another twin turbo e55 amg is born at BIP
#176
MBWorld Fanatic!
Starting to make good power, up to 514rwhp at 12lbs on 93 pump. That's 10rwhp shy of my summer e85 numbers at 16lbs on my old setup.
We have run into our next snag, the car is dropping off in power fast at 6000rpms. The tranny stays in the gear we did the run in, and cuts out.
We have run into our next snag, the car is dropping off in power fast at 6000rpms. The tranny stays in the gear we did the run in, and cuts out.
Last edited by chawkins2001; 06-04-2014 at 08:21 AM.
#177
MBWorld Fanatic!
Good job so far, I know you guys will get this latest snag taken care of soon.
#178
MBWorld Fanatic!
Update is the car will not make power passed 5500rpms. It pulls good on the dyno and the street, but as it hits 5500 rpms, the power and tq plummet, badly. We have been working with a couple other tuners as well, and have come to the conclusion it is not in the tune.
I can honestly say, without this forum, I would not be this far in the build process. I have had a lot of help from others vendors. Jerry from Eurocharged has been a huge help. Although they are a online competitor, I will always give props when due.
Craig from staff@world motorsports on here, took time out his day and emailed me what he thought my fueling issue is. The email must have taken him at least 30-45 minutes to create. He wanted nothing in return, what a standup guy.
Last I have been talking to Steve @ Weistec. Super smart guy, and always there to answer my calls and trying to figure this thing out.
Paul Sullivan has also been a HUGE help. I don't care what anyone says, but Paul has helped me a ton, and not once said anything negative about his aborted build at IPS.
With all this wealth of information, I have come to the following conclusion, I need a different intake manifold as the NA version on my car does not work. It is not designed for forced induction.I say that because that cls55 TT that Jerry tuned and run a strong 10.96 on 93 at 4400lbs has a very similar setup to mine. Only difference is he has a custom intake and reused the stock intercooler. Well the tune used on my car, on Paul's car, and on the CLS TT is VERY VERY similar. Tony and Jerry verified that for me. We all know the CLS is done and was successful, Paul and I are having identical problems. I believe Elliott has the same NA intake, and I suspect he is going to run into the exact same problem. That intake causes way to much turbulence for forced induction, it simply cannot work.
In conclusion, and new intake has to be made, this issue is not in the tune.
I can honestly say, without this forum, I would not be this far in the build process. I have had a lot of help from others vendors. Jerry from Eurocharged has been a huge help. Although they are a online competitor, I will always give props when due.
Craig from staff@world motorsports on here, took time out his day and emailed me what he thought my fueling issue is. The email must have taken him at least 30-45 minutes to create. He wanted nothing in return, what a standup guy.
Last I have been talking to Steve @ Weistec. Super smart guy, and always there to answer my calls and trying to figure this thing out.
Paul Sullivan has also been a HUGE help. I don't care what anyone says, but Paul has helped me a ton, and not once said anything negative about his aborted build at IPS.
With all this wealth of information, I have come to the following conclusion, I need a different intake manifold as the NA version on my car does not work. It is not designed for forced induction.I say that because that cls55 TT that Jerry tuned and run a strong 10.96 on 93 at 4400lbs has a very similar setup to mine. Only difference is he has a custom intake and reused the stock intercooler. Well the tune used on my car, on Paul's car, and on the CLS TT is VERY VERY similar. Tony and Jerry verified that for me. We all know the CLS is done and was successful, Paul and I are having identical problems. I believe Elliott has the same NA intake, and I suspect he is going to run into the exact same problem. That intake causes way to much turbulence for forced induction, it simply cannot work.
In conclusion, and new intake has to be made, this issue is not in the tune.
Last edited by chawkins2001; 06-06-2014 at 01:10 PM.
#179
Chawkins sorry it hasn't worked out for you but I'm sure you will work hard for a new intake, I commend you for showing every step of the way what was happening. You and bip are honest guys. Good luck!
#181
MBWorld Fanatic!
thx for the updates Craig hope it all gets sorted out soon bro. So will it work if you guys used the same intake setup as the CLS did from powerhouse?
#186
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
I do not think you would want to remove them. You would end up with two intake runner lengths at the same time. I am pretty sure that would cause some weird air flow.
#187
MBWorld Fanatic!
Stand up guy/shop to make the updated post to the board and give credit where it is due. I saw Paul yesterday at his shop and was telling me that you ran into the similar issues as he did.
#189
MBWorld Fanatic!
#191
Super Member
The M113 uses a variable intake runner design to add area under the power curve, much like subarus/svt focus/B-headed modular Fords/several v6 chrysler/MB cars. You can see them very well here (post 2, picture 6):
https://mbworld.org/forums/s-class-w...d-r-r-diy.html
Subaru guys often delete them as they're electronically controlled and sometimes fail
https://mbworld.org/forums/s-class-w...d-r-r-diy.html
Subaru guys often delete them as they're electronically controlled and sometimes fail
#192
Super Member
#194
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orbiting the planet
Posts: 4,478
Received 1,488 Likes
on
986 Posts
This place is a joke.
Sorry I wasn’t clear; I was thinking more along the lines of removing the flaps, or fixing the others in place depending on which runners you'd want,or just grinding and gutting the. inside to make it an open plenum. Don't know anything about Turbo builds and what works best.
#195
Member
You can definitely remove the flaps, the upper or both sets of runners inside. It is worth a shot to see if the car improves on the dyno. It would be the cheapest fix. The reason we decided against removing them was that once they were removed you basically have no runner, which can affect the torque. The second reason was that the air didn't have a straight path without the runners in. And lastly because with the large open void of having no runners you can actually create turbulence as the turbos are pushing air in. Obviously I dont have the "proven" numbers yet. But after some flow testing of the NA intake manifold thats why I decided to go with a different intake. Hope to see your car running strong soon Craig!
#196
Member
I would stick the flaps in the short runner position versus the long runner position. Also run a one check valve to the flap acutuators so they don't see boost
#199
MBWorld Fanatic!
I am not familiar with the Mercedes setup, but if the flaps are vacuum activated, if it is possible to switch the runners by adding check valve, vacuum can, solenoid and RPM switch, you would see better performance across the board. Long runners help low end 0-to ~4000 RPM (which helps area under the curve during acceleration), short runners help the top end. Since we are automatics we'd stay in the upper band more often.
If you are only concerned with peak horsepower, use only the short runners.
How are they currently setup? Is vacuum applied at all? Try applying constant vacuum during a pull before pulling IM.
If you are only concerned with peak horsepower, use only the short runners.
How are they currently setup? Is vacuum applied at all? Try applying constant vacuum during a pull before pulling IM.
Last edited by turbo97se; 06-08-2014 at 10:29 AM.