W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

....Speedriven's Whipple Supercharger Upgrade....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 11-10-2012 | 05:57 PM
  #251  
urbamworm's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Jacksonville, FL
05 White Pano E55, Cadillac CTS-V
Originally Posted by AMGPilot
the difference in 91 to 93 octane "MIGHT" be 7-10 crank hp
How do you come to that conclusion? It is claimed that 91 octane is like **** water and every tuner that I have ever come across expresses how much better 93 is to tune with and make power. Another .5 to 1 degree of timing could make 10whp easily must less 10 crank hp. With some adjustments of timing with increase up 1.5 degrees in some areas I gained around 25whp in my E55. So having said this I don't see why 15whp couldn't happen from adding the additional .5 to 1*.
Old 11-10-2012 | 07:54 PM
  #252  
e55amgrocket's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Northern Va
Dirt Scooters
With heads,cams,race gas 700+ would be easy on the boost they ran it at. 25psi on a built motor and 1000hp isn't out of the question. I made 619 on a dyno jet with the stock blower so I have no doubt just a blower swap would of put me well over 700rwhp.
Old 11-10-2012 | 08:21 PM
  #253  
adianaty's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Porter Ranch, CA
E55, CTS-V Wagon, Duc 1098R
Didn't see it on the website but what boost were they running.
Old 11-10-2012 | 08:39 PM
  #254  
e55amgrocket's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Northern Va
Dirt Scooters
Originally Posted by adianaty
Didn't see it on the website but what boost were they running.
I'd like to see boost, IAT's, and timing just to see what was changed.
Old 11-10-2012 | 08:43 PM
  #255  
adianaty's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Porter Ranch, CA
E55, CTS-V Wagon, Duc 1098R
Originally Posted by e55amgrocket
I'd like to see boost, IAT's, and timing just to see what was changed.
Exactly. Little weird to me that the stock and whipple curves look so similar. I would have thought that the whipple would shine more up top. Clearly it's making new found power.
Old 11-10-2012 | 08:54 PM
  #256  
chawkins2001's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,659
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
From: Atlanta
2006 E55 AMG
Damn, I cant imagine this monster on E85/meth
Old 11-10-2012 | 10:46 PM
  #257  
GT-ER's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by urbamworm
How do you come to that conclusion? It is claimed that 91 octane is like **** water and every tuner that I have ever come across expresses how much better 93 is to tune with and make power. Another .5 to 1 degree of timing could make 10whp easily must less 10 crank hp. With some adjustments of timing with increase up 1.5 degrees in some areas I gained around 25whp in my E55. So having said this I don't see why 15whp couldn't happen from adding the additional .5 to 1*.
My car has 4-5 deg. of timing retard on 91 and 0* on 93 and you can FEEL the difference. 4-5* of additional timing has got to be at least 20whp.
Old 11-10-2012 | 11:23 PM
  #258  
gaspam's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes on 155 Posts
From: miami / delray beach
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
Originally Posted by urbamworm
How do you come to that conclusion? It is claimed that 91 octane is like **** water and every tuner that I have ever come across expresses how much better 93 is to tune with and make power. Another .5 to 1 degree of timing could make 10whp easily must less 10 crank hp. With some adjustments of timing with increase up 1.5 degrees in some areas I gained around 25whp in my E55. So having said this I don't see why 15whp couldn't happen from adding the additional .5 to 1*.
i think he's probably just extrapolating an octane curve to come to that 10hp number.

as you said, it depends on how much timing going up 2 oct points is worth.

for me on an older audi i had that was stage 2 it had switchable files and going from 93 to 100 oct file added about 30whp so basically about 4 hp per 1 octane increase.

got similar results on the yellow audi when added meth...added about 40 hp and that was adding 7-8 degrees of timing (basically as if i running about 100 oct rating)

so i would think going from 91 to 93 would give between 10-20 hp depending on how aggressive the tuner got on timing...

i am interesting in seeing the iat's on the new blowers and the recovery time as to me, that is the biggest alure... keeping the same power all day long
Old 11-11-2012 | 11:32 AM
  #259  
DVC's Avatar
DVC
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,060
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
From: USA
'06 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by e55amgrocket
I'd like to see boost, IAT's, and timing just to see what was changed.
Very important questions that haven't been answered. Would love to know the boost. It will be interesting to see if the floating I/C reduces IATs and by how much.
Old 11-11-2012 | 12:22 PM
  #260  
nizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
2014 AMG E63S, 2006 XK8 victory edition convertible, 2006 supercharged trailblazer SS, 2001 E430
Awesome idea but I'm not sure if an extra 100 whp is worth $9000+ dollars. Probably well over $10k after install and tuning. But to each his own i guess

Last edited by nizzle; 11-11-2012 at 12:24 PM.
Old 11-11-2012 | 02:05 PM
  #261  
PACougar's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,109
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Las Vegas, NV
1000Hp Diesel Trucks, 2019 E63s
Originally Posted by nizzle
Awesome idea but I'm not sure if an extra 100 whp is worth $9000+ dollars. Probably well over $10k after install and tuning. But to each his own i guess
It's not the extra 100 hp that makes it worth it it's the 300 hp that it'll be cable of adding that makes it worth it.
Old 11-11-2012 | 08:14 PM
  #262  
GT-ER's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by PACougar
It's not the extra 100 hp that makes it worth it it's the 300 hp that it'll be cable of adding that makes it worth it.
x 2423536479876352
Old 11-12-2012 | 03:23 AM
  #263  
nizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
2014 AMG E63S, 2006 XK8 victory edition convertible, 2006 supercharged trailblazer SS, 2001 E430
Originally Posted by PACougar
It's not the extra 100 hp that makes it worth it it's the 300 hp that it'll be cable of adding that makes it worth it.
well IF they can get it to add 300 WHP+, THEN that will be closer to what you should be getting for $10,000.00+
Old 11-12-2012 | 03:33 AM
  #264  
Jakez's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: To your right or left, flying past you
'03 E55 AMG - '06 300C SRT8 - '93 240SX Coupe w/1JZ-GTE
Originally Posted by nizzle
well IF they can get it to add 300 WHP+, THEN that will be closer to what you should be getting for $10,000.00+
I'm sure they could get 800hp out of it? I'd hope.. And $10,000 doesn't sound bad for that. Although that $10,000 will turn into $20,000+ very quickly lol.
Old 11-12-2012 | 06:43 AM
  #265  
GT-ER's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by nizzle
well IF they can get it to add 300 WHP+, THEN that will be closer to what you should be getting for $10,000.00+
Come on man, even with the mighty GT-R you have to spend $50K to get 800whp out of it. You can't expect for an additional 100-300whp to be cheap when you already have 400-500whp to begin with, it's not realistic. Especially since you have to swap out the power adder. If to get to 700whp I have to spend a TOTAL of $25K ( no labor included since I'd do it myself )...I think that's really cheap.
Old 11-12-2012 | 11:59 AM
  #266  
nizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
2014 AMG E63S, 2006 XK8 victory edition convertible, 2006 supercharged trailblazer SS, 2001 E430
Originally Posted by GT-ER
Come on man, even with the mighty GT-R you have to spend $50K to get 800whp out of it. You can't expect for an additional 100-300whp to be cheap when you already have 400-500whp to begin with, it's not realistic. Especially since you have to swap out the power adder. If to get to 700whp I have to spend a TOTAL of $25K ( no labor included since I'd do it myself )...I think that's really cheap.
Comparing a GT-R to a W211 E55 is like comparing apples to oranges. I understand where you are coming from and your point is noted, BUT, Dude i could buy a complete, fully built, 800 HP race motor for 10k or less. And no not a MB race motor but since we are comparing apple to oranges...... Just sayin.

However, with that said, I know we are dealing with MB here and nothing for a MB is cheap. I'm just sayin $10K for 100 hp over stock for these cars is not worth it. Now for 200 - 300 HP over stock.... Still spendy but I get it and I think that is more worth it.

Last edited by nizzle; 11-12-2012 at 12:09 PM.
Old 11-12-2012 | 12:13 PM
  #267  
GregMB's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
From: The Granite State
.
Originally Posted by nizzle
Dude i could buy a complete, fully built, 800 HP race motor for 10k or less...
Not likely..... I don't think FTP is returning phone calls or PMs.





-G
Old 11-12-2012 | 12:23 PM
  #268  
nizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
2014 AMG E63S, 2006 XK8 victory edition convertible, 2006 supercharged trailblazer SS, 2001 E430
Originally Posted by GregMB
Not likely.....

-G
http://www.jegs.com/p/Blueprint-Engi...21871/10002/-1
Old 11-12-2012 | 12:33 PM
  #269  
GT-ER's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by nizzle
Comparing a GT-R to a W211 E55 is like comparing apples to oranges. I understand where you are coming from and your point is noted, BUT, Dude i could buy a complete, fully built, 800 HP race motor for 10k or less. And no not a MB race motor but since we are comparing apple to oranges...... Just sayin.

However, with that said, I know we are dealing with MB here and nothing for a MB is cheap. I'm just sayin $10K for 100 hp over stock for these cars is not worth it. Now for 200 - 300 HP over stock.... Still spendy but I get it and I think that is more worth it.
They are high end street cars just like our E55's ( it just so happens that E55's have 4 doors instead of two and the drivetrain doesn't come into this conversation ), a big block race engine that can barely idle does not fit into this conversation....and even then I don't know where you can get a fully built 800whp engine for $10K or less. I see a lot of these modern crate engine at summit costing over $25K and they still don't touch 800whp, the HUGE 8.0L+ carbureted engines should not even be mentioned in this topic and still cost over $10K and they still need an aditional $5K easy to fit them into the car.

