So how many people actually bought their E55/E63 in cash?
As far as not feeling as though the "successful" man 'deserves' the car because he pays over time??? He very well may 'work' harder on a day to day basis for the enjoyment of the car than the "wealthy" man who signs a single check for it.
Me? I'm paying over time and darned proud of it. I have managed to make double payments on my 'previously enjoyed' certified car since acquiring it last summer thanks to successes at the office beyond my control. I don't have a cabin at the lake, or a ski boat and I don't travel much. I say my E55 is like a little 'vacation' every time I turn the key. And after a day at the office, I NEED that little vacation.
For whatever it's worth, a very close friend of mine dropped dead last month at age 41 of a heart attack with no previous indicators. I sincerely hope he wasn't waiting for retirement to enjoy driving a "fun" car.
I financed the E55 by trading in a paid off 2004 Chevy Trailblazer no cash paid $1500 monthly for 6 months than paid it off with a bonus check.
Fast forward to a 2 year old car it may be worth $45,000 to $50,000 but I will be keeping it for a while.
Wolf Cross posting as Lady Wolf
I guess to each of their own, I tend to change car every 1-2 years, hardly kept any cars over 3 years. So even a lease is not for me.
Now I am 'thinking' to sell my 06 E55 with 6k miles on the clock designo edition for something else. Might sell it for just about 70k, if anyone interested let me know.
If I had leased this car, it will be hard to switch cars..
Lease doesn't work for me since I drive the car (almost 12k in 8-months already) and I didn't want car payments.
It's going to depreciate anyway. You're making payments with interest on a depreciating asset or your taking a hit on the depreciating asset.
I did, however, lease my wife's GL450 because mileage isn't a concern and I'll want a new car for her in 3-years.
S.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Coalman, let's say you have $100K to spend, which one of the following hypothetical scenarios would you choose?
Scenario A:
Buy $100K car
2 years later, sell it for $70K
You lose: $30K
Scenario B:
Lease $100K car: $0 down $833/mo
+ Put $100K investment (annual return 10%)
2 years later:
- You will have spent $40K on the car ($10K more cost on ownership)
- You will gain $20K from investment (non-compounded interest for simplicity sake).
So Scenario B will leave you w/ more money ($80K vs. $70K in Scenario A).
My point is that while it is true paying cash is always cheaper than leasing/financing, it MAY NOT be the best decision to always paying cash.
It was only hypothetical - REPEAT hypothetical - scenario.... it was not meant to be taken at face value. It was meant to get my point acrossed that while lease seems to always be more expensive, it may still a better idea to lease since you could use / leverage the remaining funds on something else that has healthy return.If you still don't get it, fill A, B, C, D, I & X below.
Assume:
- You have $A in your pocket
- Car's depreciation over X years is $B
- Car's monthly lease w/ $D down is $C
- Return on an investment over X years is $I
You have an EITHER-OR choice of:
- spending the entire $A for a car; or
- spending a fraction of $A for a car and put the remaining on investment
So....
If ($A - $B) > ($A + $I - $D - X*$C), then you'd better buy.
If ($A - $B) = ($A + $I - $D - X*$C), then no difference between buying and leasing.
If ($A - $B) < ($A + $I - $D - X*$C), then you'd better lease.
Get it now?
$1100ish a month for a lease
I'd right off 1/2 for my bussiness.
Tax savings would be $138ish
So $962 a month.
I'd invest the $50K I spent and make $230 a month interest.
So all in all it would be $732 out of my pocket per month.
Damn for $732 a month i'd definatly rather have a brand spanken new E63 with a nice warranty on it. Maybe when the all new E AMG model comes out I will do this...



