short HEADERS: what results for Kleemann and Renntech ?
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
short HEADERS: what results for Kleemann and Renntech ?
we know that the main difference between these headers is that
A- Renntech is a quasi-4-in-1 and fits to stock collector/cat , therefore last diameter is about 47-50mm
B- Kleeman is a true 4-in-1 , with collector enlarged to about 65mm and therefore requires new piping to fit stock or race cats.
at first we'd think that's better performing B ... but is there any evidence?
I'm wondering this issue especially after so good results achieved with log-style headers .. as if it were that decreasing counterpressure with larger collectors will not yield what expected
thanks for contributing
A- Renntech is a quasi-4-in-1 and fits to stock collector/cat , therefore last diameter is about 47-50mm
B- Kleeman is a true 4-in-1 , with collector enlarged to about 65mm and therefore requires new piping to fit stock or race cats.
at first we'd think that's better performing B ... but is there any evidence?
I'm wondering this issue especially after so good results achieved with log-style headers .. as if it were that decreasing counterpressure with larger collectors will not yield what expected
thanks for contributing
Last edited by dyno; 12-13-2007 at 11:14 AM.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
if so, .. please post the correct image
I do not have them, and picked the image from GMP performance, here:
http://www.gmpperformance.com/index....catList&CID=50
in any case, proper topic is not the image issue ..
I do not have them, and picked the image from GMP performance, here:
http://www.gmpperformance.com/index....catList&CID=50
in any case, proper topic is not the image issue ..
Last edited by dyno; 12-13-2007 at 11:50 AM.
#5
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sactown, CA
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi AS4
we know that the main difference between these headers is that
A- Renntech is a quasi-4-in-1 and fits to stock collector/cat , therefore last diameter is about 47-50mm
B- Kleeman is a true 4-in-1 , with collector enlarged to about 65mm and therefore requires new piping to fit stock or race cats.
at first we'd think that's better performing B ... but is there any evidence?
I'm wondering this issue especially after so good results achieved with log-style headers .. as if it were that decreasing counterpressure with larger collectors will not yield what expected
thanks for contributing
A- Renntech is a quasi-4-in-1 and fits to stock collector/cat , therefore last diameter is about 47-50mm
B- Kleeman is a true 4-in-1 , with collector enlarged to about 65mm and therefore requires new piping to fit stock or race cats.
at first we'd think that's better performing B ... but is there any evidence?
I'm wondering this issue especially after so good results achieved with log-style headers .. as if it were that decreasing counterpressure with larger collectors will not yield what expected
thanks for contributing
http://www.dinancars.com/whitepapersFile.asp?ID=3
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
I worked at Dinan Engineering for almost 9 years and have a lot of respect for Steve's knowledge. I attached the address to his M3 exhaust white paper because regardless of the engine, the theory remains the same for all. I think he does a good job explaining what’s important. You would have to do a flow compression to see which one allows the engine to “breath” better to determine the superior design. Hope this helps.
http://www.dinancars.com/whitepapersFile.asp?ID=3
http://www.dinancars.com/whitepapersFile.asp?ID=3
I'll read with interest what's in your link but ...theory is clear; our Mercedes is something .. specific
Theory, in general, is written without taking into account subsequent Pollution regulation induced modifications in modern engine's exhaust management systems.
.. hope sounds clear what I mean.
one word will help: EGR = exhaust gas recirculation system.
but this is no the present topic.
4th hole: again... even if this is not the topic, just click on the link given and would appear also to a non attentive eye
came on guys, WANTED is the opinion of those that had the opportunity to test both solutions: stock vs unrestricted short header, regardless of its brand name. and, possibly, excluding all cases of hard mods ... say, still with stock cams
Last edited by dyno; 12-13-2007 at 03:50 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
I'd still argue that shorties are shorties nd long ones aren't. Doing a little quasi playing with the lengths does NOTHING on the dyno. That is why I was so happy with the logs. Either way, you are leaving about 10hp by not going without the primary cats.
Now, the question to ask is what happens when the thing cracks. Will the vendor / shop step up and replace them quickly with new ones? That is key to me. I can't stand those that don't stand behind their products and workmanship. All I was worried about was getting the best quality at the best price. Well, I got it. I got RennTech parts and paid rock bottom pricing for it. Unfortunately, something went wrong and when the dust settled, there was no tuner or shop to be found. You may be happy now, while the prices are low, but you'll be pissed you ever went that route when your car is trashed.
Now, the question to ask is what happens when the thing cracks. Will the vendor / shop step up and replace them quickly with new ones? That is key to me. I can't stand those that don't stand behind their products and workmanship. All I was worried about was getting the best quality at the best price. Well, I got it. I got RennTech parts and paid rock bottom pricing for it. Unfortunately, something went wrong and when the dust settled, there was no tuner or shop to be found. You may be happy now, while the prices are low, but you'll be pissed you ever went that route when your car is trashed.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
I'd still argue that shorties are shorties nd long ones aren't. Doing a little quasi playing with the lengths does NOTHING on the dyno. That is why I was so happy with the logs. Either way, you are leaving about 10hp by not going without the primary cats.
Now, the question to ask is what happens when the thing cracks. Will the vendor / shop step up and replace them quickly with new ones? That is key to me. I can't stand those that don't stand behind their products and workmanship. All I was worried about was getting the best quality at the best price. Well, I got it. I got RennTech parts and paid rock bottom pricing for it. Unfortunately, something went wrong and when the dust settled, there was no tuner or shop to be found. You may be happy now, while the prices are low, but you'll be pissed you ever went that route when your car is trashed.
