My e63 tuned by wesitec, not happy at all, need help
#26
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,781
Received 2,066 Likes
on
1,440 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Time for nos
#27
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Nassau County, NY
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
16' E63s Diamond White
Originally Posted by gaspam
just go to dragtimes and click on his track (sonoma) for 10/21/15 and you get 924 DA... not to bad at all
http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...time=6:54%20PM
http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...time=6:54%20PM
OP. Our plugs on the GL slowly died and caused misfires under heavy load. High gear low rpm. With new plugs the car was transformed. Not sure how many miles are on your plugs but that may be an issue too. Felt like a new car afterwards(new plugs were from weistec)
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
Just saw. Da looks great. Weird.
OP. Our plugs on the GL slowly died and caused misfires under heavy load. High gear low rpm. With new plugs the car was transformed. Not sure how many miles are on your plugs but that may be an issue too. Felt like a new car afterwards(new plugs were from weistec)
OP. Our plugs on the GL slowly died and caused misfires under heavy load. High gear low rpm. With new plugs the car was transformed. Not sure how many miles are on your plugs but that may be an issue too. Felt like a new car afterwards(new plugs were from weistec)
just the track results are off, which could be the "driver mod" (b5 s4 audi joke)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#31
mine did this too soon after getting tuned but my plugs were the original with 40K miles on them... sometimes new tunes can foul old plugs especially when its a canned box tune thats running rich for safety, but since the op got new plugs when he got the tune i doubt this is the case... plus the op did dyno at 541 whp on heartbreaker dyno which should be around 610 whp on dynojet which is right around where he should be for tuned..... so number for the tune on a mustang dyno seem fine....
just the track results are off, which could be the "driver mod" (b5 s4 audi joke)![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
just the track results are off, which could be the "driver mod" (b5 s4 audi joke)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
When I went to the tracks I pump 100 octane and got 11.4-11.5, on a different day I use ran with the 91 octane and was hitting 11.4 all day . Elevation for dyno was sea level 50ft or 100ft I guess. Yes I understand mustang has a chance of running lower but my track times isn't where it's suppose to be at. Like some members on here with renntech or ams tune/mod running 11.1 as the above post stated
also, looking at your timeslips, your 60ft launch is pretty bad at 1.8-1.9.... the guys that are running <11 sec are getting in between 1.6-1.7... get your launch down and you are at 11-11.2 ish....
but also your mph is way down...at your 11.4 you should be around 125mph, not 120.... but again, looks like its due to your bad 60ft times, as i compared your slip to a 11.1 @126 mph slip and rate of progression from 60 to 330 ft to 660ft to 1000 ft to 1/4 mile and your rate of progession from your 11.4 slip is pretty close, indicating you are picking up speed at same rate as a 11.1 1/4 mile car does, so the power is there, just your launch is hurting you
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
Last edited by gaspam; 12-21-2015 at 01:03 PM.
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
the correction factor foir mustang to dynojet is is around 1.12 so 541x1.12 = 606... (for mustange to dyno dynamics it closer to 1.15x)
i had my e55 dyno'd on mustang multiple times at bip in atlanta at around 460 whp and dynojet in FL (525 whp) and pretty consistantly was 1.13x multiple difference given same hot summer conditions....
http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=214597
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
btw the 11.1 wasnt mine (actual non-rounded numbers were 11.19 @126.35) , it was my buddies and it was tune only so actually you should be faster then him since you have renntech tune and mufflers... for me, I still had my e55 and c63 at the time we went to the track
Last edited by gaspam; 12-21-2015 at 01:56 PM.
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes
on
20 Posts
2019 E63 S
Originally Posted by gaspam
who should be faster, the op? what was your DA ? date and time ?
btw the 11.1 wasnt mine, it was my buddies... i still had my e55 and c63 at the time we went to the track
btw the 11.1 wasnt mine, it was my buddies... i still had my e55 and c63 at the time we went to the track
The date of the time slip is October 7, 2015. The DA was somewhere in the vicinity of 1000 feet or above at the time of the run -- not a great DA for Atco.
#37
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
The OP should have been faster given that his car has the downpipes and I assume high flow cats or no cats and mine has the stock cats and downpipes.
The date of the time slip is October 7, 2015. The DA was somewhere in the vicinity of 1000 feet or above at the time of the run -- not a great DA for Atco.
The date of the time slip is October 7, 2015. The DA was somewhere in the vicinity of 1000 feet or above at the time of the run -- not a great DA for Atco.
your DA's are about that same only if you ran at 4-5pm at atco for that day, since the rest of the day DA was only 500-600
your launch is the diff (about 1.2/tenth sec better), as i noted before he is picking up speed (once he gets going) at the same rate as a 11.1 sec e63... just his launch sucks.... if he gets a >1.75 60ft launch then he should be close to 11.1 sec as generally 1/10th reduction in 60ft time = 2/10ths in 1/4 et.... that would put him pretty much dead even with your car, so i would say there is nothing wrong with OP's current results for the mods he has, given his bad 60ft times
Last edited by gaspam; 12-21-2015 at 02:11 PM.
