Totaled my E63.. lucky to be alive.
Either way, the age difference would really come from the 3-Series, which accounts for over half of BMW's sales, if I'm not mistaken. Every time some d-dag on the road thinks it's Laguna Seca Receway and is twirling in and out of traffic, poorly driving to the point of putting everyone in danger in all corners of him/her, it seems to be a BMW driver, so maybe the age difference is pretty prevalent.
I'm not denying the crash test statistics, however, like I said, those aren't so significant to me, as real world data has rarely reflected standardized data. Case in point, the previous 2 E-Classes. What I'm looking into is frame strength, which is where I find the E shines. Aside from that, I trust M-B's safety development team and their gauging of driver safety in multitudes of crashes over standardized tests, not due to blind faith or ignorance, but due to M-B's proving time and time again that the way that "they do it" is superior to how the tests do it. The roof is a significant portion of a safety cage's integrity, and the 5-Series showing a cave in during the side test, and a weak roof strength in the IIHS's actual "Roof Strength" test, shows me that perhaps the car wouldn't fare so well, relatively speaking, in crashes that are different than the strictly (and easy to pass) standardized tests.
OP you must be sore from the crash.
Anyway, O/P, hope all is feeling better, and this Thread due to thankfully your fortunate outcome have allowed us to discuss this stuff more literally, which raises awareness on car safety, which can save someone else's life.
That's a good point, and another reason as to why "cage strength" is so important to me. In a 45 MPH test, the B-Pillar of "Car X" might just bend enough to get it an "A" rating, but what happens if it gets hit at 80 MPH? M-B seems to have "over-engineered" its safety cages this time around, to ensure that these standardized tests look like it got flicked, therefore giving it more "stability" in case the stakes get much higher.
Anyway, O/P, hope all is feeling better, and this Thread due to thankfully your fortunate outcome have allowed us to discuss this stuff more literally, which raises awareness on car safety, which can save someone else's life.
Last edited by otakki; Jun 8, 2012 at 04:58 PM.
Last edited by ozy; Jun 14, 2012 at 02:38 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
i have been a bimmer fan for many years. had 10 plus cars from a dinan 7,dinan 6 to alpina 7 and a few in between. after a fluk test drive on my 2010 e63 i was hooked. couple that with the fact that ,imho, bmw lost its way. they intend to put a bmw in every garage.so many modles and sub- models, that the exlusivity, quality and design have gone to ****s. mb , otoh, makes much better cars nowdays, with beatuiful designs and attention to details. my wife's loaded 2012 ml-350 is so much nicer and fun to drive then the recently tested x- 5.(we've had 4 x-5s over the years).
until bmw gets "bangled" again, i really don't see myslef in one anytime soon.

I wish you have many trouble free safe driving
That's a good point, and another reason as to why "cage strength" is so important to me. In a 45 MPH test, the B-Pillar of "Car X" might just bend enough to get it an "A" rating, but what happens if it gets hit at 80 MPH? M-B seems to have "over-engineered" its safety cages this time around, to ensure that these standardized tests look like it got flicked, therefore giving it more "stability" in case the stakes get much higher.
.
I've read an article where MB states that they don't care too much about synthetic lab tests but are more interested in real world safety. In a lab test other brands engineer their cars to pass those "tests" with flying colors but in real life situation it becomes obvious.
I've read an article where MB states that they don't care too much about synthetic lab tests but are more interested in real world safety. In a lab test other brands engineer their cars to pass those "tests" with flying colors but in real life situation it becomes obvious.










