W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fixed Pulley Review and Findings...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-09-2013, 07:10 AM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Tech-Tune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ/Greece
Posts: 952
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 CLS55 & 2002 SL55 (R129) Silver Arrow
Fixed Pulley Review and Findings...

Figured I'd start a thread in order to accumulate information from members who have installed the new fixed (clutch less) pulley.

What I noticed right away is that during cruising (off boost) driving, the IAT's are on the average 10 degrees higher than before when I was running Shardul's smaller SC pulley. Meaning if I was at 12 degrees above ambient, I'm now at 22 degrees above with the 77mm pulley. This is only during cruising but totally understandable being the blower is spinning all the time now so it will generate more heat.

In order to put things in better perspective, here's a list of my cooling mods:
-split system
-PLM heat exchanger
-Bosch 010 pump (constant circulation)
-small reservoir located outside the engine bay (behind grill)

I am however enjoying the absence of the clutch engagement, as I've always felt it robbed the car of it's luxury feel. Also feels noticeably peppier than it did with the smaller SC pulley.

Hoping others chime in with their thoughts and findings. Its a new mod so the more information we share the better it is for all of us.
Old 08-09-2013, 07:25 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
viren.89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,242
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
So I'm assuming you car didn't get the tune yet right ?

You didn't step on it much did you ? cuz if the car isn't tuned it isn't wise to

go WOT right?
Old 08-09-2013, 07:36 AM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Tech-Tune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ/Greece
Posts: 952
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 CLS55 & 2002 SL55 (R129) Silver Arrow
Currently on my old EC tune, so I'm not driving it hard (staying under 5lbs and for short intervals).
I'm keeping a close eye on my gauges to prevent any potential harm.
Old 08-09-2013, 08:59 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Sir-Boost-a-Lot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,092
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
1967 Pro Touring turbo LSX Camaro
You might want to consider rigging the bypass valve with a sensor like "Finny" did in his Stock to Awe thread so you can know what's happening with that at different throttle positions and speeds.
Old 08-09-2013, 09:36 AM
  #5  
lm7
Super Member
 
lm7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
2003 E55
I'm hoping the tune is resolved soon so we can see results of full potential and actual #s
Old 08-09-2013, 10:44 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Toadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 4,064
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
i'd expect IATs to be higher, you're essentially going from a 168-172 pulley to a 180
Old 08-09-2013, 11:27 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
More reviews:
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...ge-thread.html
Old 08-09-2013, 11:28 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Originally Posted by Toadster
i'd expect IATs to be higher, you're essentially going from a 168-172 pulley to a 180
Incorrect as he stated this is at cruising...Essentially what he is showing is that having a solid unit, which runs the blades all the time, creates heat (dahhh)....It will be interesting to see if the on throttle benefits outweigh the off throttle disadvantages....I am still skeptical.
Old 08-09-2013, 12:20 PM
  #9  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Tech-Tune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ/Greece
Posts: 952
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 CLS55 & 2002 SL55 (R129) Silver Arrow
Originally Posted by cij911
Incorrect as he stated this is at cruising...Essentially what he is showing is that having a solid unit, which runs the blades all the time, creates heat (dahhh)....It will be interesting to see if the on throttle benefits outweigh the off throttle disadvantages....I am still skeptical.
Exactly, I too am skeptical because now I'm seeing 25-30 above ambient at cruising (off boost). Those spinning lobes make significant heat even prior to creating boost.

Last edited by Tech-Tune; 08-09-2013 at 12:24 PM.
Old 08-09-2013, 12:32 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Originally Posted by Tech-Tune
Exactly, I too am skeptical because now I'm seeing 25-30 above ambient at cruising (off boost). Those spinning lobes make significant heat even prior to creating boost.
Technically speaking, reducing the weight of the pulley system should help with response, but with the massive torque our cars produce (even off boost), I really doubt it would be evident by most...
Old 08-09-2013, 01:20 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
E55, SL63, ML550
Originally Posted by cij911
Incorrect as he stated this is at cruising...Essentially what he is showing is that having a solid unit, which runs the blades all the time, creates heat (dahhh)....It will be interesting to see if the on throttle benefits outweigh the off throttle disadvantages....I am still skeptical.

