My first run in with a E63.
Last edited by ruey220; Aug 4, 2008 at 12:24 AM.

Right when the video started, before looking at your location, I knew it was New York! So recognizable. I miss it.
-AS
Most times you can borrow a helmet from the people showing up, unless you have a huge mug like mine, or are running Jerry-curl all over your hair.

You'll have fun, don't be nervous.
nice kill.......NOT....
One more example of how far down and fast this forum is going....
+1...
Last edited by pcalver; Aug 4, 2008 at 08:03 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
:ducksandrunsforcover:

I've raced plenty of 55's, including on the track. There are a few vids around here evidencing so. The 55 (in stock form) is SLOW and will always loose to the 63 (too much torque and not enough horse power). It's always about some guy, somewhere else, that posted a great time (at the track without a 63 to represent). Every 55 I have raced has LOST and there have been plenty of people around to witness. 


I've raced plenty of 55's, including on the track. There are a few vids around here evidencing so. The 55 (in stock form) is SLOW and will always loose to the 63 (too much torque and not enough horse power). It's always about some guy, somewhere else, that posted a great time (at the track without a 63 to represent). Every 55 I have raced has LOST and there have been plenty of people around to witness. 


and i can't even comment on your "slow" remark because i'm laughing so hard.
From what i have seen dyno wise, credit is in the 55k dyno if we are talking rw hp stock numbers
...i have no idea what your second statement means.
Still though they are pretty close regardless

I've raced plenty of 55's, including on the track. There are a few vids around here evidencing so. The 55 (in stock form) is SLOW and will always loose to the 63 (too much torque and not enough horse power). It's always about some guy, somewhere else, that posted a great time (at the track without a 63 to represent). Every 55 I have raced has LOST and there have been plenty of people around to witness. 







I've raced plenty of 55's, including on the track. There are a few vids around here evidencing so. The 55 (in stock form) is SLOW and will always loose to the 63 (too much torque and not enough horse power). It's always about some guy, somewhere else, that posted a great time (at the track without a 63 to represent). Every 55 I have raced has LOST and there have been plenty of people around to witness. 



Tom
E55 drag times: http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
E63 dragtimes:http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
Edmunds.com specs
E55 stock: 469 HP, 575 torque, 0-60 4.5, curb weight: 4087
E63 stock: 507 hp, 465 torque, 0-60 4.2, curb weight: 4035
So quite frankly guys its a drivers race based off these specs. In my opinion the E63 has a better look but the E55 has way cheaper mods and easier to modify. No reason to act like one is honestly way faster then the other cause these specs just don't make it seem so. If this was a C32 vs. a C63 stock for stock comparison I would understand but its not its comparing 2 very close spec cars. The difference in HP is +38 to E63 but torque is +110 E55. Its takes one post to start a slugfest between owners.
Last edited by c32used; Aug 7, 2008 at 02:54 PM.
E55 drag times: http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
E63 dragtimes:http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes
E55 stock: 469 HP, 575 torque, 0-60 4.5, curb weight: 4087
E63 stock: 507 hp, 465 torque, 0-60 4.2, curb weight: 4035
So quite frankly guys its a drivers race based off these specs. In my opinion the E63 has a better look but the E55 has way cheaper mods and easier to modify. No reason to act like one is honestly way faster then the other cause these specs just don't make it seem so. If this was a C32 vs. a C63 stock for stock comparison I would understand but its not its comparing 2 very close spec cars. The difference in HP is +38 to E63 but torque is +110 E55. Its takes one post to start a slugfest between owners.

(must stir pot, stir stir stir
)










