W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

cts-v 556hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-11-2008, 03:10 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,722
Received 555 Likes on 366 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by chiromikey
ok, what if i say it? the last gen cts felt cheap and imho there's no other way to put it.
+1, dash materials were below even the Corvette's, which are abyssimal. I've driven a few last-gen CTS' and Nissan definitely makes a better interior. The new model, however, is a few lightyears ahead. Caddy REALLY stepped up to the plate, you absolutely cannot compare the two.
Old 06-11-2008, 03:12 PM
  #27  
Member
 
RAVEN_CTS-V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'81 Mondial 8
Originally Posted by chiromikey
ok, what if i say it? the last gen cts felt cheap and imho there's no other way to put it.
Since cheap is a very subjective term, I would tend to believe you, as you drive an E55. To call a CTS-V cheap and say that German cars are the only way to go, and drive a Sentra - seems funny, at least to me. I can tell you right now, that most of the Nissans I've sat in have felt and looked cheap.

I had a 1st Gen V - I did not think it felt cheap. It had no rattles or parts falling off. I did have problems with the diff - that was plenty. But cheapness was never one of the things that bothered me. The interior [especially the dash] was certainly plain and spartan-looking, but so is a C63 inside. I don't mind that in a sport-oriented vehicle.

Anyway - it just seems easy to lump all American cars into one group and call them cheap. I'll always stick up for the ones that deserve it.
Old 06-11-2008, 03:40 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProV1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MB, BMW
i recently checked out the current gen CTS and W204 C-class. C-class had a far cheaper looking interior with inferior plastic everywhere.

i'm hoping MB doesn't cheapen the hell out of W212 E-class..
Old 06-11-2008, 04:25 PM
  #29  
Super Member
 
rkao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'12 ML350
Admittedly this is a third person account, but a friend who's also an enthusiast (Porsche and Audi guy right now) commented that at the recent NYIAS, he had a chance to take a close look at the CTS (not sure if it was a V, did they have one there?) and he was very impressed by it inside and out.

So given the man drives an '06 Audi A8, I'd take his comment that the CTS was well screwed together and had a nice interior with more than a grain of salt...
Old 06-11-2008, 05:01 PM
  #30  
Super Member
 
Mathmik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MARYLAND
Posts: 680
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14-F Sport, 07-CLS63 2003-HUMMER 2004-Suburban 2008-MAX 2005-YZF R1
I'll take one! Ofcourse I'm getting Warranty with it! then I'm gonna smoke the tire just like in the video!!!!!!!
Old 06-11-2008, 06:08 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
here is a video of it doing a burnout....


http://www.dragtimes.com/blog/2009-c...-burnout-video
Truly a lesson I wish the Germans would get through their thick heads.

IF YOU ARE GONNA GIVE US OVER 500HP, GIVE US FRIGGIN LSD standard!!!!!

Glad GM was using the noggin. LSD standard on that Cad.



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: cts-v 556hp



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 PM.