W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rear Toe Links and Camber Arms vs K-MAC Bushings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-06-2011, 02:31 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
timeToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'08 E63 Wagon
Rear Toe Links and Camber Arms vs K-MAC Bushings

Guys, I try to get more stability and traction and less tire wear. I am just STAR lowered and not planning to go any lower.

What would you recommend MB arts Toe Links and Camber Arms or K-MAC front and rear bushings or combination of both ?

I like the idea of the bushing as they will be less squishy that the stock rubber ones, with the added benefit of being adjustable. Question do they need maintenance ? (being readjusted regularly)

What is the crowd wisdom ?
Old 07-06-2011, 07:47 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
£ C43 £ AMG £'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
E55K AMG
I Installed k-mac up front and Arms rear. Tire wear is totally even on all 4.
No maintenance carried out since the install at the begining of the year.

I did get a sqeak over bumps on one of the rear arms that lasted a few weeks when the weather was cold.

Goodluck
Old 07-06-2011, 08:27 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 1,039
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2004 E55
Originally Posted by timeToy
Guys, I try to get more stability and traction and less tire wear. I am just STAR lowered and not planning to go any lower.

What would you recommend MB arts Toe Links and Camber Arms or K-MAC front and rear bushings or combination of both ?

I like the idea of the bushing as they will be less squishy that the stock rubber ones, with the added benefit of being adjustable. Question do they need maintenance ? (being readjusted regularly)

What is the crowd wisdom ?
The MBArts control arms are garbage
Old 07-06-2011, 10:00 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Bramage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
F-250
^ I could not disagree more. With my mods, I could not keep the rear straight under load. I would track all over the place, and that can be scary.

I installed the arms, got a good alignment, and the rear is solid. As for camber, I don't know, and I don't care. I am slammed

In terms of keeping the rear end in place- they work perfect. I have had them on over a year, and no issues. I have no experience with the KMAC stuff, but there are a lot of writes ups, both for and against.
Old 07-06-2011, 11:41 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Leeward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
220SE
No maintenance is required for the K-Mac bushings, and the camber, caster and toe adjustments will remain intact unless something unforseen happens.

These are not 'positional' bushings that need to be installed in a certain position to set the alignment, but they are adjusted after installation and serrated ends on the bushings grip the crossmember (etc) and hold them in place. The urethane bushes are pre-greased for life on installation, those with inner steel bushings have a hard-chromed surface with grease grooves cut into them.

And if you're looking at putting bigger rubber on the rear, the K-Mac bushes won't push the top of the wheel out to rub on the fender like the adjustable top arms do.
Old 07-07-2011, 02:48 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Originally Posted by AMGPilot
The MBArts control arms are garbage
the mbarts arms have gone through some revisions since you tried them and so far they seem to be working for poeple.
Old 07-07-2011, 02:09 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
AUS-E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 487
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
CLK-63 BLACK/2014 E63S/2013 ML350
I just had the K-mac bushings installed all around, fronts are good and I can get the car into the factory specs even though I'm pretty low. I am having a problem with the rear toe adjuster as they keep moving, the rear camber bushing seem fine though, I called K-mac and they sent me some new bolts, nuts and washers with a fine thread for more clamping force for the rear toe adjusters and a new set of rear camber bushing saying that these are updated to a new spec which really pisses me off seeing as I just bought these and paid to have them installed and the rears are a PITA I'm told, I've been waiting to get these sorted out before I do a write up on them, if I can get the rear toe sorted out these seem to be the way to go, I will follow up with this thread either way,
Old 07-07-2011, 06:58 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
timeToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'08 E63 Wagon
I also find this: https://mbworld.org/forums/general-m...ter-screw.html

Thanks everyone

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Rear Toe Links and Camber Arms vs K-MAC Bushings



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM.