W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

W211 E55 Specs and Pricing on MB web site

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-27-2002, 06:13 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
stephens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55, F550, S600 Ducati 999
W211 E55 Specs and Pricing on MB web site

The Aussie MB web site has detailed specifications and pricing for the new E55. Can't wait until Xmas for my new ride!! There appears to be an optional wheel fitment:
AMG 18" Light Alloy Wheels 5-Spoke (set of 4)
AMG 18" Light Alloy Wheels 5-Spoke (set of 4) F:255/40 R18 R:285/35 R18
Standard: Front: 8 J x 18 H2 ET 30 - 245/40 ZR 18 Rear:9 J x 18 H2 ET 39 - 265/35 R18

Last edited by stephens; 08-27-2002 at 06:22 AM.
Old 08-27-2002, 09:49 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
E55 KEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 5,530
Received 198 Likes on 156 Posts
2016 GLE63s / 2016 E63s / 2002 E55
Stephens, go with the optional setup with:

255/40/18 front & 285/35/18 rear. Awesome!
Old 08-27-2002, 09:54 AM
  #3  
Member
 
jamesp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'97 C 280, '06 ML350
hey KEV or anyone...

could you please enlighten me on the advantages to a staggered setup? how can it help performance that the rear tire is smaller than the front? sorry for the dumb question, but i'm just learning about performance enhancements so i'll ask someone who knows. thanks.
Old 08-27-2002, 10:31 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
E55 KEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 5,530
Received 198 Likes on 156 Posts
2016 GLE63s / 2016 E63s / 2002 E55
Re: hey KEV or anyone...

Originally posted by jamesp
how can it help performance that the rear tire is smaller than the front?
You mean "how can it help performance tht the rar tire is larger than the front".

I don't know the technical aspects of it. This topic is better suited for the 'Wheels' section. I guess the idea is to stuff the widest tire possible in each wheel well and the rear will accept a much larger tire than the front can. I believe the wider the rear tire (the drive tire) the more traction you can get. More traction equals the more power to the ground and more speed. Something like that.

Last edited by E55 KEV; 08-28-2002 at 08:43 PM.
Old 08-27-2002, 03:50 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
mikE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55 AMG
I'm no expert either, but here's a simple explanation. The 285 (width) means the rear wheel is wider vs. the 255 in the front. The 35 (height) indicates that the side wall (profile) is lower/smaller vs the 40 in the front. With all the power and torque in the E55, the wider rear tires provides much better grip, as this a rear wheel drive car. The lower profile also provides for less body roll as the sidewall will flex less. The trade off is a harsher ride. Having narrow tires in the front (relative to the rear, 255 is still very wide) usually helps to make the steering better and reduces understeer.
Old 08-28-2002, 10:13 AM
  #6  
Member
 
jamesp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'97 C 280, '06 ML350
thank guys...

that explains it.
Old 08-28-2002, 03:22 PM
  #7  
Super Member
 
jswedberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C32 AMG
Having narrow tires in the front (relative to the rear, 255 is still very wide) usually helps to make the steering better and reduces understeer.
Not true - typically (with no other changes) wider tires on the back will reduce OVERsteer - that is, it will make the car understeer more.

An obvious example is the Porsche 911, which had a big oversteer problem early in its life. Wider rear tires helped to tame the oversteer.

That can all be adjusted, though, with different anti-sway bars, shocks , and springs.
Old 08-29-2002, 06:38 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
mikE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55 AMG
Well, you maybe right. But the 911's engine is in the rear, so it's vehicle dynamics are different than an E55's. In the case of the '95 BMW M3, it originally had the same tires all around and had some understeer. BMW later changed to a staggared setup with the '97 M3 to improve the car's handling.

But then again, I'm no expert in this area and will differ to other's engineering wisdom.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: W211 E55 Specs and Pricing on MB web site



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 AM.