Dyno with SC pulley only added
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
So what do u guys think ? Should I get it leaned out a little ? I know I'm losing power but how much and at what costs ? Figured it would be safer this way
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
#32
I've read and talked to a few that claim the 80 is less headache, yet others say they haven't had any problems (i.e. CEL, searching idle etc.) with the 82.
#36
Super Member
When I did my header and tune with Kleemann over a year ago Cory gave me the
Stage 2 ECU file so if I ever decided to do a crank pulley I could just install and not
Have to worry about a retune. Since I knew the smaller sc pulley wouldnt add
As much power as the crank pulley I'd be fine. Bottom line expect 15whp and 30+tq from the smaller pulley if ur lucky.
Stage 2 ECU file so if I ever decided to do a crank pulley I could just install and not
Have to worry about a retune. Since I knew the smaller sc pulley wouldnt add
As much power as the crank pulley I'd be fine. Bottom line expect 15whp and 30+tq from the smaller pulley if ur lucky.
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orbiting the planet
Posts: 4,478
Received 1,489 Likes
on
986 Posts
This place is a joke.
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)