ZR-1 Dyno
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
ZR-1 Dyno
530rwhp and 508rwtq. Less than the VRP 700 package but of course much lighter weight. Add DR's and I bet high 10's @131 are common this fall/winter.
http://www.dragtimes.com/2009-Chevro...phs-16437.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/2009-Chevro...phs-16437.html
#2
530rwhp and 508rwtq. Less than the VRP 700 package but of course much lighter weight. Add DR's and I bet high 10's @131 are common this fall/winter.
http://www.dragtimes.com/2009-Chevro...phs-16437.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/2009-Chevro...phs-16437.html
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Lotus Elise SLK55
530whp is absolutely pathetic. A regular C6 with a bolt-on supercharger makes a lot more for less than half the price (while looking 99% the same)... not sure what everyone is getting so exited about
An LS3 C6, (naturally aspired!) with bolt-ons can make 500whp. This is NA, not boosted:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Chevrolet-C...lip-12827.html
P.S. I'm not even talking about a twin-turbo C6... which is on a whole other level.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
An LS3 C6, (naturally aspired!) with bolt-ons can make 500whp. This is NA, not boosted:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Chevrolet-C...lip-12827.html
P.S. I'm not even talking about a twin-turbo C6... which is on a whole other level.
#5
530whp is absolutely pathetic. A regular C6 with a bolt-on supercharger makes a lot more for less than half the price (while looking 99% the same)... not sure what everyone is getting so exited about
An LS3 C6, (naturally aspired!) with bolt-ons can make 500whp. This is NA, not boosted:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Chevrolet-C...lip-12827.html
P.S. I'm not even talking about a twin-turbo C6... which is on a whole other level.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
An LS3 C6, (naturally aspired!) with bolt-ons can make 500whp. This is NA, not boosted:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Chevrolet-C...lip-12827.html
P.S. I'm not even talking about a twin-turbo C6... which is on a whole other level.
Sean, looks like they tuned it to make the extra power.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Lotus Elise SLK55
You guys do realize that Z06 can make 580whp with bolt-ons, and its all linear N/A power with far more controllable power delivery that you can actually put down. Look at ZR1's dyno, it has 100wtq more at 3.5k RPM than it does at 6.5k RPM
Not to mention Z06 is a much lighter car that will handle better. I just don't see what's so impressive about ZR1 that they are charging $120k for it. OK so it can make 600whp tuned, big freakin deal. C6 twin-turbo can make 1,000whp tuned
If you're going to tune the car for maximum power, twin-turbo makes a whole lot more sense than a supercharger.
Not only does it put down more power, but more importantly, Viper actually looks like a car that costs $100k. ZR1 looks the same as a $40k C6. I think its pretty clear than GM is desperately trying to exploit their customers with the ZR1..
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Not only does it put down more power, but more importantly, Viper actually looks like a car that costs $100k. ZR1 looks the same as a $40k C6. I think its pretty clear than GM is desperately trying to exploit their customers with the ZR1..
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Latest Car&Driver magizine just did another aricle on ZR1
They also improved the steering flex,w/new Steel column shaft.
& comes standard w/Magnetic selective ride control (variable shock absorbers) NOT available on the Z06, it improves body roll, & on hard launches the computer turns rear rebound to ZERO to hold the back end down for better traction.
Also has superior brakes, Brembo carbon-ceramic rotors (15.5 inches in frnt, 15.0 rear) & Monoblock calipers.
Any stock vehicle w/131mph Trap is something to respect, in perfect DA and pro hands this will easily be a mid 10 second 1/4 car
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
There are so many improvements over the Z06, it makes your statements quite sophomoric.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
ZR1
![](https://fp.images.autos.msn.com/media/580x348/9e/9ee49836839b4f8f976f3034d0ab5332.jpg)
![](https://fp.images.autos.msn.com/media/580x348/6d/6de1c5eee586404ea4474cb41b1ae1fc.jpg)
![](https://fp.images.autos.msn.com/media/580x348/a2/a2f8453c1f134ac5b7de3589f034847a.jpg)
![](https://fp.images.autos.msn.com/media/580x348/21/2181a09d80e04757b484b94e7f50caf2.jpg)
Yeah it looks just like a $40k C6
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![](https://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f246/dannygodeep/DSCF0003.jpg)
![](https://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f246/dannygodeep/Faves-68.jpg)
And before you start quoting mfr curb weight C&D states mfr @ 3350 lbs but as I said before after weighing it themselves it came in quite a bit lighter @ 3180 lbs. Even if it did weigh 3350lbs it wouldn't validate your previous statement
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Last edited by Thericker; 09-27-2008 at 02:10 AM.
