Car & Driver: Dec 2009 E63 vs CTS-V vs XFR
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'15 E63S wagon
Car & Driver: Dec 2009 E63 vs CTS-V vs XFR
As I'm sure many of you have already noticed, the new Car & Driver cover story this month is the one we've been waiting for...
2010 E63 vs CTS-V vs Jag XFR
Without ruining the entire story, the E63 wins the comparison.
Noteworthy as-tested numbers for the 2010 E63:
0-60mph in 4.0sec
1/4mi in 12.5sec @ 115mph
0-100 in 9.5 sec.
lane-change test: 65.4mph
Skidpad: 0.92
They say the DCT clutch-auto transmission makes for gnarly acceleration runs from a dig. It optimizes wheelspin. 4.0sec to 60mph is incredible, and it beats the E55 and E63 previous gen models. The new suspension is reportedly vastly improved as well.
I have a feeling the DCT transmission will be a game-changer for some of the E55 faithful, if only b/c you can now get a near perfect launch EVERY TIME, plus bang out lightning fast shifts with no torque converter. I know it's still not a FI engine too, so the mod-kings will not be as interested. The new 2010 E63 suspension & chassis sounds like a massive upgrade from the 211 suspension/chassis as well in the handling department (nimble vs "wallowing"). The handling differences alone should be considerable.
What did you guys think of the comparo? The CTS-V guys are flustered...
2010 E63 vs CTS-V vs Jag XFR
Without ruining the entire story, the E63 wins the comparison.
Noteworthy as-tested numbers for the 2010 E63:
0-60mph in 4.0sec
1/4mi in 12.5sec @ 115mph
0-100 in 9.5 sec.
lane-change test: 65.4mph
Skidpad: 0.92
They say the DCT clutch-auto transmission makes for gnarly acceleration runs from a dig. It optimizes wheelspin. 4.0sec to 60mph is incredible, and it beats the E55 and E63 previous gen models. The new suspension is reportedly vastly improved as well.
I have a feeling the DCT transmission will be a game-changer for some of the E55 faithful, if only b/c you can now get a near perfect launch EVERY TIME, plus bang out lightning fast shifts with no torque converter. I know it's still not a FI engine too, so the mod-kings will not be as interested. The new 2010 E63 suspension & chassis sounds like a massive upgrade from the 211 suspension/chassis as well in the handling department (nimble vs "wallowing"). The handling differences alone should be considerable.
What did you guys think of the comparo? The CTS-V guys are flustered...
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
Last edited by VCA_AMG; 11-02-2009 at 02:01 AM.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
The W212 E63 will definitely be one great competitor.... but will be nothing compared to the twin turbo version coming in 2 years after ![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Also, I hope a lot of the problems with MCT have been worked out.... we need more members to track these things and post some data
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Also, I hope a lot of the problems with MCT have been worked out.... we need more members to track these things and post some data
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
As I'm sure many of you have already noticed, the new Car & Driver cover story this month is the one we've been waiting for...
2010 E63 vs CTS-V vs Jag XFR
Without ruining the entire story, the E63 wins the comparison.
Noteworthy as-tested numbers for the 2010 E63:
0-60mph in 4.0sec
1/4mi in 12.5sec @ 115mph
0-100 in 9.5 sec.
lane-change test: 65.4mph
Skidpad: 0.92
They say the DCT clutch-auto transmission makes for gnarly acceleration runs from a dig. It optimizes wheelspin. 4.0sec to 60mph is incredible, and it beats the E55 and E63 previous gen models. The new suspension is reportedly vastly improved as well.
I have a feeling the DCT transmission will be a game-changer for some of the E55 faithful, if only b/c you can now get a near perfect launch EVERY TIME, plus bang out lightning fast shifts with no torque converter. I know it's still not a FI engine too, so the mod-kings will not be as interested. The new 2010 E63 suspension & chassis sounds like a massive upgrade from the 211 suspension/chassis as well in the handling department (nimble vs "wallowing"). The handling differences alone should be considerable.
