W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Header Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-15-2008, 06:27 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
komp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
ML550
Header Dyno Results

Pretty disappointing. I went back to the dyno today to see what gains, if any, the addition of my Evosport shorty headers would make to my otherwise stock car. The headers have been on the car for over a month now.

Using the same dyno, and all else being identical to my prior dyno runs other than the intake air temperature being 4 degrees warmer outside today, I got a peak gain of only 8HP at 5,300 RPM, while peak torque actually declined by 4 ft. lbs. Peak torque remained at 3,000 RPM. My car is now producing 434 RWHP and 491 ft. lbs. of torque, so I am still very pleased overall.

Perhaps others have gotten better results with just the addition of shorty headers, but I'm not one of them. I seriously doubt if shorty headers alone will actually bring anything close to the 20 - 30 RWHP I've seen claimed here. This one ranks as my second worst performance "enhancement" in terms of cost per each HP gained, the worst being on a previously owned car.

What's my next step in the quest - TB or pulley?
Old 02-15-2008, 06:32 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
SteveFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bentley Flying Spur, CL550
Pulley next for sure.

Depending on where you live, you should get some minor cooling mods(spacers, new pump, -10* mod, and 160* stat). All inexpensive and effective as a unit.
Old 02-15-2008, 06:48 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ROCKETW19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Originally Posted by kompressed55
Pretty disappointing. I went back to the dyno today to see what gains, if any, the addition of my Evosport shorty headers would make to my otherwise stock car. The headers have been on the car for over a month now.

Using the same dyno, and all else being identical to my prior dyno runs other than the intake air temperature being 4 degrees warmer outside today, I got a peak gain of only 8HP at 5,300 RPM, while peak torque actually declined by 4 ft. lbs. Peak torque remained at 3,000 RPM. My car is now producing 434 RWHP and 491 ft. lbs. of torque, so I am still very pleased overall.

Perhaps others have gotten better results with just the addition of shorty headers, but I'm not one of them. I seriously doubt if shorty headers alone will actually bring anything close to the 20 - 30 RWHP I've seen claimed here. This one ranks as my second worst performance "enhancement" in terms of cost per each HP gained, the worst being on a previously owned car.

What's my next step in the quest - TB or pulley?
I was never a beliver in the crazy gains people said either. I remember 30 rwhp quotes. I would bet 12hp for shortys.
the good news is your car is/was strong from the start. my car dynoed 401rwhp stock you have a 30hp head start.lol
Old 02-15-2008, 06:50 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ROCKETW19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Oh ya, next mod for sure pully and ECU. that will also make your headers work better. then after you add TB. your headers will be workin to their fullest.
Old 02-15-2008, 06:53 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
psk145's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: orange county, ca
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 E55
did you feel a difference on your butt dyno?

I can definitely feel a gain on the set I had made, but I havent had time to dyno it again.
Old 02-15-2008, 07:23 PM
  #6  
Member
 
LTHL VPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 105
Received 22 Likes on 13 Posts
I dyno'd a set of shorties on my stock car and saw no increase as well. Not too surprising though as headers don't usually see the gains on forced induction cars as you would see on naturally aspirated cars.
Old 02-15-2008, 07:26 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ROCKETW19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Originally Posted by LTHL VPR
I dyno'd a set of shorties on my stock car and saw no increase as well. Not too surprising though as headers don't usually see the gains on forced induction cars as you would see on naturally aspirated cars.
headers IMO shouldnt be added first. there is no need for them untill you do TB and pully. you will see gains after that for sure but I still dont belive the crazy number people quote.
Old 02-15-2008, 07:41 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
komp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
ML550
Originally Posted by psk145
did you feel a difference on your butt dyno?

I can definitely feel a gain on the set I had made, but I havent had time to dyno it again.

