rev to about 2,XXXrpm (i forget cuse i only used it about 4 times and find its not worth the trouble) then as soon as you let go of the gear lever the car launches. BMW M cars are made for the track and are really useless on the streets.(you can go to AMGs website under FAQ why doesnt AMG offer a manual gearbox) AMG cars are made with autos because that is what people prefer in a mercedes an AMG car is just a fast car for the street and a semi good track car. i have met people with ferraris and lambos that have gotten eaten by AMG's on the street and drags but if you take the same cars to the track the AMG will get eaten. AMG-ultimate street car best everyday driving machine. M-Some of the best track cars for the price ex M3.
I have yet to meet a BMW that has "eaten me" anywhere.

This still doesn't answer the question "why is the LC necessary"
Old 11-08-2005, 12:17 AM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NOTKTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
g
Automobile Mag just did a CLS55 vs M6 comparo this month. They didn't post any times of that sort except 0-60 times of 4.4 - M6 and 4.5 - CLS55. Besides that; only their comments about the car I'll scan it if anyone cares to see it. They also mention the 503Hp CLS63 and a "possible" 621Hp CLS65 and the boosted 6.8Lt 697Hp version
Old 11-08-2005, 12:22 AM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Evil Duffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey/Brooklyn
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'99 C230 K
Originally Posted by NOTKTS
Automobile Mag just did a CLS55 vs M6 comparo this month. They didn't post any times of that sort except 0-60 times of 4.4 - M6 and 4.5 - CLS55. Besides that; only their comments about the car I'll scan it if anyone cares to see it. They also mention the 503Hp CLS63 and a "possible" 621Hp CLS65 and the boosted 6.8Lt 697Hp version

im guessing they chose the M6 over the CLS55. its funny cause when motor trend did a e55 vs m5 comparison. The m5 won based soley on handling, they ignored the fact that the m5 was ugly, not as roomy, the interior was terrible (they hated it) and it was tested to be slower than the e55. i dun understand how the m5 actually won? bias maybe?
Old 11-08-2005, 12:26 AM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
OzE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E55
Originally Posted by e55 baller
Curious why the M5 is out and I have yet to see any C&D, MT, or R&T produce 0-60 and 1/4 times? Is it because they can't launch the car?

When the E55 hit the pavement there were times out 1 month before the car hit the streets. Just curious.

At least I know not to be concerned about the new M5 from a dead dig.

Magazine test times have been posted before - https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/124961-mb-amg-cls55-vs-bmw-m5-australian-motor-magazine-comparison-test.html

You'll see from the article why the LC is such a problem - the M5 got towed away!
Old 11-08-2005, 12:53 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Falco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SFV, CA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 SLK55
OOHH..Ohh...OHH so my little SLK55 stock will take an M5 all day long up to 110 b4 they pass! Can't wiat to get next to one at a light and smoke them to 60++...love to see their face when a little convert roadster gets 3/4 of a car length on an M5 from a light!!!

Not me, but bone stock SLK55 from fellow mbworlder Dinko:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...slip-5170.html

Last edited by Falco; 11-08-2005 at 01:31 AM.
Old 11-08-2005, 07:37 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Rafal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2017 S63 Coupe Iridium Silver
Originally Posted by BoBcanada
I rest my case! It will take a lot more than stock M5 to beat our E55 over 400m/1/4 mile, let alone the 60' "red light Grand Prix" in the burbs.
I got it, how about "best of 10" drags in one hour? Oops, forgot about the launch control....what's that tow truck doing here?
Old 11-08-2005, 08:14 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Fikse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
I don't see way launch control is so important..... my Viper has 450 rwhp and 500 rwtq and is 3360 pounds, no traction control, no stability control, no ABS, nothing.... and the car does 1.7 - 2.0 60' times on street tires depending track prep and conditions...
Old 11-08-2005, 08:39 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
absent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,928
Received 382 Likes on 246 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
Originally Posted by Fikse
I don't see way launch control is so important..... my Viper has 450 rwhp and 500 rwtq and is 3360 pounds, no traction control, no stability control, no ABS, nothing.... and the car does 1.7 - 2.0 60' times on street tires depending track prep and conditions...
It's the nature of the F1/SMG type trannies,very difficult to launch competitively in comparison to manual or Automatic.
Best transmission for the track,not neccesarily on the street.
Ferraris and E-gear Lambos have the same issue....
Attached Images
File Type: bmp
4.bmp (791.1 KB, 539 views)
File Type: bmp
5.bmp (791.1 KB, 541 views)
File Type: bmp
7.bmp (791.1 KB, 538 views)
File Type: bmp
11.bmp (791.1 KB, 518 views)
File Type: bmp
14.bmp (791.1 KB, 511 views)
Old 11-08-2005, 10:09 AM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Ferrarris with launch control don't have this issue...