What did you guys think of the comparo? The CTS-V guys are flustered...![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
2010 E63 vs CTS-V vs Jag XFR
Without ruining the entire story, the E63 wins the comparison.
Noteworthy as-tested numbers for the 2010 E63:
0-60mph in 4.0sec
1/4mi in 12.5sec @ 115mph
0-100 in 9.5 sec.
lane-change test: 65.4mph
Skidpad: 0.92
They say the DCT clutch-auto transmission makes for gnarly acceleration runs from a dig. It optimizes wheelspin. 4.0sec to 60mph is incredible, and it beats the E55 and E63 previous gen models. The new suspension is reportedly vastly improved as well.
I have a feeling the DCT transmission will be a game-changer for some of the E55 faithful, if only b/c you can now get a near perfect launch EVERY TIME, plus bang out lightning fast shifts with no torque converter. I know it's still not a FI engine too, so the mod-kings will not be as interested. The new 2010 E63 suspension & chassis sounds like a massive upgrade from the 211 suspension/chassis as well in the handling department (nimble vs "wallowing"). The handling differences alone should be considerable.
What did you guys think of the comparo? The CTS-V guys are flustered...
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
MB needs to/should do what GM did. When GM built the cts-v they wanted a performance sedan that could outgun the E55 and outhandle the M5. Whenever you saw testing of the cts-v before its release they always had an M5 and a E55 there to compare. I wouldn't be surprised if they purchased both cars.
just my .55
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C55 AMG, 135i, 911 GT3, GLE43 AMG
And no, it is no where as fast as the the M-DCT unit (true dual clutch transmission) in the M3.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
The transmission in the new E63 is the same as the unit in the current SL63. It is NOT a dual clutch transmission. It is the same 7 speed transmission as in previous AMG's except that a wet start-up clutch unit replaces the torque converter.
And no, it is no where as fast as the the M-DCT unit (true dual clutch transmission) in the M3.
And no, it is no where as fast as the the M-DCT unit (true dual clutch transmission) in the M3.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
"The big news with the new SL63 is the addition of Mercedes' seven-speed twin-clutch SpeedShift MCT (Multi-Clutch Transmission) with four drive modes. Shifts with the MCT are promised to be smoother, faster and more fun overall than before."
Here is the article:
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/o...3-and-sl65-am/
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C55 AMG, 135i, 911 GT3, GLE43 AMG
For a better test of "handling", slower, shorter, and more tighter tracks are probably a better venue, where cars with high HP don't have long straights to overpower lower HP cars. The skidpad grip and slalom speeds/lane change speeds that American car mags do also try to isolate the "handling" aspects objectively.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C55 AMG, 135i, 911 GT3, GLE43 AMG
According to this article, the SL63 MCT is a twin-clutch system ![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
"The big news with the new SL63 is the addition of Mercedes' seven-speed twin-clutch SpeedShift MCT (Multi-Clutch Transmission) with four drive modes. Shifts with the MCT are promised to be smoother, faster and more fun overall than before."
Here is the article:
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/o...3-and-sl65-am/
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
"The big news with the new SL63 is the addition of Mercedes' seven-speed twin-clutch SpeedShift MCT (Multi-Clutch Transmission) with four drive modes. Shifts with the MCT are promised to be smoother, faster and more fun overall than before."
