Mustang Dyno and K2 Owners
#1
Mustang Dyno and K2 Owners
Gentlemen and Ladies: just had my ECU "threemapped" again and have some dyno results to share. Data from today show rw hp 422 and 482 rw torque @ 5500 rpm. These are about the best I think I will get and thanks again to Cory/Brandon and my tuners locally at Motorwerks for putting up with my OCD syndrome!
I dont want to get into the Dynojet vs. Mustang debate at all, but can anyone reveal to the forum what their Mustang dyno resullts look like on their K2 setups? Thanks-Joker
I dont want to get into the Dynojet vs. Mustang debate at all, but can anyone reveal to the forum what their Mustang dyno resullts look like on their K2 setups? Thanks-Joker
#2
Gentlemen and Ladies: just had my ECU "threemapped" again and have some dyno results to share. Data from today show rw hp 422 and 482 rw torque @ 5500 rpm. These are about the best I think I will get and thanks again to Cory/Brandon and my tuners locally at Motorwerks for putting up with my OCD syndrome!
I dont want to get into the Dynojet vs. Mustang debate at all, but can anyone reveal to the forum what their Mustang dyno resullts look like on their K2 setups? Thanks-Joker
I dont want to get into the Dynojet vs. Mustang debate at all, but can anyone reveal to the forum what their Mustang dyno resullts look like on their K2 setups? Thanks-Joker
Ted
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 207
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
i'm sure people will say hp should be higher. i don't know enough be able to agree or disagree with that...all i can comment on is what i've witnessed and the 14% difference between a mustang and regular dyno that jakpro stated (and erased) would fall in line with what i've witnessed at our local shop.
besides k2 cars, i'd also be curious to know what other stock e55's are reporting on mustang dynos.
besides k2 cars, i'd also be curious to know what other stock e55's are reporting on mustang dynos.
Last edited by chiromikey; 09-08-2006 at 06:33 PM.
#4
#5
Gentlemen and Ladies: just had my ECU "threemapped" again and have some dyno results to share. Data from today show rw hp 422 and 482 rw torque @ 5500 rpm. These are about the best I think I will get and thanks again to Cory/Brandon and my tuners locally at Motorwerks for putting up with my OCD syndrome!
I dont want to get into the Dynojet vs. Mustang debate at all, but can anyone reveal to the forum what their Mustang dyno resullts look like on their K2 setups? Thanks-Joker
I dont want to get into the Dynojet vs. Mustang debate at all, but can anyone reveal to the forum what their Mustang dyno resullts look like on their K2 setups? Thanks-Joker
This e55 stock made 389 and 422 with pulley and ecu. The m5 made 417 stock. The numbers are little hard to read so i apologize.
As far as the mustang dyno to dynojet conversion 14% is on the high side imho. The typical % is 8 to 12 from what i have seen. The e55 above made 419 rwhp sae when stock on a dynojet . So for a k2 i believe its on the low side.
Either way forget about the chassis dyno and take it to the track, the best dyno in the world, and have some fun.
Last edited by rflow306; 09-08-2006 at 07:25 PM.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 207
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
As far as the mustang dyno to dynojet conversion 14% is on the high side imho. The typical % is 8 to 12 from what i have seen. The e55 above made 419 rwhp sae when stock on a dynojet . So for a k2 i believe its on the low side.
Either way forget about the chassis dyno and take it to the track the best dyno in the world and have some fun.
Either way forget about the chassis dyno and take it to the track the best dyno in the world and have some fun.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 12
From: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
i've witnessed and the 14% difference between a mustang and regular dyno that jakpro stated (and erased)
Least this post boosted my confidence a bit.