W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Misinformation: Mild steel vs Stainless steel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 06-03-2011, 09:41 PM
  #1  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
MBH motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Posts: 2,305
Received 90 Likes on 45 Posts
C63, SL55, E55, CLS55, ML63, C55
Misinformation: Mild steel vs Stainless steel

As I'm taking my daily browsing of Mbworld. I came across a statement about mild steel use in headers and the claim that its better than stainless steel for headers, Or something along those line. So I was inspired to try and set the record strait about mild steel vs stainless steel and its aspects of use.

First things first, Mild steel is a great metal to make things with. Its affordable its very strong and relatively easy to work with when there is no rust. Mild steel has a bunch of uses in the automotive industry. Roll bars and roll cages can be made from it. NHRA rules state 1.75 .083 wall, Mild steel can be used to construct a NHRA spec cage. With NHRA rules set to protect the driver, Its clear Mild steel is good stuff. In fact if you made a roll cage out of stainless steel, it would offer limited protection.

The truth is, Stainless steel is a softer metal. Its flexes, it bends it does everything you dont want in a devise that is meant to protect you. Carbon steel comes in a few grades. Mild Carbon Steel, Medium Carbon Steel, and Heavy Carbon Steel. When you see the term "Mild steel" that is referring to that amount of carbon inside the steel.

We all know that carbon anything is strong stuff. Thats why we use it in things that need to be structurally sound. MBH even uses it in our jigs for headers. We can't afford to have our jigs bend. In this case mild steel is a perfect choice for us. As long as we keep the rust off it. Its very dry here in AZ and the jigs never see outside use, so rust isn't a huge issue.

Stainless Steel:
Stainless steel comes in a bunch of ratings from T-409, T-304, T-308, T-316 T-321. The list could go on for days about the many other types of stainless steel. In this case we keep to what you need to know in the automotive industry.

T-409 meets the minimum requirements to be called stainless steel. In fact we all have it on our Mercedes now. As our stock exhaust system is made from it. Its stainless steel in its cheapest form.
T-304 has proven to be ideal for header use and exhaust systems. It is non-magnetic, has good flexibility qualities and handles heat well.
T-308 is basically what you use to weld T-304. Its used as a filler rod.
T-316 is a stainless steel that has good use in water, Surgical stainless steel is T-316. My Kitchen knifes are made out of T-316.
T-321 is considered on of the best steels to use in high heat applications. think of it as T-304 stainless steel with some titanium in it.

As said before mild steel has its uses. Where it is an ideal choice for the job. That is the same with stainless steel. Where I wouldn't make a roll cage from stainless steel. I also would not make a header or exhaust system with mild steel.

Here are some reasons why I wouldn't make an exhaust system out of mild steel.
1) Its extremely ridged, due to the added carbon inside the steel.

2) It rusts. In fact non protected mild (carbon) steel can begin to oxidize with in a few moments of regular exposure to air. Imagine what it would do in a rain storm or through a puddle.

3) Not having the flexibility of stainless steel, it is much more prone to cracking. So, rather than expanding under heat, the rigidity of mild steel tends to crack.

4) coating, I have never seen a coating that 100% lasts. It flakes off, it scratches and exposes raw metal, and it makes repairing difficult because you have to remove the coating before you can weld the problem area. Also note the inside coating is one of the first areas to go. This is because, the thermal coating is trapping heat inside causing it to experience much higher temps that the outside coating. Coatings can also contribute to cracking. Due to the stiffness of mild steel coating a header causes the header to be much hotter inside. The headers reaction to the extreme temp difference from outside to inside can cause cracking. Much like putting an ice cube in a glass of hot watter. The ice cracks from the extreme temp difference. Stainless steel resists this because it will expand before it will crack.

5) Condensation: Have you ever seen a car start in the morning and seen water come out of the tail pipe? I'm sure you have. That water was building up over time and just sitting stagnant on what could possibly be an exposed (uncoated) section of mild steel. Causing rust.


In comparison, quality US made stainless steel will have none of these down falls. Granted any header can crack no matter what its made of, but the likely hood is far greater with mild steel when used in a heat oriented application. Also take note, that overseas stainless steel is not the same as Stainless steel made in the USA. Stainless steel from China is an inferior product when compared to stainless from the USA.

