Cadillac V-series challenge..anybody want to bring their AMG/M/RS to challenge?
10-30-2009, 07:33 PM
#101
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
Wow what a bunch of cry baby nonsense. Great way to complain about finishing in 4th. I wonder if the "better driver" excuse works in any form of motor racing? Oh wait, no, it doesn't. Good drivers win races. This is how it works. If we are going to speculate on what was the result of the driver versus the car you could easily undermine any competitive driving series in the world.
The BMW got smoked. If the guy wasn't as good of a driver s the CTS-V drivers, TOUGH ****. Go take the time to become a better driver.
This is the most assinine logic I've ever heard. If it was an obvious publicity stunt why did you "humor" them by competing and getting smoked? You beat the privately owned CTS-Vs, good for you, but you still got smoked by better drivers. You lose. Last I checked racing is about winning, not about finishing 4th and complaining that the other drivers were "too good"
Sorry for the rant.
-m
The BMW got smoked. If the guy wasn't as good of a driver s the CTS-V drivers, TOUGH ****. Go take the time to become a better driver.
This is the most assinine logic I've ever heard. If it was an obvious publicity stunt why did you "humor" them by competing and getting smoked? You beat the privately owned CTS-Vs, good for you, but you still got smoked by better drivers. You lose. Last I checked racing is about winning, not about finishing 4th and complaining that the other drivers were "too good"
Sorry for the rant.
-m
Bob Lutz was the guy that extended the challege and he did in fact get beat by the M3. The original challenge stated that professional drivers MAY be substituted if other professional drivers competed. The guy in the M3 was by all measures an amateur driver. All of the CTS-V's that beat the M3 were drivers that had racing or testing backgrounds and were paid by Caddilac/GM.
10-30-2009, 07:36 PM
#102
MBWorld Fanatic!
you clearly missed the point.
Every racing event has different classes, you start from the bottom to the top drivers. Since you seem to know lots about motor racing. Look at Nascar or F1 or SCCA or any other form of racing.
My point again..
IF they were bracketed according to their driving experience & level or professional drivers.. the M3 won the event for the "entry level or enthusiast" class.
nobody is crying about an M3 loosing.. just pointing out the facts that "pros: vs "joes" took place in this event and the "joe" almost won.
the rest of your rant was just plain useless arguments.
Every racing event has different classes, you start from the bottom to the top drivers. Since you seem to know lots about motor racing. Look at Nascar or F1 or SCCA or any other form of racing.
My point again..
IF they were bracketed according to their driving experience & level or professional drivers.. the M3 won the event for the "entry level or enthusiast" class.
nobody is crying about an M3 loosing.. just pointing out the facts that "pros: vs "joes" took place in this event and the "joe" almost won.
the rest of your rant was just plain useless arguments.
Cry me a river.
He entered a series knowing full well the rules, regulations, and competition. He then got his *** handed to him by better drivers who were in faster cars. I don't see what's left to debate here.
-m
10-30-2009, 07:39 PM
#103
MBWorld Fanatic!
Good points but lets keep some things in mind.
Bob Lutz was the guy that extended the challege and he did in fact get beat by the M3. The original challenge stated that professional drivers MAY be substituted if other professional drivers competed. The guy in the M3 was by all measures an amateur driver. All of the CTS-V's that beat the M3 were drivers that had racing or testing backgrounds and were paid by Caddilac/GM.
Bob Lutz was the guy that extended the challege and he did in fact get beat by the M3. The original challenge stated that professional drivers MAY be substituted if other professional drivers competed. The guy in the M3 was by all measures an amateur driver. All of the CTS-V's that beat the M3 were drivers that had racing or testing backgrounds and were paid by Caddilac/GM.
-m
10-30-2009, 07:42 PM
#104
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
DUDE WHO CARES... the scoreboard is the scoreboard! 4 CTS-Vs beat the M3, and if they had better drivers, too f'ing bad? Do you see guys complaining about losing to better drivers in ANY other form of racing? NO **** THEY WERE BETTER, THAT'S WHY THEY WON! The M3 and its driver got SMOKED. If he thought he was going to race ****ty drivers when Cadillac was throwing the event then not only is he a whiny baby but he's an idiot as well.
