W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

*** Off-Road H-pipes for 55/63s ***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-25-2008 | 01:38 PM
  #1  
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 2
From: Southern California
S600TT, R350
*** Off-Road H-pipes for 55/63s ***

I have been getting requests to make an off-road H-pipe for the W211.

The H-pipes will replace stock catalytic converter assemblies, both front and rear, and will be a simple bolt in.

Without the cats, you will turn on CEL. However, we can turn it off through software.

Theoretically it should fit CLS55s and E/CLS63s as well.

I need feedback on which steel to use - aluminized or stainless. This choice will determine final pricing, as I am working on the quote.
Please feel free to post your opinion.
Old 11-25-2008 | 03:44 PM
  #2  
komp55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 6
ML550
I'm just guessing, but I would think there are vastly more installed shorty headers installed out there than either mid-length or long tube headers (which are normally sold as a full kit anyway). So I think you should determine interest in two possible configurations.

Both would bolt up to either the the stock manifolds or any of the various shorty headers out there. Both would be stainless since that's what the factory exhaust is manufactured from.

The first configuration would include larger diameter mandrel bent tubing and 100 cell high flow cats in the stock location, and would step down to be direct bolt-ons to the stock exhaust system at the location immediately ahead of the resonator. This would cover those that want to retain installation of the factory O2 sensors and have at least minimal catalysts for environmental reasons.

The second possible configuration would be identical, except it would be a true "off-road" or "test pipe" that would just be larger diameter, same shape except without the catalysts. These would be the hard-core pipes for those that aren't concerned about CELs and emissions issues. That's my fifty-five cents.

Last edited by komp55; 11-25-2008 at 03:46 PM.
Old 11-25-2008 | 04:33 PM
  #3  
rberga1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
2005 E55
Hey Vadim, I would definitely be interested in one also. I say go with stainless.

It would be nice to have one with high flow cats with the ability to swap out the cats with "off-road" pipes.
Old 11-25-2008 | 04:43 PM
  #4  
55wagon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 441
Likes: 1
From: bay area
05 E55t, 07 R63, 04 Mini R53 (SOLD):01 s4 avant st3, 06 q7
go whatever is the cheapest...... I take one also...
Old 11-25-2008 | 05:49 PM
  #5  
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 2
From: Southern California
S600TT, R350
What would be more important - price (with cats or no cats) or longevity (as in stainless vs. aluminzed)?
Old 11-25-2008 | 05:53 PM
  #6  
jangy's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 4
From: San Diego
2015 S212
HAHA!!! Both!! How about cheaper stainless?
Old 11-26-2008 | 01:20 PM
  #7  
evilb's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
IMHO it should be stainless with no consideration for aluminized. Just get a lower grade stainless (eg: Not T-304) and you'll be fine.

Good call on offering the H as an option, although I prefer the sound of an X-pipe.

Thanks,
Brad
Old 11-26-2008 | 02:22 PM
  #8  
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 2
From: Southern California
S600TT, R350
So 409 with X-cross is the winner.

We are working on it. I will post some pixs later.
Old 11-26-2008 | 08:15 PM
  #9  
Timeless's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 3
From: South Carolina
2005 E55 ///AMG
Forgive my ignorance, but this can used in place of the secondary cats and would not result in a CEL correct? And removal of the secondary cats might also increase power...ever so slightly along with a little bit more rumble?
Old 11-26-2008 | 11:43 PM
  #10  
jangy's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 4
From: San Diego
2015 S212
Originally Posted by Timeless
Forgive my ignorance, but this can used in place of the secondary cats and would not result in a CEL correct? And removal of the secondary cats might also increase power...ever so slightly along with a little bit more rumble?
Removal of the secondaries does not illicit a CEL. Power gains or losses are arguable.
Old 11-27-2008 | 07:52 PM
  #11  
Timeless's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 3
From: South Carolina
2005 E55 ///AMG
Originally Posted by jangy
Removal of the secondaries does not illicit a CEL. Power gains or losses are arguable.
That is what I thought...does this piece go in its place?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: *** Off-Road H-pipes for 55/63s ***



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 AM.