Last edited by GT-ER; 11-12-2012 at 12:36 PM.
Old 11-12-2012 | 12:37 PM
  #270  
nizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
2014 AMG E63S, 2006 XK8 victory edition convertible, 2006 supercharged trailblazer SS, 2001 E430
I like you man and I am not trying to get after you at all. However, the are FAR more differences from a GT-R to an E55 besides the extra 2 doors. Yaw control & AWD just to be quick and name a couple. And I said race motor + posted a link for you. Plus the E55 is worth 25K VS GT-R = 80K. I am not knocking ANYTHING here. I have an E55 for crying out loud .

All I was saying is 10K was too much for 100 HP over STOCK on OUR cars.
Old 11-12-2012 | 12:43 PM
  #271  
GT-ER's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by nizzle
I like you man and I am not trying to get after you at all. However, the are FAR more differences from a GT-R to an E55 besides the extra 2 doors. Yaw control & AWD just to be quick and name a couple. And I said race motor + posted a link for you. Plus the E55 is worth 25K VS GT-R = 80K. I am not knocking ANYTHING here. I have an E55 for crying out loud .

All I was saying is 10K was too much for 100 HP over STOCK on OUR cars.

Trust me, I'm not taking any of this personally or anything. I love to argue these things...lol.

I just think you aren't seeing the big picture. Whom even buys the supercharger doesn't buy it to make 560whp...they buy it to eventually get 800whp. THAT is what you pay for.
Old 11-12-2012 | 12:45 PM
  #272  
nizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
2014 AMG E63S, 2006 XK8 victory edition convertible, 2006 supercharged trailblazer SS, 2001 E430
Originally Posted by GT-ER
Trust me, I'm not taking any of this personally or anything. I love to argue these things...lol.

I just think you aren't seeing the big picture. Whom even buys the supercharger doesn't buy it to make 560whp...they buy it to eventually get 800whp. THAT is what you pay for.
I do get it. Hence in my last few posts I specifically stated not worth it for 100 over stock but 200 - 300 over stock makes more sense..... I GET IT
Old 11-12-2012 | 12:52 PM
  #273  
stevebez's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,066
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
From: London, UK
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, LRD4 HSE, R107 280SL
I think the point here is the guys buying this S/C are not guys with a stock car but guys who have gone down the whole modding road and have reached the end of it. So I see what they are offering as starting point for heavily modded cars and we need to explore how this unit operates in a stage 3 car (what ever that really is).

For example my car is pretty much maxed out, "only" things left to do is gasflow the heads and go forged on the pistons. This unit takes care of fuel delivery and injectors as well?

So I am interested in where this takes my car from here. At mom I have 630hp crank (Kleemann dyno do crank translation) so that's in the 530whp ballpark.

Swap out I should have closer to 600whp is my guess. And lets not get carried away about upping pulley sizes etc just yet - this may well be possible
- but we need to see IAT's and boost to really see where we are at here on this unit. If we are maxing out on IAT's on this setup already or boost is high already the upside will be limited. On the other hand.....
Old 11-12-2012 | 02:09 PM
  #274  
urbamworm's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Jacksonville, FL
05 White Pano E55, Cadillac CTS-V
Originally Posted by nizzle
I like you man and I am not trying to get after you at all. However, the are FAR more differences from a GT-R to an E55 besides the extra 2 doors. Yaw control & AWD just to be quick and name a couple. And I said race motor + posted a link for you. Plus the E55 is worth 25K VS GT-R = 80K. I am not knocking ANYTHING here. I have an E55 for crying out loud .

All I was saying is 10K was too much for 100 HP over STOCK on OUR cars.
You realize it costs over $7k to get a 500+whp E55 going down the bolt on path right? And that is if you bought a stage 3 package from Eurocharged which is cheaper than other routes piecing different other manufactures products together. And then you actually have a car that makes that power for one pull and then loses some power or only makes that power in cool/cold weather.

So the supercharger being roughly $1500 more is not that dramatic, but you in turn get a more efficient setup which also has a much higher possibility of big power. I really don't see where there is any arguement from someone with a stock car getting ready to go all out modding or someone with a fully modded car ready to take it to the next level. In either situation the upgrade is a big deal, but I would say it is a far better deal for a stock guy ready to make his car scream and have little bolt on options to keep increasing with down the road.
Old 11-12-2012 | 02:18 PM
  #275  
nizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
2014 AMG E63S, 2006 XK8 victory edition convertible, 2006 supercharged trailblazer SS, 2001 E430


I get it!! Is anybody reading everything I say or is everyone stuck on the simple fact that I said 10k is too much?

i understand this SC has the potential to add more than 100 HP.... I get it.

My point was $10k was too much for 100 hp over stock!!
Now 100 hp over a fully bolted and tuned car is a different story. So is 200 - 300 hp over stock.

Here just so we can stop the dead horse beating:
The E55 is the best car man has ever made. $10k, $20k, hell $100k is nothing when you're talking about spending it on such a high quality, lightening fast, sexy, reliable, beast of vehicle.

Damn can we leave it alone now?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: ....Speedriven's Whipple Supercharger Upgrade....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 PM.