W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

AMG 6.3 Conspiracy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-11-2006 | 06:00 PM
  #26  
M&M's Avatar
M&M
Super Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Not wanting to start any hate threads but the E63 & CLK63 have been tested.

Old 09-11-2006 | 06:07 PM
  #27  
WayneE's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 3
From: Frederick, MD
'72 Suburban
Originally Posted by Vadim @ MBLN
Dyno is the answer. Two cars with the same HP and same weight will trap in 1/4 mile very close.

While a low dyno could be the smoking gun, your statement above is incorrect. Gearing alone can make a dramatic change. I've seen cars drop .25-.50 off their ET with a conservative gearing change. Same with converters - loosen up the converter and watch the times drop.
Old 09-11-2006 | 06:13 PM
  #28  
DerekFSU's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
WOW, that's a ton of time from gearing.

That 0-200kp/h time above is not good.
Old 09-11-2006 | 06:21 PM
  #29  
WayneE's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 3
From: Frederick, MD
'72 Suburban
Originally Posted by WayneE
Did MB tighten up the converter on the E63 to improve drivetrain loss and driveability? That change, along with gearing, may account for some of the sluggish performance off the line.

Originally Posted by mclarenm8d
I definitely think you may be on to something with the torque converter ... although my thought would be "tighter" relative to the 55 vs 63 torque peak and output.

Right. A motor with less torque, that peaks higher, would need a looser converter vs. a motor making an ***-load (technical measurement) like the 55k. If they tightened up the converter on the E63, it could have a drastic effect on acceleration.
Old 09-11-2006 | 06:50 PM
  #30  
deaguero's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 820
Likes: 1
From: La Quinta, CALIF.
2009 C63 Black on Black
Question The US Mags Tested the E55 very early

Originally Posted by Germancar1
Gotta love conspiracy theories. They rarely make any sense or have any meaning. Just because the U.S. mags haven't tested anything yet doesn't mean there is something going on. Each and every Mercedes product for 2007, except for the C and SLK has a new engine variant, been facelifted or is all new. For months now there has been one MB after another in all of the major publications. If anything is being held back it is because they're all gettting ready to do some comparison tests. Just think about all the new Benzes that haven't been tested yet, the CLK550, CLK63, ML63, R63, E550, E63, CLS63, CLS550. The GL450, S600, SL550 and S550 have just all made their rounds at Motor Trend and Car and Driver within the last few months so it takes time folks. You'll see a E63 vs. S6 vs M5 vs Quattroporte Sport GT or something like that soon enough and you know the new "550" versions of the E/CLS are going to be tested, particularly the E550 vs. 550i. Time folks, time.

M
I really wonder why the E63 and CLS 63 have not been tested yet? When you compare this to other cars tested, they seem to be rather late. I guess we'll just have to wait but it does seem strange.
Old 09-11-2006 | 07:08 PM
  #31  
RJC's Avatar
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,824
Likes: 262
From: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
CLK63,GL450,E550 and the new ML have also been tested in the US. I reported a while back one of the US mag's had a brief test of the E63 and mentioned "it did not have the same shove you into the back of the seat as the E55"....

I also am very much looking to a full US test of the E63 and more importantly a side/side comp of it against the E55. Remember no matter what, the mag's wil always have some kind things to say about almost all new releases to keep their advertisers happy. I too am suprised we haven't seen more on the E63 since the E AMG was always such a popular and benchmarked HP sedan.

I also fully expect the E63's from MB press fleet will be performing at the top of their game, expect 0-60's about 2-3 tenth's less than the E55's which will mostly come from better traction and gearing...oh yea its smoooother too lol!!!

Last edited by RJC; 09-11-2006 at 07:15 PM.
Old 09-11-2006 | 07:16 PM
  #32  
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 5
300ce
Originally Posted by M&M
Not wanting to start any hate threads but the E63 & CLK63 have been tested.

