W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Power loss at high altitude on s/c driven motor???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-13-2012, 09:22 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ajm55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 318
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
Power loss at high altitude on s/c driven motor???

Johannesburg, South Africa (where i live) is approximately 1600 meters above sea level.

I know that high altitude adversely impacts the performance of both forced induction and naturally aspirated vehicles.

I also know that turbocharged vehicles loose less power at high altitude than do naturally aspirated vehicles. Until recently, I thought that supercharged vehicles, while suffering a greater power loss at high altitude than turbocharged vehicles, were still better off than naturally aspirated vehicles. My local tuner maintains however that supercharged vehicles suffer as big a power loss at altitude as do naturally aspirated vehicles.

Is my local tuner correct?
Old 01-13-2012, 09:48 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BBBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
03 E55 AMG, 06 Harley Road King Custom 06 Ram 2500 Cummins, 97 Firebird Race Car, 88 Cutlass Supreme
Definitely not. Superchargers will still add more power at high altitudes then a naturally aspirated motor would have.
Old 01-13-2012, 10:20 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
No idea but for example my car ran 11.4 at sea level and 12.5 at 1300meter elevation with a density altitude of 1900meters. You lose about a sec and for you a bit more. I would go turbo. They do MUCH better up here. Modded s600 ran 11.7!!
Old 01-13-2012, 11:01 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
E55, SL63, ML550
WOW! Thats a pretty big loss in power. Would having a different "tune" for high altitudes make a difference or not?
Old 01-14-2012, 05:21 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BBBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
03 E55 AMG, 06 Harley Road King Custom 06 Ram 2500 Cummins, 97 Firebird Race Car, 88 Cutlass Supreme
Lack of oxygen in the air is the problem. No way to tune for that.
Old 01-14-2012, 09:18 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
e55amgrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Dirt Scooters
Originally Posted by BBBSS
Lack of oxygen in the air is the problem. No way to tune for that.
Well there is 1 way lol Just bring your own oxygen
Old 01-14-2012, 11:40 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
WHTEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
07' SL65, 04' E55, 03' Evo8, 08' GSXR, DSM's...
I live in Colorado at around 6k ft and the car still performs pretty well, and have had it higher in elevation too. You will see a power loss but no where near what a n/a car would feel like. Whoever you're talking to doesn't know what he's talking about.

Aaron
Old 01-15-2012, 12:41 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Forrest Gump 9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,190
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
shrimp boat
Originally Posted by Jakpro1
No idea but for example my car ran 11.4 at sea level and 12.5 at 1300meter elevation with a density altitude of 1900meters. You lose about a sec and for you a bit more. I would go turbo. They do MUCH better up here. Modded s600 ran 11.7!!
Do you know what's your boost?
Old 01-15-2012, 02:28 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes on 155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
the mathematical equation for power reduction due to elevation oxygen restriction is:
hp loss = (elevation x 0.03 x hp @ sea level )/1000

this only applies to NA motors as F/I motors are basically adjusting the power back to sea level equivalents within its mechanical means (meaning size of turbine or s/c max output is the max it can adjust power to compensate for altitude).... A supercharger can be thought of either as artificially increasing the density of the air by compressing it or as forcing more air than normal into the cylinder every time the piston moves down.

in airplanes the point of a turbocharger or s/c is to develop sea-level power as altitude increases so they will not suffer power drop (again until its mechanical limit is reached) like a NA engine will. So depending on how big your turbo or s/c is and at what percent of its max output you are running it at will determine at what altitude oxygen deprevation will start to cause power loss on you engine.

Last edited by gaspam; 01-15-2012 at 02:30 AM.
Old 01-15-2012, 04:17 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BBBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
03 E55 AMG, 06 Harley Road King Custom 06 Ram 2500 Cummins, 97 Firebird Race Car, 88 Cutlass Supreme
Originally Posted by e55amgrocket
Well there is 1 way lol Just bring your own oxygen
You got me there!
Old 01-15-2012, 05:44 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,659
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
Jo'Burg is killer. Go for it on the purchase of the car if you dont have one. These cars repsond amazingly well to mods, and you will be extremely happy if you indeed pick one up.



Originally Posted by ajm55
Johannesburg, South Africa (where i live) is approximately 1600 meters above sea level.

I know that high altitude adversely impacts the performance of both forced induction and naturally aspirated vehicles.

I also know that turbocharged vehicles loose less power at high altitude than do naturally aspirated vehicles. Until recently, I thought that supercharged vehicles, while suffering a greater power loss at high altitude than turbocharged vehicles, were still better off than naturally aspirated vehicles. My local tuner maintains however that supercharged vehicles suffer as big a power loss at altitude as do naturally aspirated vehicles.

Is my local tuner correct?

Last edited by chawkins2001; 01-15-2012 at 06:38 AM.
Old 01-15-2012, 06:30 AM
  #12  
Super Member
 
Sher Judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2017 991.2 Turbo PDK 2017 C63S Coupe Ceramic Brakes 2015 CLS63S AMG Full House
Originally Posted by BBBSS
Definitely not. Superchargers will still add more power at high altitudes then a naturally aspirated motor would have.
This is correct in the early 1930's most or almost all planes used superchargers, to deal with excessive very high altitude and great load on the engine turbines.

My supercharged cars pull like a cyclone up in Johannesburg.
Old 01-15-2012, 06:41 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,659
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
You have quite the stable of sleds there boet Up in Johees, I bet you have to watch when you come to robots, and where you chose to park your cars



Originally Posted by Sher Judge
This is correct in the early 1930's most or almost all planes used superchargers, to deal with excessive very high altitude and great load on the engine turbines.

My supercharged cars pull like a cyclone up in Johannesburg.
Old 01-15-2012, 06:47 AM
  #14  
Super Member
 
Sher Judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2017 991.2 Turbo PDK 2017 C63S Coupe Ceramic Brakes 2015 CLS63S AMG Full House
Hey there boet, got to be on the alert 24/7 Jozi streets.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Power loss at high altitude on s/c driven motor???



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 PM.