-m
-m
Go get some portillo's or a shake from potbelly or something.
10-31-2009, 05:42 PM
#105
MBWorld Fanatic!
Whoa, damn, chill out. I don't know about these other guys but all I'm saying is that the guy in the M3 performed admirably, and in the spirit of the original challenge, won. Yes he absolutely got beat, I'm not disputing that for a second.
Go get some portillo's or a shake from potbelly or something.
Go get some portillo's or a shake from potbelly or something.
10-31-2009, 06:03 PM
#106
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'15 E63S wagon
BTW Mr. Lutz is in his mid-70's. A good driver, but I'd hope a 21yr old with track experience could beat a 70+yr old.
The BMW M3 did well but it was beaten by the CTS-V. When driven by the exact same drivers in every magazine comparison, the CTS-V wins again and is faster, so the argument that the M3 would have been faster in Heinricy's hands is bogus as well.
The brand nobbery on the M3 boards I've visited is stunning. It exists here too, but aren't we ALL "car guys"?? A simple tip of the hat from the BMW M-group would go miles in my book.
The CTS-V is fastest right now. Who knows what the next M5 will do...or the next gen E63 will do. Isn't that the point..to have constantly evolving, faster cars that we can all enjoy.
Last edited by VCA_AMG; 10-31-2009 at 06:05 PM.
10-31-2009, 08:36 PM
#107
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Oh no, this just gave M3's owners something else to be completely uppity and douchey about.
M3 is a remarkable performance machine, especially considering its "class", but the CTS-V IS the better performer through and through.
M3 is a remarkable performance machine, especially considering its "class", but the CTS-V IS the better performer through and through.
10-31-2009, 10:06 PM
#108
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'15 E63S wagon
I don't think there's anything for the M3 guys to be extra douchey about...they lost fair & square. The CTS-V beat it, as it has done in every comparison test in every magazine I've seen to date.
Having said that I'd still prefer an M3!
Having said that I'd still prefer an M3!
11-01-2009, 01:28 AM
#109
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
This is inaccurate---the CTS-V Challenge rules were clear from the beginning, and nowhere ANYWHERE ever did it say "come beat Bob Lutz to win." There is no "spirit of the original challenge" other than to compete against the CTS-V and the fastest car wins. The challenge was to come to a GM event and go up against CTS-Vs, driven by whomever GM wanted (not just Bob Lutz). That was the original spirit, period. GM won, as they knew they would, it was their event.
BTW Mr. Lutz is in his mid-70's. A good driver, but I'd hope a 21yr old with track experience could beat a 70+yr old.
The BMW M3 did well but it was beaten by the CTS-V. When driven by the exact same drivers in every magazine comparison, the CTS-V wins again and is faster, so the argument that the M3 would have been faster in Heinricy's hands is bogus as well.
The brand nobbery on the M3 boards I've visited is stunning. It exists here too, but aren't we ALL "car guys"?? A simple tip of the hat from the BMW M-group would go miles in my book.
The CTS-V is fastest right now. Who knows what the next M5 will do...or the next gen E63 will do. Isn't that the point..to have constantly evolving, faster cars that we can all enjoy.
BTW Mr. Lutz is in his mid-70's. A good driver, but I'd hope a 21yr old with track experience could beat a 70+yr old.
The BMW M3 did well but it was beaten by the CTS-V. When driven by the exact same drivers in every magazine comparison, the CTS-V wins again and is faster, so the argument that the M3 would have been faster in Heinricy's hands is bogus as well.
The brand nobbery on the M3 boards I've visited is stunning. It exists here too, but aren't we ALL "car guys"?? A simple tip of the hat from the BMW M-group would go miles in my book.
