Buddy is a Cadillac dealer and said the following...




I live in the DC area and he's an older guy who has been selling Cadillacs for probably 3-4 decades. I realize this means that I should take everything he says with a grain of salt. I also respect his opinion, because he talks **** about them as well. For instance, he thinks their new flagship is a bad idea because it's all aluminum (increased repair costs he says).
He said they brought him to a NJ track to test the new CTS-V. They got to spend a day driving it around with professional instructors and comparing it to other cars (notably, the M5). He said the M5 was no match for it and I joked with him that they didn't bother to test it against an E63 because it wouldn't even be a contest.
That's when he told me that Mercedes refused to send an AMG tester because they claimed it would overheat and not be able to do a full track day without shutting down.
Now... I like this guy. He's a lot older than me and I think he's a decent bar patron to chat with, so I didn't argue with him. I made a quick joke about the new Corvette shutting down because of overheating and he got defensive.
Anyways.... How full of **** is he? I'm not even an AMG guy (I like my diesels), but I can't imagine that MB can't withstand a track day...
Also, can anyone cite some numbers/articles that show otherwise so I can casually bring these up the next time I run into him? Does the E63S really have to worry about losing to a freaking GM?
Next week I'll be in Vegas for a Track day with the AMG performance tour, I'll report if I see any signs of overheating on any of the various models.
If they were approached, and weren't interested, they'd just say 'No' without further comment.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I will also agree that driving both cars back to back you can tell that the cts v was priced to compete with the C63/M3. It's a lot more toss-able than the E or 5, grips much better, feels a lot faster, feels a lot cheaper.
Currently the one size fits all approach for the cts has been discarded. Now the cts has the E directly in its scope and it shows in the interior especially. Much much more improved quality! And a corresponding increase in price.
I will also agree that driving both cars back to back you can tell that the cts v was priced to compete with the C63/M3. It's a lot more toss-able than the E or 5, grips much better, feels a lot faster, feels a lot cheaper.
Currently the one size fits all approach for the cts has been discarded. Now the cts has the E directly in its scope and it shows in the interior especially. Much much more improved quality! And a corresponding increase in price.
I will also agree that driving both cars back to back you can tell that the cts v was priced to compete with the C63/M3. It's a lot more toss-able than the E or 5, grips much better, feels a lot faster, feels a lot cheaper.
Currently the one size fits all approach for the cts has been discarded. Now the cts has the E directly in its scope and it shows in the interior especially. Much much more improved quality! And a corresponding increase in price.
I had a order placed for the new escalade and ditched it once I actually got to drive one and get a good feel for it, build quality is as usual, typical GM, looks fancy, not quite worth what it costs though.
Motortrend also did best driver's car where the newest gen cts-v placed behind even the c63s...
Last edited by marcolarco52; Nov 9, 2015 at 11:51 AM.
I had a order placed for the new escalade and ditched it once I actually got to drive one and get a good feel for it, build quality is as usual, typical GM, looks fancy, not quite worth what it costs though.
Motortrend also did best driver's car where the newest gen cts-v placed behind even the c63s...
Also I ask because driving the E350.....I assumed the E63 has lost all that made the AMG great in terms of quality and vault-like feeling. However after driving the E63....I will say its on par with the old E55. The E350 however is definitely not! I am driving a 2015 E350 right now and my wife's comment about that after driving it was "looks good, but feels cheap, you want me to give up my BMW for that???"
As long as the CTS-V doesn't have folding rear seats, I wouldn't be able to consider it. BTW, I heard overheating has been an issue for Z06's.
Also I ask because driving the E350.....I assumed the E63 has lost all that made the AMG great in terms of quality and vault-like feeling. However after driving the E63....I will say its on par with the old E55. The E350 however is definitely not! I am driving a 2015 E350 right now and my wife's comment about that after driving it was "looks good, but feels cheap, you want me to give up my BMW for that???"
One more thing, I have driven a e55...does not perform as well as a e63s...it is fast and it handles ok, just not as fast and the handling is not on par with the e63. I am referring to stock vs stock.
Last edited by marcolarco52; Nov 9, 2015 at 06:04 PM.