Now, the question to ask is what happens when the thing cracks. Will the vendor / shop step up and replace them quickly with new ones? That is key to me. I can't stand those that don't stand behind their products and workmanship. All I was worried about was getting the best quality at the best price. Well, I got it. I got RennTech parts and paid rock bottom pricing for it. Unfortunately, something went wrong and when the dust settled, there was no tuner or shop to be found. You may be happy now, while the prices are low, but you'll be pissed you ever went that route when your car is trashed.
-LOG STYLE or SHORTY makes quite no difference
(and that with CATS off is better than with cats on. no question on this)
so, I'm allowed to infer that ONE better difference of modded Shorties versus Stock is because of their larger piping diameter at engine's outlets.
.. but we still miss the main issue: what about LARGE COLLECTOR/OUTLET vs STOCK COLLECTOR ?
PS:
the "after service" issue: if you are concerned with this, then better remain STOCK. ... in my long enough experience I can tel you that when the problem get serious, After-market will NEVER go hands-in-hands with After-Service.
We are a bit off-topic, but I want also tell you that for example in Germany you can buy a specific insurance coverage together with the tuning service. BUT: your car is not entitled if it has more than 30k miles, and you cannot mod it DIY !
Last edited by dyno; 12-13-2007 at 06:50 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Can I throw this out? Are you sure you got 28rwhp because of headers? Or did you get 28rwhp because of outside weather temps, the car wasn't as heatsoaked, the correction factor on the dyno was more, and so forth.
I'm not saying you didn't make the power. I'm just asking the questions.
I have a supra that will vary 50-60rwhp on any given day with all things constant. It'll make 1090rwhp and the next week it makes 1160rwhp, then the next week it make 1140rwhp. So...with that said...was everything constant?
dkm
I'm not saying you didn't make the power. I'm just asking the questions.
I have a supra that will vary 50-60rwhp on any given day with all things constant. It'll make 1090rwhp and the next week it makes 1160rwhp, then the next week it make 1140rwhp. So...with that said...was everything constant?
dkm
#14
#15
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Quinta, CALIF.
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2009 C63 Black on Black
The dyno said so!
Can I throw this out? Are you sure you got 28rwhp because of headers? Or did you get 28rwhp because of outside weather temps, the car wasn't as heatsoaked, the correction factor on the dyno was more, and so forth.
I'm not saying you didn't make the power. I'm just asking the questions.
I have a supra that will vary 50-60rwhp on any given day with all things constant. It'll make 1090rwhp and the next week it makes 1160rwhp, then the next week it make 1140rwhp. So...with that said...was everything constant?
dkm
I'm not saying you didn't make the power. I'm just asking the questions.
I have a supra that will vary 50-60rwhp on any given day with all things constant. It'll make 1090rwhp and the next week it makes 1160rwhp, then the next week it make 1140rwhp. So...with that said...was everything constant?
dkm
The conditions were almost exactly the same with 102 degree outside temps and the humidity at about 15% both days. We ran them both in the morning around 10:00am and this was the best we could do with the early June summer conditions in Arizona 6/05/2007 to be exact. The promise from Chris at Floored Fab was "A gain of 20 - 25 HP gain or no charge. Man was I happy after the dyno confirmation! Aside from the dynos, The car really has lots of top end pull as attested from the "Fontana day" in October since my E55 was the 3rd fasted AMG that day out of about ten or so cars both E55's and E63's. Regards!
#16
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sactown, CA
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi AS4
Kleemann Headers on the 2007 E63 with engine management software and high flow cats made a big difference. The car feels faster and sounds great. Don't know about the headers by themselves.
Last edited by JKK; 12-13-2007 at 09:11 PM.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So.Ca.
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
One of our clients (who posts on the SL55 area) has our ECU work and Renntech headers. He posted a dyno of 486hp @ the wheels.
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So.Ca.
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55
#21
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sactown, CA
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi AS4
I don’t know, however the owner is very in tune with his vehicle. He tracks it (Thunder Hill, Sears Point, I-80, etc.) and was really happy with the upgrades and definitely noticed the improvements. I have a friend that has a couple of Dynapak dynamometers and I will see if we can do a few rips. I’ll post ‘em if I can get ‘em.
#22
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sactown, CA
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi AS4
I have done the Kleemann headers on both the E55 and the E63. Each design is different. The E55 headers have long tubes and the E63 has the short, same company with both versions. The issue is room. The E63 has less room than the E55 and so the compromise is going with the short version (due to space) with larger diameter. To my knowledge, best case would be equal length tubes, larger diameter, with a collector that is smooth and doesn’t create any turbulence within the system. With this set up you can “tune” the exhaust flow and actually create suction to help the intake system breath better. Better breathing = added hp/lbft. With any aftermarket tuner there will always be compromises. There is only so much physical space and therefore only so much room for improvements.
#23
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
good, we are now something further. you say that
-LOG STYLE or SHORTY makes quite no difference
(and that with CATS off is better than with cats on. no question on this)
so, I'm allowed to infer that ONE better difference of modded Shorties versus Stock is because of their larger piping diameter at engine's outlets.
.. but we still miss the main issue: what about LARGE COLLECTOR/OUTLET vs STOCK COLLECTOR ?
-LOG STYLE or SHORTY makes quite no difference
(and that with CATS off is better than with cats on. no question on this)
so, I'm allowed to infer that ONE better difference of modded Shorties versus Stock is because of their larger piping diameter at engine's outlets.
.. but we still miss the main issue: what about LARGE COLLECTOR/OUTLET vs STOCK COLLECTOR ?