Edmunds: First Drive: 2007 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG (versus E55)
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Edmunds: First Drive: 2007 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG (versus E55)
Interesting article. What stood out for me was the discussion of reduced torque and WHY that was necessary for the 7 speed anyway:
"In its state of tune for U.S.-bound E63 sedans and wagons, the 6,208cc four-valve DOHC V8 puts out 507 horsepower at 6,800 rpm compared to the E55's 5,439cc three-valve SOHC supercharged V8's rating of 469 hp at 6,100 rpm. Well and good. The newer car should be more powerful. Torque? The bigger V8 twists out 465 pound-feet of torque at 5,200 rpm compared to the (what's this?) 516 lb-ft of torque from the outgoing V8. The E55's torque also peaked earlier, at 2,650 rpm. Sounds like a step backward.
However, there was good reason for the reduction in torque. This allowed Mercedes to fit its new, sophisticated seven-speed automatic in place of the old five-speed. Though the new gearbox is far more efficient than the five-speed, and though it was not built to handle the massive torque of the supercharged engine, its limit of 542 lb-ft, say Mercedes engineers, gives it the required durability to handle the 6.2's far-from-paltry crank twist."
So, what are people going to do who want to mod / are able to mod their E63 past 542 torque? That is the big question for me.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115406
There will more reviews to come, and they say the E63 is a tick faster... but I still think the 4.2 and 4.3 tests to 60 in the mags may put them neck and neck.... I don't buy Mercedes factory claims...
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
"In its state of tune for U.S.-bound E63 sedans and wagons, the 6,208cc four-valve DOHC V8 puts out 507 horsepower at 6,800 rpm compared to the E55's 5,439cc three-valve SOHC supercharged V8's rating of 469 hp at 6,100 rpm. Well and good. The newer car should be more powerful. Torque? The bigger V8 twists out 465 pound-feet of torque at 5,200 rpm compared to the (what's this?) 516 lb-ft of torque from the outgoing V8. The E55's torque also peaked earlier, at 2,650 rpm. Sounds like a step backward.
However, there was good reason for the reduction in torque. This allowed Mercedes to fit its new, sophisticated seven-speed automatic in place of the old five-speed. Though the new gearbox is far more efficient than the five-speed, and though it was not built to handle the massive torque of the supercharged engine, its limit of 542 lb-ft, say Mercedes engineers, gives it the required durability to handle the 6.2's far-from-paltry crank twist."
So, what are people going to do who want to mod / are able to mod their E63 past 542 torque? That is the big question for me.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115406
There will more reviews to come, and they say the E63 is a tick faster... but I still think the 4.2 and 4.3 tests to 60 in the mags may put them neck and neck.... I don't buy Mercedes factory claims...
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sin City
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
12' C63 P31, 06' Supercharged Range, 08' BMW 550i
Originally Posted by Loren
So, what are people going to do who want to mod / are able to mod their E63 past 542 torque? That is the big question for me.
Loren
Loren
#3
Super Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by dragonAMG
That definitely sucks for the e63 owners. This is one reason why I belive the E55 will hold it's value after the debut of the E63.
This also means that if there were to be some TT version of the E63 someday... or anything approaching the power of the 65s... that we'd see a completely restructured tranny / torque converter as part of the change. Otherwise it would fall apart...
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
#4
Member
Originally Posted by Loren
At least for people who mod, like most people on this board. That tranny limit is scary...
Interesting, Edmunds is wondering whether the new E63 will be able to run with the Audi S6?
"Would it be able to run with the 10-cylinder BMW M5 and Audi S6 sport sedans?"
I didn't think the new Audi was in the same league.
After reading the review, it does seem that the E63 is a "better" car...but then, it will be $10+K more than my E55, or on a lease basis about $4-500month more, so I am not complaining...and I love driving my car...but it could be a genuinely better car. One would think, if MB had years to work on releasing a comparably priced replaced for the E55 to better compete with the M5, it would be a better car.
Last edited by SoxFan; 05-20-2006 at 07:15 PM.
#5
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 E350W4
SoxFan, I think you left out the rest of the sentence…..
As per the author:
“Would it be able to run with the 10-cylinder BMW M5 and Audi S6 sport sedans? This driver discovered the answer — yes!”
Also, some of you folks keep saying that the E55 is the better car because of the modding characteristics but, let’s face it, how many of the E55 owners have modded their cars? Looking at most of you folks on this site….not many.
My opinion and, please, take it for whatever is worth….the E63 will sell just as good as the 55 did and most of the owners will be very happy (even without the mods).
As per the author:
“Would it be able to run with the 10-cylinder BMW M5 and Audi S6 sport sedans? This driver discovered the answer — yes!”
