W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fuel Rail DIY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 02-07-2012, 03:43 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Das Geld 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,267
Received 195 Likes on 160 Posts
SL55, S500
Originally Posted by stevebez
The logic why this is a problem at 3/4th gear (and beyond) is the amount of time you spend at wot at high rpm... 1st and second are only brief moments at WOT so the fuel flow has time to catch up assuming it becomes deficient or the injectors go static. In higher gears you spend more time at sustained high rpm leaving more chance for the injectors to go static and for a fuel flow pressure drop to occur - and for longer periods of time, and so there is the possibility of going lean / detonating.

I still dont quite get the physics why the #8 cylinder should be the low pressure point in the OEM fuel rail but evidence suggests its the first cylinder to go for some reason, and so we have to assume there is more of a pressure drop here then elsewhere in the loop.

I think what is critical for us is making sure our cars fuel pressure is up to speed and our fuel pumps/filters are spotless. This is critical IMHO. I think if you have solid pressure / clean system you should be ok with OEM setup, but as we have seen there have been issues with cars going boom ....

I would say SLR injectors should be sufficient on OEM loop but closed loop and SLR injectors should be plenty of headroom. And of course there is the TTM alternative too.

Personally I have neither but then I dont have a very agressive tune... I just have not found a looped rail that looks OEM enough for me yet. On the injector side Kleeman swear you dont need bigger injectors even on K4 + gas flowed heads... so honestly I dont know what to think anymore.
You seem very knowledgeably on this subject maybe you can answer my question?

I've recently changed my fuel filter from the Bosch to Mann and my old filter was very clogged according to the blow test and it prob had 100k miles on it. My throttle response before the change was flawless and power was being applied instantly in all scenarios.

After this new fuel filter there is throttle lag and the car just doesn't pull as hard anymore and feels softer. All the data I read shows new filter should increase throttle response/mpg/power. Is there a possibility that a clogged filter somehow raises PSI and throws more fuel into the system or even raise power? What can this be? I didn't think it can be a MANN vs BOSCH issue..The best way I can describe it is like the car is always in the wrong and higher gear as before it was always instantly boom!

Thanks.
Old 02-07-2012, 03:52 PM
  #27  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by stevebez
The logic why this is a problem at 3/4th gear (and beyond) is the amount of time you spend at wot at high rpm... 1st and second are only brief moments at WOT so the fuel flow has time to catch up assuming it becomes deficient or the injectors go static. In higher gears you spend more time at sustained high rpm leaving more chance for the injectors to go static and for a fuel flow pressure drop to occur - and for longer periods of time, and so there is the possibility of going lean / detonating.

I still dont quite get the physics why the #8 cylinder should be the low pressure point in the OEM fuel rail but evidence suggests its the first cylinder to go for some reason, and so we have to assume there is more of a pressure drop here then elsewhere in the loop.

I think what is critical for us is making sure our cars fuel pressure is up to speed and our fuel pumps/filters are spotless. This is critical IMHO. I think if you have solid pressure / clean system you should be ok with OEM setup, but as we have seen there have been issues with cars going boom ....

I would say SLR injectors should be sufficient on OEM loop but closed loop and SLR injectors should be plenty of headroom. And of course there is the TTM alternative too.

Personally I have neither but then I dont have a very agressive tune... I just have not found a looped rail that looks OEM enough for me yet. On the injector side Kleeman swear you dont need bigger injectors even on K4 + gas flowed heads... so honestly I dont know what to think anymore.
#8 is closest to the fuel feed line. Pressure builds from the ends
Old 02-08-2012, 12:49 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
stevebez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,066
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, LRD4 HSE, R107 280SL
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
#8 is closest to the fuel feed line. Pressure builds from the ends
Yep I heard that before although I dont know why. If you think about it you got 4 injectors sucking fuel before the fuel makes it to the ends ... so why presure builds at the ends is a bit odd for me... also the further you are from the pump you will have more pressure drop too no?

