W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

Interesting article...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 06:51 PM
  #1  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Interesting article...

Some of you may've read this already, but in case not:

http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/08/news...ion=2009070906
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #2  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
Some of you may've read this already, but in case not:

http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/08/news...ion=2009070906
Very interesting read, thanks for posting

I'm not sure if it is too exciting seeing both companies using very similar parts though I hope they're very careful going forward with the idea as both brands may lose their "soul" and uniqueness.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 09:31 PM
  #3  
Karlson's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax,VA
06 E55
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
Very interesting read, thanks for posting

I'm not sure if it is too exciting seeing both companies using very similar parts though I hope they're very careful going forward with the idea as both brands may lose their "soul" and uniqueness.
agreed. If Mercedes will be the same or similar to BMW, my next car will be skyline
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 10:21 PM
  #4  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
Very interesting read, thanks for posting

I'm not sure if it is too exciting seeing both companies using very similar parts though I hope they're very careful going forward with the idea as both brands may lose their "soul" and uniqueness.
No problem - thought it'd be enjoyed 'round these parts.

Agreed on the joint-procurement issue - although both seem to suggest they're looking to keep their separate and distinct philosophies intact. It wouldn't bother me if the E63 and M5 both shared a bulletproof DSG-style transmission, for example - it's the implementation of the tranny, TCU programming, how it matches the engine's character, etc. that'll make for a unique AMG or M experience, my $0.02.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 10:25 PM
  #5  
220S's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 8
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
Yeah, thanks for posting the article. Interesting.

I sorta suspected some of the C Class parts in the W212.

I think this kind of thing will be the trend now, and not just with MB. It works for Audi/VW and Porsche shares from their parts bins, too.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 10:28 PM
  #6  
shardul's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 12,139
Likes: 295
From: Houston
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
interesting read
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 01:50 AM
  #7  
Ali_E55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 13
From: Abu Dhabi
C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1, W213 E63S
alot of can manufactors use shared parts.

in japan, USA, Eurpe

no harm in that if each brand makes u feel unique in a way
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #8  
prodigymb's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 3
From: Philly
997TT, C192 GT63, W464 G550, MS Plaid
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
No problem - thought it'd be enjoyed 'round these parts.

Agreed on the joint-procurement issue - although both seem to suggest they're looking to keep their separate and distinct philosophies intact. It wouldn't bother me if the E63 and M5 both shared a bulletproof DSG-style transmission, for example - it's the implementation of the tranny, TCU programming, how it matches the engine's character, etc. that'll make for a unique AMG or M experience, my $0.02.
tranny has to match the engine. the DSG and SMG transmissions have very low factory torque ratings. The VW/Audi DSG clutchpacks are only rated at 268 ft-lbs of torque, from what I hear BMW ones have similar low rating.

anticipated introduction of the 7 speed AMG trans was one of the several reason they got rid of the supercharger. new tranny wasnt friendly with brute torque, but something had to be done because the 5 spd we have just doesnt compare to the BMW gearboxes driveability wise.

all i'm saying that the gearing and the overall behavior of the trans should match the desired power output of the engine. i
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 12:18 PM
  #9  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by prodigymb
tranny has to match the engine. the DSG and SMG transmissions have very low factory torque ratings. The VW/Audi DSG clutchpacks are only rated at 268 ft-lbs of torque, from what I hear BMW ones have similar low rating.

anticipated introduction of the 7 speed AMG trans was one of the several reason they got rid of the supercharger. new tranny wasnt friendly with brute torque, but something had to be done because the 5 spd we have just doesnt compare to the BMW gearboxes driveability wise.

all i'm saying that the gearing and the overall behavior of the trans should match the desired power output of the engine. i
prodigymb,

Very true - they can be overbuilt and it's fine, but underbuilt is a different story. Technology marches forward... I wouldn't be surprised to see a strong DSG-style tranny, sourced from ZF or Getrag, used by several manufacturers in their performance lines in the coming years... we're obviously not talking 2007 level tech, if they're only in the initial stages of the joint-procurement discussions... probably looking at "twenty-teens" model years before we'd even see it.

BTW - the Veyron is a VAG DSG tranny, isn't it?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #10  
prodigymb's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 3
From: Philly
997TT, C192 GT63, W464 G550, MS Plaid
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
prodigymb,

Very true - they can be overbuilt and it's fine, but underbuilt is a different story. Technology marches forward... I wouldn't be surprised to see a strong DSG-style tranny, sourced from ZF or Getrag, used by several manufacturers in their performance lines in the coming years... we're obviously not talking 2007 level tech, if they're only in the initial stages of the joint-procurement discussions... probably looking at "twenty-teens" model years before we'd even see it.

BTW - the Veyron is a VAG DSG tranny, isn't it?
Correct - Veyron has 7spd dual wet clutch DSG trans rated at 1106 ft-lbs of torque. Rumors were that it was a collaboration trans of several companies and VAG engineers. Veyron also features Haldex electronically controlled all wheel drive system - which can be found in VW R32s and 3.2 Audi TT......except that it sux in the VW and can't hold any power.

Point in short - DSG that can hold a lot of power = a lot of $$$$. It will happen. Auto without torque converter is def the way of the future and not just in "sporty" cars.....even simply for the added fuel efficiency it offers.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.