I agree with Toad on this one, even while cruising the 180 size spins the blower faster creating more heat than a 168 would. Remember even while cruising our pulley is engaged majority of the time.
Old 08-09-2013, 01:27 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Originally Posted by Shifter
I agree with Toad on this one.... Remember even while cruising our pulley is engaged majority of the time.

Ughhh incorrect...do some logging and you'll understand a bit more.

Last edited by cij911; 08-09-2013 at 01:30 PM.
Old 08-09-2013, 01:40 PM
  #13  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Tech-Tune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ/Greece
Posts: 952
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 CLS55 & 2002 SL55 (R129) Silver Arrow
Originally Posted by Shifter
even while cruising the 180 size spins the blower faster creating more heat than a 168 would.
Off boost the clutched pulley is not engaged, so this is not an accurate statement. ^
If I were to run the 83mm fixed pulley (which is equivalent to my smaller clutched pulley) it would still create more heat off boost than the clutched one.

Both my clutched pulley's engaged at around -2lbs of vacuum (just prior to boost).
Old 08-09-2013, 02:26 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CharlyE500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Socal, Chino
Posts: 4,399
Received 58 Likes on 46 Posts
E55 2006 / CLS55 / S450 / Jag XKR2011
Is this will shorten the SC life which is always engaging ?
Old 08-09-2013, 02:37 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Style_Front's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 324
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
ez-go
Originally Posted by CharlyE500
Is this will shorten the SC life which is always engaging ?
Who can really answer this? What if the supercharger life was 500,000 miles and it shortened it in half, only 250,000 miles? Yes it will be running more but as long as it stays within operating temps and well lubed it should run like a top for a long long time.
Old 08-09-2013, 02:46 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CharlyE500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Socal, Chino
Posts: 4,399
Received 58 Likes on 46 Posts
E55 2006 / CLS55 / S450 / Jag XKR2011
Originally Posted by Style_Front
Who can really answer this? What if the supercharger life was 500,000 miles and it shortened it in half, only 250,000 miles? Yes it will be running more but as long as it stays within operating temps and well lubed it should run like a top for a long long time.

Running more even with the right temp will still shorten the SC life. Plus, I don't really think they will last 300K in stock form. My point is, few of us has the car more than 100K miles and how long the SC will last with this pulley.
Old 08-09-2013, 03:02 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Style_Front's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 324
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
ez-go
I doubt theres a documented expected life span on the supercharger. The answer is definately yes, it will shorten the life span, but to what degree I dont think any one can really say without fabricating a number. Time will tell.
Old 08-09-2013, 03:50 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
E55, SL63, ML550
Originally Posted by Tech-Tune
Off boost the clutched pulley is not engaged, so this is not an accurate statement. ^
If I were to run the 83mm fixed pulley (which is equivalent to my smaller clutched pulley) it would still create more heat off boost than the clutched one.

Both my clutched pulley's engaged at around -2lbs of vacuum (just prior to boost).
So are you saying at any speed while out of boost the clutch is disengaged ?
Old 08-09-2013, 04:03 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
E55, SL63, ML550
Originally Posted by cij911
Technically speaking, reducing the weight of the pulley system should help with response, but with the massive torque our cars produce (even off boost), I really doubt it would be evident by most...
Incorrect, our cars don't make massive torque off boost.
Old 08-09-2013, 04:05 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
E55, SL63, ML550
Originally Posted by Tech-Tune
Off boost the clutched pulley is not engaged, so this is not an accurate statement. ^
If I were to run the 83mm fixed pulley (which is equivalent to my smaller clutched pulley) it would still create more heat off boost than the clutched one.