Old 02-08-2012, 12:56 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
stevebez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,066
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, LRD4 HSE, R107 280SL
Originally Posted by Das Geld 2
You seem very knowledgeably on this subject maybe you can answer my question?

I've recently changed my fuel filter from the Bosch to Mann and my old filter was very clogged according to the blow test and it prob had 100k miles on it. My throttle response before the change was flawless and power was being applied instantly in all scenarios.

After this new fuel filter there is throttle lag and the car just doesn't pull as hard anymore and feels softer. All the data I read shows new filter should increase throttle response/mpg/power. Is there a possibility that a clogged filter somehow raises PSI and throws more fuel into the system or even raise power? What can this be? I didn't think it can be a MANN vs BOSCH issue..The best way I can describe it is like the car is always in the wrong and higher gear as before it was always instantly boom!

Thanks.
You're too kind ... no expert just an enthisiast!

I expect a clogged filter in between tank and pump may affect pump pressure - as it puts more workload on the pump. I don't see how a clean filter would result in a pressure drop unless the flow spec of the filter is insufficient?

The only way a clogged filter will raise the pressure is if the filter sat on the boosted side of the pump (which I expect it does not), and even then the pressure rise would be between the filter and the pump not between the filter and the motor.
Old 02-08-2012, 04:55 PM
  #30  
PLATINUM SPONSOR
 
Exotic-metal55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,810
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
2003 CL55
Nice clean set up Grant!
__________________



E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.

CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.

www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
Old 02-08-2012, 05:05 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SterlingE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,693
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
2006 E55, 2012 Jeep SRT, 2008 G37s 6MT (The Mrs.), 2005 Explorer
Originally Posted by stevebez
Yep I heard that before although I dont know why. If you think about it you got 4 injectors sucking fuel before the fuel makes it to the ends ... so why presure builds at the ends is a bit odd for me... also the further you are from the pump you will have more pressure drop too no?

Pressure comes from the restriction of flow. Nothing is more restrictive than an wall. So think of it as relatively free flowing until it hits the wall and then pressure builds from the wall out. Thus creating your pressure gradient with #8 always on the low end.
Old 02-08-2012, 05:21 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Originally Posted by Triman2008
Awesome thread, I 'm looking into doing this same mod. I already have upgraded injectors, just need to rail know. What about re-welding the gas feed line to the rear of the rail....


And still welding on your an fittings on the front and making it a loop???
there's no reason to add a loop with this set up...
Old 02-15-2012, 10:32 PM
  #33  
Super Member
 
400RWHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 618
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2006 CL600
Ok so at the risk of sounding stupid here, this DIY is simply taking some AN fittings, welding them onto the ends and placing a piece of SS braided between them so the fuel rail has a loop in it instead of terminating at the end? This is simply being done to equalize fuel pressure across all the injectors so you don't get a lean condition from the injector at the end not being saturated with fuel or suffering a pressure drop? Am I understanding this correctly?
I have worked on tons of higher boost Japanese imports but they have return systems and I haven't run across this. Is this a consequence of a returnless system?

Regards
Old 02-15-2012, 11:27 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
pearlpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
E55 w/ goods, Z32 Project underway
Originally Posted by 400RWHP
Ok so at the risk of sounding stupid here, this DIY is simply taking some AN fittings, welding them onto the ends and placing a piece of SS braided between them so the fuel rail has a loop in it instead of terminating at the end? This is simply being done to equalize fuel pressure across all the injectors so you don't get a lean condition from the injector at the end not being saturated with fuel or suffering a pressure drop? Am I understanding this correctly?
I have worked on tons of higher boost Japanese imports but they have return systems and I haven't run across this. Is this a consequence of a returnless system?

Regards
Yes.
Old 02-15-2012, 11:43 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,694
Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts
2005 E55
does anyone have the specs on the slr injectors? how off do you think the tune would be if we swapped those in?the car would go rich but would the ecu be able to pull enough fuel to compensate?

also what about just running a higher pressure regulator?
Old 02-16-2012, 05:21 AM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmb614's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West
Posts: 1,239
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
E55 AMG
If only we had a return system...
Old 02-16-2012, 07:09 AM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
grantwoodtx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,460
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
GLE 63S
Originally Posted by 400RWHP
Ok so at the risk of sounding stupid here, this DIY is simply taking some AN fittings, welding them onto the ends and placing a piece of SS braided between them so the fuel rail has a loop in it instead of terminating at the end? This is simply being done to equalize fuel pressure across all the injectors so you don't get a lean condition from the injector at the end not being saturated with fuel or suffering a pressure drop? Am I understanding this correctly?
I have worked on tons of higher boost Japanese imports but they have return systems and I haven't run across this. Is this a consequence of a returnless system?

Regards
You are correct that the result is to try and equalize pressure and prevent starvation of the #8 cylinder in particular. HOWEVER even with a stock looped fuel rail the total volume required to supply all cylinders in higher horsepower cars is not sufficent. This is why there are some guys working on a high flow billet fuel rail.
Old 02-16-2012, 07:18 AM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
grantwoodtx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,460
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
GLE 63S
Originally Posted by skratch77
does anyone have the specs on the slr injectors? how off do you think the tune would be if we swapped those in?the car would go rich but would the ecu be able to pull enough fuel to compensate?

also what about just running a higher pressure regulator?
Angelo

The SLR injectors can be used but are very hard to get hold of (VIN is required when ordering etc.) and they are $$$. Last time we checked +$150 each

Either way the tune has to be adjusted to scale for the higher flow injectors.

Fuel regulator - are you referring the the "regulator" on the fuel rail? If so this is actually a pulse damper that prevents hydro dynamic pulses in the rail as injectors close. I believe the SLR has 2 on the fuel rail it uses mainly due to the increased flow of the it's looped rail and higher flow injectors.
Old 02-16-2012, 07:32 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
e55amgrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Dirt Scooters
Originally Posted by skratch77
does anyone have the specs on the slr injectors? how off do you think the tune would be if we swapped those in?the car would go rich but would the ecu be able to pull enough fuel to compensate?

also what about just running a higher pressure regulator?
They flow 516cc at 3 bar.
Old 02-16-2012, 10:10 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmb614's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West
Posts: 1,239
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
E55 AMG
Originally Posted by grantwoodtx
You are correct that the result is to try and equalize pressure and prevent starvation of the #8 cylinder in particular. HOWEVER even with a stock looped fuel rail the total volume required to supply all cylinders in higher horsepower cars is not sufficent. This is why there are some guys working on a high flow billet fuel rail.
At what horsepower level are you referring to? I haven't done scientific tests, merely datalogging and visual observation, but when I changed my plugs the other day the cylinders closest to the firewall appeared to be the richest (#8). This is with a looped stock fuel rail, TTM injectors, 185 pulley.

Prior to looping the fuel rail it was the opposite, though not nearly as noticeable on the stock plugs. If what you say is true, at what power level would this change to a higher volume rail be required? Are there tests proving that this would be necessary?

If people are approaching power levels that would require this mod, wouldn't it be best to build a return system and increase fuel line size? Even if the rail is a monster would the stock lines and pump be big enough to feed it?
Old 02-16-2012, 10:37 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
grantwoodtx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,460
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
GLE 63S
Originally Posted by jmb614
At what horsepower level are you referring to? I haven't done scientific tests, merely datalogging and visual observation, but when I changed my plugs the other day the cylinders closest to the firewall appeared to be the richest (#8). This is with a looped stock fuel rail, TTM injectors, 185 pulley.

Prior to looping the fuel rail it was the opposite, though not nearly as noticeable on the stock plugs. If what you say is true, at what power level would this change to a higher volume rail be required? Are there tests proving that this would be necessary?

If people are approaching power levels that would require this mod, wouldn't it be best to build a return system and increase fuel line size? Even if the rail is a monster would the stock lines and pump be big enough to feed it?
I think the general consensus is 500RWHP plus is the point at which the looped rail and increased flow injectors are required.

