Pricing on E55




#(877)989-1500 -- I leased my E55 with 0 down and $1245/month for 48 mos. "flex-lease" (meaning I can get out after 36 months). It is a great way to get into a great car with little money out of our pockets. I thought it was too good to be true but now I'm driving an '04. BTW - They delivered my exact car I wanted directly to my doorstep!! It is a legit company dealing in high-end cars.
Kens-E55
I leased my 1st 911 Turbo. I got a great deal @ $1722 a month..or so I thought. Although the payment was inexpensive (relative to the price of the car), I would have come out much better on a purchase. My current buyout on my lease is 97k...which is relatively close to a retail price on the car currently. Had I put the same dollars into a purchase, I would have had around $6,000 in equity at this point. Luckily, I found someone to assume my lease since my '04 Turbo arrives in a few weeks.
On my new E55, my current payment is around $1,550. At the interst rate of 3.65%, I am quickly building equity...something I could never accomplish on a lease in a short time frame. IMO the E55 is a better car for purchase over lease.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Cars that hold value very well are sometimes poor choices for a lease. You end up spending a lot more money.
If the driver tend to get to get into lots of accidents, a walk away lease is a good way to protect you from the accelerated depreciation due to the costly repairs. On the spouse's previous Volvo, I'm glad we leased as the repair bill on the car was over $15,000 in 4 years. We would have had a tough time trading it in or selling it.
Last edited by W210; May 2, 2004 at 03:05 PM.
Wow! that was fast.
I ordered mine several months ago and still hasnt arrived.
Did you buy from a dealer on LI?
Prior to starting my own biz 10 years ago, I was in the auto biz. I was very pro-lease and still am in most situations...higher-end, ltd. production cars are the exception. IMO the E55 is a better car for purchase over lease.
Several factors must be considered, not the least of which is the fact that the limited production market is very quirky. You can hit a home run or strike out.
Examples: a new SL55 the first year in production has held its value extremely well, for many reasons,
But an '01 or '02 E55 was a terrible investment if you bought new.
Also factor in that the E55 market is much smaller than the M5 market, and this is true for most of the AMG cars. Sport tuned cars without a manual transmission appeal to a smaller niche than BMW's M cars, Porsches, etc. Look how small the market is for a used S55, for example.
In addition to those factors, some people will take the extra cash not spent on a purchased car and get far better returns than they would putting it into a depreciating asset like a car.
Everyone's situation is different, and the merit of lease vs. but for each AMG model is different.
BTW colinforte, the burl wood is a standing (no fee) option for the E55. Just ask the dealer about it when ordering.
I leased my 03.5 M3, and sold it within a few months. I took a hit, but then I figured out how much I would have lost if I had bought it, and I would have lost an additional $3K+ in sales tax, plus the additional 300 a month in payment I would have made over 6 mos. I would say a lease is better for a quick turnover, so long as there are no prepay penalties, and your finance rate is reasonably low. MB has a high lease factor, so I don't know how it would work out. But when you pay off a lease, you do not pay any future finace charge, only the future "rent"