.......Interesting. According to the table you posted, the E63 is slower than the M5 in every category. The 0-100km/h time for the E63 in this table places it in the same performance category as the E39M5. This falls in line so far with what Derek observed. Problem is that it is totally inconsistent with the figures MB is releasing for the E63. Futher it is completely out of line with the figures posted in this table from the following thread. Something is amiss. https://mbworld.org/forums/ml55-amg-ml63-amg-w163-w164/161402-0-100-0-km-h-times-ml63.html

Ted
Old 09-11-2006 | 07:19 PM
  #33  
RJC's Avatar
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,824
Likes: 262
From: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
This was posted some time ago and both cars tested very slow compared to reported previous #'s...well at least the M5 did

Last edited by RJC; 09-11-2006 at 07:46 PM.
Old 09-11-2006 | 08:12 PM
  #34  
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 2
From: Southern California
S600TT, R350
I've seen cars drop .25-.50 off their ET with a conservative gearing change
I am not talking about ET - elapsed time. I am talking about MPH. You can spin off the line and still run a lousy ET, but MPH will still be very close to the one with a good lauch.

Plus E63 has tigher gearing from 7-speed trans.
Old 09-12-2006 | 05:52 AM
  #35  
Germancar1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 290
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by deaguero
I really wonder why the E63 and CLS 63 have not been tested yet? When you compare this to other cars tested, they seem to be rather late. I guess we'll just have to wait but it does seem strange.

Nothing strange about it really, think about how many new Mercedes' have been introduced for 2007, the mags can only test so many at a time. The S550, S600 and SL55 have just made their rounds, now it will be the ML63, E63, CLK63 etc. etc. as the months go foward. Pluse all the mags for October are new car issues with lots of reporting on every brand.

M
Old 09-12-2006 | 10:46 AM
  #36  
MiamiAMG's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
From: The Magic City
C63
Originally Posted by M&M
Not wanting to start any hate threads but the E63 & CLK63 have been tested.


This chart shows some pretty dismal numbers for both of these new cars, imho. Very strange.
Old 09-12-2006 | 10:37 PM
  #37  
SmokinV10's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 220
Likes: 3
From: Houston, TX
2018 E63S,
hypothetically speaking, if the dyno numbers keep on coming back with these lower high 300rwhp numbers, what are all you 63 owners gonna do?
Old 09-12-2006 | 11:57 PM
  #38  
Kens-E55's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 385
Likes: 1
From: Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.
2004 E55
Originally Posted by M&M
Not wanting to start any hate threads but the E63 & CLK63 have been tested.

WOW!! These times are horrible!!!
but "dead-on" with what Derek's E63 did at the track.
Some stats compared:

E63//////0-100 in 10.8///0-111 in 13.5(hence 13 flat 1/4 @110 is normal!!)
E55//////0-100 in 9.4 ///0-117 in 12.4 (#'s are stout over E63)
E55(K2)/0-100 in 7.7 ///0-121 in 11.8(many different forum members!!!)

I hope AMG fixes the performance disparity FAST!!!

Last edited by Kens-E55; 09-13-2006 at 12:19 AM.
Old 09-13-2006 | 02:17 AM
  #39  
MidniteBluBenz's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
540 6spd
What an interesting twist to the horsepower race that Mercedes so despirately wants to sit atop of.

They build what is toted as the first all-amg engine only to be exposed by an enlightened group of enthusiats whose preliminary findings say that a 55K car will own a 63 in the quarter-mile all day long. Not to mention that a lightly moddified 55K will walk away from a 63 at any speed.

Last edited by MidniteBluBenz; 09-13-2006 at 02:21 AM.
Old 09-13-2006 | 04:54 AM
  #40  
benzmodz's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 10
From: Sydney, Australia
W203 slightly modified
Originally Posted by rake55
There has been a lot of talk on this forum regarding speculation that the new 6.3 liter motor isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.
We should let you run in an E200 for 1 month ... after that you will be so glad just to sit in an AMG.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: AMG 6.3 Conspiracy?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 AM.