As for testing the inforamtion is available on another forum but I've sent you the link via PM.
Old 02-16-2012, 10:48 AM
  #42  
Super Member
 
ahmad0658's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Saudi Arabia - Qatif
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Brabus K8 E55 05
Originally Posted by grantwoodtx
I think the general consensus is 500RWHP plus is the point at which the looped rail and increased flow injectors are required.

As for testing the inforamtion is available on another forum but I've sent you the link via PM.
To be more conservative, any power above 450 rwhp based on dyno mustang (considering weather condition going hot) you will need to have higher flow injectors and also possibly closed fuel rail.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:34 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmb614's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West
Posts: 1,239
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
E55 AMG
Originally Posted by ahmad0658
To be more conservative, any power above 450 rwhp based on dyno mustang (considering weather condition going hot) you will need to have higher flow injectors and also possibly closed fuel rail.
I understand the desire for a looped rail and larger injectors when running a larger than stock pulley. Hence the reason I am running the larger squirters and looped rail. My question really pertains to the larger volume rail you guys are talking about. For instance, if I am running 450-500+ WHP with the looped rail and bigger injectors, at what point should I consider going to a larger volume rail? And would the stock pump and fuel lines be enough to feed a larger volume rail?

At this point with my current mods I am between 475-500 whp on a mustang dyno, my current fueling setup appears to be adequate, maybe even more than adequate considering that my plugs appearance shows that the BACK cylinders are running rich with the fronts appearing to be normal. I also notice through datalogging that AFR's are at a slightly rich 11.2-11.5.

I apologize for the noobish questions, just wondering if I need to look at upgrading the entire fuel system once I add headers, TB etc...
Old 02-16-2012, 12:36 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmb614's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West
Posts: 1,239
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
E55 AMG
Originally Posted by grantwoodtx
As for testing the inforamtion is available on another forum but I've sent you the link via PM.
Thank you sir
Old 02-18-2012, 11:12 AM
  #45  
Member
 
JoshM813's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
What fittings are those on the rail? I was thinking about doing this myself.
Old 02-18-2012, 05:12 PM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,230
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
CLS55 AMG
grant, did you go with -8an fittings? i picked up a set of -6, and they are way too small, im returning those and going to a -8. i'm having my buddy do the work with a tig welder. i'll post pics once done.
Old 02-18-2012, 05:13 PM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,230
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
CLS55 AMG
nevermind i was able to make out the part number on the fitting and confirmed those are -8an. good call
Old 02-18-2012, 06:20 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
pearlpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
E55 w/ goods, Z32 Project underway
Originally Posted by xpl0sive
grant, did you go with -8an fittings? i picked up a set of -6, and they are way too small, im returning those and going to a -8. i'm having my buddy do the work with a tig welder. i'll post pics once done.
I went with 8, worked out great. Be careful with the tig, I used the same, just need to get it right to avoid coking anything, or going through the thin tube. The bitc! is feeding the fuel line. Most would prefer to silver solder (brazing)

Last edited by pearlpower; 02-19-2012 at 12:33 AM.
Old 02-19-2012, 03:19 AM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
pearlpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
E55 w/ goods, Z32 Project underway
Another option for those more adventurous would be to buy two billets, tap the ends to run lines, etc. Also would need hold downs, still affordable for a custom look

http://www.rossmachineracing.com/dash8.html
Old 02-25-2012, 03:43 AM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
pearlpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
E55 w/ goods, Z32 Project underway
Pic of my 2nd rail. This is for another members car. Picked up a used rail for fairly cheap, grinded down the bungs for clearance, used my miter saw to cut the rail, and then my Lincoln to tig weld it up. I go a bit heavy on the bottom as it is so close to the injector, polish both the outside and inside by the welds to clean it up after pressure testing it.

Seen a pic floating around where the bungs are not grinded down. This would make installation very difficult as the clearance on both sides is very tight. Just to clarify, I did this as a favor, not for profit, or interested in another.




You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Fuel Rail DIY



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 AM.