W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

180 vs. 190 pulley debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 10-21-2011, 11:07 AM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
beauphus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
180 vs. 190 pulley debate

Hello all. I know this pulley topic has been exhausted by I need some expert opinions. I havent really finished the CLS ever since I bought the CL TT and had a baby earlier this year. Im rady to complete this project car. Jeremy is coming to town shortly and I am debating going back to a 180 pulley. As it currently stands I have a 190. Most would argue this is far too big but due to the amount of mods and types of mods I have it may not be. Here is my current list of mods:

190 pulley
ported and polished heads
ported supercharger
meth injection
kleemann cams
long tube headers
CF airbox
82 TB
TTM fuel rail with high flow injectors
MBH intercooler (huge)
rear mount reservoir with dual mziere pumps

Based on above cooling is not a particular issue for me. I have been told that due to some of my mods I am not creating as much boost which is why I went with the 190 pulley. I am trying to decide whether I should drop down to a 180 or stick wih the 190. Any thoughts here from those in the know?
Old 10-21-2011, 11:19 AM
  #2  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes on 242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
lets talk in terms of boost. what boost are you seeing with the 190?
Since you have heads headers etc etc. the boost generated with a 190 may not be that much. Hell a stock car with a 180 may generate more boost.
Old 10-21-2011, 11:20 AM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
beauphus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
Originally Posted by shardul
lets talk in terms of boost. what boost are you seeing with the 190?
Since you have heads headers etc etc. the boost generated with a 190 may not be that much. Hell a stock car with a 180 may generate more boost.
mid 13's
Old 10-21-2011, 11:57 AM
  #4  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes on 242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
i dont think so that is high at all. that is roughly 2 psi over stock. Now since you said cooling is not a issue you should stick with the 190mm
Old 10-21-2011, 01:06 PM
  #5  
PLATINUM SPONSOR
 
Exotic-metal55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,810
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
2003 CL55
Stay with the 190mm all day long. Your mods need them and your boost is low.

I would go 195mm and get tuned for that!!!
__________________



E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.

CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.

www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
Old 10-21-2011, 01:41 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yacht Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
Originally Posted by Exotic-metal55
Stay with the 190mm all day long. Your mods need them and your boost is low.

I would go 195mm and get tuned for that!!!
+1 all the mods that serve to allow the engine breathe better, Porting, LT headers etc, can cause a drop in boost. If anything you are on the low side.
I agree with Exotic, a 195 would make more sense considering your current mods.
Old 10-21-2011, 02:25 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
cfi_luz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 SL55
At what point (RPM) is the supercharger out of its efficiency range?
Old 10-21-2011, 02:39 PM
  #8  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
beauphus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
thanks all for the input. Aside from boost would it be possible to create MORE power from the 180 on less boost or is there a direct relationship between boost and power?

Bruce at TTM concurred with all the opinions above and being that he is the resident genius I shouldve listened
Old 10-21-2011, 02:52 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
KLR CLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,380
Received 64 Likes on 46 Posts
CLS63 PP
Technically it's not about boost at all, but CFM. The more CFM of cool dense air the more power you make. PSI is affected by head flow characteriscs, exhaust scavenging, TB sizing etc. More pressure generally means more heat for a given size pulley. IE less pressure in the intake tract surely lowers compressor outlet temps.

Bottom line is a bigger pulley makes more revolutions/ more compressor flow in CFM. Thats why the bigger pulleys always make waaay more torque down low. Heat management is what keeps it making power through the whole run.
Old 10-21-2011, 03:15 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
cfi_luz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 SL55
Originally Posted by KLR CLS
Technically it's not about boost at all, but CFM. The more CFM of cool dense air the more power you make. PSI is affected by head flow characteriscs, exhaust scavenging, TB sizing etc. More pressure generally means more heat for a given size pulley. IE less pressure in the intake tract surely lowers compressor outlet temps.

Bottom line is a bigger pulley makes more revolutions/ more compressor flow in CFM. Thats why the bigger pulleys always make waaay more torque down low. Heat management is what keeps it making power through the whole run.
Agreed, more CFM is what you need to worry about, not what the boost gauge says. Just like doing head work will effectively lower the boost pressure, you are still moving the same amount of air, but since you now have a larger volume the air is compressed less, hence a lower boost reading. You will make more power as you increase CFM of the supercharger until you either spin past its efficient rpm range or you heat the charge so much the car pulls timing/detonates.
Old 10-21-2011, 04:45 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
stevebez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,066
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, LRD4 HSE, R107 280SL
Has anyone analysed what the parasytic losses on the S/C are for diff pulley sizes and at diff rpms?
Old 10-24-2011, 05:48 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
BRABUS786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 443
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Stage 3 63
Hey

190mm. And dont look back

Acid
Old 10-25-2011, 01:08 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ali_E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1, W213 E63S
go for 190mm, you won't regret it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: 180 vs. 190 pulley debate



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.