TB Y Splitter
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
TB it is rippled and may not flow air as smoothly.
Last edited by Hammer Down; 06-07-2009 at 06:46 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
then ask the question..why is it rippled?, am sure it is not just to mkae it look pretty
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
smooth pipe would not be better ... that helical stock design is not made that way just for shake .. it helps airflow and avoids unwanted turbulences
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
If you look at a VRP or Renntech airbox they completely eliminate the hoses making that section smooth for extra air that will be flowing to the TB due to the larger airbox. Can't we do the same with some nice semi flexible smooth silicon hoses?
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
even that FANG tentative retained stock hoses ..
imho, I would only make a better Y-pipe and bigger Airboxes
btw, even gruppeM who made bigger airboxes .. retained stock hoses
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I would be curious to see how that tract of SLR is made. I tried to get an exploded view of the intake but seems doesn't exist
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
.. we are sure only about its bigger than our 's airbox
#13
Out Of Control!!
I think that is what was being discussed. I agree that a bigger y-pipe would help free up alot of flow. I went to a single pipe design because I felt the E55 airboxes and y-pipes were restrictions (although looked much cleaner/cooler than my current setup). Again, that's just my opinion.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
I think that is what was being discussed. I agree that a bigger y-pipe would help free up alot of flow. I went to a single pipe design because I felt the E55 airboxes and y-pipes were restrictions (although looked much cleaner/cooler than my current setup). Again, that's just my opinion.
BB do you think it will flow enough air?
Do you have any pics of your setup for those of us that not had to privilege to see your car in person?
#15
Out Of Control!!
On my setup the outlet of the y-pipe had a measured ID of 72mm I believe. This was the biggest restriction along with the MAF housing (E55's don't have), and tubes from airbox to y-pipe. I have replaced the y-pipe with a single 3.5" diameter pipe (85mm) and CNC'd a piece for my MAF sensor to slide into. I also routed air through my headlight to the filter, although I have now lost he "ram air" effect. So now the smallest diameter piping on my intake is the TB, which is 82mm
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
It ain't pretty but it gets the job done (excuse the crappy cell phone pic quality lol), I may want to go to a bigger filter soon or maybe even make a y and run a filter to each side. For now it flows plenty, until I get the SLR injectors installed and retuned. What you don't see in the pic is a heat shield over the headers. You could build a box around the filter to shield it from the engine bay heat and possibly wrap the intake pipe in heat wrap
Last edited by blackbenzz; 06-08-2009 at 11:52 AM.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
"tongue-like protrusion"
I think that is what was being discussed. I agree that a bigger y-pipe would help free up alot of flow. I went to a single pipe design because I felt the E55 airboxes and y-pipes were restrictions (although looked much cleaner/cooler than my current setup). Again, that's just my opinion.
ciao BB !
it s not only a matter of size
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
yes, considering the bigger TB, also a bigger Y and bigger hoses (while possibly retaining the same design) and everything down to the car's grille, would be desirable.
but, mainly, I think it could be useful to make a better designed Y : unfortunately now it is not exactly an Y .. the correct design should have a "tongue-like protrusion" where twin duct merges into one ..
do you know what I mean
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#17
Out Of Control!!
ciao BB !
it s not only a matter of size![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
yes, considering the bigger TB, also a bigger Y and bigger hoses (while possibly retaining the same design) and everything down to the car's grille, would be desirable.
but, mainly, I think it could be useful to make a better designed Y : unfortunately now it is not exactly an Y .. the correct design should have a "tongue-like protrusion" where twin duct merges into one ..
do you know what I mean![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
it s not only a matter of size
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
yes, considering the bigger TB, also a bigger Y and bigger hoses (while possibly retaining the same design) and everything down to the car's grille, would be desirable.
but, mainly, I think it could be useful to make a better designed Y : unfortunately now it is not exactly an Y .. the correct design should have a "tongue-like protrusion" where twin duct merges into one ..
do you know what I mean
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)