Also, some of you folks keep saying that the E55 is the better car because of the modding characteristics but, let’s face it, how many of the E55 owners have modded their cars? Looking at most of you folks on this site….not many.
My opinion and, please, take it for whatever is worth….the E63 will sell just as good as the 55 did and most of the owners will be very happy (even without the mods).
#6
Member
Originally Posted by SGEM
SoxFan, I think you left out the rest of the sentence…..
As per the author:
“Would it be able to run with the 10-cylinder BMW M5 and Audi S6 sport sedans? This driver discovered the answer — yes!”
As per the author:
“Would it be able to run with the 10-cylinder BMW M5 and Audi S6 sport sedans? This driver discovered the answer — yes!”
Is it a cool car, and a good value for $75,000 MSRP...probably...I considered it...especially is 1-2 years if you can get it for $65-70K. But I didin't think it was in the same league, snob appeal and badges aside.
#7
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Topaz Blue M3.....to upcoming E63
Price....
Did anyone realize that the edmunds article states that the E63 will retail for around the same price as the E55? Curious as to how accurate that is. My dealer told me almost a $10 K premium over the E55. I can only hope that the MSRP would still be in the 80's. Time will tell.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Originally Posted by istewart
My dealer told me almost a $10 K premium over the E55. I can only hope that the MSRP would still be in the 80's. Time will tell.
These cars will be competitive with the M5s on price and performance.
The price difference between the E55s and the E63s will not be based on sticker, it will be determined by how dealers sell them vs. MSRP; while E55s can be bought for a BIG discount to sticker, the new E63s will be going for prices close to MSRP, or at a premium to MSRP (as we know, there are some dealers who will use this as an opportunity to gouge their customers).
So, there you have a difference of $10-15K, or more.
#9
Senior Member
Did anyone else catch the quote about weight?
Article states that the E63 will be 45 lbs heavier! I thought it would be lighter since the engine is supposed to weigh less?
Article states that the E63 will be 45 lbs heavier! I thought it would be lighter since the engine is supposed to weigh less?
![wall](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/banghead.gif)
#11
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 E55,2005 Ferrari F430 Spider, 2005 Corvette 427 TT, 2005 Range Rover
I find the fact that the car gained weight truobling. I would have though they dropped 100 lbs off the car by elminating the supercharger and aftercooler. It appears they also dropped the 8 piston front brakes down to six. All these things would appear to be to help reduce the weight and make it handle better. It's going to be a shame if they didn't accomplish this.
#13
Super Member
Thread Starter
[QUOTE=RJC]
I may be wrong, but I thought I remembered reading or hearing that they went with floating rotors in the front and the new brake setup... thus the 6 piston setup.
In other words, I don't think the rotor is the same either... anyone know if that's true?
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
Originally Posted by Blocktrader
It appears they also dropped the 8 piston front brakes down to six.
QUOTE] More decontenting perhaps...
QUOTE] More decontenting perhaps...
In other words, I don't think the rotor is the same either... anyone know if that's true?
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,824
Received 260 Likes
on
186 Posts
[QUOTE=Loren]
I may be wrong, but I thought I remembered reading or hearing that they went with floating rotors in the front and the new brake setup... thus the 6 piston setup.
In other words, I don't think the rotor is the same either... anyone know if that's true?
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
Did you mean floating calipers?
Originally Posted by RJC
I may be wrong, but I thought I remembered reading or hearing that they went with floating rotors in the front and the new brake setup... thus the 6 piston setup.
In other words, I don't think the rotor is the same either... anyone know if that's true?
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
'03 G500, '13 G63, '17 GLS63,
I'm not really buying the review. Obviously these people are the type to only believe manufacturer marketing hype and report accordingly. To say the 6.2 litre is more "durable" than the 5.5 Kompressor motor without any justification just reeks of ignorance.
IMO, it seems the "official" E55 0-60 times were the conservative ones and the E63 are probably more on the money. SGEM is right, though. E63 owners will be more than happy with the vehicle stock. Not knocking the E63, either. I'd love to have one, but I wouldnt give up my E55 for it.
The true enthusiasts will still lean towards the E55, the rest are those that base purchase decisions strictly on whats new and availabe at the time.
IMO, it seems the "official" E55 0-60 times were the conservative ones and the E63 are probably more on the money. SGEM is right, though. E63 owners will be more than happy with the vehicle stock. Not knocking the E63, either. I'd love to have one, but I wouldnt give up my E55 for it.
The true enthusiasts will still lean towards the E55, the rest are those that base purchase decisions strictly on whats new and availabe at the time.
#16
Super Member
Thread Starter
[QUOTE=RJC]
No, floating rotors... rotors with the detachable center hub mounted via screws in an oval hole so they can expand and move as they heat up, as opposed to a solid single piece of steel like our existing rotors. I thought I heard they were going with floating rotors on the E63s... adn that the smaller 6 piston caliper worked fine in that setup... dunno...
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
Originally Posted by Loren
Did you mean floating calipers?
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
#17
Super Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by medici78
I'm not really buying the review. Obviously these people are the type to only believe manufacturer marketing hype and report accordingly. To say the 6.2 litre is more "durable" than the 5.5 Kompressor motor without any justification just reeks of ignorance.
IMO, it seems the "official" E55 0-60 times were the conservative ones and the E63 are probably more on the money. SGEM is right, though. E63 owners will be more than happy with the vehicle stock. Not knocking the E63, either. I'd love to have one, but I wouldnt give up my E55 for it.
The true enthusiasts will still lean towards the E55, the rest are those that base purchase decisions strictly on whats new and availabe at the time.
IMO, it seems the "official" E55 0-60 times were the conservative ones and the E63 are probably more on the money. SGEM is right, though. E63 owners will be more than happy with the vehicle stock. Not knocking the E63, either. I'd love to have one, but I wouldnt give up my E55 for it.
The true enthusiasts will still lean towards the E55, the rest are those that base purchase decisions strictly on whats new and availabe at the time.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,631
Received 1,085 Likes
on
872 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
I'm sticking with my original prediction that the E55 ends up tied or faster 0-60....
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,824
Received 260 Likes
on
186 Posts
[QUOTE=Loren]
No, floating rotors... rotors with the detachable center hub mounted via screws in an oval hole so they can expand and move as they heat up, as opposed to a solid single piece of steel like our existing rotors. I thought I heard they were going with floating rotors on the E63s... adn that the smaller 6 piston caliper worked fine in that setup... dunno...
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
Something else to go wrong with MB brakes LOL!
Originally Posted by RJC
No, floating rotors... rotors with the detachable center hub mounted via screws in an oval hole so they can expand and move as they heat up, as opposed to a solid single piece of steel like our existing rotors. I thought I heard they were going with floating rotors on the E63s... adn that the smaller 6 piston caliper worked fine in that setup... dunno...
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
#21
Super Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 E-55-95-F355S- 99 Porsche 911 C2 w mods
[QUOTE=RJC]
AMG use's the 2 piece rotors on the 65 models already.
Originally Posted by Loren
Something else to go wrong with MB brakes LOL!
#22
Originally Posted by Loren
EXACTLY. If anything, the E55 factory times were proven to be WAY off compared to testing by just about every mag. With the E63, maybe they're pushing a slight improvement for political reasons. Any review that merely quotes factory times will not be accurate... never have been. What I want to see are actual mag & GPS based tests like all of those 4.2 and 4.3 results in mags. I'm sticking with my original prediction that the E55 ends up tied or faster 0-60....
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
- A full tank of gas
- One passenger
Each Car company does it a little differently for there is no Universal Standard when it comes to posting 0-60 or 0-62 times.
#23
Super Member
when are the 63's expected in showrooms?
also, is their arrival in dealerships the same time that parts begin to arrive, or does one predate another?
i have an interest in replacing my taillights on my wagon with the tinted taillights on the 63 wagon. since one of the taillights is cracked, i've got to replace them anyway, so it might as well be with the tinted versions for the cool look.
anyone have an idea of what the parts would cost for a set of 4 wagon taillights?
thanks,
vic
also, is their arrival in dealerships the same time that parts begin to arrive, or does one predate another?
i have an interest in replacing my taillights on my wagon with the tinted taillights on the 63 wagon. since one of the taillights is cracked, i've got to replace them anyway, so it might as well be with the tinted versions for the cool look.
anyone have an idea of what the parts would cost for a set of 4 wagon taillights?
thanks,
vic
#24
Originally Posted by vixapphire
when are the 63's expected in showrooms?
also, is their arrival in dealerships the same time that parts begin to arrive, or does one predate another?
i have an interest in replacing my taillights on my wagon with the tinted taillights on the 63 wagon. since one of the taillights is cracked, i've got to replace them anyway, so it might as well be with the tinted versions for the cool look.
anyone have an idea of what the parts would cost for a set of 4 wagon taillights?
thanks,
vic
also, is their arrival in dealerships the same time that parts begin to arrive, or does one predate another?
i have an interest in replacing my taillights on my wagon with the tinted taillights on the 63 wagon. since one of the taillights is cracked, i've got to replace them anyway, so it might as well be with the tinted versions for the cool look.
anyone have an idea of what the parts would cost for a set of 4 wagon taillights?
thanks,
vic