2007 E63 Head Gasket Went Bye Bye
Thanks in Advance
^^You think 2 owners at 57xxx miles is excessive and indicates a problem??? Wow, you must be trolling.
Coolant was leaking into the exhaust and oil pan. Apparently I had about 1 gallon of coolant sitting in the oil pan when they took it in. Luckily I stopped driving it about 2 weeks ago after I noticed the "milky oil".
Next steps: Convince eBay policy that to cover the issue. Replace head bolts.........
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Just glad it is being covered without too much hassle. However I am looking forward to getting her back after over 3 weeks.
About 2/3 of the bolts absolutely look fine. NO sign of corrosion at all anywhere. 1/3 of the bolts look like they are about to snap at the head. The corrosion there is already causing rust flakes to fall off the bolt.
The bolt that actually had its head snap off, you can clearly see the rust seeping into the bolt (inner is lighter, outer ring has a dark rust coloring).
When the car is done I will have the bolts in my possession and I believe some of the guys on the forum are looking to do a metallurgy test on them. To me it almost looks like there was a bad batch of bolts mixed in with good ones. Don't see why 2/3 of them are near perfect sitting in the near to same conditions are the 1/3.
About 2/3 of the bolts absolutely look fine. NO sign of corrosion at all anywhere. 1/3 of the bolts look like they are about to snap at the head. The corrosion there is already causing rust flakes to fall off the bolt.
The bolt that actually had its head snap off, you can clearly see the rust seeping into the bolt (inner is lighter, outer ring has a dark rust coloring).
When the car is done I will have the bolts in my possession and I believe some of the guys on the forum are looking to do a metallurgy test on them. To me it almost looks like there was a bad batch of bolts mixed in with good ones. Don't see why 2/3 of them are near perfect sitting in the near to same conditions are the 1/3.
Last edited by motoman; Aug 30, 2013 at 11:04 AM. Reason: lust for failed headbolt
The head bolts are a torque to yield design only to be used once. They corrode at the tops breaking off causing the head gasket to leak. Caught in time, the problem can be fixed, for about $5k dealer pricing. However if you don't catch it in time and the motor hydro-locks, its time for a new motor, about $40k. The intake manifold bolts are also torque to yield and suffer from a stretching issue causing an intake manifold leak. The design of the original M156 lifters did not allow sufficient hydraulic compression to occur fast enough causing premature wear on the take up ramps of the cam shaft lobes.These were replaced by lifters from the SLS63. Please see the sticky on the top of the C63 section to view pictures of the failed and redesigned head bolts. I notice you do have 6.3 motor. Hopefully you will not suffer the fate of many 6.3 owners or have an extended warranty. However when it comes time to sell your vehicle, unless you trade it in to a dealer or a neophyte unfamiliar with these issues, you may take a hit on your value.
Last edited by DuaneC63; Aug 30, 2013 at 02:12 PM.
I have been itching to possibly to get into a C63. I was looking at the 2010s, but it might be wise to wait a bit longer and get 2012 or even 2013 after reading this thread.
Let me repeat what you said about MB. Known bad parts (but no recall). So they wait hoping the failures occur after warranty or on added warranty. Great company to do business with. I will tear apart my C63 at first hint.
Why would anyone look at the CLA with 30 lbs of boost. I can only imagine what is in store for those unfortunate owners. A little more boost and you're at Indy. Regards motoman
The prior thread suggested "crevice corrosion." If that is the cause , upgraded bolts will not necessarily escape this mechanism. I am strictly a read and report scribe, but if the moisture is being trapped under the bolt heads the only thing I recall that could reduce the likelihood of crevice corrosion was reduced tensile strength. This is counter intuitive so I asked if anyone had seen reduced torque/yield- turn on the new headbolts. No answers yet.
Bogeyman still at the window ? Hope not.
PS this thread should be stuffed into the main sticky.
About 2/3 of the bolts absolutely look fine. NO sign of corrosion at all anywhere. 1/3 of the bolts look like they are about to snap at the head. The corrosion there is already causing rust flakes to fall off the bolt.
The bolt that actually had its head snap off, you can clearly see the rust seeping into the bolt (inner is lighter, outer ring has a dark rust coloring).
When the car is done I will have the bolts in my possession and I believe some of the guys on the forum are looking to do a metallurgy test on them. To me it almost looks like there was a bad batch of bolts mixed in with good ones. Don't see why 2/3 of them are near perfect sitting in the near to same conditions are the 1/3.
Does anyone know if the revised bolts have had a metal change? I have read everywhere but no one seems to know. The design change itself as you stated will not resolve the corrosion problem. The only good thing is no reported failures on engines with the new head bolt (whether that is due to low mileage/time or actual design improvement who knows)
Yeah I wish I had the bolt positions, but the shop didn't keep track them. The only thing I know is my bolt broke between cylinders 6-7
Are we looking at electrolysis at work?
Were the bolts that look the worst closer to the exhaust manifolds?
Even though I say "crevice corrosion" I keep vascillating. Your bolts look like coolant "could" have gone up the whole shafts, but something triggered the runaway corrosion on some? To my knowledge proper coolant is not affected by temp gradients, and I do not know how/if fresh coolant separates so that water alone is somehow at the top of those corroded headbolts.
I ramble so some expert will chime in, hopefully. All this is moot except for curiosity as these cars age and MB corporate shrugs the problem off as routine maintenance. ( Yeah, my lowly , running 26 year old GM iron block has never been apart)
Neither has the SR20 in the Nissan.
Last edited by motoman; Aug 30, 2013 at 08:21 PM. Reason: Oh yeah and further...
Baronet.
The sticky of the MBZ service bulletin indicates the engine serial numbers impacted. Some 2011 fall into this range. The only way to know for sure is check the engine serial number. The 2012 and later do have the wet clutch pack instead of a torque converter. However these are prone to overheating with heavy usage. At the AMG driving academy they put blower fans under the C63's and let the engine idle after they come in from the track. Nothing an extra large tranny cooler won't fix.
Still thinking this has something to do with electrolysis with the dissimilar metals of the block and the head bolt along with acidic coolant.
Comments !





