e55 vs e63
I'm in the market of an second vehicle.. and have narrowed down to either an e55 or e63.
the thing though, have anyone had any serious issue with either the e55 or the e63?
is there any noticeable difference between the 03-06 vs the 07-09 body style? should I go for the newer model? any interior refinement that the e63 over the e55?
another thing, what are some of the specific things i should look for when i go look at the cars?
The one's I have been looking are starting from 11k's to mid 20k's.
I found an 05 with high mileage but they are only asking 11k's for it? should i take a look and see it?
the $18k one has 72k miles and is an 05 also
and the third one is an 06 with 85k miles but asking $22.5k..
but there is also the 4th one which is an 07 with 78k miles and asking $23k
I'm leaning towards the 05 e55 with 78k and the 06 with 85k miles because they both have almost complete maintenance records on it..
The W211 AMG got a facelift in 07 (so all E63s have the facelift). The most obvious facelift details are the more aggressive front bumper, different headlights, different front grille and different tail lights.
The E63 interior has a few very minor updates, most notably the black instrument cluster instead of the satin aluminum one in the E55.
The E55 is a hold-on-to-something-we-are-about-to-takeoff kind of car. It's geared longer and has ALOT of torque especially down low and so it really feels like a jet. It's also much easier to get power out of and much cheaper unless you Weistec or Kleemann supercharge it which is expensive. The E55 is much more of a muscle car, the gearbox is very slushy but not really in a bad way, it's pretty quick but it's just really smooth.
They cannot really be described. You just need to go out and drive them. You'll be shocked at how different they feel considering it's the same platform/chassis. Personally I like the E63 a tiny bit more but that's just me. It's true about the head bolt and cam issues. You can preemptively repair those though. Weistec sells a kit for the head bolts.
Just gonna leave you with this video

I am posting a link to a 07 E63 White with tan interior, package 1 with normal sunroof (that can be good or bad, at least no squeaking and no chance of motor going out), with about 63k miles or so. I have looked at it myself, but went with a Black 08. Its priced well and they will deal to a degree. Its a nice car from what I have seen of it. This should be on your list!!!!!!
If you want this one, contact me and I will put you in touch with the Finance Manager so you can talk personally with him. He drives a E63 also.
http://www.metrolinaautogroup.com/20..._232852382.veh
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...tenance-3.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...hen-cel-2.html
The 55K is more or less a "true muscle car", although in many TV and Print Ads they're claiming the same about the "true" 63 engines (means over 6L displacement) these days...
One is Natural Aspirated the other is Forced Induction. Forced induction powertrains always have advantages over NA powertrains in terms of efficiency and power development - especially with a supercharger that creates power from idle RPM up.
IMHO what they did in the E63AMG is to compensate for the lack of torque with a shorter gearing 7-Speed Automatic gearbox and other measures and they did succeeded - although the 55K is still "faster" or equally fast and way better to mod, not to speak about reliability of the powertrain itself.
I hate the 7Speed boxes in every Benz i have driven so far, these to many gear switches annoy the **** out of me. The 7-Speeds are "always" at shifting gears it seems, it makes the whole experience a bit turbulent/restive. I love the 5 Speed much more.
People say they are slow, they can be altered to shift quicker by a TCU tune, or even get the CLK AMG DTM TCU (or its software).
I'd always chose the 55K and facelift it to E63AMG + add the saved money in some tune goodies. Also the much more beautiful 63AMG instrument cluster can be interchanged to fit the E55K, IIRC.
I remember the very first comparison test by Mercedes in the german TV press, just days after the E63 had been officially announced.
They launched both on an improvised dragstrip and i remember that i was shocking to see that the E63 was not faster. IIRC they were equally fast and the 55K was even a half or even one full car length ahead at the end.
Many people, i remember reading in the forums these days, were shocked to see this, as the E63AMG was marketed to be faster by the numbers.
476HP E55K vs. 517HP E63AMG were the Numbers in geman DIN Horsepower. And like 4.8seconds 0-62mph for the E55K and IIRC 4.5seconds 0-62mph for the E63.
Reality shows different. During that time people were even claiming that their 55K cars were suddenly slower after a "software update" by the dealer during service, just shortly before the 63AMGs did arrive on the market. I know its maybe "just" a conspiracy theory and one could resolve it with a box or custom tune by any tuner, but still quite interesting for sure.
The 55K is more or less a "true muscle car", although in many TV and Print Ads they're claiming the same about the "true" 63 engines (means over 6L displacement) these days...
One is Natural Aspirated the other is Forced Induction. Forced induction powertrains always have advantages over NA powertrains in terms of efficiency and power development - especially with a supercharger that creates power from idle RPM up.
IMHO what they did in the E63AMG is to compensate for the lack of torque with a shorter gearing 7-Speed Automatic gearbox and other measures and they did succeeded - although the 55K is still "faster" or equally fast and way better to mod, not to speak about reliability of the powertrain itself.
I hate the 7Speed boxes in every Benz i have driven so far, these to many gear switches annoy the **** out of me. The 7-Speeds are "always" at shifting gears it seems, it makes the whole experience a bit turbulent/restive. I love the 5 Speed much more.
People say they are slow, they can be altered to shift quicker by a TCU tune, or even get the CLK AMG DTM TCU (or its software).
I'd always chose the 55K and facelift it to E63AMG + add the saved money in some tune goodies. Also the much more beautiful 63AMG instrument cluster can be interchanged to fit the E55K, IIRC.
I remember the very first comparison test by Mercedes in the german TV press, just days after the E63 had been officially announced.
They launched both on an improvised dragstrip and i remember that i was shocking to see that the E63 was not faster. IIRC they were equally fast and the 55K was even a half or even one full car length ahead at the end.
Many people, i remember reading in the forums these days, were shocked to see this, as the E63AMG was marketed to be faster by the numbers.
476HP E55K vs. 517HP E63AMG were the Numbers in geman DIN Horsepower. And like 4.8seconds 0-62mph for the E55K and IIRC 4.5seconds 0-62mph for the E63.
Reality shows different. During that time people were even claiming that their 55K cars were suddenly slower after a "software update" by the dealer during service, just shortly before the 63AMGs did arrive on the market. I know its maybe "just" a conspiracy theory and one could resolve it with a box or custom tune by any tuner, but still quite interesting for sure.