#9
You guys do realize that Z06 can make 580whp with bolt-ons, and its all linear N/A power with far more controllable power delivery that you can actually put down. Look at ZR1's dyno, it has 100wtq more at 3.5k RPM than it does at 6.5k RPM
Not to mention Z06 is a much lighter car that will handle better. I just don't see what's so impressive about ZR1 that they are charging $120k for it. OK so it can make 600whp tuned, big freakin deal. C6 twin-turbo can make 1,000whp tuned
If you're going to tune the car for maximum power, twin-turbo makes a whole lot more sense than a supercharger.
Not only does it put down more power, but more importantly, Viper actually looks like a car that costs $100k. ZR1 looks the same as a $40k C6. I think its pretty clear than GM is desperately trying to exploit their customers with the ZR1..
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Not only does it put down more power, but more importantly, Viper actually looks like a car that costs $100k. ZR1 looks the same as a $40k C6. I think its pretty clear than GM is desperately trying to exploit their customers with the ZR1..
A C6 Z06 will not make 580rw with bolt-ons. There are a few reports of a few H/C + all bolt-on cars making right at or close to 600rw, but H/C doesn't count as a bolt-on.
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Ohh my, that's a gem![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
I think his attitude toward the ZR1 is driven by the belief his lil' slk55 is the fastest car on the roads lol... Here's an excerpt from his Ebay add selling his almighty 530 Crank HP slk55 yet he thinks while his lil' slk55 makes 435 RWHP![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
And he thinks it beats all these cars below in his add![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
Title: Kleemann 530hp SLK55 (faster than SL55 SL65 M3 M6 911 )
Mileage: 9,900 miles
Location: Miami, FL
Vehicle Information
VIN: WDBWK73F06F111410 | Get the Vehicle History Report
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
I think his attitude toward the ZR1 is driven by the belief his lil' slk55 is the fastest car on the roads lol... Here's an excerpt from his Ebay add selling his almighty 530 Crank HP slk55 yet he thinks while his lil' slk55 makes 435 RWHP
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
And he thinks it beats all these cars below in his add
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
Title: Kleemann 530hp SLK55 (faster than SL55 SL65 M3 M6 911 )
Mileage: 9,900 miles
Location: Miami, FL
Vehicle Information
VIN: WDBWK73F06F111410 | Get the Vehicle History Report
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by Thericker; 09-27-2008 at 04:58 AM.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Driven a lotus at the track? no mb or vette will ever be as fun, engaging, thrilling, and dynamic as a lotus. I dont care what MHP does to the tune or how much you strip off the car a lotus is an amazing machine.
Is it a drag car? Oh heck no! Is it a absolute blast that requires the driver to be alert and fluid with skill? Absolutely.
Well driven a lotus can Lap my local track just as fast as a Z-06 C6 with 190 hp vs 500 plus. And this is a track with very few slow sections. Not many cars stock can run a 1:32 at willow springs let alone one with 190 hp.
I know different strokes for different folks. Had to post it though.
Is it a drag car? Oh heck no! Is it a absolute blast that requires the driver to be alert and fluid with skill? Absolutely.
Well driven a lotus can Lap my local track just as fast as a Z-06 C6 with 190 hp vs 500 plus. And this is a track with very few slow sections. Not many cars stock can run a 1:32 at willow springs let alone one with 190 hp.
I know different strokes for different folks. Had to post it though.
#13
Senior Member
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Daytona, Florida
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
SL600
Driven a lotus at the track? no mb or vette will ever be as fun, engaging, thrilling, and dynamic as a lotus. I dont care what MHP does to the tune or how much you strip off the car a lotus is an amazing machine.
Is it a drag car? Oh heck no! Is it a absolute blast that requires the driver to be alert and fluid with skill? Absolutely.
Well driven a lotus can Lap my local track just as fast as a Z-06 C6 with 190 hp vs 500 plus. And this is a track with very few slow sections. Not many cars stock can run a 1:32 at willow springs let alone one with 190 hp.
I know different strokes for different folks. Had to post it though.
Is it a drag car? Oh heck no! Is it a absolute blast that requires the driver to be alert and fluid with skill? Absolutely.
