2013 or 2014 E63?




So, 14+ you can get BO Sound, and 360o cameras?, and of course standard AWD and LED headlights.
Are those the big differences? Anything I'm missing? 2012s are going for great prices it seems.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The awd keeps me alive
I love love the 360 Birdseye view as it keeps my rims nice and clean and scuff free and makes parking a breeze and kinda fun
The BO sound has been discussed and most don't feel it's near worth the price
Also keep in mind the 2013+ has a better cooling system which can tolerate more aggressive track time in stock form and also a tune. If you don't think cooling is a big deal, ask the e55 and c63 guys about cooling issues
Last edited by PeterUbers; Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM.
who buys a $100K car for the drag strip, these cars were built for the street and rwd on street tires gets smoked by awd on street tires when its same car

and for awd in racing, i guess you have never heard of rally car racing
rally car is more representative of real world driving than formula 1... ok so there are no jumps on the street like in rally, but there are many surface imperfections, dirt and debris and oil ,etc.... while in formula 1 the course surface is near perfect and if it heavy rains or snows they stop the race..... so yeah, formula1 runs rwd because it saves weight(less gas waste and pitstops for refiills) and they dont have to worry about ever racing surface that is pretty much less than perfect... the real world streets are not close to a formula1 track... they are imperfect and thats where awd shines... hence why they use awd in rally car, because it gives better traction on less than perfect surfacesalso in terms of street cars on track, nurburgring lap is considered the gold standard for production cars and the top 3 laps times by production cars are AWD (918, aventador and GTR)..... as mentioned before RWD gains advantage in racing in terms of weight reduction and thus pit stop refueling reduction and just one less pitstop from one car to another can win the race
there is a reason why GTR's are pretty much the car to beat on the street on street tires.... same reason why WRX/EVO's were feared on the streets before the GTR
but yeah for street, if you drive around on drag radials 24/7 then same RWD car would be just as fast as the AWD 600hp 4400lb car.... unless it rains, or snows, or is really cold out, or road has some pebbles on it, or dirt/ oil patch, or you want to go around a turn really fast
.... the RWD really shines when it happens to find a stoplight with a bucket of sticky VHT laid down
the same people that disavow AWD today are the same type of people that were saying turbos will never be as fast as superchargers and before that they were saying manual transmissions are the best.... the technology is evolving and awd isnt as heavy and inefficient as they used to be 10 yrs ago, just like turbos dont have giant lag anymore
Last edited by gaspam; Mar 4, 2016 at 12:06 PM.
But agreed not many people buying new $100k cars for the drag strip
Lol

as for NHRA, again, prepped track, vht, drag radials.... i dont live my life a 1/4 mile at a time like vin diesel and if i did, a mercedes wouldnt be my weapon of choice for NHRA drag battle
and street light racing skills? you mean mash the pedal and point the car in a straight line? lol its an automatic street legal production car.. its not like your launching a 7000 hp funny car

again, you are right bro IF you want a car that has less traction in anything that less than perfect conditions... i guess if that's what you like then yeah your right..... BUT, if you want more traction in all conditions then your wrong and awd is better, so i guess it depends on what is your definition of "better".... seems like your definition of better is equal traction of rwd to awd on a prefect track/ drag strip...... my definition of better is more traction of awd on 95% of the surfaces encountered in real life



