180 vs. 190 pulley debate
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
180 vs. 190 pulley debate
Hello all. I know this pulley topic has been exhausted by I need some expert opinions. I havent really finished the CLS ever since I bought the CL TT and had a baby earlier this year. Im rady to complete this project car. Jeremy is coming to town shortly and I am debating going back to a 180 pulley. As it currently stands I have a 190. Most would argue this is far too big but due to the amount of mods and types of mods I have it may not be. Here is my current list of mods:
190 pulley
ported and polished heads
ported supercharger
meth injection
kleemann cams
long tube headers
CF airbox
82 TB
TTM fuel rail with high flow injectors
MBH intercooler (huge)
rear mount reservoir with dual mziere pumps
Based on above cooling is not a particular issue for me. I have been told that due to some of my mods I am not creating as much boost which is why I went with the 190 pulley. I am trying to decide whether I should drop down to a 180 or stick wih the 190. Any thoughts here from those in the know?
190 pulley
ported and polished heads
ported supercharger
meth injection
kleemann cams
long tube headers
CF airbox
82 TB
TTM fuel rail with high flow injectors
MBH intercooler (huge)
rear mount reservoir with dual mziere pumps
Based on above cooling is not a particular issue for me. I have been told that due to some of my mods I am not creating as much boost which is why I went with the 190 pulley. I am trying to decide whether I should drop down to a 180 or stick wih the 190. Any thoughts here from those in the know?
#2
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes
on
242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
lets talk in terms of boost. what boost are you seeing with the 190?
Since you have heads headers etc etc. the boost generated with a 190 may not be that much. Hell a stock car with a 180 may generate more boost.
Since you have heads headers etc etc. the boost generated with a 190 may not be that much. Hell a stock car with a 180 may generate more boost.
#3
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
#5
PLATINUM SPONSOR
Stay with the 190mm all day long. Your mods need them and your boost is low.
I would go 195mm and get tuned for that!!!
I would go 195mm and get tuned for that!!!
__________________
![](https://mbworld.org/forums/signaturepics/sigpic87171_15.gif)
E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.
CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.
www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
![](https://mbworld.org/forums/signaturepics/sigpic87171_15.gif)
E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.
CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.
www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
I agree with Exotic, a 195 would make more sense considering your current mods.
Trending Topics
#8
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
thanks all for the input. Aside from boost would it be possible to create MORE power from the 180 on less boost or is there a direct relationship between boost and power?
Bruce at TTM concurred with all the opinions above and being that he is the resident genius I shouldve listened
Bruce at TTM concurred with all the opinions above and being that he is the resident genius I shouldve listened
![bow](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bowdown.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Technically it's not about boost at all, but CFM. The more CFM of cool dense air the more power you make. PSI is affected by head flow characteriscs, exhaust scavenging, TB sizing etc. More pressure generally means more heat for a given size pulley. IE less pressure in the intake tract surely lowers compressor outlet temps.
Bottom line is a bigger pulley makes more revolutions/ more compressor flow in CFM. Thats why the bigger pulleys always make waaay more torque down low. Heat management is what keeps it making power through the whole run.
Bottom line is a bigger pulley makes more revolutions/ more compressor flow in CFM. Thats why the bigger pulleys always make waaay more torque down low. Heat management is what keeps it making power through the whole run.
#10
Technically it's not about boost at all, but CFM. The more CFM of cool dense air the more power you make. PSI is affected by head flow characteriscs, exhaust scavenging, TB sizing etc. More pressure generally means more heat for a given size pulley. IE less pressure in the intake tract surely lowers compressor outlet temps.
Bottom line is a bigger pulley makes more revolutions/ more compressor flow in CFM. Thats why the bigger pulleys always make waaay more torque down low. Heat management is what keeps it making power through the whole run.
Bottom line is a bigger pulley makes more revolutions/ more compressor flow in CFM. Thats why the bigger pulleys always make waaay more torque down low. Heat management is what keeps it making power through the whole run.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Has anyone analysed what the parasytic losses on the S/C are for diff pulley sizes and at diff rpms?