In conclusion mild steel is great for structural uses. where as stainless steel is not. Stainless steel is good for things that are exposed to the elements, things that need to be less stiff. This makes it one of the best choices for use in automotive exhaust systems.

Last edited by MBH motorsports; 06-03-2011 at 10:08 PM.
Old 06-03-2011, 11:53 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Hammer Down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,275
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by MBH motorsports
As I'm taking my daily browsing of Mbworld. I came across a statement about mild steel use in headers and the claim that its better than stainless steel for headers, Or something along those line. So I was inspired to try and set the record strait about mild steel vs stainless steel and its aspects of use.

First things first, Mild steel is a great metal to make things with. Its affordable its very strong and relatively easy to work with when there is no rust. Mild steel has a bunch of uses in the automotive industry. Roll bars and roll cages can be made from it. NHRA rules state 1.75 .083 wall, Mild steel can be used to construct a NHRA spec cage. With NHRA rules set to protect the driver, Its clear Mild steel is good stuff. In fact if you made a roll cage out of stainless steel, it would offer limited protection.

The truth is, Stainless steel is a softer metal. Its flexes, it bends it does everything you dont want in a devise that is meant to protect you. Carbon steel comes in a few grades. Mild Carbon Steel, Medium Carbon Steel, and Heavy Carbon Steel. When you see the term "Mild steel" that is referring to that amount of carbon inside the steel.

We all know that carbon anything is strong stuff. Thats why we use it in things that need to be structurally sound. MBH even uses it in our jigs for headers. We can't afford to have our jigs bend. In this case mild steel is a perfect choice for us. As long as we keep the rust off it. Its very dry here in AZ and the jigs never see outside use, so rust isn't a huge issue.

Stainless Steel:
Stainless steel comes in a bunch of ratings from T-409, T-304, T-308, T-316 T-321. The list could go on for days about the many other types of stainless steel. In this case we keep to what you need to know in the automotive industry.

T-409 meets the minimum requirements to be called stainless steel. In fact we all have it on our Mercedes now. As our stock exhaust system is made from it. Its stainless steel in its cheapest form.
T-304 has proven to be ideal for header use and exhaust systems. It is non-magnetic, has good flexibility qualities and handles heat well.
T-308 is basically what you use to weld T-304. Its used as a filler rod.
T-316 is a stainless steel that has good use in water, Surgical stainless steel is T-316. My Kitchen knifes are made out of T-316.
T-321 is considered on of the best steels to use in high heat applications. think of it as T-304 stainless steel with some titanium in it.

As said before mild steel has its uses. Where it is an ideal choice for the job. That is the same with stainless steel. Where I wouldn't make a roll cage from stainless steel. I also would not make a header or exhaust system with mild steel.

Here are some reasons why I wouldn't make an exhaust system out of mild steel.
1) Its extremely ridged, due to the added carbon inside the steel.

2) It rusts. In fact non protected mild (carbon) steel can begin to oxidize with in a few moments of regular exposure to air. Imagine what it would do in a rain storm or through a puddle.

3) Not having the flexibility of stainless steel, it is much more prone to cracking. So, rather than expanding under heat, the rigidity of mild steel tends to crack.

4) coating, I have never seen a coating that 100% lasts. It flakes off, it scratches and exposes raw metal, and it makes repairing difficult because you have to remove the coating before you can weld the problem area. Also note the inside coating is one of the first areas to go. This is because, the thermal coating is trapping heat inside causing it to experience much higher temps that the outside coating. Coatings can also contribute to cracking. Due to the stiffness of mild steel coating a header causes the header to be much hotter inside. The headers reaction to the extreme temp difference from outside to inside can cause cracking. Much like putting an ice cube in a glass of hot watter. The ice cracks from the extreme temp difference. Stainless steel resists this because it will expand before it will crack.

5) Condensation: Have you ever seen a car start in the morning and seen water come out of the tail pipe? I'm sure you have. That water was building up over time and just sitting stagnant on what could possibly be an exposed (uncoated) section of mild steel. Causing rust.


In comparison, quality US made stainless steel will have none of these down falls. Granted any header can crack no matter what its made of, but the likely hood is far greater with mild steel when used in a heat oriented application. Also take note, that overseas stainless steel is not the same as Stainless steel made in the USA. Stainless steel from China is an inferior product when compared to stainless from the USA.

