E55 vs 2007 EC TUNED S65! Guess who won?
#51
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55
79 rwhp and 100 rwt..
https://mbworld.org/forums/s55-amg-s...ing-video.html
Okay, so this w220 s65 is over 5,000 lbs.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-10181.html
So add .2 for the w221 being 200 lbs heavier and your your still looking at a 11.3 second car MAX, prob more like 11.2.. And thats 1/4 mile times where the 55 would have the advantage, and this video is highway where the 65 would have the advantage . So the 65 must have been playing around, thats my guess.
https://mbworld.org/forums/s55-amg-s...ing-video.html
Okay, so this w220 s65 is over 5,000 lbs.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-10181.html
So add .2 for the w221 being 200 lbs heavier and your your still looking at a 11.3 second car MAX, prob more like 11.2.. And thats 1/4 mile times where the 55 would have the advantage, and this video is highway where the 65 would have the advantage . So the 65 must have been playing around, thats my guess.
My car is just a beast.
#52
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
V12-Biturbo
I believe if memory serves, the SL65 model weighs 4550-4600+ vs the SL600 @ 4370.. These weights are w/OUT drivers.. Clay, your SL600 pic on scale w/OUT driver showed 4370
Q? From video I hear a passenger in the E55? So the S65 must have a passenger as well or? I'm in the E55 camp on this arguement, it could easily accomplish the video results esp if the heavier 07'-up S65 had a passenger?
The 5035 lbs Tom quoted is w/out ANY driver or passengers, so add 200 lbs ea for average guy you have a 2007 S65 @ 5035 lbs + 400 lbs in peep's add some fuel etc that rig prolly weighed 5500 + lbs
I've seen umpteen Dyno tuned 65/600 v12's there just isn't 80 rwhp left on that engine w/ECU tune ONLY, add a RACE gas ms109 tune, Down Pipes, cat delete, & then you'll see 80 rwhp gains..
If Hadi's 55k is in 10.9x country it'd MOST DEFINITELY bring the pain to this 2007 S65 @ 5250-5500 + lbs EVEN from a roll-on as vid shows, the heavier S65 TUNE only isn't UNBEATABLE by ANY means.. I've driven a 2008 S65 (friends in Las Vegas) the extra weight is very noticable w/OUT any passengers, add the ancient 5 speed slush- box, & extremely TALL 2.65 gearing Free-way pulls are a dissapointment in the newer w221's
Last edited by Thericker; 11-01-2011 at 06:46 PM.
#53
MBWorld Fanatic!
just go get it from the source cheaper and with out shampoo that turns to rock in your ECU
#54
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
17 Posts
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
The SL65 weighs decidedly more, it's the ONLY 65 model to come standard equipment w/LSD diff, all other CL/S 65's DON'T come w/LSD as standard equipment, it's an option. Also the 65 motor weighs a tad bit more w/half a liter in displacement 6.0 vs the 5.5 liter in 600 v12 biturbo models.
I believe if memory serves, the SL65 model weighs 4550-4600+ vs the SL600 @ 4370.. These weights are w/OUT drivers.. Clay, your SL600 pic on scale w/OUT driver showed 4370
Q? From video I hear a passenger in the E55? So the S65 must have a passenger as well or? I'm in the E55 camp on this arguement, it could easily accomplish the video results esp if the heavier 07'-up S65 had a passenger?
The 5035 lbs Tom quoted is w/out ANY driver or passengers, so add 200 lbs ea for average guy you have a 2007 S65 @ 5035 lbs + 400 lbs in peep's add some fuel etc that rig prolly weighed 5500 + lbs
I've seen umpteen Dyno tuned 65/600 v12's there just isn't 80 rwhp left on that engine w/ECU tune ONLY, add a RACE gas ms109 tune, Down Pipes, cat delete, & then you'll see 80 rwhp gains..
