W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

E55 weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 17, 2012 | 11:07 PM
  #26  
Forrest Gump 9's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 35
shrimp boat
Originally Posted by e500slr
JESUS Why do these cars make so much torque (not a bad thing )? I mean the torque is so down low it's road shredding.
I don't know about you, but I rather have a little bit less torque and little more hp up top. Torque is what brake shiats.
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 11:24 PM
  #27  
chawkins2001's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 67
From: Atlanta
2006 E55 AMG
One thing that generates tq is Cubic inches which the 5.4 litre has, and the second is changing out the crank pulley and not the blower pulley. If the pulley of choice to change was the blower pulley, I guarentee it would not make as much tq. Creating boost via the crank pulley produces a large increase in tq.
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 11:46 PM
  #28  
RedBullJnky's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,921
Likes: 9
From: Streets of SoFlo
you to Hate
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
One thing that generates tq is Cubic inches which the 5.4 litre has, and the second is changing out the crank pulley and not the blower pulley. If the pulley of choice to change was the blower pulley, I guarentee it would not make as much tq. Creating boost via the crank pulley produces a large increase in tq.
I agree. But it also takes a good tune.
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 12:00 AM
  #29  
blackbenzz's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,489
Likes: 96
haters crazy
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
One thing that generates tq is Cubic inches which the 5.4 litre has, and the second is changing out the crank pulley and not the blower pulley. If the pulley of choice to change was the blower pulley, I guarentee it would not make as much tq. Creating boost via the crank pulley produces a large increase in tq.
Why would it not make as much torque? Both result in spinning the supercharger faster. If the SC is spinning at same speed it shouldn't mater which pulley you changed
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 07:56 AM
  #30  
e55amgrocket's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 7
From: Northern Va
Dirt Scooters
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
One thing that generates tq is Cubic inches which the 5.4 litre has, and the second is changing out the crank pulley and not the blower pulley. If the pulley of choice to change was the blower pulley, I guarentee it would not make as much tq. Creating boost via the crank pulley produces a large increase in tq.
I think spinning the blower faster either way will make more power and torque. It's possible with the extra load of the larger pulley it could make a little more but im not sure on that one. The reason these cars make the crazy torque is because 331CI (almost 332CI) and a screw blower that makes its boost instantly.
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 08:50 AM
  #31  
chawkins2001's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 67
From: Atlanta
2006 E55 AMG
it does make a difference, I am not sure why though. The reasoning stems from owning several terimators and my Lightning. When those cars first came out, guys were just changing the blower pillows to a much smaller diameter. Well that started causing severe belt slip, so for increased belt wrap, they started leaving the upper pulley alone, and changed the crank pulley. What happened was the following, changing uppers only to say a 2.81 resulted in 460/470 on a04 cobra car. Leaving the blower pulley alone and changing the crank pulley to say a 8lb lower would result in 440/540. I will find out why the distribution is so different for you guys.
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 09:11 AM
  #32  
e55amgrocket's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 7
From: Northern Va
Dirt Scooters
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
it does make a difference, I am not sure why though. The reasoning stems from owning several terimators and my Lightning. When those cars first came out, guys were just changing the blower pillows to a much smaller diameter. Well that started causing severe belt slip, so for increased belt wrap, they started leaving the upper pulley alone, and changed the crank pulley. What happened was the following, changing uppers only to say a 2.81 resulted in 460/470 on a04 cobra car. Leaving the blower pulley alone and changing the crank pulley to say a 8lb lower would result in 440/540. I will find out why the distribution is so different for you guys.
I know some tricks for belt slip so never had that problem
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 05:07 PM
  #33  
E55Bullet's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 1
From: Lafayette, IN
2008 ML63 2009 SL63 2010 Alpha 7 GTR
Originally Posted by e55amgrocket
I know some tricks for belt slip so never had that problem



Oh man, please do tell!
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 07:50 PM
  #34  
e55amgrocket's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 7
From: Northern Va
Dirt Scooters
Originally Posted by E55Bullet
Oh man, please do tell!
Take the belt off and spray it with brake clean and the pulleys also. They get oily and causes belt slip. 2 things that work great to stop it if that dosent work is hair spray and the best is VHT.
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 08:09 PM
  #35  
e500slr's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,214
Likes: 29
2011 E63, 2013 CLS63
Originally Posted by Forrest Gump 9
I don't know about you, but I rather have a little bit less torque and little more hp up top. Torque is what brake shiats.
That's true because ultimately torque without power is no fun and useless but it gives you bragging rights you know. It's not just the number either, it's the curve and when the torque is at it's peak which in these cars is very low in the RPM range which means this car is an incredible daily driver, it doesn't scream and shout when driving normally but glides and is effortless and for me that's invaluable since I commute daily and the traffic is a *****

I'm surprised that the 6.3 Weistecs don't make more than these in torque I mean 5.4 is pretty big but not enormous. I mean Exotic's car is making over 700wtq for example which is over 900 crank tq and that's about as much as the Veyron makes (not SS) and that's a quad turbo W16
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 AM.