In conclusion mild steel is great for structural uses. where as stainless steel is not. Stainless steel is good for things that are exposed to the elements, things that need to be less stiff. This makes it one of the best choices for use in automotive exhaust systems.

So what grade of steel is your mid-section made of?
Old 06-04-2011, 12:21 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SterlingE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,693
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
2006 E55, 2012 Jeep SRT, 2008 G37s 6MT (The Mrs.), 2005 Explorer
Also from a steel manufacturing standpoint mild steel is much more inconsistent bc of the large amount of variance in the spec. That being said there are specs for all types of steel so knowing what you have and what it's properties are is important. I've had mild steel headers on my S10 for 8ish years. Haha all about application. Why would I spend SS money on a $2-3k car? The AMG only gets the best SS ftw in any spec over mild steel.
Old 06-04-2011, 01:11 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
220S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
Hooley, I'm curious as to what you might think about what Brad says with the Evosport headers from this recent thread: https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-now-what.html

He said this:

"There is a reason we use mild steal [steel]. For it to crank [crack], there has been an excessive amount of torquing into the merge collector. That can only happen with the fluid filled motor mounts begin to or have totally failed. This allows the engine to rotate more than anticipated and as the exhaust is very rigid, the forces concentrate on the merge collector in the header. This will happen to ANY header, FYI. In fact, if it was 304, it would be far worse and happen sooner as 304 is more brittle after many high EGT heat cycles." https://mbworld.org/forums/4702056-post19.html

It's all interesting stuff and I'm curious about it. But now we have two different views going on here it seems.

Thanks for your post, it was informative.

p.s., I'm assuming what you posted was in response to that thread, but I'd like to hear more......

Last edited by 220S; 06-04-2011 at 01:14 AM.
Old 06-04-2011, 01:43 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
i don't know that i've ever heard or read anyone generically claim mild steel to be "better" than stainless. regardless, mild steel has been successfully used on exhaust systems for decades and for most people it will outlast their ownership of the car, even when left uncoated. ironically, most reports around here of headers cracking are of the stainless variety (but i would surmise that has more to do with workmanship rather than material).
Old 06-04-2011, 06:48 AM
  #6  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
MBH motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Posts: 2,305
Received 90 Likes on 45 Posts
C63, SL55, E55, CLS55, ML63, C55
Originally Posted by 220S
Hooley, I'm curious as to what you might think about what Brad says with the Evosport headers from this recent thread: https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-now-what.html

He said this:

"There is a reason we use mild steal [steel]. For it to crank [crack], there has been an excessive amount of torquing into the merge collector. That can only happen with the fluid filled motor mounts begin to or have totally failed. This allows the engine to rotate more than anticipated and as the exhaust is very rigid, the forces concentrate on the merge collector in the header. This will happen to ANY header, FYI. In fact, if it was 304, it would be far worse and happen sooner as 304 is more brittle after many high EGT heat cycles." https://mbworld.org/forums/4702056-post19.html

It's all interesting stuff and I'm curious about it. But now we have two different views going on here it seems.

Thanks for your post, it was informative.

p.s., I'm assuming what you posted was in response to that thread, but I'd like to hear more......
I've been hear a while, Its best to let people say things in threads that relate to them. If I was to reply to that thread it would have taken away from their customers issue. Something I was not interested in doing. Carbon steel, weather it be mild, medium, or heavy is harder than stainless steel, in general. When steel gets harder it in turn becomes more brittle. The easiest way to think of it is... When carbon is added to steel the more brittle if becomes. Carbon steel can be heat treated. Where as 304 stainless can not. Some types of stainless can be heat treaded, but not 304. it comes down to the contents inside the stainless, in turn dictates the stainless steels grade. 304 stainless has an element of elasticity to it where as carbon steel does not.

@mikey, You have to ask yourself, are any of the headers that are stainless steel made from stainless steel from the USA? Granted I've seen 409 stainless crack all over the place, but thats a total different beast than a 300 series US made stainless steel. I personalty think 409 is junk. some shops and manufactures like it simply for the selling point that is considered stainless steel.
Old 06-04-2011, 08:28 AM
  #7  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 292 Likes on 241 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
nice write up!
Old 06-04-2011, 12:04 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
i hear you mike and i fully agree...but i also recognize that for many exhaust applications, mild steel is quite adequate.
Old 06-04-2011, 12:37 PM
  #9  
PREMIER SPONSOR
 
brad @ evosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
None fast enough!
Hooley, et all

We have had this debate before and it is searchable, but I want to counter a number of points so that the viewers get a more accurate picture of the facts. Although we have been making headers for 10+ years and sold over 1000 in that time, I will actually quote an independent and give comment in this post. The individual that I will quote is Jack Burns (whom I think we will agree has a fair bit of experience).

From this page: http://www.burnsstainless.com/stainlesssteel.aspx

Jack starts near the top with this (which I am sure to most would be the end of the debate, but it really is the start:

Compared to mild steel, stainless steel has superior high temperature characteristics. It is an excellent material for headers and exhaust systems, or any application where high heat is encountered.
This is a true statement, however, once you coat mild with a true aerospace 2-stage lifetime ceramic coating, it nullifies this statement. We will see more as we go...

Stainless steel is similar to mild and alloy steels; it is an alloy of iron that contains at least 12% chromium. This high chromium content retards corrosion giving the steel its "stainless" quality. There are many alloys of stainless steel, which are broken down into two basic categories:

Chromium-nickel grades
Straight chromium grades

The chromium-nickel grades are the more common stainless steels used in race car fabrication compared to the straight chromium types, due to the nickel content which provides excellent weldability and corrosion resistance.

...

Stainless steel typically has a rather low carbon content, in the range of .08% to .15%, and sometimes as low as .03%. The carbon is needed for hardness, but it also can cause the stainless to become susceptible to corrosion at high temperatures. What happens is this: when chromium-nickel steel is heated to a temperature range of 800° to 1590°F, the carbon in the steel combines with chromium to form chromium carbides. This transformation is called carbide precipitation and reduces the corrosion resistance of the steel. The chromium is reduced in this heat-affected area and makes the steel subject to what is known as intergranular corrosion. Some stainless steels are known as low carbon grades to minimize this carbide precipitation; others, such as 321, are special alloys that reduce carbide precipitation by combining and stabilizing the chromium at elevated temperatures.
So as we read, we see that low carbon content steel (such as 304) is not as hard as high carbon content steel (mild) as to yield strength. (This does not impact elasticity or tensile strength) We also see that stainless such as 304 will start to break down above 800° (such as on high EGT S/C or Turbo applications).

You may have heard Smokey Yunick talk about maintaining high exhaust velocity and increase scavenging by covering headers with a thermal wrap. In addition, there are companies that coat headers with a thermal barrier, typically some type of ceramic formula, in order to keep the heat inside the exhaust system. Stainless steel performs this function without the need for add-ons because it has a much lower coefficient of thermal conductivity, thereby keeping more heat inside and transmitting it to the header outlet. Radiated heat is perhaps the most important reason to wrap or ceramic coat the headers to protect the car and the driver from excessive, fatiguing high temperatures.

Typical {uncoated} 1010 carbon (mild) steel conducts 219% more heat per foot than do the types of stainless steel we use in header fabrication. By contrast, quite a bit more heat stays inside the stainless header tubes and does not get passed into the surrounding air. By not allowing the contraction of the cooling gases as they flow down the tubes, more exhaust velocity is retained which promotes better scavenging at the collector. This retention of velocity increases the overall header efficiency
OK, so Burns acknowledges that coated mild steel and uncoated stainless give the same benefits as to exhaust velocity. This is one of the 2 major reasons we have always coated ALL our mild steel headers.

Pertaining directly to 304:

304 is the most inexpensive and available stainless in the 300 series. It is suitable for normally-aspirated header applications, and has been successfully used by many racing teams. It does not have the high temperature fatigue resistance that 321 does, but is considerably less costly and much more available. Most 304 tubing these days has the dual designation of 304/304L.
Burns states quite clearly that 304 is a great choice for NA applications. However, due to the reasons posted above, does not make a great choice for high EGT applications.


Looking at this chart, again from Burns, we see some very interesting facts (not opinion as was the earlier quoted text).
  • Tensile Strength - Stainless IS higher than mild, not the reverse
  • Modulus of Elasticity - There is more flex in Mild, not less
  • Coefficient of Thermal Expansion - Mild is lower
  • Coefficient of Thermal Conductivity - uncoated mild is much higher

So now is evosport stance and a comment on why I posted this. To start with the second, I posted this as I have a very big problem with anyone posting opinion as FACT. Hooley, your entire post is coached as absolute fact, and it supports YOUR product. What you are really doing is posting a position statement as to why you manufacture a certain way, with an effort to paint any mild header as inferior. That is not ok. Feel free to post your opinion or your position, but please for the betterment of the community, post it as such so people understand.

Now to the first point. Evosport makes headers out of Mild, 304, 321 and Inconel (depending on the application).

Mild Steel
We opted to use Mild on ALL high egt applications. These include BMW high-reving engines and AMG S/C engines. We do this for the very reasons that Burns states. Under high EGT's, 304 will not hold up. It will (as Burns states above 800) transform and become brittle. This is not theory, we have seen it happen on 2 different stainless brands of headers we used to sell (one for BMW and one for AMG).

Mild gives us more elasticity, higher resistance to breakdown from high EGT's and greater yield strength.

Now, the two agreed downsides to Mild are corrosion and heat retention. However, we coat the headers with a LIFETIME aerospace 2-stage TBC (thermal barrier coating) that completely eliminates these downsides. In fact, the coating is so good, that it will lower radiated heat significantly. For example: If the EGT is 1300°, Header Surface Temp will be 810°. Uncoated radiated head will be 170° and coated radiated heat will be 60° (for a drop of 110°).

These headers have been used on numerous Grand-Am, World Challenge, NASA, BMW, etc race cars (including championship cars). These headers have been used on AMG's for 10+ years.
304
We have used this on all the NA low EGT 6.3 AMG's. For all the reasons that Burns posts, this is a great choice for this application.
321
We have used this on a number of turbo full race cars. Again, for the same reasons Burns states.
Inconel
We are using this in some Porsche turbo applications for the weight and heat benefits.
So the net/net is simply this: There are multiple choices for header material. Evosport had very clear and supported reasons for our choices of material for each. This is not to say that another choice for another manufacturer is wrong, it is to state why we have selected the material we use and why.

Hopefully this helps.

Thanks
Brad
Old 06-04-2011, 04:28 PM
  #10  
Super Member
 
theeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
e55 w/LET TUNE Drinks: vodka STRAIGHT Wheels: 19" HRE 547r Mods:FF headers ASP Pulley
damn you brad... good job
Old 06-04-2011, 05:01 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
220S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
Originally Posted by brad @ evosport

So now is evosport stance and a comment on why I posted this. To start with the second, I posted this as I have a very big problem with anyone posting opinion as FACT. Hooley, your entire post is coached as absolute fact, and it supports YOUR product. What you are really doing is posting a position statement as to why you manufacture a certain way, with an effort to paint any mild header as inferior. That is not ok. Feel free to post your opinion or your position, but please for the betterment of the community, post it as such so people understand.

Now to the first point. Evosport makes headers out of Mild, 304, 321 and Inconel (depending on the application).
Although I have to say that when you said "In fact, if it was 304, it would be far worse and happen sooner as 304 is more brittle after many high EGT heat cycles" then there was also the implication that 304 was simply inappropriate material, period. So you can see the confusion that a reader might have about it.

I do realize of course that the context was within an example of a specific set of headers that cracked, but for the uninitiated the assumption could be that 304 is inferior no matter what. And I think that's why Hooley addressed it. So both of you were stating a specific position within a certain context.

Good info and all is very much appreciated This certainly helps clear up the concerns. Thanks.

I'm looking for a bolt-on mod that makes sense for the n/a 6.2 motor in respect to bang for the buck and headers make sense. So it's all a good education for me and helps a lot.

