Heat Exchangers
A bar and plate has better internal aerodynamics, and a tube fin has better external aerodynamics. Everything being exactly equal, the bar and plate will have a lower pressure drop (by like, 1% if that), but the charge air will be hotter and will be more prone to heat soak because of the poorer external aerodynamics. However, you can overcome the poor internal aerodynamics by using a core with more rows, making it better in both aspects than the bar and plate. Which is what we did.
If you are upgrading your intercooler, then you should use a bar and plate design. If you are wanting to upgrade your heat exchanger, then you should use a tube and fin because of its low pressure.
Hands down our tube and fin HE will outperform even the slightly larger bar and plate unit on the market. Not to mention that it costs half the price.
LET Motorsports has done extensive research on this and we have teamed up with C&R Racing, who is known for providing the same cores we purchased to the top Nascar teams.
Call David Bridges @ C&R if you care to hear his opinion on bar & plate vs tube & fin in low pressure, air to water instances.
Again bar & plate is better for FMIC's....but that is not what we have. The unit mounted on the front of our car is a heat exchanger (FMHE), not an intercooler (FMIC). Our IC is mounted below the supercharger.
Last edited by sales@eurocharged.com; Mar 11, 2008 at 09:27 AM.
A bar and plate has better internal aerodynamics, and a tube fin has better external aerodynamics. Everything being exactly equal, the bar and plate will have a lower pressure drop (by like, 1% if that), but the charge air will be hotter and will be more prone to heat soak because of the poorer external aerodynamics. However, you can overcome the poor internal aerodynamics by using a core with more rows, making it better in both aspects than the bar and plate. Which is what we did.
If you are upgrading your intercooler, then you should use a bar and plate design. If you are wanting to upgrade your heat exchanger, then you should use a tube and fin because of its low pressure.
Hands down our tube and fin HE will outperform even the slightly larger bar and plate unit on the market. Not to mention that it costs half the price.
LET Motorsports has done extensive research on this and we have teamed up with C&R Racing, who is known for providing the same cores we purchased to the top Nascar teams.
Call David Bridges @ C&R if you care to hear his opinion on bar & plate vs tube & fin in low pressure, air to water instances.
Again bar & plate is better for FMIC's....but that is not what we have. The unit mounted on the front of our car is a heat exchanger (FMHE), not an intercooler (FMIC). Our IC is mounted below the supercharger.
now I have to change my signature to FM HE!
for the price.. its a great set up.
I'm not sure about the out perform part..
its hard to say.. unless you test 2 different STOCK cars, same pump on both cars, on the same day with both units and road testing using a data log software (not dyno).
this probably can be done once more LET's units hit the road.
The first set of sheets is from our 5" unit on a pullied car. The second set of sheets is with the 7" unit with no pulley. As you can see, our units produce great results. They also look great in the bumper. All units now have larger angled end tanks as well for superior flow to square tanks.


I forgot to label, dark blue is IAT, light blue is speed.


Do you separate the cooling lines? Are the results above still 1-line or 2-line?
I plan to separate my cooling... but thinking of using stock H/E (so smaller than yours) since I have a spare one
Wonder how much of the difference in terms of IAT impact:1-line bigger H/E vs. 2-line stock H/E.
Separating the coolant circuit on the E55 does not yield the kind of gains it does on the C32. On the C32, separating the circuit, without adding more capacity has been good for -8° IAT at full boost. There is hardly a difference on the E55.
Unless you are going to be running a larger reservoir, I wouldn't worry about separating. Although, maybe you should call David Bridges first, he might know lol.
And any insight to illiterate mind why it would work w/ C32 but not E55? Is it because the engine size?
I would love to compare the HE's head to head on the forum.
In fact, our HE's were compared by a 3rd party on the C32 and they chose ours as best performing.....or do you not remember?
Secondly, our single unit will work with all E55's. We use Mercedes OEM brackets to mount the oil cooler. We also use the same 4 bumper support bolts to mount the HE.
Last but not least, our unit costs $275 less than yours and yes, it shows better numbers.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
1. it is not the opinion of one guy, please provide me with some data that imperically states that bar and plate is superior to tube and fin for a water to air application...
2. if someone would like to do the testing as an independent third party, i would be willing to provide them with one of our units...