Yeah, and I learned my butt dyno was wrong. After the header install, it felt like low end torque (below 2,500 RPM) was down. In fact, the dyno shows decent gains in low end torque with the addition of the headers; e.g. +11 ft. lbs. at 2,500 RPM. The upper RPM range feels like the engine is less restricted, but the power gains measured didn't seem commensurate with the feel of the butt dyno. Either way, the car seems more eager to accelerate with the addition of the headers; they just didn't create gains as large as I had been led to believe I might obtain. Definitely dyno your car and share your experience.
Old 02-15-2008, 07:46 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ROCKETW19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Originally Posted by kompressed55
Yeah, and I learned my butt dyno was wrong. After the header install, it felt like low end torque (below 2,500 RPM) was down. In fact, the dyno shows decent gains in low end torque with the addition of the headers; e.g. +11 ft. lbs. at 2,500 RPM. The upper RPM range feels like the engine is less restricted, but the power gains measured didn't seem commensurate with the feel of the butt dyno. Either way, the car seems more eager to accelerate with the addition of the headers; they just didn't create gains as large as I had been led to believe I might obtain. Definitely dyno your car and share your experience.
psk145s results will be better than yours due to the fact he has a pully. your letting your motor breath better but first you need to give it a reason to breath better (TB, pully)
Old 02-15-2008, 07:48 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
phatmitzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55
Get rid of your primaries and let it breath.
Old 02-15-2008, 07:57 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S600TT, R350
On the car with pulley and tune, the headers make a nice 20-25RWHP gain. On a stock car, stock manifolds are OK.

I will going through of these bolton again on Jangies E55, will be able to see all of the gains, part by part.
Old 02-15-2008, 08:18 PM
  #12  
Out Of Control!!
 
jangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 S212
I'm expecting to get slightly better bottom end and hopefully about 20hp. Anything more is butter.
Old 02-15-2008, 08:22 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
komp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
ML550
Originally Posted by Vadim @ VRP
I will going through of these bolton again on Jangies E55, will be able to see all of the gains, part by part.
Yep, that's my plan too. Measure the gains produced by each add-on. I'm thinking pulley is the next project.
Old 02-16-2008, 03:48 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,154
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
cls 55 or FIAT Coupe T20v-6speed
Originally Posted by kompressed55
Yeah, and I learned my butt dyno was wrong. After the header install, it felt like low end torque (below 2,500 RPM) was down. In fact, the dyno shows decent gains in low end torque with the addition of the headers; e.g. +11 ft. lbs. at 2,500 RPM. The upper RPM range feels like the engine is less restricted, but the power gains measured didn't seem commensurate with the feel of the butt dyno. Either way, the car seems more eager to accelerate with the addition of the headers; they just didn't create gains as large as I had been led to believe I might obtain. Definitely dyno your car and share your experience.
I think result is not bad, considering that only difference is because of some steel curving ..: quite same primary pipes diameter and stock outlet port.

I got the idea that, other things equal, benefit comes even from larger pipes' dia.
therefore VRP's that I think have a 1.75" diameter should do better ..
Old 02-16-2008, 04:50 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
NGS_E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 CLS63 2004 S55
Even at 20hp, have you guys done the $/hp? I am considering discounted headers and even at a discount, it doesnt seem so appealing.
Old 02-16-2008, 09:49 AM
  #16  
Super Member
 
higginsbeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E55 AMG and 2003 C320 4Matic Miss my 993 Turbo above!!
Originally Posted by kompressed55
Pretty disappointing. I went back to the dyno today to see what gains, if any, the addition of my Evosport shorty headers would make to my otherwise stock car. The headers have been on the car for over a month now.

Using the same dyno, and all else being identical to my prior dyno runs other than the intake air temperature being 4 degrees warmer outside today, I got a peak gain of only 8HP at 5,300 RPM, while peak torque actually declined by 4 ft. lbs. Peak torque remained at 3,000 RPM. My car is now producing 434 RWHP and 491 ft. lbs. of torque, so I am still very pleased overall.

