W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Possible to Retro 09 Hard Drive Command?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-12-2011, 02:02 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by AMGPilot
WOW. Incredibly bad advice. If you would read my post you would have read a correct answer. It's $4K NOT $6K, Steve was zero help and actually had incorrect info when I talked to him about the conversion. Withe the Comandoline conversion harness it's a VERY simple job. As for your claims of weak sound and insufficient bass... Well it's obvious that you've never heard a converted car with the correct amps. The sound quality is amazing with deep tight bass
Apparently you may have not read your own post correctly: you contradicted yourself bro... now you say it's $4k.... yet in post #10 you stated that the price of parts alone was $4800. Then you added that installation would take 4 to 8 hours. Most people are not tech savy to tackle the conversion themselves, so it's reasonable to account about $500 to $600 for installation, which would put the conversion cost around $5400. My estimate of $6k was from a year and a half ago; price drops of $500 are not unreasonable for a year or two although according to the cost for the list of OEM parts that was listed on this forum in the past was around $5300.

Originally Posted by AMGPilot
It's obvious that MB_Forever has no idea what he's talking about since he claims "weak sound and no bass" and that nth 2.5 needs the rotary controller.
I never said "needs".... please re-read my post again and try to understand it. I said some people have posted that the controls were awkward compared to cars who actually have the rotary knob, which makes sense since the new system was designed to have that knob in place. Can it function without it? Absolutely. Is it much more convenient with the knob? Many people think so. I never said it "needs" a knob or must have a knob or anything like that.

Last edited by MB_Forever; 08-12-2011 at 02:10 AM.
Old 08-12-2011, 02:22 AM
  #27  
Super Member
 
abhatti55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 835
Received 69 Likes on 51 Posts
'19 G63 Ed 1,'18 M5, '16 G63,'12 458 , '11 E63, Brabus SL55-K8, '10 S63, '94 E500 "Wolf", '91 560SEC
MB_Forever is 100% correct in that the user interface is better suited for the rotary knob, it uses the same menus as the newer gen cars that started with the W221 S-Class. I am sure it gets it easier to use with time in the W211's, it is confusing as hell to use coming from the previous gen command units our cars had., which had a much more user friendly interface.
Old 08-12-2011, 02:56 AM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
220S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
Apparently you may have not read your own post correctly: you contradicted yourself bro... now you say it's $4k.... yet in post #10 you stated that the price of parts alone was $4800. Then you added that installation would take 4 to 8 hours. Most people are not tech savy to tackle the conversion themselves, so it's reasonable to account about $500 to $600 for installation, which would put the conversion cost around $5400. My estimate of $6k was from a year and a half ago; price drops of $500 are not unreasonable for a year or two although according to the cost for the list of OEM parts that was listed on this forum in the past was around $5300.



I never said "needs".... please re-read my post again and try to understand it. I said some people have posted that the controls were awkward compared to cars who actually have the rotary knob, which makes sense since the new system was designed to have that knob in place. Can it function without it? Absolutely. Is it much more convenient with the knob? Many people think so. I never said it "needs" a knob or must have a knob or anything like that.
Originally Posted by abhatti55
MB_Forever is 100% correct in that the user interface is better suited for the rotary knob, it uses the same menus as the newer gen cars that started with the W221 S-Class. I am sure it gets it easier to use with time in the W211's, it is confusing as hell to use coming from the previous gen command units our cars had., which had a much more user friendly interface.
I also feel that the knob does help quite a bit (the system was designed with it in mind.) As I said in my post, (that AMGPilot said was "absolutely incorrect" ), the "rotary dial helps" but the buttons are okay. Another thing that's better is they put the screen up at eye level and not down below where you have to shift your view from the road. I realize that would have meant a re-design of the W211 dash which would have been obviously not possible. But at least they did elect to use the 2.5 in the 2009's so that was a good thing.