But one thing all this implies to me (in conjunction with the other thread) is that if you're getting Evosport headers (or other comparable quality) then be certain to keep an eye on the motor mounts otherwise you'll be susceptible to cracks. And with 304 steel used in the n/a 6.2 liter headers (Evosport or MBH) then it's an even bigger issue. And if it's an issue even if the mounts are just beginning to fail, then it's a problem with any header despite the material, but worse with 304. On the other hand without concerns over high EGT heat cycles, maybe the 304 won't suffer the brittleness you mention
That can only happen with the fluid filled motor mounts begin to or have totally failed.
So there's going to be a potential problem with cracking if you ever have mounts failing (even beginning to fail) no matter the material. And with 304 being even worse (potentially speaking.)

Maybe I'll stay stock

Last edited by 220S; 06-05-2011 at 02:19 AM.
Old 06-04-2011, 05:15 PM
  #12  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
MBH motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Posts: 2,305
Received 90 Likes on 45 Posts
C63, SL55, E55, CLS55, ML63, C55
Not interested in debating. But I will say this lastly, Brittleness in steel basically mean the lack of plasticity. When carbon is added to steel that increases its strength, However with increased strength from the added carbon, it in turn decreases the plasticity.

Plasticity in metal means how much the metal can move, shape, or distort without breaking.

More carbon content the less it can move without breaking, Less carbon content in steel, the more it can move without breaking.

We use 2 grades of stainless steel in our headers. On the part that sees the most heat (header flange) we use T-321 stainless steel plate and T-304 tubing for the primary. If this was a turbo application that sees much higher exhaust temps than a supercharged engine. 321 through out would be the way to go. However since the supercharger is sitting on the top of the motor. The 304 stainless is not exposed to two glowing red turbos. That make 1400 or so degrees of heat on the manifold.
Old 06-04-2011, 09:28 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
I love it when topics are debated in a civil matter....

To the experts: what about ceramic coated T304? Also, can you shed some light on titanium headers/exhaust?
Old 06-04-2011, 10:31 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,929
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
06 SL65 / 97 993tt /11 Suburban/ 2012 GTR (AMG è la mia Famiglia la Bestia è la mia protezione)
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
I love it when topics are debated in a civil matter....

To the experts: what about ceramic coated T304? Also, can you shed some light on titanium headers/exhaust?
+1...That was quality reading...and I'm not even being sarcastic in the least. This is what MBWorld should be about...informative without anyone pissing on each others remarks.

Good job...

PS I'm also interested in the last part of MB_Forever's comment...your 411 on the matter would be appreciated. All the GTR guys seem to be headed down the titanium route mainly for weight savings (I believe) but I ended up going with an electronic valve exhaust system that is made from 304 steel (mainly for the ability to switch from quiet to loud - I've already been given notice for noise violation from my homeowner's assoc. on my E55 straight pipe). The more I can learn the better...thanks again.

Last edited by AMGfan; 06-04-2011 at 10:39 PM.
Old 06-04-2011, 11:24 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
OK55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes E55 AMG (2006), Mercedes 560 SEL (1991)
Originally Posted by MBH motorsports

First things first, Mild steel is a great metal to make things with. Its affordable its very strong and relatively easy to work with when there is no rust. Mild steel has a bunch of uses in the automotive industry. Roll bars and roll cages can be made from it. NHRA rules state 1.75 .083 wall, Mild steel can be used to construct a NHRA spec cage. With NHRA rules set to protect the driver, Its clear Mild steel is good stuff. In fact if you made a roll cage out of stainless steel, it would offer limited protection.

The truth is, Stainless steel is a softer metal.
I'm afraid I have some misgivings about your fundamental assumption here. The ultimate tensile strength of AISI 302 stainless steel of 860 MPa is much higher than the 400 Mpa figure of mild steel. AISI 302 stainless steel also has a yield strength of 502 MPa, higher than the 250 Mpa figure for mild steel. How then is stainless steel softer than mild steel?
Old 06-04-2011, 11:32 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
motorkas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
a Rivera...via a Custom 24, Strat and Les Paul
Originally Posted by AMGfan
+1...That was quality reading...and I'm not even being sarcastic in the least. This is what MBWorld should be about...informative without anyone pissing on each others remarks.

Good job...

