Big Yay for Surrey Rolling Road - check my dyno results
At the crank...

and at the wheels...

Have had the car on two other rolling roads with unsuccessful top end readings, as it was spinning the rear wheels in 4th at 2900 rpm
I'm a happy boy now
In my experience on dyno dynamics:
Stock 55k = 380-400rwhp
Pulley/HE/ECU = 420-435rwhp
Pulley/HE/ECU/TB/Headers = 460-470rwhp
Now the adjustments/corrections your operator is using may be different, since that is a pretty high number for your mods... but then again you just might have a STRONG car. Congrats in any event.
-m
Nice ride, I'm sure that thing rolls out!
Last edited by taurran; Jun 9, 2009 at 01:00 PM.
-m
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
-m
The only real comparison between two cars is a heads up run or a dyno on the same dyno, on the same day.
Dynojets are better for standard comparisons and posting up numbers, as they're the current US industry standard. But, being simple inertia dynos, aren't quite as sophisticated when it comes to dyno tuning.
Traction/etc will affect numbers downward, but not upward. You cannot spin, or launch poorly and get an excessively high trap speed. On a dyno you can inflate numbers, but you cannot significantly inflate a car's trap speed. It will vary a few MPH, but the best it does is the best it does. You cannot make a 115mph car trap 120mph, unless when he trapped 115mph he was spinning half way down the track or backed off the throttle.
Of course, with trap speed, there is DA, which again will only affect numbers down.
-m
Traction/etc will affect numbers downward, but not upward. You cannot spin, or launch poorly and get an excessively high trap speed. On a dyno you can inflate numbers, but you cannot significantly inflate a car's trap speed. It will vary a few MPH, but the best it does is the best it does. You cannot make a 115mph car trap 120mph, unless when he trapped 115mph he was spinning half way down the track or backed off the throttle.
Of course, with trap speed, there is DA, which again will only affect numbers down.
-m
We're talking a measure of straight horsepower here - not weight, conditions, traction, or driving ability. The same dyno on the same day isn't entirely perfect, but it's the best comparison you can hope to get.
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-hd-video.html
Thanks for all the comments - and I'm happy with my numbers
We're talking a measure of straight horsepower here - not weight, conditions, traction, or driving ability. The same dyno on the same day isn't entirely perfect, but it's the best comparison you can hope to get.
A better 60 ft will always net a lower trap speed. Rolling off the line gently will net a higher trap speed. I am very well aware of that and acknowledged it in my first post. However you are talking about a few MPH at our levels. You aren't talking 10mph, or 15mph. You might trap 116 with a good launch, and 118 with a crappy one. Regardless of the variance, unlike a dyno which will just measure HP - trap speed will tell you how you stack up against a totally different car... like a stripped out modified Elise who makes crap HP on the dyno but because he weighs 2800lbs actually can put out a decent trap.
Above all, dyno's still often don't translate into real world results. I have seen cars that dyno high and get to the track only to run mediocre trap speeds/times. I have NEVER seen a car that traps well put down crappy numbers (assuming his car is running the same way it did when it trapped well).
-m
A better 60 ft will always net a lower trap speed. Rolling off the line gently will net a higher trap speed. I am very well aware of that and acknowledged it in my first post. However you are talking about a few MPH at our levels. You aren't talking 10mph, or 15mph. You might trap 116 with a good launch, and 118 with a crappy one. Regardless of the variance, unlike a dyno which will just measure HP - trap speed will tell you how you stack up against a totally different car... like a stripped out modified Elise who makes crap HP on the dyno but because he weighs 2800lbs actually can put out a decent trap.
Above all, dyno's still often don't translate into real world results. I have seen cars that dyno high and get to the track only to run mediocre trap speeds/times. I have NEVER seen a car that traps well put down crappy numbers (assuming his car is running the same way it did when it trapped well).
-m
Above all, dyno's still often don't translate into real world results. I have seen cars that dyno high and get to the track only to run mediocre trap speeds/times. I have NEVER seen a car that traps well put down crappy numbers (assuming his car is running the same way it did when it trapped well).
-m
. Afer these results I knew it was time for the track. After taking my car to the track a couple of times I trapped 123.7 with a 11.56. Not sure what that calculates out to in rwhp but I was definitely happy. As Marcus said, the track will let you know if your making power or not.
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-hd-video.html
Thanks for all the comments - and I'm happy with my numbers
330ft - 5.2687
1/8 ET - 7.9565
1/8 MPH 91.59
1000' ET 10.2068
1/4 ET - 12.2158
1/4 MPH - 116.25
With true 480+rwhp on Dynodynamics you should be trapping 122-124mph not 116mph
Last edited by Thericker; Jun 16, 2009 at 03:02 AM.
. Afer these results I knew it was time for the track. After taking my car to the track a couple of times I trapped 123.7 with a 11.56. Not sure what that calculates out to in rwhp but I was definitely happy. As Marcus said, the track will let you know if your making power or not.Dyno = engine power and environment
Track = all of the components of the car, environment, and driver rolled into one.
Just sayin'...