The CTS-V is fastest right now. Who knows what the next M5 will do...or the next gen E63 will do. Isn't that the point..to have constantly evolving, faster cars that we can all enjoy.
And while this whole event/stunt began with a personal challenge from Bob Lutz in a conference call with media, GM will have professional racer and former GM engineer John Heinricy on-hand. According to Twork, "Heinricy will be used at the discretion of Mr. Lutz." In other words, GM will have its own ringer should any other competitor bring one.
All in all, I think this was a great showcase for the CTS-V and honestly, good for them. They made a good car that can truly hold it's own to world-class performance sedans. Whether or not any of us would buy one is a different story but I'm sure this exposure will turn some heads.
11-01-2009, 03:11 AM
#110
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
The true winner was GM's marketing dept. Or maybe Old Man Lutz if it was actually his original idea (although kinda hard to believe from a guy who sank the ship in the first place.)
"There's enormous attention being paid to this, and if you compare this cost-wise and effectiveness-wise to, say, making a bunch of TV commercials, this is a highly effective way to get the word out about how good the car is," Lutz said. "If we sell 50 or 100 of the CTS-V off this, we'd consider it a success." http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/29/gm-...utos-lutz.html
The CTS-V is an admirable car to have come out of the GM work shed. No doubt about it. But a well designed promotional event like this doesn't necessarily mean it's the ultimate fast sedan.
How about a worldwide mfg's challenge with one pro driver doing all the driving? Now that would be a real showdown event worthwhile of a lot of attention.
But for a GM promo event (that they knew was going to be predictable from the very beginning), it was pure advertising genius.
"There's enormous attention being paid to this, and if you compare this cost-wise and effectiveness-wise to, say, making a bunch of TV commercials, this is a highly effective way to get the word out about how good the car is," Lutz said. "If we sell 50 or 100 of the CTS-V off this, we'd consider it a success." http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/29/gm-...utos-lutz.html
The CTS-V is an admirable car to have come out of the GM work shed. No doubt about it. But a well designed promotional event like this doesn't necessarily mean it's the ultimate fast sedan.
How about a worldwide mfg's challenge with one pro driver doing all the driving? Now that would be a real showdown event worthwhile of a lot of attention.
But for a GM promo event (that they knew was going to be predictable from the very beginning), it was pure advertising genius.
11-01-2009, 02:54 PM
#111
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
11 Posts
2007 E63 w/P30 and Eurotech CF Diffuser
+1
And as for the earlier comment about BMW's M Group "tipping their hat" , I do not understand. They did not compete. They would have preferred the individual with the M3 did not even participate.
Now if the M3 forum "tipped their hat", that would be... well... I guess I am not ready for the end of the world yet.
And as for the earlier comment about BMW's M Group "tipping their hat" , I do not understand. They did not compete. They would have preferred the individual with the M3 did not even participate.
Now if the M3 forum "tipped their hat", that would be... well... I guess I am not ready for the end of the world yet.
11-01-2009, 03:15 PM
#112
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E63
there should have been an RS4 there. not so sure the CTS-v would have done well against that car.
BTW i really like the new CTS-V just not sure if I would ever buy a used one. I think I would have more faith in a C63 or M3 sedan. but if the 100k warranty applied might change my mind
BTW i really like the new CTS-V just not sure if I would ever buy a used one. I think I would have more faith in a C63 or M3 sedan. but if the 100k warranty applied might change my mind
11-01-2009, 07:11 PM
#113
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
a quarter mile at a time
there should have been an RS4 there. not so sure the CTS-v would have done well against that car.
BTW i really like the new CTS-V just not sure if I would ever buy a used one. I think I would have more faith in a C63 or M3 sedan. but if the 100k warranty applied might change my mind
BTW i really like the new CTS-V just not sure if I would ever buy a used one. I think I would have more faith in a C63 or M3 sedan. but if the 100k warranty applied might change my mind
11-02-2009, 02:29 AM
#116
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
335i
In the current Car And Driver issue, they had a 3 way show down and the new E63 was pretty damn close to the acceleration of this particular CTS-V that day. The AMG even beat the CTS-V in the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times. And to top things off, the AMG won the overall comparo. The new M5 due out in a year and a half or so, will have between 555-600hp. It should beat the CTS-V considering the current 5.0L NA M5 got pretty damn close times in the other comparo.
Last edited by hotrod182; 11-02-2009 at 02:32 AM.
11-02-2009, 08:54 AM
#117
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
It seems the E's new tranny is clearly giving it the edge. As the speeds get higher, the other two pull on it (and trap higher), but that thing seems to get to 115MPH very quick and efficiently.
11-02-2009, 09:48 AM
#118
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,732
Received 563 Likes
on
372 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
In the current Car And Driver issue, they had a 3 way show down and the new E63 was pretty damn close to the acceleration of this particular CTS-V that day. The AMG even beat the CTS-V in the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times. And to top things off, the AMG won the overall comparo. The new M5 due out in a year and a half or so, will have between 555-600hp. It should beat the CTS-V considering the current 5.0L NA M5 got pretty damn close times in the other comparo.
Opinion does not equal actual track times.
The new E63 would get smoked by the CTS-V on the track.
11-02-2009, 11:39 AM
#119
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
11-02-2009, 12:33 PM
#120
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
11 Posts
2007 E63 w/P30 and Eurotech CF Diffuser
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...oty-issue.html
Merc E63........................1.36.22
Mitsu EVO FQ400.............1.36.44
Porsche Panamera Turbo...1.36.83
Caddy CTS-V..................1.38.85
Audi S4..........................1.39.07
Jaguar XFR......................1.39.37
Vauxhall Insignia VXR........1.43.53
11-02-2009, 01:40 PM
#121
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,732
Received 563 Likes
on
372 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Uh... wrong. The new suspension and trans are "transforming".
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...oty-issue.html
Merc E63........................1.36.22
Mitsu EVO FQ400.............1.36.44
Porsche Panamera Turbo...1.36.83
Caddy CTS-V..................1.38.85
Audi S4..........................1.39.07
Jaguar XFR......................1.39.37
Vauxhall Insignia VXR........1.43.53
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...oty-issue.html
Merc E63........................1.36.22
Mitsu EVO FQ400.............1.36.44
Porsche Panamera Turbo...1.36.83
Caddy CTS-V..................1.38.85
Audi S4..........................1.39.07
Jaguar XFR......................1.39.37
Vauxhall Insignia VXR........1.43.53
11-02-2009, 01:55 PM
#122
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
Those times don't mean much to me. With the Jag and Audi so close to the CTS-V, it's pretty obvious the track they ran these tests on aren't anywhere near the Nurburgring. If the 2010 E63 can run a sub-8 minute Nordschleife time, then it's king. Until then, the CTS-V is.
11-02-2009, 02:24 PM
#123
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E63
11-02-2009, 03:06 PM
#124
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,732
Received 563 Likes
on
372 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
that is because you do not want to believe. And to put so much faith on the 'Ring' results really is indicative of your automotive knowledge. The AMGs numbers are far lower yet you chose to ignore that..... Post what you choose, but based on your post above, it will mean nada as your bias is clear.
Ring results are what EVERY AUTOMAKER OUT THERE including Mercedes, who torture tested the W212 E63 there extensively (according to their own website), goes by. Why? Because it's a long course with virtually every type of corner/chicane/straight that you can pack into a track. The Nordschleife is, for good reason, the pinnacle of performance testing. No minute-and-a-half long circuit is going to go the same length to DEFINITIVELY prove a car's absolute performance that a sub 8 minute lap on the 'Ring would prove.
And since the E63 has been documented as having been tested at the Nordschleife, and no numbers have been released, you can speculate away. The minute the CTS-V posted a 7:59 it was everywhere.
Yes the AMG's ACCELERATION numbers are better, fantastic. The perspective that the ring gives you can and will mitigate acceleration numbers. That's the place where the M3 CSL beat the CLK DTM AMG.