PS I'm also interested in the last part of MB_Forever's comment...your 411 on the matter would be appreciated. All the GTR guys seem to be headed down the titanium route mainly for weight savings (I believe) but I ended up going with an electronic valve exhaust system that is made from 304 steel (mainly for the ability to switch from quiet to loud - I've already been given notice for noise violation from my homeowner's assoc. on my E55 straight pipe). The more I can learn the better...thanks again.
F@#CKING HOA's; while I understand the desire for a standard set of rules to protect property values, I know of way too many instances when the wrong person gets on the board and miraculously starts to channel Stalin. . . my favorite story was when my cousin was the president of his HOA, he led the charge to "gate" his community. . .one of the home owners took issue with his tactics and the punchline was him (as well as the home owner who took issue with the gate) had to place calls to their respective wives to bail them out of jail. . .I couldn't resist telling him "well it seems the gate wasn't necessary because it appears the criminal element already lives with in the community" rant over. . .Hooley, does your X-pipe mid section work with Kleemann headers with no cats?
Old 06-07-2011, 02:32 AM
  #17  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
MBH motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Posts: 2,305
Received 90 Likes on 45 Posts
C63, SL55, E55, CLS55, ML63, C55
Originally Posted by OK55
I'm afraid I have some misgivings about your fundamental assumption here. The ultimate tensile strength of AISI 302 stainless steel of 860 MPa is much higher than the 400 Mpa figure of mild steel. AISI 302 stainless steel also has a yield strength of 502 MPa, higher than the 250 Mpa figure for mild steel. How then is stainless steel softer than mild steel?
You know what you are right, I was wrong. I went down to the steel yard today and basically got a crash course and master class all rolled into one. The guy kept telling me I was thinking about chromoly. And thats why people choose chromoly for cages. If someone want to correct me as to why the NHRA does not have a spec for stainless steel cages in their book (the real reason why)? Other than it would cost a boat load to get it in a safe gauge. knowing chromoly has to have a wall thickness of .083 and Mild Steel cages have to have a wall thickness of .120 inches. We use 16g (.060) stainless in our header and that costs a boat load.

I also was corrected about the hardness thing that Brad stated. Where stainless is more dense than mild steel. Interesting development I also found out was there are mild steels out there that can be stronger than 304 stainless. As there are many different mild steels out there. I picked up some 16g mild steel pipes to do some self testing vs stainless. In the end, I guess it all depends.

Off the top of my head we can swage out stainless pretty far without cracking. So I want to see If I take the mild steel out as far before it cracks. Part of me things the mild steel will crack on its rolled seem or at least before the stainless will. We will see.

The last piece I will add to this thread is... There is a wealth of information out there. In my spare time I found a bunch of information that supports both arguments. In one article I find info that supports my stance. Then the next one says the opposite. It can be really tricky to make heads or tails of it all thats for sure. Hopefully I can get some free time this week to crack some metal.

Best Regards,
Mike
Old 06-07-2011, 03:02 AM
  #18  
Moderator Alumni
 
TruTaing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
w203 m112
great info in here!
Old 06-07-2011, 04:09 AM
  #19  
Super Member
 
theeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
e55 w/LET TUNE Drinks: vodka STRAIGHT Wheels: 19" HRE 547r Mods:FF headers ASP Pulley
GJ mike
Old 12-17-2017, 12:21 PM
  #20  
Member
 
tommiett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: North of Charlotte NC
Posts: 147
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
2015 C350 Sport
My 2 cents..... Steel. For one, durability. And aluminum does cost more to repair. My guess is the performance gains would be deathly minor and the extra $100.00 would be better spent on other toys for your car.

For a DD... Steel... For a weekend racer, aluminum.
Old 12-17-2017, 02:39 PM
  #21  
Super Member

 
E55amg0220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Utah
Posts: 770
Received 69 Likes on 59 Posts
2003 Mercedes E55 AMG
Originally Posted by tommiett
My 2 cents..... Steel. For one, durability. And aluminum does cost more to repair. My guess is the performance gains would be deathly minor and the extra $100.00 would be better spent on other toys for your car.

For a DD... Steel... For a weekend racer, aluminum.
Dont see the relevance of your comment this is a debate over which STEEL is better for headers ,.. aluminum would not be a good choice for any exhaust material
Old 12-17-2017, 06:45 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
trabots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Dawesville, West Australia
Posts: 367
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
2006 E55, 2006 SL55, 2006 LS7 Ute
I read somewhere that mild steel headers sound better than stainless

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Misinformation: Mild steel vs Stainless steel



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 AM.