The first set of sheets is from our 5" unit on a pullied car. The second set of sheets is with the 7" unit with no pulley. As you can see, our units produce great results. They also look great in the bumper. All units now have larger angled end tanks as well for superior flow to square tanks.


I forgot to label, dark blue is IAT, light blue is speed.



My jab was at the ridiculous thought of calling some random guy to hear his thoughts on why one is better than the other.
Being that you guys are just getting into the E55 market, please take the time to read all of the forum posts that pertain to this same debate. There is a great deal of dialogue between Victor and myself on the subject, with all the technical information you could ask for. No need to rehash it here. I have gone to great lengths to explain the benefits of BP core in air-water systems.
Out of curiosity, what is that graph you are posting? Mods, car, speeds, temps. Any useful data would be interesting instead of just splashing some random piece of datalogging....In fact, just start a new thread about the incredible results so we can get all the facts. No need to have it floating in here.
As far as the C32, please...Two guys tested it on a dyno lol. I would be more than happy to post real world datalogging. As I remember, the guy with my unit made more power..? But we can take that to the C32 forum...
Just so that everyone is clear, we sell one unit that fits every year E55. We also offer an upgraded, larger unit for the 03 with no oil cooler. We sell them as fast as we build them. I will put one aside for some head to head testing. Let me know when you guys have one built.
the head to head comparison was on a car strapped on a dyno..
the graphs displayed were from 2 different cars with different set ups in terms of mods.
to date I'm not sure if a proper road testing data logging has taken place between similar packaged cars...
this country is great, since you get to buy at Walmart or Target, depending on your wallet and needs.
Personal opinion: the bar and plate just looks better and probably will take a beating better than the tube and fin. Once a rock hits those fins, it will not look as nice.
The same will apply on the Bar and plate units, but the damage won't be as noticeable.
just my .02$
I'm adding a trunk mount like many have done.
This is the one I'll be using...

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
Brandon,
Thats the one that I've bought. It fits in the trunk nicely.

You are right Joe, BP can take a beating. I guess part of the testing should be dropping the unit off of a roof
If I look at a TF core funny, it will bend.Look guys, really, I don't care. Congratulations on creating a bargain priced unit. I am sure it will preform great and sell well. Best of luck.
I'm adding a trunk mount like many have done.
This is the one I'll be using...

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
Brandon,
Thats the one that I've bought. It fits in the trunk nicely.

I'm adding a trunk mount like many have done.
This is the one I'll be using...

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
Brandon,
Thats the one that I've bought. It fits in the trunk nicely.

Why don't both of you meet up on a sunny day, install your respective HE, datalog all the pertinent information and post the results. I think both companies make a great product and are priced significantly less than the alternatives.
Well put.
I've seen the prototype LET unit, and it isn't too shabby.
I look forward to putting one on my car. As a matter of fact, I look forward to putting a bunch of LET stuff on my car.

I've never really seen a huge difference in performance between the two designs on a street-driven vehicle....all things being equal, I may not want to pay the weight penalty of a BP setup.
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, yadda yadda yadda...
Yeah, its an extra tank to hold more water, and a place for the water to sit longer to cool before its being sucked back into the intercooler(After passing the HE).
Why don't both of you meet up on a sunny day, install your respective HE, datalog all the pertinent information and post the results. I think both companies make a great product and are priced significantly less than the alternatives.
best of all.. I'm a happy customer either way I turn.
wether its Tube and Fin or Bar and Plate.. its a must mod for any E55.
I use Code3, because they are local. If this was the othe way around.. I would use LET. Its all business here.. and let's not take it personal.





