"Must see video: 2xLambo, NSX-R, 911Turbo, F360 and M3 CSL on track"
Those that take their E55's to the track might find it interesting.
VIDEO Here (save as)
For the first half, I thought it was an NSX commercial. The last three cars were too far behind. And the CSL beat the 911 turbo and was on par in straight line acceleration with the 360?
love those straight line acceleration of those Lambos though
For the first half, I thought it was an NSX commercial. The last three cars were too far behind. And the CSL beat the 911 turbo and was on par in straight line acceleration with the 360?
love those straight line acceleration of those Lambos though
Conserning this video. the 996 Turbo was an automatic and that makes the Porsche quite a bit slower. I would expect the 996 to be faster or at least equally fast as the 2 Lambos on a racetrack. The NSX-R is much faster than most guys give it credit for, but NOT faster than any of the cars involved in this race. The CSL is NOT as fast as the 996 T in straigh line, almost as fast as the 360 BUT definatly as fast as both of the in the twisties, probably faster.
I also have a feeling after whatching the video that the NSX driver got the lead a little to easy for it to have been realistic.
Anyway it was fun to whatch
For the first half, I thought it was an NSX commercial. The last three cars were too far behind. And the CSL beat the 911 turbo and was on par in straight line acceleration with the 360?
love those straight line acceleration of those Lambos though
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Conserning this video. the 996 Turbo was an automatic and that makes the Porsche quite a bit slower.
You sure about that? I must admit I have not seen any track times comparing the 2 so that was based on "common sence".
You may be right but that is very suprising, to put it mildly....
The thing I am sure of is that the 996T manuel is faster in straight line.
Anyway the car is fast regardless of type of gearbox
You may be right but that is very suprising, to put it mildly....
The thing I am sure of is that the 996T manuel is faster in straight line.
Anyway the car is fast regardless of type of gearbox
NSX's are very slow when compared to that company. Having owned one after my 911 TT I found it rather disappointing speed wise but it still handled like a go-cart. When the NSX came out in the early 90's it was a monster but after a decade of very little change, many every day cars can out run it in a straight line.
The NSX is definatly NOT my kind of car, but its quite capable considering the tiny engine. Totaly overpriced also IMO...
Just for fun, here is a link where it can be compared to the fantastic CLK DTM monster of AMG.
Even if it is totaly destroyed in straight line it puts up a good fight on both the "ring" and on Hockenheim. Also note that the DTM car is on special R- tires where the NSX use "normal" tires.
http://www.track-challenge.com/compa...ar1=52&Car2=83
I dont think that tiptronic would be faster on track...With a driver who can handle the stick ...
I have to agree with M5 rus with this, I cant understand why a auto 996T should be faster on a track when it is definatly slower in any straigh line exercise ( quite a lot to accoring to tests in Europe), at least in the hand of a competent driver....
Welcome. As a quick learner and one who observes from all angles you should probably of clicked "new thread" rather than post in one that is 11 years old.
Also, a high performance German sedan probably wasn't the best car to learn on.
You are welcome for the reply.



996TT lost from NSX?? More power, AWD, german eng..... must be the driver