Here is the article:
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/o...3-and-sl65-am/
"At the heart of the new AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT 7-speed sports transmission lies the wet start-up clutch, which runs in an oil bath and replaces the previous torque converter. Thanks to its low rotational inertia, the transmission responds instantaneously and dynamically with no slip. Accelerator pedal movements trigger an instant traction response. Fitted with four drive modes: “C” (Comfort), “S” (Sport), “S+” (Sport plus) and “M” (Manual), the transmission provides gearshifting with no loss of tractive force and supports customised control strategies for maximum driving pleasure. In “C” mode the gearshifts are comfortable, coupled with a “soft” accelerator response set-up for outstandingly smooth power transfer. In “S” mode the engine and transmission interact with more "bite": the engine speed is allowed to reach a higher level in each gear; the downshifts also feel more spontaneous. The gearshifts are around 20 per cent faster than in “C” mode. Switching to “S+” mode cuts another 20 per cent off shift times, while “M” is the sportiest mode: here the AMG 6.3-litre V8 engine has even more bite, added to which the transmission shifts gear another 10 per cent faster – a reduction of 50 per cent compared with “C” mode. In “M” mode the gearshifts take just 100 milliseconds.
Ultra-fast, spontaneous multiple downshifts are another forte of the new MCT sports transmission. For instance, kickdown lets you move straight from seventh down to fourth gear or from fifth to second. In the “S” (Sport), “S+” (Sport plus) and “M” (Manual) modes the automatic double-declutching function is active. Every manual or automatic downshift is accompanied by precisely metered double-declutching – from “S” through “S+” to “M” incrementally. And this not only adds to the driver's emotional experience: the virtually load-free downshift minimises load-change reactions, which pays dividends particularly when braking into a bend on the racetrack."
#11
Very impressive, but I'm sure BMW's upcoming M5 will be a top performer. I'm sure Audi will make a strong comeback, so Mercedes really needs to step up their game for the next version.
For the E63 to handle as well as it did, great job to AMG.
Balance is where it is at, not overall HP, as evidenced by Porsche for so many years. It appears the E63 has really succeeded there.
For the E63 to handle as well as it did, great job to AMG.
Balance is where it is at, not overall HP, as evidenced by Porsche for so many years. It appears the E63 has really succeeded there.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
I have to disagree with you there. Although the Nurburgring laptimes are a very good measure of a car's OVERALL performance (acceleration and handling), a lot of time on the Ring can be made up simply by having a high HP car where it will shine on the long straights and fast sweeping corners.
For a better test of "handling", slower, shorter, and more tighter tracks are probably a better venue, where cars with high HP don't have long straights to overpower lower HP cars. The skidpad grip and slalom speeds/lane change speeds that American car mags do also try to isolate the "handling" aspects objectively.
For a better test of "handling", slower, shorter, and more tighter tracks are probably a better venue, where cars with high HP don't have long straights to overpower lower HP cars. The skidpad grip and slalom speeds/lane change speeds that American car mags do also try to isolate the "handling" aspects objectively.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
This is an old video but it shows how much better the M5 handles vs the E55 (no surprise) but the M5 also handles well at the ring.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2rBDTkggj0
CTS-V vs M5 around a different track
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQp5ih_QOE0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2rBDTkggj0
CTS-V vs M5 around a different track
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQp5ih_QOE0
#14
Administrator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
The transmission in the new E63 is the same as the unit in the current SL63. It is NOT a dual clutch transmission. It is the same 7 speed transmission as in previous AMG's except that a wet start-up clutch unit replaces the torque converter.
And no, it is no where as fast as the the M-DCT unit (true dual clutch transmission) in the M3.
And no, it is no where as fast as the the M-DCT unit (true dual clutch transmission) in the M3.
I love the DCT in my two rides!!!
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
That article was from 2008 and not an official MB press release. I have not seen from any official MB press release mentioning anything about a dual clutch design. MCT stands for multi-clutch technology, and it refers to the multi-clutch design which replaces the torque converter. A true dual clutch transmission always has 2 gears selected (1 engaged and another pre-selected) and ready to go at any time. This is not the case with the AMG unit in SL63 or E63. Double de-clutching refers to how the clutches operate during gear shifts......it doesn't refer to having 2 gears engaged at the same time.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#16
Administrator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Interesting.... I'm glad somebody shed some light on this. I always thought it was a dual clutch system similar to the DCT, but I guess not. I wonder why Mercedes went this route instead of a true dual clutch? The technology is more than available
At 100 ms, the MCT shifts are still much slower than DCT and even slower than SMG II and III (80 ms), which are almost 4 years old.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'15 E63S wagon
Good catch, the new E63 is (as you've all already said) a MCT not DCT, my bad.
From the numbers I've seen, it seems that the MBZ MCT trans still blows away the 211-class torque-converter transmission with regard to both shift speed and engagement/firmness/power transfer. Add the launch control and I have a hard time believing the 211 transmission w/torque converter is in the same league at all.
From the numbers I've seen, it seems that the MBZ MCT trans still blows away the 211-class torque-converter transmission with regard to both shift speed and engagement/firmness/power transfer. Add the launch control and I have a hard time believing the 211 transmission w/torque converter is in the same league at all.
#20
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 E63, 2006 C55
RE: W212 Comparison Test
I read the test yesterday, and while I have not yet driven the W212 E63, I believe the quicker 0-60 time stems mostly from the rear axle ratio change from 2.82 to 3.06.
The other performance numbers are not all that different from W211, although I anticipate it will do significantly better lap times on a track, especially with the upgraded suspension package. The W212 suspension upgrades and new transmission technology will be substantial ehancements on the road too, but I'm in no rush to trade in my 07.
And for what it's worth, my 09 automatic CTS-V is a definitely few ticks faster than my E63.
I do look forward to seeing and driving a W212 E63 soon.
The other performance numbers are not all that different from W211, although I anticipate it will do significantly better lap times on a track, especially with the upgraded suspension package. The W212 suspension upgrades and new transmission technology will be substantial ehancements on the road too, but I'm in no rush to trade in my 07.
And for what it's worth, my 09 automatic CTS-V is a definitely few ticks faster than my E63.
I do look forward to seeing and driving a W212 E63 soon.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'15 E63S wagon
Where do you notice the "few clicks" difference---down low, mid-range, up top at freeway speeds?
I've driven too many E63s to count but the CTS-V is still a car I've yet to experience in any reasonable fashion.
The CTS-V feels twice as small as the E-class as well.
I've driven too many E63s to count but the CTS-V is still a car I've yet to experience in any reasonable fashion.
The CTS-V feels twice as small as the E-class as well.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,725
Received 558 Likes
on
368 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
I have to disagree with you there. Although the Nurburgring laptimes are a very good measure of a car's OVERALL performance (acceleration and handling), a lot of time on the Ring can be made up simply by having a high HP car where it will shine on the long straights and fast sweeping corners.
For a better test of "handling", slower, shorter, and more tighter tracks are probably a better venue, where cars with high HP don't have long straights to overpower lower HP cars. The skidpad grip and slalom speeds/lane change speeds that American car mags do also try to isolate the "handling" aspects objectively.
For a better test of "handling", slower, shorter, and more tighter tracks are probably a better venue, where cars with high HP don't have long straights to overpower lower HP cars. The skidpad grip and slalom speeds/lane change speeds that American car mags do also try to isolate the "handling" aspects objectively.
#23
Your premise being accurate, the E46 M3 CSL is also much lighter and setup for track use. A few source even state the car made 20 or so more hp (it all adds up). About as close to a track car one will get even in a limited edition production vehicle. Not a vehicle I would want to live with day in and out, but a great weekend car I suppose.
Last edited by myntk12; 11-05-2009 at 11:42 AM.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
9 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
So is the SLS a true dual clutch setup?
Here is audio of that baby shifting.
Don't judge first to 2nd...I think he bangs the limiter. Listen to 2nd to 3rd....it's near instant. Sure beats our 55 slushers.
Here is audio of that baby shifting.
Don't judge first to 2nd...I think he bangs the limiter. Listen to 2nd to 3rd....it's near instant. Sure beats our 55 slushers.