Keyless Go Lawsuite - What you guys think?
We all understand stupidity and personal forgetfulness; however, engineers must design things with these ideas in mind. Just like how a microwave manual must state that live animals cannot be placed inside while in operation. You would assume people would know better, but no.
Keyless entry is a transition into a more futuristic era of vehicular transformations; however, the keyword here is transition. It has not quite become accustomed to baby boomers and generation X as it will be to millienials in the next 10-20 years.
That is my take on this topic.
I do agree with the above that they should engineer a proximity based or time based shut off unless you perform an action sequence in the car to force it to stay running when you leave the car.
Then I could have the keys to 3 or 4 cards in my pocket and not get a crippling injury from sitting on the pile of fobs all day.
Someone call me a lawyer. I think I can work this into a disability claim at work too.

However (having lost a relative to suicide this way), I think that cars should be safer in this respect. So here is my fix.
1. Install a CO monitor to determine the concentration of CO.
2. If the concentration of CO gets too high and and the car has been stationary (eg. in park or not moving for a designated period of time) it shuts off automatically.
I figure this should add no more than $40 to the cost of a car and prevent accidental and intentional CO poisoning.
Trending Topics
You don't want your car the turn itself off when the key fob is away because the wife and kid is waiting for you in the car on a hot day while your running to the store to pick up milk.
I think CO monitoring is more practical weather your passenger or just while it sits idling with no one in the car. Once the CO gets to dangerous levels, it turns itself off or better yet, open the window and sunroof.
I would rather waste a tank of gas the get hurt from CO poisoning.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG





