W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MY 2011 Twin Turbo!!! for v6 and v8's :

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-17-2009, 02:06 PM
  #101  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,950
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 CLS63 030
Originally Posted by prodigymb
i ran 11.71 stage 1 on 19" street tires with a 1.86 60'. out of all people you know what adding a drag radial would have done to the et on that setup

What did you trap as a stage 1 E55?

i am no longer stage, but i am nowhere near stg5 lol


correction: stock powered e55 and stock powered cls63. sorry but running on drag radial is not STOCK and is a significant mod

I never said I was stock
what I am saying is a stock CLS 63 vs a stock CLS 55 would be equal


most would agree with me that stock is the way your car rolled off the factory. it is common sense that stock your car will not go 1.4x 60' (which btw is awesome)
agree with you 100%

also i was talking about ETs not trap speeds. record e55 et is 11.77 while record e63 et 11.95 and yours is 12.00 . thats a fact


Trap is a better indication of HP, so lets use trap it is a clearer picture.

LOL i never said a stage one car will embarrass you. I also said that the race would be driver determined.

Full throttless did

However just about all Stage 1 cars have a faster ET then a 11.80. No point to argue of that. My car did in 11.7, tracshun went 11.5 stage 1 and there are plenty of ppl in between.
lets use cars same day same track for our comparisons not times from cars all over the usa


I respect you and your responses,
Old 12-17-2009, 02:09 PM
  #102  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by Full Throttle
You know this for a fact....huh i love how people assume they know everything on the net. How about this sport. We race for $20,000 any track in the country you want,any week in February. I promise you i will blow your doors off in my CLS.

You game?
Just curious, what is your best time and traps to date? Is your car still stock?
Old 12-17-2009, 02:10 PM
  #103  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by juicee63
As most 63 guys will tell ya, drag radials typically produce identical times to street tires as the sidewall is similar as is the operating temp.
Really? If they produce the same times, why do so many people bother with a dedicated drag setup with DRs? That seems counterintuitive. I thought "most" guys (63 or otherwise) can lower their 60's and shave a couple tenths' worth of ET by using DRs (like M/T or Hoosier) instead of street tires (T1Rs, PS2s, Invos, et al).
Old 12-17-2009, 02:14 PM
  #104  
Banned
 
Full Throttle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: D.C. METRO AREA
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by juicee63
As most 63 guys will tell ya, drag radials typically produce identical times to street tires as the sidewall is similar as is the operating temp.
This is the post of the century.
Old 12-17-2009, 02:14 PM
  #105  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by Zod
Juiceee no offence...but ur running more then just DR no?...
your car has weight reduction no?
wheels?
battery?
ECU?
under drive pulley?
moved some sensor back (some of the earlier VRP packages)

this is stock?
The battery and pulleys are back to stock.... you can now some up his mods as:

1) ECU Tune
2) Weight reduction (includes wheels - this one is the most important for the 63)
3) Sensor relocation.

The rest of his amazing times come from driver skill/experience (a lot of people under-estimate this), properly trained tranny (not just a reset), good track conditions, good weather conditions, etc...
Old 12-17-2009, 02:17 PM
  #106  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
Really? If they produce the same times, why do so many people bother with a dedicated drag setup with DRs? That seems counterintuitive. I thought "most" guys (63 or otherwise) can lower their 60's and shave a couple tenths' worth of ET by using DRs (like M/T or Hoosier) instead of street tires (T1Rs, PS2s, Invos, et al).
NOT on a stock E63.... I've ran side by side with another stock E63 countless times (username: gE63). He was running drag radials and I was running Continentals (stock tires), and his 60 foot was identical to mine. We switched drivers, cars, and tried a few other things. At the end of the session he did edge me out a little but not by much. For some reason, the 7g tranny bogs if you grip too good. This is still a mystery to me, as I'm trying to get to the bottom of it, but I do believe that once we figure out what exactly is happening with the 63 launch, drag radials will benefit us a great deal
Old 12-17-2009, 02:39 PM
  #107  
Zod
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Zod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 2,597
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
Originally Posted by juicee63

I know for a fact Full Throttle could not beat me with his CLS 55 and that really is all that matters to me.
[/QUOTE]

I agree to
Old 12-17-2009, 02:40 PM
  #108  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,950
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 CLS63 030
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
Really? If they produce the same times, why do so many people bother with a dedicated drag setup with DRs? That seems counterintuitive. I thought "most" guys (63 or otherwise) can lower their 60's and shave a couple tenths' worth of ET by using DRs (like M/T or Hoosier) instead of street tires (T1Rs, PS2s, Invos, et al).