#38
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E63 S Amg, s63 amg
91 octane, and plugs. Sometimes people have new plugs installed and they aren't properly spaced, this can cause you to lose power. The High TQ numbers though don't make sense, as other said have Weistec take a closer look at your car, after all the money you spent I would be upset too.
#39
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,781
Received 2,066 Likes
on
1,440 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
#41
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes
on
20 Posts
2019 E63 S
Originally Posted by gaspam
he's also on 91 oct vs 93 you get on the east coast... that pretty much negates the power he would pick of from downpipe.. you car and his should put down same hp given those 2 differences
your DA's are about that same only if you ran at 4-5pm at atco for that day, since the rest of the day DA was only 500-600
your launch is the diff (about 1.2/tenth sec better), as i noted before he is picking up speed (once he gets going) at the same rate as a 11.1 sec e63... just his launch sucks.... if he gets a >1.75 60ft launch then he should be close to 11.1 sec as generally 1/10th reduction in 60ft time = 2/10ths in 1/4 et.... that would put him pretty much dead even with your car, so i would say there is nothing wrong with OP's current results for the mods he has, given his bad 60ft times
your DA's are about that same only if you ran at 4-5pm at atco for that day, since the rest of the day DA was only 500-600
your launch is the diff (about 1.2/tenth sec better), as i noted before he is picking up speed (once he gets going) at the same rate as a 11.1 sec e63... just his launch sucks.... if he gets a >1.75 60ft launch then he should be close to 11.1 sec as generally 1/10th reduction in 60ft time = 2/10ths in 1/4 et.... that would put him pretty much dead even with your car, so i would say there is nothing wrong with OP's current results for the mods he has, given his bad 60ft times
We tried launching the car all day to find the fastest technique. The fastest technique was simply brake torquing the car and letting the brake go when the revs hit about 2000-2500. Let it off higher and the car would bog
Race start was definitely not faster which was a surprise
Last edited by sdg1871; 12-22-2015 at 06:45 AM.
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
did you do the 1000 mile break-in period (never exceeding a certain speed/rpm) ? and the differential fluid change that comes at 1,600 miles?
i still think your timeslip is due to your launch though,,,,, go to track again, and brake torque instead of using the race start... ive never got near as good a launch using race start as i have brake torquing
i still think your timeslip is due to your launch though,,,,, go to track again, and brake torque instead of using the race start... ive never got near as good a launch using race start as i have brake torquing
#43
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
brake torquing was consistantly about 3/10ths of sec faster on 0-60mph vbox recordings for me.... race start pauses for a second when you launch just like as if when you do the basic mash the throttle method
#44
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,781
Received 2,066 Likes
on
1,440 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
The problem is not his plugs
Thing is he was using same technique to launch before tune
Thing is he was using same technique to launch before tune
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
also if track was same, DA same, weight same, etc? ... lot of variables need to be made constant to make accurate comparison of runs on a different day...
plenty of times i have gone to track with no changes at all to my car and run times 2/10ths to 4/10ths different.... just a change in weather, track conditions or bad launch can make a pretty big difference
#46
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E63 S Amg, s63 amg
i agree with this and have confirmed it before with my vbox sport.... the race start function sucks on these cars
brake torquing was consistantly about 3/10ths of sec faster on 0-60mph vbox recordings for me.... race start pauses for a second when you launch just like as if when you do the basic mash the throttle method
brake torquing was consistantly about 3/10ths of sec faster on 0-60mph vbox recordings for me.... race start pauses for a second when you launch just like as if when you do the basic mash the throttle method
Yes i did do the intial break in on the engine
Another thing off topic, when you do a rolling stop and u gas it, does it lag before it accelerates.
Last edited by Pho; 12-21-2015 at 06:51 PM. Reason: adition info
#47
Any check engine lights? Even one that comes and goes?
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
im going to go the track in a couple of weeks and ill try this out. When i try to do launch with out launch control it felt weird. When i apply brakes and gassed it seem like it didnt even rev up at all.
Yes i did do the intial break in on the engine
Another thing off topic, when you do a rolling stop and u gas it, does it lag before it accelerates.
Yes i did do the intial break in on the engine
Another thing off topic, when you do a rolling stop and u gas it, does it lag before it accelerates.
#50
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,781
Received 2,066 Likes
on
1,440 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
im going to go the track in a couple of weeks and ill try this out. When i try to do launch with out launch control it felt weird. When i apply brakes and gassed it seem like it didnt even rev up at all.
Yes i did do the intial break in on the engine
Another thing off topic, when you do a rolling stop and u gas it, does it lag before it accelerates.
Yes i did do the intial break in on the engine
Another thing off topic, when you do a rolling stop and u gas it, does it lag before it accelerates.
Yes. All e63's do this... It's the mct and it's slow throttle response
Normal behavior for this car sadly