Perhaps others have gotten better results with just the addition of shorty headers, but I'm not one of them. I seriously doubt if shorty headers alone will actually bring anything close to the 20 - 30 RWHP I've seen claimed here. This one ranks as my second worst performance "enhancement" in terms of cost per each HP gained, the worst being on a previously owned car.

What's my next step in the quest - TB or pulley?
I have the same headers but had them installed with an 80mm Throttle Body and it kicks ***. Get the TB and you won't be sorry. As it was explained to me, you have more air that can go into the Supercharger with the headers, now you can force more air into it with a TB. The two can together quite nicely and than an ECU tune to tie it together for more HP....TB is an expensive Mod but BOY OH BOY is sounds like a giant Vacuum sucking air into the supercharger........
Old 02-16-2008, 10:31 AM
  #17  
Out Of Control!!
 
jangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 S212
From a $ analysis, you need to keep in mind that the headers should actually come AFTER you modify the intake. In that respect, you have typically already started to approach the diminishing returns. By contrast, look into $2500 for an easy 50 (HP and TQ) with the pulley and ecu.

On a forced induction, why open the back end when the front is tight? You only put in as much air as the screw and other associated backpressures allow. The headers basically come into play at the top end, when the screw is really being more of a restriction than a help. The headers help to drop the localized pressure, and therefore increase the airflow. On a dyno chart, I would look mostly at the HP curve to be more linear, rather than plataeuing out.

EVO Headers are nice. You kind of twisted it by getting them first, but they are still nice. Just add more bol on toys and you will be happy.
Old 02-16-2008, 11:55 AM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55 RUSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E55K
My car made 535 HP at the crank with just shorties...
Old 02-16-2008, 12:15 PM
  #19  
Out Of Control!!
 
jangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 S212
Originally Posted by E55 RUSS
My car made 535 HP at the crank with just shorties...
At the crank? Did you measure or are you "correcting"? What was it at the wheels?
Old 02-16-2008, 12:25 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55 RUSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E55K
It was my 1st dyno ever...on Dyno Dynamics and machine calculates it self...I know its not right but everybody measures here crank HP...
Old 02-16-2008, 12:48 PM
  #21  
Out Of Control!!
 
jangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 S212
Do you know the wheel numbers? It would be interesting to see what just shorties really adds to a stock car on the dyno. I'm not so sure that the gains can really be captured that way, but just curious.
Old 02-16-2008, 12:56 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
komp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
ML550
Originally Posted by jangy
It would be interesting to see what just shorties really adds to a stock car on the dyno.
See my original post. Just shorties added to a stock car. 8 RWHP.
Old 02-16-2008, 03:27 PM
  #23  
Out Of Control!!
 
jangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 S212
Originally Posted by kompressed55
See my original post. Just shorties added to a stock car. 8 RWHP.

Sorry bro, I was asking Russ, but didn't make it clear. i was just curious to see if he claims different numbers than yours. I dunno that we have any other data on a stock setup with just headers.
Old 02-16-2008, 05:19 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,154
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
cls 55 or FIAT Coupe T20v-6speed
Originally Posted by jangy
Sorry bro, I was asking Russ, but didn't make it clear. i was just curious to see if he claims different numbers than yours. I dunno that we have any other data on a stock setup with just headers.

Russ probably had the popular chip tuning that gives 525 crank HP
.. so, shorties added 10 , or 8 at wheels.
seems correct.
Old 02-16-2008, 06:23 PM
  #25  
Out Of Control!!
 
jangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 S212
Originally Posted by dyno
Russ probably had the popular chip tuning that gives 525 crank HP
.. so, shorties added 10 , or 8 at wheels.
seems correct.
What chip tuning that gives 525 at the crank? Sorry for the ignorance, but i have only recently begun to believe that anyone has a clue about MB ECUs.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Header Dyno Results



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM.