My first run in with a E63.
08-04-2008, 12:20 AM
#51
Senior Member
no offense, but i would have believed you if you weren't swearing and so personal about the other driver in the video. Sounded a bit too serious there about taking him out and bragging your car was better.
Last edited by ruey220; 08-04-2008 at 12:24 AM.
08-04-2008, 12:31 AM
#52
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Santa Barbara & Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32, Cobra, 700hp Vespa
Sweet video and glad to see you had fun! 
Right when the video started, before looking at your location, I knew it was New York! So recognizable. I miss it.
-AS
Right when the video started, before looking at your location, I knew it was New York! So recognizable. I miss it.
-AS
08-04-2008, 06:38 AM
#53
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
11 Posts
2006 s65. Ford Excursion 6.0. Pontiac GTO convertible. Porsche 944 Turbo SCCA car. Wife-E550 and 968
If you look at the first sticky on the w211 forum, you will see all of the details. A few of the guys up here are bringing their highly modded and very fast e55's, they run mid 11's. I'm trying to convince a friend of mine with a bone stock 55 to drive down with me... he and I aren't really sure who's car is faster - it seems like mine above 80, his from 10-70, all bets are off on a street launch.
08-04-2008, 11:50 AM
#54
Senior Member
If you look at the first sticky on the w211 forum, you will see all of the details. A few of the guys up here are bringing their highly modded and very fast e55's, they run mid 11's. I'm trying to convince a friend of mine with a bone stock 55 to drive down with me... he and I aren't really sure who's car is faster - it seems like mine above 80, his from 10-70, all bets are off on a street launch.
08-04-2008, 01:22 PM
#55
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
hey im kind of interested in the MIR meet, but it would be my first time going to the track. Do i need a helmet? can i rent there if i do or do i have to buy one?
08-04-2008, 02:21 PM
#56
Super Member
Most times you can borrow a helmet from the people showing up, unless you have a huge mug like mine, or are running Jerry-curl all over your hair.
You'll have fun, don't be nervous.
08-04-2008, 08:00 PM
#57
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Potomac, MD
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2007 SL550 - Aegean Blue; 2008 E63 Wagon - Iridium Silver
that is one of the saddest examples of a race I have ever seen. Your broken in 55 vs an unbroken in 63...in tons of traffic to top it off.
nice kill.......NOT....
One more example of how far down and fast this forum is going....
+1...
nice kill.......NOT....
One more example of how far down and fast this forum is going....
+1...
Last edited by pcalver; 08-04-2008 at 08:03 PM.
08-04-2008, 08:35 PM
#58
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
11 Posts
2006 s65. Ford Excursion 6.0. Pontiac GTO convertible. Porsche 944 Turbo SCCA car. Wife-E550 and 968
Good news, you have plenty of time to go to a track near you to practice prior to 11/15! If you go to ATCO, my guess is Oldgixxer will be lurking around there, and he appears to be quite the drag-racing bad*ss. I'd say to PM him, but apparently he has been banned around here for not "complying". The drag racing sticky is good, but expect not to be that great your first few runs, it is hard to get a handle on a good launch... I'm still not that great and I've brought the benz 4 or 5 times. The other good news is that some of the better guys around at launching will be there to give you tips. You do need a helmet, which you can get for about 100 bucks at any motorcycle store, just check the tracks required snell rating and make sure the helmet meets the rating... for that reason I would only buy a used one if it is recent vintage. But you should definitely come, just make sure your IC pump is working, a cheap fix and something that appears to break on many 55s, and will slow you down dramatically if it is malfunctioning. Z
08-05-2008, 04:53 PM
#59
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
04 w211 E55
Well the reason why I was swearing was because I got a little excited when I actually saw that my car was pulling on his. I was a little carried away but still not bragging. You see it your way still doesn't matter to me.
08-05-2008, 05:29 PM
#60
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix by way of Texas
Posts: 1,010
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
:ducksandrunsforcover:
08-06-2008, 01:12 AM
#61
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E63
I've raced plenty of 55's, including on the track. There are a few vids around here evidencing so. The 55 (in stock form) is SLOW and will always loose to the 63 (too much torque and not enough horse power). It's always about some guy, somewhere else, that posted a great time (at the track without a 63 to represent). Every 55 I have raced has LOST and there have been plenty of people around to witness. 
08-06-2008, 01:14 AM
#62
MBWorld Fanatic!
I've raced plenty of 55's, including on the track. There are a few vids around here evidencing so. The 55 (in stock form) is SLOW and will always loose to the 63 (too much torque and not enough horse power). It's always about some guy, somewhere else, that posted a great time (at the track without a 63 to represent). Every 55 I have raced has LOST and there have been plenty of people around to witness. 
and i can't even comment on your "slow" remark because i'm laughing so hard.