I remember a lot of people saying the conversion was pricey and so elected not to go through with it. I think Mo is correct in his real world cost estimate.

One thing that helps not having the knob on the 2009 W211s is at least having a full VC system. You can use VC instead of stabbing at buttons while having to look down away from the road. I use VC a lot. But with the conversion, what about VC? It needs a stalk on the steering column to activate plus a mic. Can you have the full 2.5 VC system on an older car? That would add to the conversion cost, too. Or is there a work around? Without VC it means you've only got the buttons....
Old 08-12-2011, 04:27 AM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 1,039
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2004 E55
Originally Posted by 220S
I also feel that the knob does help quite a bit (the system was designed with it in mind.) As I said in my post, (that AMGPilot said was "absolutely incorrect" ), the "rotary dial helps" but the buttons are okay. Another thing that's better is they put the screen up at eye level and not down below where you have to shift your view from the road. I realize that would have meant a re-design of the W211 dash which would have been obviously not possible. But at least they did elect to use the 2.5 in the 2009's so that was a good thing.

I remember a lot of people saying the conversion was pricey and so elected not to go through with it. I think Mo is correct in his real world cost estimate.

One thing that helps not having the knob on the 2009 W211s is at least having a full VC system. You can use VC instead of stabbing at buttons while having to look down away from the road. I use VC a lot. But with the conversion, what about VC? It needs a stalk on the steering column to activate plus a mic. Can you have the full 2.5 VC system on an older car? That would add to the conversion cost, too. Or is there a work around? Without VC it means you've only got the buttons....
VC is part of NTG 2.5 all you need is the linguatronic lever which is $55, the mic is already installed. "Stabbing at buttons" is faster and easier though. and I honestly see no reason that you "Need" a rotary selector since you can use the either the 4 way directional or the Phone pad to enter data.

Current prices for the conversion is ~$4100 and is actually easy enough for someone with moderate skills to achieve themselves. By the time you off the old comand components you're out of pocket is even less (About $2000) and for that you get MUCH better Nav (Since it's address level and live Traffic updates) HD radio, DVD player and most importantly MUCH better amps (main and Sub amps) that make a HUGE difference in sound quality all while retaining stock appearance, operation and integration
Old 08-12-2011, 04:58 AM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
220S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
Originally Posted by AMGPilot
VC is part of NTG 2.5 all you need is the linguatronic lever which is $55, the mic is already installed. "Stabbing at buttons" is faster and easier though. and I honestly see no reason that you "Need" a rotary selector since you can use the either the 4 way directional or the Phone pad to enter data.

Current prices for the conversion is ~$4100 and is actually easy enough for someone with moderate skills to achieve themselves. By the time you off the old comand components you're out of pocket is even less (About $2000) and for that you get MUCH better Nav (Since it's address level and live Traffic updates) HD radio, DVD player and most importantly MUCH better amps (main and Sub amps) that make a HUGE difference in sound quality all while retaining stock appearance, operation and integration
I don't see where anyone said it "needs" the rotary dial, but just that it's "helpful." I found the dial to be more intuitive and quicker, like the dial with the latest iDrive system. The fact is that just about all modern systems use a rotary knob. The buttons are okay but a bit more convoluted, imho. Plus the knob is right where you normally rest your arm. One thing that the W212 (at least the US version) now does, is to NOT allow for address input while in motion. The 2009 still lets you input while driving. And while VC is slower, I find it "safer" in the fact that you don't have to take your eye off the road.

My live traffic is only available as a Sirius XM service. I don't have to subscribe to sat radio but do have to have the service activated for the traffic portion.

btw, where is the linguatronic lever attached when doing an upgrade? Is it the same as the factory install? It seems to be part of the column.

Another thing I like about the 2.5 is that you can use it with the display totally off (and just use VC in combo with the steering buttons and the IC readout.) Not sure if that was possible with the earlier COMANDS (?) And then there's the DVD-A playback for higher bit rate music.
Old 08-12-2011, 11:38 AM
  #31  
Super Member
 
abhatti55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 835
Received 69 Likes on 51 Posts
'19 G63 Ed 1,'18 M5, '16 G63,'12 458 , '11 E63, Brabus SL55-K8, '10 S63, '94 E500 "Wolf", '91 560SEC
What components are needed to do the upgrade?
Old 08-12-2011, 01:19 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 1,039
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2004 E55
Originally Posted by abhatti55
What components are needed to do the upgrade?
As was posted earlier in the thread

You need to remove anything on the most ring that is NOT NTG 2.5 (In other words EVERYTHING that is in the car stock. Radio, Audio Gateway (Amp/tuner unit in the trunk) CTEL module, SDAR module (If installed) Lignuatronic module (If installed), CD Changer, Ipod Interface (If installed) Nav Processor/DVD Drive (If installed) Bluetooth Phone interface (If installed) You replace all that with NTG 2.5 headunit (which has Nav, Linguatronic, Bluetooth and DVD Changer built in), Main Amp, Sub Amp, SDAR/HD Radio module, Media Interface (Ipod interface) and a Conversion wiring harness from Comandonline.co.uk

Install took me 8 hours going very slowly, if I did it again I can probably do it in 4 hours
Old 12-16-2011, 01:36 AM
  #33  
Member
 
MB4tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 E550
Originally Posted by AMGPilot
As was posted earlier in the thread

You need to remove anything on the most ring that is NOT NTG 2.5 (In other words EVERYTHING that is in the car stock. Radio, Audio Gateway (Amp/tuner unit in the trunk) CTEL module, SDAR module (If installed) Lignuatronic module (If installed), CD Changer, Ipod Interface (If installed) Nav Processor/DVD Drive (If installed) Bluetooth Phone interface (If installed) You replace all that with NTG 2.5 headunit (which has Nav, Linguatronic, Bluetooth and DVD Changer built in), Main Amp, Sub Amp, SDAR/HD Radio module, Media Interface (Ipod interface) and a Conversion wiring harness from Comandonline.co.uk

Install took me 8 hours going very slowly, if I did it again I can probably do it in 4 hours
NTG 2.5 headunit- I'm seeing these on ebay for $800-1400
Main Amp- Anyone have an estimated price? new/second hand market? part #?
Sub Amp- $179 - there is one on ebay now - 130617371323 for example Buy it now @ $200 with a warranty available
SDAR/HD Radio module- part number? estimated price?
Media Interface (Ipod interface) - Not sure exactly what this is.. there is an NTG 2.5 Multimedia interface on ebay from Japan item - 250884737947 for about $231? it gives 2 AV input, audio output, satellite nav gps
Conversion wiring harness from Comandonline.co.uk - Seems this is about $268 USD

Thats about $2100 so far with the missing information from second hand ebay parts..
Old 12-16-2011, 02:18 AM
  #34  
Super Member
 
pullejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 888
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'12 E63, E55(sold), C32 (sold), '65 Skylark GS 445 convertible, '12 ML350
So...for the non-serious folks (that's me....someone who has ipod integration...with the ****ty factory system...but yes...its still manageable...).... This is totally not worth it?

I'd drop $1500 on a system that would replace our head units and integrate to our existing interfaces (dash, steering wheel, etc) in a HEARTBEAT....

...but I'm thinking that for a similar to OEM overhaul, it's more like $4K realistically?
Old 12-16-2011, 02:28 AM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 1,039
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2004 E55
Originally Posted by pullejo
So...for the non-serious folks (that's me....someone who has ipod integration...with the ****ty factory system...but yes...its still manageable...).... This is totally not worth it?

I'd drop $1500 on a system that would replace our head units and integrate to our existing interfaces (dash, steering wheel, etc) in a HEARTBEAT....

...but I'm thinking that for a similar to OEM overhaul, it's more like $4K realistically?
Well MB4tronic's list is incomplete and has some wrong prices on it

$4K outlay then you can sell off your old components for about $2K.