Well driven a lotus can Lap my local track just as fast as a Z-06 C6 with 190 hp vs 500 plus. And this is a track with very few slow sections. Not many cars stock can run a 1:32 at willow springs let alone one with 190 hp.
I know different strokes for different folks. Had to post it though.
Don't get me wrong...lotus really isn't my bag of chips. I doubt I could fit my 6'4" fat azz into one if I tried, anyway. But I can definitely see why someone would want one. They seem to be very competent cars.
#16
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
11 Posts
2006 s65. Ford Excursion 6.0. Pontiac GTO convertible. Porsche 944 Turbo SCCA car. Wife-E550 and 968
You guys do realize that Z06 can make 580whp with bolt-ons, and its all linear N/A power with far more controllable power delivery that you can actually put down. Look at ZR1's dyno, it has 100wtq more at 3.5k RPM than it does at 6.5k RPM
Not to mention Z06 is a much lighter car that will handle better. I just don't see what's so impressive about ZR1 that they are charging $120k for it. OK so it can make 600whp tuned, big freakin deal. C6 twin-turbo can make 1,000whp tuned
If you're going to tune the car for maximum power, twin-turbo makes a whole lot more sense than a supercharger.
Not only does it put down more power, but more importantly, Viper actually looks like a car that costs $100k. ZR1 looks the same as a $40k C6. I think its pretty clear than GM is desperately trying to exploit their customers with the ZR1..
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Not only does it put down more power, but more importantly, Viper actually looks like a car that costs $100k. ZR1 looks the same as a $40k C6. I think its pretty clear than GM is desperately trying to exploit their customers with the ZR1..
There is nothing pathetic about a ZR1. It is an angry car that will eat and then poop anything on the road priced near it. Oh yeah, and then you can throw your golf bags and suitcases in the trunk and take it on a 500 mile road trip with the suspension set on soft and your wife won't divorce you. Try that in a Lotus and you'll make it 1 hr down the road, but golf bags on the roof are so unaerodynamic. A Z06 is a tremendous performance value, and if you put on stickier rubber, it is a tremendous track car as well, but the ZR1 is exceptional because it does both road and track well.
If you want to talk about "exploiting their customers", how about ferrari, lamborghini, or bentley charging upwards of 15k for the option of upgrading to essentially the same brakes that come standard on the ZR1? In addition, take a Z06 and upgrade it to the same spec as a ZR1 with daily driveability/durability in mind, including the carbon fiber lightening mods and adjustable suspension, and you will be way more expensive than 105k for a ZR1. For example, I seem to remember that the paint they use on the carbon fiber clearcoat costs more per gallon than most economy cars cost complete.
And if you want to talk looks similarity to the base model, how about our AMG E classes or your SLK? Yeah, we all can spot one from a mile away, but I'm guessing less than 10% of the population can. Fenders, aerokit, exhaust, wheels and stance separate my e63 from an e350, just like a base c6 vs. a ZR1.
#17
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
old daily driver '07 E63(gone); new dd '14 750xi; 2013 Viper GTS
Have you seen what the new ACR Viper is putting down on the dyno....pretty damn impressive. It also holds the record for around the 'ring at 7.22
#18
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
old daily driver '07 E63(gone); new dd '14 750xi; 2013 Viper GTS
And if you want to talk looks similarity to the base model, how about our AMG E classes or your SLK? Yeah, we all can spot one from a mile away, but I'm guessing less than 10% of the population can. Fenders, aerokit, exhaust, wheels and stance separate my e63 from an e350, just like a base c6 vs. a ZR1.
#21
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Woodway, TX
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 E63, 2010 GT-R, 2008 Escalade ESV
#22
You won't see them for a while. I'm privy to a lot of info reg. pre production domestics and testing.
With nothing but a medium size pulley/CAI a LSA equipped CTS-V put down 607rwhp/605rwtq. With a smaller pulley they made over 650rw and this is just with a 1.9L TVS blower and more restrictive single brick IC (ZR1 uses a 2.3L (twin brick) just like the Ford Racing GT500 upgrade which has made 700rw+ on 93 octane on several cars to date). Just like on any PD blower app, it's the blower size itself, not the motor behind it, that dictates peak HP/TQ numbers.
I saw a ZR1 dyno over a year ago, at the time the car had just a moderate size pulley and tune and made 667rwhp on a DJ.