The 11.77 E55 was on street tires as was the 11.95 E63

as was the 12.1 E63

All the best times on stock cars are absent drag radials
Old 12-17-2009, 02:44 PM
  #109  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,950
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 CLS63 030
Originally Posted by Full Throttle
This is the post of the century.
Perhaps if you ran your car instead of flapping gums you would already know this to be true.

A street tire on a well prepped track will do just fine.

Heck most 55 guys know this
Old 12-17-2009, 02:55 PM
  #110  
Banned
 
Full Throttle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: D.C. METRO AREA
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by juicee63
Perhaps if you ran your car instead of flapping gums you would already know this to be true.
Put up your $20,000 and i will race your CLS63 rolling dumpster at any track in the country.
Old 12-17-2009, 03:00 PM
  #111  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yacht Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
Haven't had this much action here since Jrcart.
Old 12-17-2009, 03:13 PM
  #112  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
prodigymb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
997TT, R8 V10+, G550, Plaid S
Originally Posted by juicee63
lets use cars same day same track for our comparisons not times from cars all over the usa
What did you trap as a stage 1 E55? -121.8

I never said I was stock
what I am saying is a stock CLS 63 vs a stock CLS 55 would be equal
i wasn't arguing that.

Trap is a better indication of HP, so lets use trap it is a clearer picture.
trap is a better indication of HP. but i was not comparing HP. i was comparing how fast the cars can cover same amount of distance....
Full throttless did
lol you and MB Forever are arguing with me like i was trashing the 63s. which i wasn't. i simply stated that a stage 1 e55 should be faster then 11.8 in normal conditions. not cls55 - because i don't know what those run, so i can't say much about them.


I respect you and your responses,
Old 12-17-2009, 03:18 PM
  #113  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,727
Received 559 Likes on 369 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Oh no, not again!!

Old 12-17-2009, 03:20 PM
  #114  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MRAMG1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 3,341
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
S600, GL450, Audi A5 Cab
Originally Posted by Yacht Master
Haven't had this much action here since Jrcart.
I hear you, now pass the

PS: What did ever happen to good old Jrcart
Old 12-17-2009, 03:32 PM
  #115  
Senior Member
 
LB63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: el clinico magnifico
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63, S550
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
NOT on a stock E63.... I've ran side by side with another stock E63 countless times (username: gE63). He was running drag radials and I was running Continentals (stock tires), and his 60 foot was identical to mine. We switched drivers, cars, and tried a few other things. At the end of the session he did edge me out a little but not by much. For some reason, the 7g tranny bogs if you grip too good. This is still a mystery to me, as I'm trying to get to the bottom of it, but I do believe that once we figure out what exactly is happening with the 63 launch, drag radials will benefit us a great deal
I figure the 6.2 will not benefit much from DRs because of the lower amount of torque compared to the 55k which has tons of torque and therefore a harder time hooking up.
Old 12-17-2009, 04:06 PM
  #116  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by LB63
I figure the 6.2 will not benefit much from DRs because of the lower amount of torque compared to the 55k which has tons of torque and therefore a harder time hooking up.
Correct..... the torque becomes noticeable right after 4500 rpm. However, on modded 63s, the torque arives a little earlier: 2.7k to 3k, which then would make drag radials more beneficial
Old 12-17-2009, 04:31 PM
  #117  
Super Member
 
deaguero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Quinta, CALIF.
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2009 C63 Black on Black
Yeah Juice, But!

Originally Posted by juicee63
a 6.2 TT would be far better than a 5.5, The SLS motor is a one off?
With Mileage requirements and the "Copenhagen" green requirements we all have to give up something, right!!

Anyway, the 55 rises again!!

I'll look forward to getting a new 55

Phil
Old 12-17-2009, 04:41 PM
  #118  
Super Member
 
deaguero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Quinta, CALIF.
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2009 C63 Black on Black
Unhappy Not good!

Originally Posted by 220S
Going DI is a concern, for sure. My SA at the Porsche dealer told me they are running into heavy deposits already. They're recommending full clean out (expensive) on all DI motors now.
I guess DI is not the panacea that the emissions/mileage folks believe they are
Old 12-17-2009, 05:23 PM
  #119  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
NOT on a stock E63.... I've ran side by side with another stock E63 countless times (username: gE63). He was running drag radials and I was running Continentals (stock tires), and his 60 foot was identical to mine. We switched drivers, cars, and tried a few other things. At the end of the session he did edge me out a little but not by much. For some reason, the 7g tranny bogs if you grip too good. This is still a mystery to me, as I'm trying to get to the bottom of it, but I do believe that once we figure out what exactly is happening with the 63 launch, drag radials will benefit us a great deal
MB Forever, as usual, very interesting info - thanks for sharing. While I agree 100% that same day, same track comparisons are best - I'd caution against drawing any definitive conclusions from a sample size of "one vs. one." To be clear - I don't have any beef with anyone in this or any other thread - but for someone to state "most 63 guys" (no mention of stock or modded) and then someone else reference one applicable, relevant heads-up result of two cars... while that may reinforce the hypothesis, it falls far short of confirming it (IMHO).