It does require quite a bit of Star Programming and you have to know what your are doing in order to make it work
Old 12-16-2011, 02:41 AM
  #36  
Super Member
 
pullejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 888
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'12 E63, E55(sold), C32 (sold), '65 Skylark GS 445 convertible, '12 ML350
Yep....not worth it to me when I have a 160gb old school ipod that I sync regularly and just throw in that slot in the glove box.

Now...navigating on the steering wheel suck unless you make playlists for the new stuff you have...

Nowhere near what you get in a Ford Focus now.
Old 12-16-2011, 08:38 AM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,707
Received 542 Likes on 359 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by pullejo
Yep....not worth it to me when I have a 160gb old school ipod that I sync regularly and just throw in that slot in the glove box.

Now...navigating on the steering wheel suck unless you make playlists for the new stuff you have...

Nowhere near what you get in a Ford Focus now.
With the Media Interface Plus unit, it's worth every penny. You can bluetooth your ipod to it and stream pandora and mp3's. When connected you have much better control over the music etc. It's a great head unit.
Old 02-09-2012, 10:05 PM
  #38  
Super Member
 
gazosnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ChiTown
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
e46 m3, w211 e55
This info is a bit conflicting than what i researched on other forums. Well at least someone elsewhere mentioned that the non command units w/o nav / non HK e.g. 20 etc are more plug and play since they do not use the fiber optic system.

In this case I think all that was required other than the headunit was a new wire harness.

Also in this case I dont think you would NEED to rip everything out - but you could to sell. The reason being the new HU has everything integrated so the other parts are therefore no longer used.

SOmeone can maybe verify - but from searching around i believe this is the case. Now if you presently have older Nav unit then the info posted about would be correct.
Old 02-09-2012, 10:10 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Toadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 4,064
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by Bullett
That thing is money... (picking up the phone to order)

thanks
no kidding, that is a good deal

here's a video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynYf0NmAkf8
Old 02-09-2012, 11:43 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Ryououki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by Toadster
no kidding, that is a good deal

here's a video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynYf0NmAkf8
Based on that video, I'd say it's utter shiz. It is running on a very slow processor as the transitions take forever! That would drive me insane. Plus it looks like the touchscreen is not very accurate and/or responsive based on how many times he had to touch the same spots a few times.

I'd be very careful when dealing with cheap items like that.
Old 02-09-2012, 11:54 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Toadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 4,064
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by Ryououki
Based on that video, I'd say it's utter shiz. It is running on a very slow processor as the transitions take forever! That would drive me insane. Plus it looks like the touchscreen is not very accurate and/or responsive based on how many times he had to touch the same spots a few times.

I'd be very careful when dealing with cheap items like that.
agreed, not something I'd want running Windows CE - but they also make Android versions as well - maybe not for the 211, but it seems they have some decent development going on...

I need to talk to some guys at work, most likely could build some really cool demos around this kind of stuff...
Old 02-10-2012, 02:07 AM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 1,039
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2004 E55
Originally Posted by gazosnic
This info is a bit conflicting than what i researched on other forums. Well at least someone elsewhere mentioned that the non command units w/o nav / non HK e.g. 20 etc are more plug and play since they do not use the fiber optic system.

In this case I think all that was required other than the headunit was a new wire harness.

Also in this case I dont think you would NEED to rip everything out - but you could to sell. The reason being the new HU has everything integrated so the other parts are therefore no longer used.

SOmeone can maybe verify - but from searching around i believe this is the case. Now if you presently have older Nav unit then the info posted about would be correct.

Incorrect info. You have to have the MOST ring (Fiber optics) in the car already since NTG 2.5 is MOST not DB2. Everything in my previous post has to done, all original non NTG 2.5 modules have to be removed from the optical ring since they are not compatible

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Possible to Retro 09 Hard Drive Command?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 PM.