Ford is brining out some decent meat in the 2011 Mustang GT. 400hp/360 tq from a revised 5.0L 4v Modular (3.6X bore x 3.6X stroke) on 87 octane. The 2011 GT500 gets an Aluminum block and 40 extra HP (540hp total) to go along with the '10's revised exterior/interior.
In 2013 the TT DI 5.0L 4v Bobcat will be released in various makes--likely the Shelby. So far with ethanol injection it's making 500hp/700tq, pretty sporty.
With nothing but a medium size pulley/CAI a LSA equipped CTS-V put down 607rwhp/605rwtq. With a smaller pulley they made over 650rw and this is just with a 1.9L TVS blower and more restrictive single brick IC (ZR1 uses a 2.3L (twin brick) just like the Ford Racing GT500 upgrade which has made 700rw+ on 93 octane on several cars to date). Just like on any PD blower app, it's the blower size itself, not the motor behind it, that dictates peak HP/TQ numbers.
I saw a ZR1 dyno over a year ago, at the time the car had just a moderate size pulley and tune and made 667rwhp on a DJ.
Ford is brining out some decent meat in the 2011 Mustang GT. 400hp/360 tq from a revised 5.0L 4v Modular (3.6X bore x 3.6X stroke) on 87 octane. The 2011 GT500 gets an Aluminum block and 40 extra HP (540hp total) to go along with the '10's revised exterior/interior.
In 2013 the TT DI 5.0L 4v Bobcat will be released in various makes--likely the Shelby. So far with ethanol injection it's making 500hp/700tq, pretty sporty.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
You guys do realize that Z06 can make 580whp with bolt-ons, and its all linear N/A power with far more controllable power delivery that you can actually put down. Look at ZR1's dyno, it has 100wtq more at 3.5k RPM than it does at 6.5k RPM
Not to mention Z06 is a much lighter car that will handle better. I just don't see what's so impressive about ZR1 that they are charging $120k for it. OK so it can make 600whp tuned, big freakin deal. C6 twin-turbo can make 1,000whp tuned
If you're going to tune the car for maximum power, twin-turbo makes a whole lot more sense than a supercharger.
Not only does it put down more power, but more importantly, Viper actually looks like a car that costs $100k. ZR1 looks the same as a $40k C6. I think its pretty clear than GM is desperately trying to exploit their customers with the ZR1..
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Not only does it put down more power, but more importantly, Viper actually looks like a car that costs $100k. ZR1 looks the same as a $40k C6. I think its pretty clear than GM is desperately trying to exploit their customers with the ZR1..
Edited... see MHP already replied and filled you in.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
For the record and regarding the dyno numbers... something isn't right even though SAE are listed. Least in my opinion... the car should be making 580 at the wheels before tuning. Drivetrain loss especially on a Dynojet for the ZR should be about 12%. I am thinking it isn't broken in yet and might shine one some miles are put on it. *Confused look at the dyno above*
Also, I too agree this car with a pulley/tune (up the boost to about 16 pounds) will see 700 to the wheels and I bet trap speeds hit 140+ with a DR and a decent driver.
Cheers,
Allen
Last edited by Almo; 09-27-2008 at 06:09 PM.
#24
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CL65
Driven a lotus at the track? no mb or vette will ever be as fun, engaging, thrilling, and dynamic as a lotus. I dont care what MHP does to the tune or how much you strip off the car a lotus is an amazing machine.
Is it a drag car? Oh heck no! Is it a absolute blast that requires the driver to be alert and fluid with skill? Absolutely.
Well driven a lotus can Lap my local track just as fast as a Z-06 C6 with 190 hp vs 500 plus. And this is a track with very few slow sections. Not many cars stock can run a 1:32 at willow springs let alone one with 190 hp.
I know different strokes for different folks. Had to post it though.
Is it a drag car? Oh heck no! Is it a absolute blast that requires the driver to be alert and fluid with skill? Absolutely.
Well driven a lotus can Lap my local track just as fast as a Z-06 C6 with 190 hp vs 500 plus. And this is a track with very few slow sections. Not many cars stock can run a 1:32 at willow springs let alone one with 190 hp.
I know different strokes for different folks. Had to post it though.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,546
Received 1,065 Likes
on
854 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
From what I've read about the ZR1 and according to GM, it will not take anymore boost dependably since the intercooler is too small and any larger it would not fit under the hood. Dependable gains on this motor will come from heads, exhaust, and cams.