difference between 2010&2011-2012 E63
2011 has alcantara headliner whereas the 2010 doesn't. Otherwise I think the 2010 and 2011 are the same.
2012 has the biturbo motor.
The MY11 also has the 6.2lt and has black colouring around the gearshift - they also improved fuel economy and as said the alcantara
The MY12 has the 5.5TT the colour graphic display AMG speedo (before that it was B&W). But for all the details:
http://www.topspeed.com/cars/mercede...-ar108830.html
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The MY11 also has the 6.2lt and has black colouring around the gearshift - they also improved fuel economy and as said the alcantara
The MY12 has the 5.5TT the colour graphic display AMG speedo (before that it was B&W). But for all the details:
http://www.topspeed.com/cars/mercede...-ar108830.html

Or maybe the information is wrong.



My W211 was max on performance and getting 10-11 is just a body change with a power drop so 2012 is it....Did they payoff as yet? Remember to get all your options from the dealer....
MB should just match the car's nomenclature with the engine size instead of calling everything "63." Yes, in terms of hp/tq and "tune-ability," the M156 was a downgrade. It's simply due to the fact that M156 is N/A and M157 is FI. M156 was designed to be a racing unit more suitable for lighter cars and not really for a large, heavy saloon car like E or S class doing lots of stop-and-go. As a result, the M156-based M159 was used for the SLS, not the M157 which wouldn't be the proper application for the SLS.
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2010/...kages_options/
The 6.2NA motor is a phenomenal powerplant, no one disputes that. The sound is also amazing. Anyone can stick a supercharger or turbo on a motor and make it perform great. Have you seen the 360hp 4-banger from AMG?
Interior difference perhaps in the "body change"? Yeah this one is so much better.


Round, flowing design has again returned for the new C-class with a rounded interior which matches the rounded S-class like exterior. So I guess boxy vs roundness will just keep on taking turn coming back to the design table. In design, boxy is generally associated with masculine and roundness with feminine. Unfortunately, mixing them usually don't turn out very well, because what you end up is a "hermaphrodite." But I'm sure some prefer that. Personally, I prefer boxy. Of course, roundness is just as sexy in a different way.
Last edited by otakki; Apr 11, 2014 at 07:13 PM.
Round, flowing design has again returned for the new C-class with a rounded interior which matches the rounded S-class like exterior. So I guess boxy vs roundness will just keep on taking turn coming back to the design table. In design, boxy is generally associated with masculine and roundness with feminine. Unfortunately, mixing them usually don't turn out very well, because what you end up is a "hermaphrodite." But I'm sure some prefer that. Personally, I prefer boxy. Of course, roundness is just as sexy in a different way.
One thing I find really interesting is how people hang on to old designs. No other is stronger than the 993 in the Porsche 911 line. Old interior, but the damn thing is air cooled. "If it ain't air cooled, it's krap" many faithful say.... Well, progress is progress, regardless of the luddites who insist the old stuff is good, and soon we'll all be driving hybrid sports cars with 500 gas+electric horsepower with more oversight nannies than you care to deal with, and service is going to be ridiculous because that computer that controls 25% of the electronics is $2500. And by the way, it will likely fail before 75K miles.
That's why people yearn for the "good 'ol days'...
Personally, I like progress...
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2010/...kages_options/