Both my clutched pulley's engaged at around -2lbs of vacuum (just prior to boost).
This is a very general statement about when the clutch is or is not engaged and is not fully accurate either.
Old 08-09-2013, 04:27 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Originally Posted by Shifter
This is a very general statement about when the clutch is or is not engaged and is not fully accurate either.
You really should do a bit more homework and datalogging....You'll understand a lot more on when the S/C engages and is not engaged...

As for you stating that our cars don't have a lot of torque off boost, I am not sure what your comparison is, but generally most would agree that a 5.5L v8 can generate a fair bit of torque....Add boost and you have the potential for monster truck levels (j/k)....

I really am not convinced the extra heat, or load for that matter, is worth it...
Old 08-09-2013, 04:35 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
E55, SL63, ML550
Originally Posted by cij911
You really should do a bit more homework and datalogging....You'll understand a lot more on when the S/C engages and is not engaged...

As for you stating that our cars don't have a lot of torque off boost, I am not sure what your comparison is, but generally most would agree that a 5.5L v8 can generate a fair bit of torque....Add boost and you have the potential for monster truck levels (j/k)....

I really am not convinced the extra heat, or load for that matter, is worth it...
You haven't elaborated when you say it is or isn't tho.
What I'm saying I have seen that's all.

I guess I'm comparing torque off boost like driving with a bad ic pump after the sc shuts off and the engine makes 200 lbs. give or take ofcourse.

A 5.4 liter v8 with 8.5:1 compression isn't going to be a beast off boost IMO

Last edited by Shifter; 08-09-2013 at 04:38 PM.
Old 08-09-2013, 05:04 PM
  #23  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Tech-Tune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ/Greece
Posts: 952
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 CLS55 & 2002 SL55 (R129) Silver Arrow
Originally Posted by Shifter
This is a very general statement about when the clutch is or is not engaged and is not fully accurate either.
I monitor my car daily, trust me its accurate.
Old 08-09-2013, 05:09 PM
  #24  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Tech-Tune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ/Greece
Posts: 952
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 CLS55 & 2002 SL55 (R129) Silver Arrow
Originally Posted by cij911
You really should do a bit more homework and datalogging....You'll understand a lot more on when the S/C engages and is not engaged...
Agreed.

Originally Posted by cij911
I really am not convinced the extra heat, or load for that matter, is worth it...
That's what I want to find out. The new pulley feels incredibly responsive and I'm enjoying the absence of the clutch engagement. I really hope the tune gets ironed out and the higher intake temps have minimal effect on performance.

I just uploaded a revised file so I'm gonna go put some miles on it to log the differences.
Old 08-09-2013, 05:15 PM
  #25  
Super Member
 
johnnyblaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 752
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
CLS63S
:Not directed at the OP but everyone inquiring about fixed pullies, OP sorry about OT:

A lot of you guys stayed away from a 180 crank pulley because of the heat it builds on the motor and some of you wouldnt get it because of the one in thousands of crank pulleys that broke or otherwise. Now you're slapping a fixed 77mm upper pulley(basically 180mm crank), without a tune? What the hell lol..

I'm still interested in to what the tune does for a fail safe...

The reason, well one of them, the pulley is clutched is to save the motor from its own temperature demons. It turns off the supercharger if your temperatures get too high, makes sense right?


So you've added a heat exchanger, good, that's going to make sure you recover faster and hold your IAT's down a bit longer(a couple seconds) when you're on the boost. A lot of you guys have already noticed, just having a heat exchanger in conjunction with a better pump, does not eliminate temperatures eventually reaching high levels(back to back pulls). You guys that are adding this fixed pulley need to find a more helpful modification to reduce cooling especially if you guys are daily driving your fixed pulleys. Killer Chiller, Methanol Injection and Split cooling would be your only options. Based on what I know of our cars I would safely say these are must needs now with these fixed pullies and high mileage motors.

Last edited by johnnyblaze; 08-09-2013 at 05:17 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Fixed Pulley Review and Findings...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 PM.