hit the track up
ran 3 back to back to back runs with no cool down.It was also like 84 out with massive humidity
8:39 pm
rt 070
60 2.035
330 5.400
1/8 8.11@ 92.11
1000 10.446
1/4 12.397@118.66
8:46 pm
rt 143
60 1.892
330 5.236
1/8 7.943@ 92.23
1000 10.278
1/4 12.231@118.61
8:53 pm
rt 160
60 1.970
330 5.341
1/8 8.058@ 91.80
1000 10.403
1/4 12.361@118.32
I love the consistency of stock boost,but not getting in the 11's is killing me.This was on street tires and the way I drive my car to work everyday.
172 pulley and kleemann tune should get me there
Last edited by skratch77; Sep 1, 2010 at 10:19 PM.
the car will hit the dyno soon to be sure
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Im still 50/50 on either going with a 168 or a 172 pulley.
Thanks for the offer hammer,I have a set of M/T radials but I was too lazy to throw them on.
meth kit is also getting installed over the winter,I just dont feel like taking the supercharger off again,its my DD

At Sacramento, I trapped a high of 118.899 mph completely stock with stock air filters and charcoal filters in place and no weight reductions what so ever (yes I still had my spare and tools in the trunk). And yes I know that everybody questions Sacramento's trap speed due to the controversial beam distance thing, but even at Famoso I have trapped anywhere from 114 to 116 mph in different DA days.
Your car has (at least) 50 rwhp more than mine, so it definitely has the potential of running 11s, but it is only a matter of good weather and good track prep. I predict you'll run 11.7 @ 120 mph if weather cooperates this next time out

At Sacramento, I trapped a high of 118.899 mph completely stock with stock air filters and charcoal filters in place and no weight reductions what so ever (yes I still had my spare and tools in the trunk). And yes I know that everybody questions Sacramento's trap speed due to the controversial beam distance thing, but even at Famoso I have trapped anywhere from 114 to 116 mph in different DA days.
Your car has (at least) 50 rwhp more than mine, so it definitely has the potential of running 11s, but it is only a matter of good weather and good track prep. I predict you'll run 11.7 @ 120 mph if weather cooperates this next time out

. Traction was not too great for street tires though.I was only 0.2 mph away from your 119.2 record. Had we been able to run for 2 more hours that day (as we had planned before the Corvette guy screwed it up for us), I think I would've hit 119.5 mph and everyone else would've beat their records as well

At Famoso, the highest I trapped was 116.x mph and that was at a very good day with DA between -100 ft to +200 ft. On average, in a good day, my car traps 114 to 115 mph at Famoso.
Last edited by MB_Forever; Sep 4, 2010 at 08:20 AM.
. Traction was not too great for street tires though.I was only 0.2 mph away from your 119.2 record. Had we been able to run for 2 more hours that day (as we had planned before the Corvette guy screwed it up for us), I think I would've hit 119.5 mph and everyone else would've beat their records as well

At Famoso, the highest I trapped was 116.x mph and that was at a very good day with DA between -100 ft to +200 ft. On average, my car traps 114 to 115 mph at Famoso.

At Sacramento, I trapped a high of 118.899 mph completely stock with stock air filters and charcoal filters in place and no weight reductions what so ever (yes I still had my spare and tools in the trunk). And yes I know that everybody questions Sacramento's trap speed due to the controversial beam distance thing, but even at Famoso I have trapped anywhere from 114 to 116 mph in different DA days.
Your car has (at least) 50 rwhp more than mine, so it definitely has the potential of running 11s, but it is only a matter of good weather and good track prep. I predict you'll run 11.7 @ 120 mph if weather cooperates this next time out