If Hadi's 55k is in 10.9x country it'd MOST DEFINITELY bring the pain to this 2007 S65 @ 5250-5500 + lbs EVEN from a roll-on as vid shows, the heavier S65 TUNE only isn't UNBEATABLE by ANY means.. I've driven a 2008 S65 (friends in Las Vegas) the extra weight is very noticable w/OUT any passengers, add the ancient 5 speed slush- box, & extremely TALL 2.65 gearing Free-way pulls are a dissapointment in the newer w221's
I believe if memory serves, the SL65 model weighs 4550-4600+ vs the SL600 @ 4370.. These weights are w/OUT drivers.. Clay, your SL600 pic on scale w/OUT driver showed 4370
Q? From video I hear a passenger in the E55? So the S65 must have a passenger as well or? I'm in the E55 camp on this arguement, it could easily accomplish the video results esp if the heavier 07'-up S65 had a passenger?
The 5035 lbs Tom quoted is w/out ANY driver or passengers, so add 200 lbs ea for average guy you have a 2007 S65 @ 5035 lbs + 400 lbs in peep's add some fuel etc that rig prolly weighed 5500 + lbs
I've seen umpteen Dyno tuned 65/600 v12's there just isn't 80 rwhp left on that engine w/ECU tune ONLY, add a RACE gas ms109 tune, Down Pipes, cat delete, & then you'll see 80 rwhp gains..
If Hadi's 55k is in 10.9x country it'd MOST DEFINITELY bring the pain to this 2007 S65 @ 5250-5500 + lbs EVEN from a roll-on as vid shows, the heavier S65 TUNE only isn't UNBEATABLE by ANY means.. I've driven a 2008 S65 (friends in Las Vegas) the extra weight is very noticable w/OUT any passengers, add the ancient 5 speed slush- box, & extremely TALL 2.65 gearing Free-way pulls are a dissapointment in the newer w221's
Good point about the LSD! Totally forgot about that too. It should also be mentioned that Andy's 11.0x runs were at MIR, the miracle track.
Learned a little bit in this thread today. I swear before this thread, I would've bet a left nut, that a tuned W221 S65 would be a mid-11 car, at the least.
Yeah, even recently.....as like in ....TODAY, I've seen more of his epoxy handy work. I mean, I guess it doesn't hurt the electronics but damn, he puts a lot of that stuff in there.
#56
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55
The SL65 weighs decidedly more, it's the ONLY 65 model to come standard equipment w/LSD diff, all other CL/S 65's DON'T come w/LSD as standard equipment, it's an option. Also the 65 motor weighs a tad bit more w/half a liter in displacement 6.0 vs the 5.5 liter in 600 v12 biturbo models.
I believe if memory serves, the SL65 model weighs 4550-4600+ vs the SL600 @ 4370.. These weights are w/OUT drivers.. Clay, your SL600 pic on scale w/OUT driver showed 4370
Q? From video I hear a passenger in the E55? So the S65 must have a passenger as well or? I'm in the E55 camp on this arguement, it could easily accomplish the video results esp if the heavier 07'-up S65 had a passenger?
The 5035 lbs Tom quoted is w/out ANY driver or passengers, so add 200 lbs ea for average guy you have a 2007 S65 @ 5035 lbs + 400 lbs in peep's add some fuel etc that rig prolly weighed 5500 + lbs
I've seen umpteen Dyno tuned 65/600 v12's there just isn't 80 rwhp left on that engine w/ECU tune ONLY, add a RACE gas ms109 tune, Down Pipes, cat delete, & then you'll see 80 rwhp gains..
If Hadi's 55k is in 10.9x country it'd MOST DEFINITELY bring the pain to this 2007 S65 @ 5250-5500 + lbs EVEN from a roll-on as vid shows, the heavier S65 TUNE only isn't UNBEATABLE by ANY means.. I've driven a 2008 S65 (friends in Las Vegas) the extra weight is very noticable w/OUT any passengers, add the ancient 5 speed slush- box, & extremely TALL 2.65 gearing Free-way pulls are a dissapointment in the newer w221's
I believe if memory serves, the SL65 model weighs 4550-4600+ vs the SL600 @ 4370.. These weights are w/OUT drivers.. Clay, your SL600 pic on scale w/OUT driver showed 4370
Q? From video I hear a passenger in the E55? So the S65 must have a passenger as well or? I'm in the E55 camp on this arguement, it could easily accomplish the video results esp if the heavier 07'-up S65 had a passenger?