....both Car & Driver and Road & Track reported flawless launches and ran sub-12 second 1/4 miles when they tested the new F430 F1 in Europe earlier this year. And does Lambo even have smg?? I thought they only had manuals and/or DSG....
Old 11-08-2005, 10:16 AM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
absent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,928
Received 382 Likes on 246 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
Originally Posted by Improviz
....both Car & Driver and Road & Track reported flawless launches and ran sub-12 second 1/4 miles when they tested the new F430 F1 in Europe earlier this year. And does Lambo even have smg?? I thought they only had manuals and/or DSG....
Lambo has E-Gear, which is nothing more then F1/SMG.
F430 tested in Europe had a Euro spec Launch Control and had much better times then the US version.
Me personally,after driving the new M5,while appreciating the benefits of the SMG,would rather have a "normal" manual tranny and thats what I'm ordering for F600.
I'm just not tracking my cars enough to justify the need for an electronic transmission.

Last edited by absent; 11-08-2005 at 10:20 AM.
Old 11-08-2005, 10:46 AM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
traumadoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pinehurst, NC
Posts: 1,347
Received 26 Likes on 12 Posts
2019 G550. 2018 AMG GT roadster
Well said!

Originally Posted by idrivatitleist
the old M5 is so much better looking than the new one.

It's ugly. And ugly is ugly at any performance level
Fugly!
Old 11-08-2005, 11:04 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Belmondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by absent
I'm just not tracking my cars enough to justify the need for an electronic transmission.
WHat exactly do you not like about SMG in M5? BMW knew that only a small number of owners will ever track M5's in Europe or in US.

Last edited by Belmondo; 11-08-2005 at 11:08 AM.
Old 11-08-2005, 11:07 AM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by absent
F430 tested in Europe had a Euro spec Launch Control and had much better times then the US version.
Correct. In fact, the mags reported when they tested it that LC would not be available stateside, for liability reasons as I recall (lame, but that's their excuse!). But my point was that the F430's LC system does work fabulously & does not seem to suffer from the same maladies as the M5...which in fairness one might expect in a car costing double the price.

Originally Posted by absent
Me personally,after driving the new M5,while appreciating the benefits of the SMG,would rather have a "normal" manual tranny and thats what I'm ordering for F600.
I'm just not tracking my cars enough to justify the need for an electronic transmission.
Yeah, I agree...SMG is the best for a track, but unless you live in canyon country or somewhere else where there are nothing but twisties, it's not necessarily the best-suited system for the street. Me, I also live in the midwest with lots of long, razor-straight gridlines otherwise known as "roads".
Old 11-08-2005, 11:20 AM
  #47  
Member
 
Mardeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can adjust the LC rpm with the cruise control stalk. I think it was by 500 rpm up and down, that might effect the launch as well as the suspension setting.
Old 11-08-2005, 12:33 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
absent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,928
Received 382 Likes on 246 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
Originally Posted by Belmondo
WHat exactly do you not like about SMG in M5?
It's not that "I don't like it",just my opinion that conventional manual or Automatic is more suited for daily traffic grind.
SMG would be superior on the track or Autobahn,would lose to AMG in drag races every time...
Old 11-08-2005, 12:40 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Belmondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by absent
It's not that "I don't like it",just my opinion that conventional manual or Automatic is more suited for daily traffic grind.
SMG would be superior on the track or Autobahn,would lose to AMG in drag races every time...
Thanks.
What about P400 and something ohter than S6 or S5, would it make any difference in the traffic ?

Last edited by Belmondo; 11-08-2005 at 12:46 PM.
Old 11-08-2005, 02:38 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
enzom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 E55
Originally Posted by absent
It's the nature of the F1/SMG type trannies,very difficult to launch competitively in comparison to manual or Automatic.
Best transmission for the track,not neccesarily on the street.
Ferraris and E-gear Lambos have the same issue....
Your car, Absent? Looks nice in Black.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: M5 real world 1/4 mile submission....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 AM.