W212 AMG Discuss the W212 AMG's such as the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

14 E63 1/4 Run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-06-2013, 03:36 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG E Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,355
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
E55 amg
Originally Posted by ace10
You think the '14 S's are actually producing only 577hp?
no they are making 540-550whp but that is no where near the 640+whp from the aftermarket tunes. thats 100whp more ! we need these tunes to be sorted out asap !
Old 11-06-2013, 10:19 PM
  #27  
Super Member
 
mainly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Edmonton alberta, canada.
Posts: 921
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Porsche 991 GT3, 2012 cls63 Kleemann K3
Originally Posted by ace10
You think the '14 S's are actually producing only 577hp?
you think they're under rating the actual hp by 100 hp?
Old 11-07-2013, 10:29 AM
  #28  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by mainly
you think they're under rating the actual hp by 100 hp?
I dont... there was that one car vid comparo vs the M5 with the comp pack and they did dynos where the E63 had 540 at the wheels... but we all know what dynos mean. The trap speeds in the quarter were slightly lower than the M5 in that test. I think the AMG is slightly underrated though but no way 100hp.

My local tuner just did an E63S and they got 588 AWHP but I have to clarify if that was with dp's or not.
Old 11-07-2013, 12:30 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
 
drhemi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: West Coast, Canada
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1968 Hemi Dart, 1971 Hemicuda, 2009 ML63 (sold), E63S Wagon
Originally Posted by Vic55
My local tuner just did an E63S and they got 588 AWHP but I have to clarify if that was with dp's or not.
What was the AWHP before the tune? In reviewing a number of threads that discuss tuning this seems to be something most, if not all tuners, somehow avoid stating. If you are going to change or "improve" something, it really is scientifically proper to know what the starting point is. Then each change can be measured and documented (on the same dyno, of course).

Just my 2 cents worth.

Wayne
(still waiting patiently for my E63S)
Old 11-07-2013, 01:24 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Patric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 417
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
14 E63S Wagon, 16 GTS Edition1 (Sold), 17 SL450 designo edition
Exactly Wayne. Without a baseline and incremental pulls for multiple mods things can get confusing real fast.
Old 11-07-2013, 01:32 PM
  #31  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by drhemi
What was the AWHP before the tune? In reviewing a number of threads that discuss tuning this seems to be something most, if not all tuners, somehow avoid stating. If you are going to change or "improve" something, it really is scientifically proper to know what the starting point is. Then each change can be measured and documented (on the same dyno, of course).

Just my 2 cents worth.

Wayne
(still waiting patiently for my E63S)
Originally Posted by Patric
Exactly Wayne. Without a baseline and incremental pulls for multiple mods things can get confusing real fast.
I agree, Ive been tuning my cars for over 10 years and always do baselines (if there was one available)

Lets not assume there wasnt a baseline because I didnt mention it:

baseline was 508awhp--- tune took it to 588 awhp and now I confirmed 610 awhp with downpipes. So the tune was about 80 awhp...
Old 11-07-2013, 02:01 PM
  #32  
Super Member
 
mainly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Edmonton alberta, canada.
Posts: 921
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Porsche 991 GT3, 2012 cls63 Kleemann K3
Originally Posted by Vic55
I agree, Ive been tuning my cars for over 10 years and always do baselines (if there was one available)

Lets not assume there wasnt a baseline because I didnt mention it:

baseline was 508awhp--- tune took it to 588 awhp and now I confirmed 610 awhp with downpipes. So the tune was about 80 awhp...
yeah 508 awhp makes more sense.
Old 11-07-2013, 02:58 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Patric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 417
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
14 E63S Wagon, 16 GTS Edition1 (Sold), 17 SL450 designo edition
So with a 508 awhp base it looks like the stock motor is a bit under stated adding the usual 20 percent drive train loss for AWD. It pencils out to about 609 hp at the crank or 32 above the advertised 577. More is always better than less.

Last edited by Patric; 11-07-2013 at 03:05 PM.
Old 11-07-2013, 03:15 PM
  #34  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by Patric
So with a 508 awhp base it looks like the stock motor is a bit under stated adding the usual 20 percent drive train loss for AWD. It pencils out to about 609 hp at the crank or 32 above the advertised 577. More is always better than less.
Its dyno and operator dependant though.... I take stock in only before and after dynos to see what gains are from mods. Id much rather have the car that is faster on the street and slower on paper; I had one like that in my 2004 E55 which had some lower dyno numbers but would beat other cars like it that dyno'd higher. Dynos are conditional to say the least so it all depends and as for DT loss that depends too. Some say the MCT should use a lower percentage and others say higher. I dont know what to use but if one wants to claim more crank hp just turn up the DT percentage LOL.
Old 11-07-2013, 03:32 PM
  #35  
Super Member
 
mainly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Edmonton alberta, canada.
Posts: 921
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Porsche 991 GT3, 2012 cls63 Kleemann K3
Originally Posted by Patric
So with a 508 awhp base it looks like the stock motor is a bit under stated adding the usual 20 percent drive train loss for AWD. It pencils out to about 609 hp at the crank or 32 above the advertised 577

good lord here we go again.
Old 11-07-2013, 03:38 PM
  #36  
Junior Member
 
drhemi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: West Coast, Canada
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1968 Hemi Dart, 1971 Hemicuda, 2009 ML63 (sold), E63S Wagon
Originally Posted by Vic55
I agree, Ive been tuning my cars for over 10 years and always do baselines (if there was one available)

Lets not assume there wasnt a baseline because I didnt mention it:

baseline was 508awhp--- tune took it to 588 awhp and now I confirmed 610 awhp with downpipes. So the tune was about 80 awhp...
Thanks Vic55. This is exactly what I wanted to know. I like your approach to the incremental mods with testing at each stage. I wish everyone would play by the same rules.

Regards,

Wayne

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 14 E63 1/4 Run



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 PM.