The 5035 lbs Tom quoted is w/out ANY driver or passengers, so add 200 lbs ea for average guy you have a 2007 S65 @ 5035 lbs + 400 lbs in peep's add some fuel etc that rig prolly weighed 5500 + lbs
I've seen umpteen Dyno tuned 65/600 v12's there just isn't 80 rwhp left on that engine w/ECU tune ONLY, add a RACE gas ms109 tune, Down Pipes, cat delete, & then you'll see 80 rwhp gains..
If Hadi's 55k is in 10.9x country it'd MOST DEFINITELY bring the pain to this 2007 S65 @ 5250-5500 + lbs EVEN from a roll-on as vid shows, the heavier S65 TUNE only isn't UNBEATABLE by ANY means.. I've driven a 2008 S65 (friends in Las Vegas) the extra weight is very noticable w/OUT any passengers, add the ancient 5 speed slush- box, & extremely TALL 2.65 gearing Free-way pulls are a dissapointment in the newer w221's
The S65 did have a passenger in his vehicle also. I've weighed my car on the scale at the tracks, and with just myself in the vehicle it came in at 4350lbs. I've driven this S65 before, and it just doesn't have "get up an go" feeling. Maybe because it has an extremely smooth ride, but there was no aggressive feeling like the E55.
#58
PLATINUM SPONSOR
A bunch of us raced a renntech tuned S65 a year and half ago and I was making about 520 hp back then and he killed us all from a roll! We had Cutt, me, shardul, Hadi and few others run him..
The 65 makes around 575 to 600 rwhp after tune and tons of TQ. It should be a close race, if all cars are in thier right mind.
Nice Kill either way for the HADSTER!!! He is the king of videos! He drives around with his own personel videographer..lol
The 65 makes around 575 to 600 rwhp after tune and tons of TQ. It should be a close race, if all cars are in thier right mind.
Nice Kill either way for the HADSTER!!! He is the king of videos! He drives around with his own personel videographer..lol
__________________
E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.
CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.
www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.
CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.
www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
#62
MBWorld Fanatic!
Solid kill man! It is what it is, your cars a beast and the 65 had no chance. Don't know wtf the bickering is about.
Reminds me of of when my brothers cls55 laid an *** whooping on my m6. People were calling the race "rigged" and car was having "problems". Always the fanboys.
Reminds me of of when my brothers cls55 laid an *** whooping on my m6. People were calling the race "rigged" and car was having "problems". Always the fanboys.
Last edited by tbal; 11-01-2011 at 10:56 PM.
#64
MBWorld Fanatic!
Here come the pain!!!!
Yeah, what most said. Those extra few pounds will definitely be felt, even from a roll. The 55 is agile and its able to put bus lenghts. On an earlier 65 model i'd watch my steps though.
Yeah, what most said. Those extra few pounds will definitely be felt, even from a roll. The 55 is agile and its able to put bus lenghts. On an earlier 65 model i'd watch my steps though.
#65
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Having said that follow me here, your previous TUNE ONLY CL600 (TCU can partially remove TQ limitters, but that will have ZERO EFFECT on rwhp gains)
Your 600 starts @ 14 psi in stock form, TUNED the boost will be raised to 20-21 psi, so each pound of boost on OTHERWISE STOCK 600 is worth about 7-9 rwhp maybe as high as 10 rwp, again you have 6-7 psi to play with = what EVERY OTHER tune ONLY 600 V12 BITURBO gains 50-65 rwhp @ peak/max gains, Though you can see up to 100 rwp gains UNDER THE CURVE for a BRIEF 1000 -1200 rpm's not the same as STATING "you picked up over 124 rwhp w/ECU tune"
If peak # gains thru ENTIRE CURVE?? Your 600 wasn't working @ full potential BEFORE tuning IE IC pump on way out or plethora of other variables easily tweeked to show what will appear to be legit 124+ rwhp gains.
Add a few bags of ice to the tops of your intercoolers POST tune, I've personally seen this in action you could gain 25-30 rwhp thru ENTIRE dyno curve w/this little trick alone on v12 biturbo models. It basically tricks the ECU into thinking POST tune the Ambient Air temperature has suddenly dropped to 45-55 degrees outside from up to 95 + degrees..
Now add that to 100-109 High Octane Tune, another 25-30 rwhp thru entire curve and guess what you're left with from your 124+ rwp gains? 64 rwhp Truly Legit gained from the 6-7 psi left on the 600 V12tt platform...