Originally Posted by juicee63
The 11.77 E55 was on street tires as was the 11.95 E63

as was the 12.1 E63

All the best times on stock cars are absent drag radials
Last point first - a stock car result has to be absent DRs... since DRs make it no longer a "stock car." So, of course the best times would be absent DRs. Second - who has the E55 you mention? Hammer Down (according to his sig.) is "The Fastest Stock Powered E55 on DR's 121.67 in the USA
The Quickest Stock Powered E55 on DR's on the West Coast 11.79" - what was HD's best ET on street tires? 11.9 or so?

Originally Posted by MB_Forever
Correct..... the torque becomes noticeable right after 4500 rpm. However, on modded 63s, the torque arives a little earlier: 2.7k to 3k, which then would make drag radials more beneficial
MB Forever - that does make some sense, for stock cars. Although, the 6.2L V8 makes plenty of TQ down low compared to the M112k (just saying, everything's relative ). Question - how much does the 7G let you preload the TC and raise the rpms before you start pushing through the beams? If high enough to spin a set of street tires - it would seem (hypothetically) that a properly heated set of DRs could yield a better 60' and ET... no?
Old 12-17-2009, 05:40 PM
  #120  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,950
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 CLS63 030
Originally Posted by Full Throttle
Put up your $20,000 and i will race your CLS63 rolling dumpster at any track in the country.

Our cars look identical, so...

Just run your beautiful CLS, beat my splits and I will STFU. Until you do your just a keyboard striker.


Your M113 is a super power plant as is the M156. We have already seen with the advent of the M159 the 6.2L V8 can achieve near 600 hp. STOCK

We are getting greener not meaner.
Old 12-17-2009, 05:49 PM
  #121  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
MB Forever, as usual, very interesting info - thanks for sharing. While I agree 100% that same day, same track comparisons are best - I'd caution against drawing any definitive conclusions from a sample size of "one vs. one." To be clear - I don't have any beef with anyone in this or any other thread - but for someone to state "most 63 guys" (no mention of stock or modded) and then someone else reference one applicable, relevant heads-up result of two cars... while that may reinforce the hypothesis, it falls far short of confirming it (IMHO).
No problem.... I always appreciate your input and point of view on any topic Regarding my quote, I was actually stating one case as an example. I didn't mean to provide a list of every attempt we made. I just posted my opinion from my own experience at several tracks. We tried a lot more than one case though: we tried DR and even full slicks on Juicee's car when it was fully stock and we tried a drag setup on yet one more E63 (white, the person was from OC) and very similar results. I am not saying DR won't help at all..... I am sure they do, but in the case of stock E and CLS 63s, there is something else going on and since there is a very limited selection of 63 owners who actually drag their cars often (heck I only know of me and Juicee who do , tuners haven't looked into the issue much. I don't have the technical background to know what it is, but I do feel it. The effects are reduced a little on a tuned car, but are still there.
Old 12-17-2009, 06:54 PM
  #122  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Interesting indeed. Didn't realize it'd had been tested that extensively - good to know.
Old 12-17-2009, 07:36 PM
  #123  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
Interesting indeed. Didn't realize it'd had been tested that extensively - good to know.
I wouldn't call it intensively, but we have tried it on at least 4 different cars. And even more interesting..... results were a little better on lighter stock 63 models, aka, C63 and CLK63. I'm thinking that because of the nature of the 63 design, weight causes spikes in torque management interference at a much higher rate than it does on the 55..... but again, at this point, these are just observations. I wish some of the aftermarket companies would do more research on this.
Old 12-17-2009, 10:21 PM
  #124  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
prodigymb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
997TT, R8 V10+, G550, Plaid S
are you guys using the same exact overall height tire on the 63? i read that newer cars act up if they sense gear ratio changing which can be caused by changing the overall diameter of the tire. i know the e55 monitors this too but it is a 5spd with much longer gears then the 7spd. maybe thats part of the issue.
Old 12-17-2009, 10:42 PM
  #125  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
enzom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 E55
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
Second - who has the E55 you mention? Hammer Down (according to his sig.) is "The Fastest Stock Powered E55 on DR's 121.67 in the USA
The Quickest Stock Powered E55 on DR's on the West Coast 11.79" - what was HD's best ET on street tires? 11.9 or so?

That was my car. Sold it to another member this summer. Mystery solved.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 1.00 average.

Quick Reply: MY 2011 Twin Turbo!!! for v6 and v8's :



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 PM.