08-06-2008, 02:10 AM
#63
MBWorld Fanatic!
From what i have seen dyno wise, credit is in the 55k dyno if we are talking rw hp stock numbers
08-06-2008, 02:40 AM
#64
MBWorld Fanatic!
...i have no idea what your second statement means.
08-06-2008, 03:19 AM
#65
MBWorld Fanatic!
Still though they are pretty close regardless
08-06-2008, 11:26 AM
#66
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix by way of Texas
Posts: 1,010
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
I've raced plenty of 55's, including on the track. There are a few vids around here evidencing so. The 55 (in stock form) is SLOW and will always loose to the 63 (too much torque and not enough horse power). It's always about some guy, somewhere else, that posted a great time (at the track without a 63 to represent). Every 55 I have raced has LOST and there have been plenty of people around to witness. 
08-06-2008, 11:53 PM
#68
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
04 w211 E55
I've raced plenty of 55's, including on the track. There are a few vids around here evidencing so. The 55 (in stock form) is SLOW and will always loose to the 63 (too much torque and not enough horse power). It's always about some guy, somewhere else, that posted a great time (at the track without a 63 to represent). Every 55 I have raced has LOST and there have been plenty of people around to witness.
08-07-2008, 12:12 AM
#69
MBWorld Fanatic!
Tom
08-07-2008, 12:32 AM
#70
I researched this to help not to pick one over the other...(keep in mind I don't own either)
E55 drag times: http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
E63 dragtimes:http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
Edmunds.com specs
E55 stock: 469 HP, 575 torque, 0-60 4.5, curb weight: 4087
E63 stock: 507 hp, 465 torque, 0-60 4.2, curb weight: 4035
So quite frankly guys its a drivers race based off these specs. In my opinion the E63 has a better look but the E55 has way cheaper mods and easier to modify. No reason to act like one is honestly way faster then the other cause these specs just don't make it seem so. If this was a C32 vs. a C63 stock for stock comparison I would understand but its not its comparing 2 very close spec cars. The difference in HP is +38 to E63 but torque is +110 E55. Its takes one post to start a slugfest between owners.
E55 drag times: http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
E63 dragtimes:http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
Edmunds.com specs
E55 stock: 469 HP, 575 torque, 0-60 4.5, curb weight: 4087
E63 stock: 507 hp, 465 torque, 0-60 4.2, curb weight: 4035
So quite frankly guys its a drivers race based off these specs. In my opinion the E63 has a better look but the E55 has way cheaper mods and easier to modify. No reason to act like one is honestly way faster then the other cause these specs just don't make it seem so. If this was a C32 vs. a C63 stock for stock comparison I would understand but its not its comparing 2 very close spec cars. The difference in HP is +38 to E63 but torque is +110 E55. Its takes one post to start a slugfest between owners.
Last edited by c32used; 08-07-2008 at 02:54 PM.
08-07-2008, 12:54 AM
#71
MBWorld Fanatic!
I researched this to help not to pick one over the other...(keep in mind I don't own either)
E55 drag times: http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
E63 dragtimes:http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
E55 stock: 469 HP, 575 torque, 0-60 4.5, curb weight: 4087
E63 stock: 507 hp, 465 torque, 0-60 4.2, curb weight: 4035
So quite frankly guys its a drivers race based off these specs. In my opinion the E63 has a better look but the E55 has way cheaper mods and easier to modify. No reason to act like one is honestly way faster then the other cause these specs just don't make it seem so. If this was a C32 vs. a C63 stock for stock comparison I would understand but its not its comparing 2 very close spec cars. The difference in HP is +38 to E63 but torque is +110 E55. Its takes one post to start a slugfest between owners.
E55 drag times: http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
E63 dragtimes:http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
E55 stock: 469 HP, 575 torque, 0-60 4.5, curb weight: 4087
E63 stock: 507 hp, 465 torque, 0-60 4.2, curb weight: 4035
So quite frankly guys its a drivers race based off these specs. In my opinion the E63 has a better look but the E55 has way cheaper mods and easier to modify. No reason to act like one is honestly way faster then the other cause these specs just don't make it seem so. If this was a C32 vs. a C63 stock for stock comparison I would understand but its not its comparing 2 very close spec cars. The difference in HP is +38 to E63 but torque is +110 E55. Its takes one post to start a slugfest between owners.
(must stir pot, stir stir stir )
08-07-2008, 01:02 AM
#72