Now go on to the 65 AMG's STOCK @ 18 psi again aftermarket tuners push it to 21-22 psi.That leaves 3-4 psi to play with on your BASIC TUNE ONLY, 65's have slightly larger turbo inlet wheels among few other AMG bits which increases the rwhp gains per pound of boost to anywhere between 11-13 rwhp... You now can see how impossible the 80 rwhp gains quoted in other posts are not happening, UNLESS otherwise moded or temporarily Ice Cooled etc..
Last edited by Thericker; 11-02-2011 at 12:04 AM.
#66
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,654
Received 1,089 Likes
on
876 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Ricker, I've got nothing to prove here but only what I experienced. I mentioned the TCU because Renntech calls it their ECU/TCU tune. I know it has nothing to do with RWHP. Car dynoed a little less than 400 RHWP stock and 525 RWHP after the ECU/TCU tune from Renntech. I posted the results years ago with copies of the dyno chart. It was making over 500 RWHP for a significant duration of the run after the tune and not just a spike. I live in Florida so they tuned for 93 octane. Not sure how much that matters vs a CA tune.
Dyno operator was independent of the tune. Did not buy it from them. Only used their dyno. Same intercooler pump as first run and within a week or so of the first run. The only difference was higher octane fuel. But I've heard that it does not translate to much higher hp readings unless the car is tuned to run on 100 plus octane. Even going by what you said about the fuel, I got a legitimate 100+ RWHP out of the ECU tune.
I posted about my results back in 2007:
https://mbworld.org/forums/cl-class-...-renntech.html
Renntech says 132 hp increase from their tune. I gained a bit more but that was probably due to increased octane.
http://www.renntechmercedes.com/www/node/366
Dyno operator was independent of the tune. Did not buy it from them. Only used their dyno. Same intercooler pump as first run and within a week or so of the first run. The only difference was higher octane fuel. But I've heard that it does not translate to much higher hp readings unless the car is tuned to run on 100 plus octane. Even going by what you said about the fuel, I got a legitimate 100+ RWHP out of the ECU tune.
I posted about my results back in 2007:
https://mbworld.org/forums/cl-class-...-renntech.html
Renntech says 132 hp increase from their tune. I gained a bit more but that was probably due to increased octane.
http://www.renntechmercedes.com/www/node/366
#67
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Ricker, I've got nothing to prove here but only what I experienced. I mentioned the TCU because Renntech calls it their ECU/TCU tune. I know it has nothing to do with RWHP. Car dynoed a little less than 400 RHWP stock and 525 RWHP after the ECU/TCU tune from Renntech. I posted the results years ago with copies of the dyno chart. It was making over 500 RWHP for a significant duration of the run after the tune and not just a spike. I live in Florida so they tuned for 93 octane. Not sure how much that matters vs a CA tune.
Dyno operator was independent of the tune. Did not buy it from them. Only used their dyno. Same intercooler pump as first run and within a week or so of the first run. The only difference was higher octane fuel. But I've heard that it does not translate to much higher hp readings unless the car is tuned to run on 100 plus octane. Even going by what you said about the fuel, I got a legitimate 100+ RWHP out of the ECU tune.
I posted about my results back in 2007:
https://mbworld.org/forums/cl-class-...-renntech.html
Renntech says 132 hp increase from their tune. I gained a bit more but that was probably due to increased octane.
http://www.renntechmercedes.com/www/node/366
Dyno operator was independent of the tune. Did not buy it from them. Only used their dyno. Same intercooler pump as first run and within a week or so of the first run. The only difference was higher octane fuel. But I've heard that it does not translate to much higher hp readings unless the car is tuned to run on 100 plus octane. Even going by what you said about the fuel, I got a legitimate 100+ RWHP out of the ECU tune.
I posted about my results back in 2007:
https://mbworld.org/forums/cl-class-...-renntech.html
Renntech says 132 hp increase from their tune. I gained a bit more but that was probably due to increased octane.
http://www.renntechmercedes.com/www/node/366
I followed your links, you admit using 104 octane, even if NOT tuned for it Turbo cars love race gas, it's worth 20+ rwhp w/out even tuning for it on these V12tt's
Last edited by Thericker; 11-02-2011 at 01:51 AM.
#68
Super Member
how's about we get both these cars to the drags and see what they do? be curious to see what they both mph.
any 1/4 mi times on this e55? looks like a pretty stout mod list.
congrats on the win, you put multiple lengths on that s65 to 150mph
any 1/4 mi times on this e55? looks like a pretty stout mod list.
congrats on the win, you put multiple lengths on that s65 to 150mph
Last edited by 02cl55amg; 11-02-2011 at 04:02 AM.
#69
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,654
Received 1,089 Likes
on
876 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Not trying to upset ya, but your 600 obviously fell into my category.. IE stock V12 600 tt on most widely used Dyno's DynoJet (your post Tune #'s are exactly what 600's make on DynoJets w/ ECU tune ONLY) But your STOCK figures are sorely OFF IE DynoJet #'s again BONE STOCK 600 V12tt make bet 450-460 rwhp ALL DAY LONG w/NO tricks So again take your POST TUNE 525 rwhp & reverse back to what your CL600 should've made 450-460 & you'll see 65+ rwhp to be made, right inline w/my figures..
I followed your links, you admit using 104 octane, even if NOT tuned for it Turbo cars love race gas, it's worth 20+ rwhp w/out even tuning for it on these V12tt's
I followed your links, you admit using 104 octane, even if NOT tuned for it Turbo cars love race gas, it's worth 20+ rwhp w/out even tuning for it on these V12tt's
Here is a CL600 that was 418 RWHP stock. It gained 78 RWHP but it was on a Speedriven tune. When I was researching the tunes, I heard over and over that the Renntech tune produced the highest numbers more often than any other ECU tunes. http://tuningbible.com/?attachment_id=799
Here is the dyno chart from my runs. I was very pleased with the results. Once again, results can vary stock and tuned. Just sharing my experience and not trying to discredit anyone.
https://mbworld.org/forums/attachmen...65-cldyno3.jpg
#70
MBWorld Fanatic!
I have seen some freaks that dyno around 450 RWHP but I've also seen them dyno very close to my figure. I gained over 100 RWHP on the tune. Again, not trying to upset you, just sharing my experience. It was also the experience of others I spoke to before getting the tune as well as Renntech directly.
Here is a CL600 that was 418 RWHP stock. It gained 78 RWHP but it was on a Speedriven tune. When I was researching the tunes, I heard over and over that the Renntech tune produced the highest numbers more often than any other ECU tunes. http://tuningbible.com/?attachment_id=799
Here is the dyno chart from my runs. I was very pleased with the results. Once again, results can vary stock and tuned. Just sharing my experience and not trying to discredit anyone.
https://mbworld.org/forums/attachmen...65-cldyno3.jpg
Here is a CL600 that was 418 RWHP stock. It gained 78 RWHP but it was on a Speedriven tune. When I was researching the tunes, I heard over and over that the Renntech tune produced the highest numbers more often than any other ECU tunes. http://tuningbible.com/?attachment_id=799
Here is the dyno chart from my runs. I was very pleased with the results. Once again, results can vary stock and tuned. Just sharing my experience and not trying to discredit anyone.
https://mbworld.org/forums/attachmen...65-cldyno3.jpg
It looks like the two runs on the Speedriven dyno were done in different gears.
Your dyno looks like the dyno operator just nailed the throttle and the car down shifted and then upshifted (on both runs). It doesn't look like he tried to do a run keeping it in a specific gear and doing a pull. I have never seen a stock 600 Biturbo pull that low of a # on a dynojet....
Tom
#73
MBWorld Fanatic!
I stand corrected bro, I did not even notice it was a new S65. It is so shweet to see the E55 creep up in power over the years. It just keeps creeping and creeping as members keep pushing the envelope and sharing information on the boards.
I wonder if it is safe to say that we are now king of the V12 benz motors too I think the ones to be careful of, now that we are speaking cannibalism, is those pesky C63's!!!
I wonder if it is safe to say that we are now king of the V12 benz motors too I think the ones to be careful of, now that we are speaking cannibalism, is those pesky C63's!!!
#74
MBWorld Fanatic!
Get this 55 to the track then.. If it doesnt go 10s, im smelling something fishy going on in this video or the tune in the 65 somehow got flashed back to stock..
#75
MBWorld Fanatic!