Tuning for 93 Octane
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Tuning for 93 Octane
It seems that most "standard" tunes are geared for 91 octane since it's available everywhere. I live in FL & 93 is available at all the gas stations here. I'd like to have my Kleemann tune switched out for a 93 octane tune.
The real question is how damaging would it be to the engine if I were forced to use 91 octane? It won't happen here, but I do occasionally drive up the east coast & could possibly encounter 91 somewhere out there.
The next question would be "is it worth it"? Would there be a noticeable improvement in performance going from a standard K2 to a 93 octane tune?
Thanks!
The real question is how damaging would it be to the engine if I were forced to use 91 octane? It won't happen here, but I do occasionally drive up the east coast & could possibly encounter 91 somewhere out there.
The next question would be "is it worth it"? Would there be a noticeable improvement in performance going from a standard K2 to a 93 octane tune?
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes,Porsche etc
[quote=Andy0331;3366974]It seems that most "standard" tunes are geared for 91 octane since it's available everywhere. I live in FL & 93 is available at all the gas stations here. I'd like to have my Kleemann tune switched out for a 93 octane tune.
The real question is how damaging would it be to the engine if I were forced to use 91 octane? It won't happen here, but I do occasionally drive up the east coast & could possibly encounter 91 somewhere out there.
The next question would be "is it worth it"? Would there be a noticeable improvement in performance going from a standard K2 to a 93 octane tune?
well its not damaging, as the ECU will adapt but you will notice the different if you car is tuned for 93 and you run 91.
best thing to do is tune your car for 93, and put 91 in along with 2 gallons of 100 octane racing fuel.. what I do,, runs perfect
averages out to around 93-94 oct, and runs perfect..
here in cali we dont have 91, but we do have racing fuel lol at 100,
so it will boost the octane..
works great
The real question is how damaging would it be to the engine if I were forced to use 91 octane? It won't happen here, but I do occasionally drive up the east coast & could possibly encounter 91 somewhere out there.
The next question would be "is it worth it"? Would there be a noticeable improvement in performance going from a standard K2 to a 93 octane tune?
well its not damaging, as the ECU will adapt but you will notice the different if you car is tuned for 93 and you run 91.
best thing to do is tune your car for 93, and put 91 in along with 2 gallons of 100 octane racing fuel.. what I do,, runs perfect
averages out to around 93-94 oct, and runs perfect..
here in cali we dont have 91, but we do have racing fuel lol at 100,
so it will boost the octane..
works great
Last edited by storm; 02-25-2009 at 05:53 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'm assuming that if I'm out of town & can't find 93, that I might not be able to find 100 easily either.
I've never been a fan of "octane boost", but I could keep some in the trunk if it would actually help.
I've never been a fan of "octane boost", but I could keep some in the trunk if it would actually help.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Not to derail the topic...but this was an interesting test of octane boosters:
http://www.europeancarweb.com/tech/0...ted/index.html
Based on the chart the NOS Octane booster resulted in a boost of 2.5 AKI (RON+MON/2). That seems real (although the MMT additive isn't doing wonderful things to the cats)...![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Tom
http://www.europeancarweb.com/tech/0...ted/index.html
Based on the chart the NOS Octane booster resulted in a boost of 2.5 AKI (RON+MON/2). That seems real (although the MMT additive isn't doing wonderful things to the cats)...
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Tom
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
It seems that most "standard" tunes are geared for 91 octane since it's available everywhere. I live in FL & 93 is available at all the gas stations here. I'd like to have my Kleemann tune switched out for a 93 octane tune.
The real question is how damaging would it be to the engine if I were forced to use 91 octane? It won't happen here, but I do occasionally drive up the east coast & could possibly encounter 91 somewhere out there.
The next question would be "is it worth it"? Would there be a noticeable improvement in performance going from a standard K2 to a 93 octane tune?
Thanks!
The real question is how damaging would it be to the engine if I were forced to use 91 octane? It won't happen here, but I do occasionally drive up the east coast & could possibly encounter 91 somewhere out there.
The next question would be "is it worth it"? Would there be a noticeable improvement in performance going from a standard K2 to a 93 octane tune?
Thanks!
#7
It seems that most "standard" tunes are geared for 91 octane since it's available everywhere. I live in FL & 93 is available at all the gas stations here. I'd like to have my Kleemann tune switched out for a 93 octane tune.
The real question is how damaging would it be to the engine if I were forced to use 91 octane? It won't happen here, but I do occasionally drive up the east coast & could possibly encounter 91 somewhere out there.
The next question would be "is it worth it"? Would there be a noticeable improvement in performance going from a standard K2 to a 93 octane tune?
Thanks!
The real question is how damaging would it be to the engine if I were forced to use 91 octane? It won't happen here, but I do occasionally drive up the east coast & could possibly encounter 91 somewhere out there.
The next question would be "is it worth it"? Would there be a noticeable improvement in performance going from a standard K2 to a 93 octane tune?
Thanks!
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
That is a 98 RON octane rating. Here in the US octane is rated based on AKI (anti-knock index). It takes the RON (Research Octane Number) rating and averages it with the MON (Motor Octane Number) rating. Apparently in Australia, the Shell V-Power 98 is 91.5 AKI ((98 RON + 85 MON)/2). The Shell V-Power Race 100 is 94.5 AKI ((100 RON + 89 MON)/2).
Most parts of the US have 93 AKI available.
Tom
Most parts of the US have 93 AKI available.
Tom
#9
Super Member
I only get my gas from one station in town and it is rated at 94. On the test that they run every few months the owner says it usually test out over 94. Mostly high 90's even over 100 a few times.
What should I do when I get my car tuned? I'm planning on driving up to Chicago to LET and having them do it, which is 8 hours away so I won't have the gas I usually run on.
What should I do when I get my car tuned? I'm planning on driving up to Chicago to LET and having them do it, which is 8 hours away so I won't have the gas I usually run on.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
On my VR700 tune, I tried the Shell racing fuel and 93 Octane fuel w/10% ethanol mix and I kept getting CEL's.
I'm back to Mobil 93 Octane (no ethanol...at least it is not posted anywhere...it is damn harder to find) and I haven't had any CEL's.
Performance wise on Shell RF, I really didn't get to the point I could notice since I kept worrying about the CEL's.
I'm back to Mobil 93 Octane (no ethanol...at least it is not posted anywhere...it is damn harder to find) and I haven't had any CEL's.
Performance wise on Shell RF, I really didn't get to the point I could notice since I kept worrying about the CEL's.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
I only get my gas from one station in town and it is rated at 94. On the test that they run every few months the owner says it usually test out over 94. Mostly high 90's even over 100 a few times.
What should I do when I get my car tuned? I'm planning on driving up to Chicago to LET and having them do it, which is 8 hours away so I won't have the gas I usually run on.
What should I do when I get my car tuned? I'm planning on driving up to Chicago to LET and having them do it, which is 8 hours away so I won't have the gas I usually run on.
Tom
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes,Porsche etc
its not octane boost,, that is a crap product that is not gas,,TOTALLY DIFFERENT. NOT WHAT I SAID AT ALL..
this is real 100 octane RACING GAS,, that $400,000 race cars and bikes use
IT IS GAS from the OIL company UNION 76 and it made from the same oil batches your 91 is made just to a higher octane lol at the same refinery
and any chemist knows when you take some chemical at a certain strength,, like 91 octane and mix it with identical chemical 100 octane,, it averages out,, to around 94 and is stable..
same exactly gas as if you got 93-94 out of the pump..
here is the math for you
10 gallons 91 octane,, when you add 2 gallons of 100 octane, thats a 20% percentage, so 2 gallons of 100 octane RACING GAS when diluted in 10 gallons of
91 octane will make the gas about 2 octane higher or around 93-94..
thats a just a fact
Last edited by storm; 02-27-2009 at 01:21 AM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes,Porsche etc
On my VR700 tune, I tried the Shell racing fuel and 93 Octane fuel w/10% ethanol mix and I kept getting CEL's.
I'm back to Mobil 93 Octane (no ethanol...at least it is not posted anywhere...it is damn harder to find) and I haven't had any CEL's.
Performance wise on Shell RF, I really didn't get to the point I could notice since I kept worrying about the CEL's.
I'm back to Mobil 93 Octane (no ethanol...at least it is not posted anywhere...it is damn harder to find) and I haven't had any CEL's.
Performance wise on Shell RF, I really didn't get to the point I could notice since I kept worrying about the CEL's.
thats cause you used ethanol, and that you likely put too much racing gas in and it thinned the mixture too much
higher octane gets better gas milage and pollutes LESS as it burns more thouroughly
try 91 REG GAS, NON ETHANOL, and add 2-4 gallons of RACING 100 gas
know 20 people that do this works fine, on $250,000 ferrairs and lambos'
and mercs
what do you think all the racing cars use and racing bikes?
Last edited by storm; 02-27-2009 at 01:22 AM.
#14
Super Member
I don't know. All my friends were the ones that told me about it. I think he showed them the data sheets too. Either way I know for a fact that the pumps say 94. That's the only place in town that says that. Most others say 91 with some that have 93.
#15
Member
to answer the original question....
It depends on the tune...
Normally---the higher the octane---the more timing you can run before detonation. The stock ECU has all sorts of safety mechinisms. For example---In the orginal tune made for 91 octane---the max timing advance would be set at 22degree(guess)......if the AIT/oil temp/engine temp/transmission load/knock sensor output are all within safety parameters---> the ECU will advance timing to 22 degrees and give you X power.
If someone were "tuning" the same car with 100octane----they could set the max advance to 27degrees. Now under the same conditions---the ecu will advance the timing upto 27 degrees and gain 20-30 hp.
Now heres the fly in the ointment----if any safety parameters are exceeded---like ait's or knock sensor counts---the ecu will back out timing. It wont matter what the "max" is set to because it will never get there.
For example--->Lets say you run 104oct AND your cars max timing is set to 30 degrees. You punch the gas and the car makes crazy HP....the engine is fine...ait's are nice...all temps are good...there's no knock.....BUT.....the tranny senses a HUGE overrunn in its "torque limit"----> Guess what....your timing will drop like a rock.
So unless ALLLLLLLLLLLL the parameters that control timing are KNOWN to the tuner and are adjusted----tuning your car for higher octane is a waste of resouces.
As we all are aware---we have yet to tame the "ECU SHREW"
It depends on the tune...
Normally---the higher the octane---the more timing you can run before detonation. The stock ECU has all sorts of safety mechinisms. For example---In the orginal tune made for 91 octane---the max timing advance would be set at 22degree(guess)......if the AIT/oil temp/engine temp/transmission load/knock sensor output are all within safety parameters---> the ECU will advance timing to 22 degrees and give you X power.
If someone were "tuning" the same car with 100octane----they could set the max advance to 27degrees. Now under the same conditions---the ecu will advance the timing upto 27 degrees and gain 20-30 hp.
Now heres the fly in the ointment----if any safety parameters are exceeded---like ait's or knock sensor counts---the ecu will back out timing. It wont matter what the "max" is set to because it will never get there.
For example--->Lets say you run 104oct AND your cars max timing is set to 30 degrees. You punch the gas and the car makes crazy HP....the engine is fine...ait's are nice...all temps are good...there's no knock.....BUT.....the tranny senses a HUGE overrunn in its "torque limit"----> Guess what....your timing will drop like a rock.
So unless ALLLLLLLLLLLL the parameters that control timing are KNOWN to the tuner and are adjusted----tuning your car for higher octane is a waste of resouces.
As we all are aware---we have yet to tame the "ECU SHREW"
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
#16
here's the math:
(10*91)+(2*100)
------------------- 92.5 octane
12
Let me break it down incase you don't get higher math
10 gal of 91 is 910 points
2 gal of 100 is 200 points
200+910 is 1110
now divide that by TOTAL gallons (12 gal) and you get 92.5 octane.
I'm not even going to get into blending aromatics like Toluene (112octane) or Xelene (116 octane) with pump fuel in order to get 100 octane
Anyone who is a test driver for Porsche or GM would know that.....
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
And it's a fact your math is wrong. Just like everything else you post.
here's the math:
(10*91)+(2*100)
------------------- 92.5 octane
12
Let me break it down incase you don't get higher math
10 gal of 91 is 910 points
2 gal of 100 is 200 points
200+910 is 1110
now divide that by TOTAL gallons (12 gal) and you get 92.5 octane.
I'm not even going to get into blending aromatics like Toluene (112octane) or Xelene (116 octane) with pump fuel in order to get 100 octane
Anyone who is a test driver for Porsche or GM would know that.....
here's the math:
(10*91)+(2*100)
------------------- 92.5 octane
12
Let me break it down incase you don't get higher math
10 gal of 91 is 910 points
2 gal of 100 is 200 points
200+910 is 1110
now divide that by TOTAL gallons (12 gal) and you get 92.5 octane.
I'm not even going to get into blending aromatics like Toluene (112octane) or Xelene (116 octane) with pump fuel in order to get 100 octane
Anyone who is a test driver for Porsche or GM would know that.....
Lol...ouch.... but you're right, his math was off...unless he meant 8 gal of 91 and 10 gallons total...which isn't what he said...
Tom
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Anyway, I can see the logic of mixing racing gas with the 91, but I'm operating under the assumption that if I'm traveling and can't find 93, race gas will probably be just as hard to find. And no, I'm not keeping a couple of gallons in a can in my trunk. Visiting my parents in the mountains of N. Carolina... I'm not chasing around for racing fuel.
My question, was only based on the "damage" that could be done running 91 if you were tuned specifically for 93.
I doubt I'll mess with it at all, as the difference in performance is probably minor (at least in relation to cost & risk).
#19
Somehow I missed some of these replies.
Anyway, I can see the logic of mixing racing gas with the 91, but I'm operating under the assumption that if I'm traveling and can't find 93, race gas will probably be just as hard to find. And no, I'm not keeping a couple of gallons in a can in my trunk. Visiting my parents in the mountains of N. Carolina... I'm not chasing around for racing fuel.
My question, was only based on the "damage" that could be done running 91 if you were tuned specifically for 93.
I doubt I'll mess with it at all, as the difference in performance is probably minor (at least in relation to cost & risk).
Anyway, I can see the logic of mixing racing gas with the 91, but I'm operating under the assumption that if I'm traveling and can't find 93, race gas will probably be just as hard to find. And no, I'm not keeping a couple of gallons in a can in my trunk. Visiting my parents in the mountains of N. Carolina... I'm not chasing around for racing fuel.
My question, was only based on the "damage" that could be done running 91 if you were tuned specifically for 93.
I doubt I'll mess with it at all, as the difference in performance is probably minor (at least in relation to cost & risk).
#21
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
Please feel free to PM me if you would like more info.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes,Porsche etc
[quote=E55 ButtPilot [B]And it's a fact your math is wrong. Just like everything else you post.[/B]
actually, I was only off by 1/2 of 1 octane, I said you would get 93 and you said 92.5 ... douchbag..
and that is because I was merely approximating and giving a rough idea to the guy as a example.. not as an exact science..
every ECU tuner, from EVO, THE BRABUS, to KLEEMAN, ro POWERCHIP all say you can add 100 octane a few gallons to get the 93 needed for the tuned ECU
bottom like it works, and your way to ****, or wound up to be
having a fit over 1/2 an octane rating..
actually, I was only off by 1/2 of 1 octane, I said you would get 93 and you said 92.5 ... douchbag..
and that is because I was merely approximating and giving a rough idea to the guy as a example.. not as an exact science..
every ECU tuner, from EVO, THE BRABUS, to KLEEMAN, ro POWERCHIP all say you can add 100 octane a few gallons to get the 93 needed for the tuned ECU
bottom like it works, and your way to ****, or wound up to be
having a fit over 1/2 an octane rating..
![](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/_s6Ofh7u9lF0/SMcMYGbzmeI/AAAAAAAAA18/D5XLUfDbkVw/s400/douchbag.congrats.jpg)
Last edited by storm; 03-15-2009 at 04:46 AM.
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
[QUOTE=storm;3410315]
ClayJ:
I think the problem is that you definitively said here is the math....and your math was wrong. If you are an engineer...you should just take your lumps and walk away because saying you were only off by 1/2 an octane point isn't going to help your cause.
Tom
Originally Posted by E55 ButtPilot [B
And it's a fact your math is wrong. Just like everything else you post.[/B]
actually, I was only off by 1/2 of 1 octane, I said you would get 93 and you said 92.5 ... douchbag..
and that is because I was merely approximating and giving a rough idea to the guy as a example.. not as an exact science..
every ECU tuner, from EVO, THE BRABUS, to KLEEMAN, ro POWERCHIP all say you can add 100 octane a few gallons to get the 93 needed for the tuned ECU
bottom like it works, and your way to ****, or wound up to be
having a fit over 1/2 an octane rating..
![](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/_s6Ofh7u9lF0/SMcMYGbzmeI/AAAAAAAAA18/D5XLUfDbkVw/s400/douchbag.congrats.jpg)
actually, I was only off by 1/2 of 1 octane, I said you would get 93 and you said 92.5 ... douchbag..
and that is because I was merely approximating and giving a rough idea to the guy as a example.. not as an exact science..
every ECU tuner, from EVO, THE BRABUS, to KLEEMAN, ro POWERCHIP all say you can add 100 octane a few gallons to get the 93 needed for the tuned ECU
bottom like it works, and your way to ****, or wound up to be
having a fit over 1/2 an octane rating..
![](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/_s6Ofh7u9lF0/SMcMYGbzmeI/AAAAAAAAA18/D5XLUfDbkVw/s400/douchbag.congrats.jpg)
ClayJ:
I think the problem is that you definitively said here is the math....and your math was wrong. If you are an engineer...you should just take your lumps and walk away because saying you were only off by 1/2 an octane point isn't going to help your cause.
Tom