W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Motor Builder Test & Compare

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-08-2008, 03:41 AM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
NSX2NV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 586
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03' E55 Techtite Grey
Motor Builder Test & Compare

I was just wondering has anyone ever tested to see which mechanic makes the best horse numbers? I'm talking about the actual AMG techs who built the motor initially thats signs the charger when finished. I think this would be a really interesting thing to test and compare.
Old 07-08-2008, 09:55 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
I think I have pretty much figured out that the differing HP numbers come from different setup of the rings causing different piston compression numbers.

Mine was literally on the BOTTOM of the scale and thus a lower hp stock car. Higgins tested nearly at the top of the scale when he did his compression test and again, his car is a monster with just a K2 package.

Need to have a sticky. "Before buying a used 55, DO A COMPRESSION CHECK"

The numbers you get off the pistons will literally be an indicator where your car will fall on the hp scale AND the modding ET scale.

Perhaps the AMG guys are installing the rings a tiny bit differently and certain motors setup better etc, but otherwise I think it just comes down to how she sets up under initial breakin period. Fly in the ointment is Gid_e_up. He drove it like he stole it new off the lot and pulled the highest stock numbers we have seen. 517hp est crank at Kleemann while mine a week or 2 later pulled an embarrassing 470something.
Old 07-08-2008, 01:21 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Skeeter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55, Renntech Pulley, ECU
Interesting! My E put up some strong numbers when I had it dyno'd stock (forget now, but I'll dig up the thread or dyno sheet when I go to work Thursday).

I now have TWO friends who want to buy E55's now. What type of compression numbers should they look for? What is 'good' and what isn't? I'm giving generic advice. Like don't EVER deal with the dealership-from-hell (S.F. Mercedes, or MB of Oakland), buy a low-mile 2005 with a CPO warranty, make sure it has keyless go and the premium package... Pano roof is a personal choice, etc... But to be able to advise/predict stock power based on compression, that'd be a good word to pass on.

Thanks,

Skeeter
Old 07-08-2008, 01:41 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jrcart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Naperville, IL/Chicago
Posts: 6,621
Received 54 Likes on 44 Posts
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
I hate to rain on your parade, but it would be near impossible to figure out what you guys are talking about. No matter how well calibrated, all dynos are going to show slightly different numbers. In addition to that, there are so many other factors that come into play when dyno testing a car such as elevation, temp, humidity etc.. Now throw in the different dyno manufactures and varying software and you have a whole mess of variables. Just because your car showed low numbers does not mean anything, but if it shows consistant lower numbers on different days and different shops dynos, it would be safe to assume you have a low HP engine. I've seen as much as a 5% variance on some of my cars from one dyno to another. You can take the same car, dyno test it today and then dyno it again in a few days on the same dyno and get slightly different numbers with a different curve. Most of us do not have access to climate and humidity controlled dyno rooms. I had my car dyno tested by Evosport in late February when the completed my mods, I believe they showed 500.3RWHP. A week later I dyno tested it at home, near Chicago and the car made 502.4RWHP, over two more WHP than Evosports dyno showed just a week previous. The thing that suprises me about those numbers are that I would have guessed the car would have made more HP on the Evosport dyno, they are in Huntington Beach, California which is at or very near sea level, Chicago is 600-700 feet above sea level if I'm not mistaken.
Old 07-08-2008, 07:18 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rflow306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mia
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 E 55
Originally Posted by Skeeter
Interesting! My E put up some strong numbers when I had it dyno'd stock (forget now, but I'll dig up the thread or dyno sheet when I go to work Thursday).

I now have TWO friends who want to buy E55's now. What type of compression numbers should they look for? What is 'good' and what isn't? I'm giving generic advice. Like don't EVER deal with the dealership-from-hell (S.F. Mercedes, or MB of Oakland), buy a low-mile 2005 with a CPO warranty, make sure it has keyless go and the premium package... Pano roof is a personal choice, etc... But to be able to advise/predict stock power based on compression, that'd be a good word to pass on.

Thanks,

Skeeter
The accepted values are 9 to 12 Bar, limit value is 8 bar and maximum allowed difference between cylinders is 1.5 Bar.1 bar = 14.503 psi

Originally Posted by jrcart
I hate to rain on your parade, but it would be near impossible to figure out what you guys are talking about. No matter how well calibrated, all dynos are going to show slightly different numbers. In addition to that, there are so many other factors that come into play when dyno testing a car such as elevation, temp, humidity etc.. Now throw in the different dyno manufactures and varying software and you have a whole mess of variables. Just because your car showed low numbers does not mean anything, but if it shows consistant lower numbers on different days and different shops dynos, it would be safe to assume you have a low HP engine. I've seen as much as a 5% variance on some of my cars from one dyno to another. You can take the same car, dyno test it today and then dyno it again in a few days on the same dyno and get slightly different numbers with a different curve. Most of us do not have access to climate and humidity controlled dyno rooms. I had my car dyno tested by Evosport in late February when the completed my mods, I believe they showed 500.3RWHP. A week later I dyno tested it at home, near Chicago and the car made 502.4RWHP, over two more WHP than Evosports dyno showed just a week previous. The thing that suprises me about those numbers are that I would have guessed the car would have made more HP on the Evosport dyno, they are in Huntington Beach, California which is at or very near sea level, Chicago is 600-700 feet above sea level if I'm not mistaken.
That's why the reading is sae corrected, if you were to compare uncorrected numbers and weather conditions you would see the difference from both locations.

Last edited by rflow306; 07-08-2008 at 07:29 PM.
Old 07-08-2008, 08:35 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S600TT, R350
I had my car dyno tested by Evosport in late February when the completed my mods, I believe they showed 500.3RWHP. A week later I dyno tested it at home, near Chicago and the car made 502.4RWHP, over two more WHP than Evosports dyno showed just a week previous. The thing that suprises me about those numbers are that I would have guessed the car would have made more HP on the Evosport dyno, they are in Huntington Beach, California which is at or very near sea level, Chicago is 600-700 feet above sea level if I'm not mistaken.
502.4 - 500.3 = 2.1, (2.1/500.3) = 0.4%. Well with 1-2% that I have seen Dynojets to be.

When Dynojet at Evosport was instaled in December of 1997, it was the third one in Southern California. Kenne Bell and HKS were the other two. We ran a Taurus SHO on all three dynoes on the same day, all of them were very close to 250RWHP, plus a minus a 0.5HP.
Old 07-08-2008, 09:01 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Murtaza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63S coupe, X5M
Originally Posted by Jakpro1
517hp est crank at Kleemann while mine a week or 2 later pulled an embarrassing 470something.
Interesting results but did you actually race your friend to see if he really had +47hp on you? Dynos vary but a race won't lie, he would pull on you significantly with that much difference in power.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Motor Builder Test & Compare



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 AM.